JPMorgan rises to stablecoin challenge with roll out of deposit token

JPmorgan's response to the rising interest in stablecoins is to launch its own rival token, called JPMD.
1
This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.
The US banking giant has told CNBC that it's planning to launch a so-called deposit token on Coinbase's public blockchain Base, which is built on top of the Ethereum network. Each deposit token is meant to serve as a digital representation of a commercial bank deposit.
The new yield-bearing token will offer round-the-clock settlement and will only be available to the bank's commercial client base.
'We see institutions using JPMD for onchain digital asset settlement solutions as well as for making cross-border business-to-business transactions,' Naveen Mallela, global co-head of Kinexys, JPMorgan's blockchain unit, told CNBC. 'Given the fact that deposit tokens would eventually be interest bearing as well, this would provide better fungibility with existing deposit products that institutions currently use.'
The bank says that while its token may share some similarities with a stablecoin, it's ultimately a different kind of product, providing institutions with a similar product that also has the benefit of closer ties to the banking system.
In May, the Wall Street Journal reported that PMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo have held discussions on potentially launching a stablecoin that will improve transaction speeds whilst managing competition from encroaching crypto firms.
The move follows US regulatory action towards stablecoin regulation, with the Senate pushing for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for Stablecoin Act (GENIUS Act).

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Geeky Gadgets

17 minutes ago

• Geeky Gadgets

iPhone 20th Anniversary: The Radical Redesign Revealed

Apple is reportedly preparing a significant redesign to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the iPhone, set for release in 2027. Codenamed 'Glass Wing,' the iPhone XX is anticipated to transform smartphone design and functionality. With its seamless aesthetics and innovative features, this device could establish a new benchmark in the industry. Here's an in-depth look at what makes this upcoming release so compelling in a new video from AppleTrack. The video gives us more details on the rumored iPhone 20th Anniversary and its design changes. Watch this video on YouTube. Innovative Design: A Glimpse Into the Future The iPhone XX is rumored to feature a wraparound display that extends seamlessly to the edges, eliminating visible bezels for a truly immersive viewing experience. This innovative design is expected to integrate hidden sensors and an under-display camera, creating a clean, uninterrupted screen. Even the Face ID technology is likely to be embedded beneath the display, making sure robust security while enhancing the device's sleek and futuristic appearance. Another notable feature is the introduction of solid-state buttons, replacing traditional mechanical ones. These buttons are designed to enhance durability and waterproofing, making the device more resistant to wear and environmental damage. Together, these advancements promise a minimalist aesthetic that aligns with Apple's long-standing design philosophy, offering users a device that feels both modern and timeless. Camera Upgrades: Redefining Mobile Photography For photography enthusiasts, the iPhone XX is expected to deliver a horizontal camera bar housing wide, ultrawide, and telephoto lenses. This setup could include a 200-megapixel sensor, allowing sharper images and improved zoom capabilities. Such a high-resolution sensor, combined with advanced computational photography, aims to elevate mobile photography to new heights, allowing users to capture professional-grade images directly from their smartphones. Additionally, the horizontal camera bar design may improve ergonomics and balance when taking photos or recording videos. With these enhancements, Apple is likely to appeal to both casual users and professionals seeking a portable yet powerful photography tool. Battery Technology: A Step Toward Longevity Battery performance remains a critical focus for smartphone users, and the iPhone XX is rumored to introduce solid-state or silicon battery technology. These advancements promise higher energy density, leading to longer battery life and slower degradation over time. For users, this translates to fewer charging cycles and a more reliable device throughout its lifespan. The potential adoption of this technology could also result in faster charging speeds and improved safety, as solid-state batteries are less prone to overheating. By addressing one of the most common pain points for smartphone users, Apple aims to deliver a device that is not only powerful but also dependable for everyday use. Performance Boosts: AI and Memory Advancements The iPhone XX is expected to use high-bandwidth memory (HBM) to power advanced AI-driven features. This innovative memory technology could enable faster on-device processing, enhancing tasks such as real-time language translation, photo editing, and augmented reality applications. By integrating AI more deeply into the device, Apple seeks to create a smarter, more responsive user experience that adapts seamlessly to individual needs. In addition to memory advancements, the iPhone XX may feature a next-generation processor designed to handle complex computations with greater efficiency. This combination of hardware and AI-driven software could redefine how users interact with their devices, making everyday tasks faster and more intuitive. Launch Timeline and Target Audience Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone XX in September 2027, positioning it as a premium, standalone model alongside its regular iPhone lineup. As a high-end device, it will likely cater to tech enthusiasts, early adopters, and loyal Apple users who value innovative innovations. This release not only celebrates two decades of the iPhone but also underscores Apple's vision for the future of mobile technology. The iPhone XX is poised to attract users who seek the latest advancements in design, performance, and functionality. By offering a device that combines aesthetic appeal with practical innovation, Apple aims to solidify its position as a leader in the smartphone industry. A Milestone in Smartphone Evolution The iPhone XX represents Apple's unwavering commitment to innovation, blending bold design choices with advanced technology. From its wraparound display and hidden sensors to its new camera system and battery advancements, this device is set to challenge conventional expectations. As the 20th-anniversary model, the iPhone XX is more than just a celebration of Apple's legacy—it offers a glimpse into the future of smartphones, redefining what users can expect from their devices in the years to come. Stay informed about the latest about the iPhone by exploring our other resources and articles. Source & Image Credit: AppleTrack Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Telegraph

