Oil markets see closure of Hormuz Strait as unlikely, Eni CEO says
MILAN, June 18 (Reuters) - The CEO of Italian energy company Eni (ENI.MI), opens new tab said on Wednesday oil markets are signalling that an escalation between Israel and Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is unlikely.
About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the Strait, which lies between Oman and Iran and links the Gulf north of it with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond.
"The markets have not pushed the value of crude oil above $80, $90 a barrel (signalling that) they are predicting that more extreme situations, including the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, are unlikely," Eni's Claudio Descalzi said on the sidelines of an energy conference.
Israel launched strikes against Iran on June 13, saying it targeted nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders during the start of an operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon.
Iran, which has denied such intentions, has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz for traffic in retaliation against Western pressure.
Descalzi said that a potential closure of the Strait would first affect Iran's oil sales and would probably involve U.S. intervention.
"All things that, even though we are in an extreme volatile situation, I think that the world's leaders will try very hard to avoid," Descalzi said.
Oil prices were steady on Wednesday, after a gain of 4% in the previous session, with Brent crude futures hovering around $76.6 per barrel at 1225 GMT.
Eni CEO said the state-controlled group had been working for years to reduce its exposure to oil by developing new businesses including renewable and biofuel ventures.
The group is likely to generate 2 billion euros ($2.3 billion) from a planned sale of a 20% stake in its renewable unit Plenitude by the end of this year, Descalzi told reporters.
Eni said in May it had entered exclusive talks with investment firm Ares Alternative Credit Management on the disposal of the 20% Plenitude stake.
($1 = 0.8685 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Exact dates millions of energy customers must make essential bill check ahead of price cap change
ENERGY bills are set to fall by 7% in July, bringing much-needed relief to millions of households. The average annual gas and electricity bill will drop from £1,849 to £1,720, saving a typical household about £129 a year. 1 The savings will provide relief to millions, as over 22million households on standard variable tariffs are directly affected by the price cap, which is updated every three months. From July 1, electricity will cost around 25.73p per kWh with a daily standing charge of 51.37p. Gas will cost around 6.33p per kWh with a 29.82p standing charge. However, many might still pay more than Ofgem 's headline figure because the cap limits the prices you pay not your total bill. Ofgem's estimate assumes typical usage of 2,700 kWh of electricity and 11,500 kWh of gas per year. Using more means a higher bill