30 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Trump attack on Left-wing bias on TV sparks ‘constitutional crisis'

Elon Musk may have stepped aside, but Donald Trump still has a Doge problem. The US president's plan to run a scythe through up to $425bn (£316bn) of government spending could be gutted or even vetoed in the Senate, where just a few rebel Republicans could scupper the cuts. But Trump and Russell Vought, his budget tsar, have hatched a scheme, called a 'pocket rescission', that might keep the Doge (department of government efficiency) dream on track. And it could even shift the constitutional balance of power between president and Congress towards a testy Trump. It's a high-risk, high-stakes strategy. The outcome will determine whether the Doge spending reductions can go ahead, helping to pay for Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax cuts without blowing out the budget and rattling the bond markets. But the unprecedented procedure takes the White House and Capitol Hill into uncharted legal waters. So it is likely to end up in the courts – joining a raft of litigation that will either reinforce the institutional checks on the president's power or unleash him. 'It's a challenge to Congress,' says Sarah Binder, a political scientist at the Brookings Institution and George Washington University. 'I don't like to throw around the term 'constitutional crisis', but it's not a great position for lawmakers and institutions.' Under the constitution, Congress has the so-called power of the purse, meaning that lawmakers, not the president, are the final arbiter of what the government spends or does not spend. If the president wants to cut funding or programmes that Congress has already authorised, his only option is to launch a rescission procedure – a formal request for the cuts, which both houses of Congress must approve. The rescission process was introduced in a law called the Impoundment Control Act, which had the overall aim of making it hard for Richard Nixon, the then-president, and his successors from delaying or withholding funds once Congress had green-lighted them. Rescission has seldom been used. Ronald Reagan used it to secure $15.2bn of spending cuts as president in the early 1980s, but later in the decade, Congress tended to ignore or refuse his rescission messages. Trump tried it on with a $15bn-plus request in his first term, but was stymied in the Senate. The Democrats then got control of Congress in the midterms and pushed back another $27bn salvo. Now Trump is trying again. The initial proposal – Vought says it will be 'the first of many' – is to scuttle $9.4bn of spending on public broadcasters and international aid programmes. This rescission was flagged back in March but formally put to Congress only this month. In an executive order early last month, Trump said he wanted to terminate all public funding of National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), which accounts for about $1bn of this first rescission package. 'Which viewpoints NPR and PBS promote does not matter. What does matter is that neither entity presents a fair, accurate or unbiased portrayal of current events to tax-paying citizens,' Trump said. 'Today the media landscape is filled with abundant, diverse, and innovative news options. Government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence.' The White House has until July 18 to persuade Congress. The rescission scraped through the House of Representatives by 214 votes to 212, but the Senate is the real test. If just four Republicans in the 100-seat upper house swap sides, the spending stays in place. It's not looking promising for Trump. Several Republicans have already voiced concern about at least some of the cuts. The dissenters include Senator Susan Collins, who chairs an influential Senate finance committee that will consider the cuts at a session on June 25. There could be fireworks. Vought will appear before the committee and, in recent weeks, he has started airing the possibility of bypassing Congress altogether through an untested and almost unknown variant of rescission: the so-called pocket rescission. 'It's a provision that has been rarely used, but it is there,' Vought told CNN. 'And we intend to use all of these tools.' The trick with the pocket rescission is to make the request to Congress right before the end of the fiscal year, which runs to Sept 30. The White House reckons that the Impoundment Control Act's wording creates a loophole: if Congress does not act on the request before Sept 30, then even if the window is well short of 45 days the spending approval will lapse automatically on that date. The case for pocket rescissions was made recently by Wade Miller, of the Center for Renewing America (CRA), a Right-wing think tank. 'A rescission is a viable tool for carrying out the broader political mandate to curb unnecessary spending,' he wrote in a briefing paper. 'If the executive branch decides to use this process, the deployment of a rescission with fewer than 45 days remaining in the fiscal year is a statutorily and constitutionally valid strategy.' The CRA was set up by Vought himself, after he served as director of the Office of Management and Budget in the final six months of Trump's first term. He returned to the White House with the president this January, in the same role. But other Washington think tanks trenchantly oppose the CRA's position. 'Calling it a pocket rescission implies that it's like an actual functional tool under the law, in a way that it's actually not. It is a strategy that the person who is running the Office of Management and Budget has articulated to evade the law,' says Cerin Lindgrensavage, a lawyer at Protect Democracy. She says the whole purpose of the Impoundment Control Act was to stop any presidential ploy to skirt its strictures. 'One of the reasons why they might want to do this is because they're afraid they don't have the votes to actually make the cuts the legal way.' Binder, from Brookings, says that the Act doesn't explicitly deal with what happens if a president makes the request right before the end of the fiscal year. 'There's certainly room here for an aggressive Office of Management and Budget and an aggressive administration to try to stretch – others might say manipulate – the silence in the budget law,' she says. 'But the logic of the matter suggests that pocket rescissions are not legal under the Act and I would imagine there's a strong argument that they are unconstitutional under Congress's power of the purse.' Binder suspects Vought is looking to get a test case into the courts. Given there could be a constitutional principle at stake, it could go all the way to the Supreme Court, where a majority of judges are Republican appointees. In the meantime, litigants could get restraining orders or injunctions to prevent the Doge cuts. But they can't necessarily get the White House to respect these. The stage is set for a constitutional showdown. The question is whether Trump and Vought will really pull the trigger. And then, whether the weapon will actually work.

Reuters

32 minutes ago

• Reuters

Middle East tensions put investors on alert, weighing worst-case scenarios

NEW YORK, June 21 (Reuters) - Investors are mulling a host of different market scenarios should the U.S. deepen its involvement in the Middle East conflict, with the potential for ripple effects if energy prices skyrocket. They have honed in on the evolving situation between Israel and Iran, which have exchanged missile strikes, and are closely monitoring whether the U.S. decides to join Israel in its bombing campaign. Potential scenarios could send inflation higher, dampening consumer confidence and lessening the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. This would likely cause an initial selloff in equities and possible safe-haven bid for the dollar. While U.S. crude prices have climbed some 10% over the past week, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab has been little changed as of yet, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks. However, if attacks were to take out Iranian oil supply, "that's when the market is going to sit up and take notice," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth. "If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today's WTI price and that is where things get negative," Hogan said. The White House said on Thursday President Donald Trump would decide on U.S. involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks. Analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, ranging from a de-escalation in the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian production, and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, "each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices," the firm said in a note. In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around $130 per barrel, driving U.S. inflation near 6% by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note. "Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the U.S. this year," Oxford said in the note. The biggest market impact from the escalating conflict has been restricted to oil, with oil prices soaring on worries that the Iran-Israel conflict could disrupt supplies. Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near 5-month high of $79.04 on Thursday. The accompanying rise in investors' expectations for further near-term volatility in oil prices has outpaced the rise in volatility expectations for other major asset classes, including stocks and bonds. But other asset classes, including stocks, could still feel the knock-on effects of higher oil prices, especially if there is a larger surge in oil prices if the worst market fears of supply disruptions come true, analysts said. "Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil," Citigroup analysts wrote in a note. "To us, the key for equities from here will come from energy commodity pricing," they said. U.S. stocks have so far weathered rising Middle East tensions with little sign of panic. A more direct U.S. involvement in the conflict could, however, spook markets, investors said. Financial markets may be in for an initial selloff if the U.S. military attacks Iran, with economists warning that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs. Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead. On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro. An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the U.S. dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished U.S. exceptionalism. In the event of U.S. direct engagement in the Iran-Israel War, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said. "Traders are likely to worry more about the implicit erosion of the terms of trade for Europe, the UK, and Japan, rather than the economic shock to the US, a major oil producer," Thierry Wizman, Global FX & Rates Strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note. But longer-term, the prospect of US-directed 'nation-building' would probably weaken the dollar, he said. "We recall that after the attacks of 9/11, and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened," Wizman said.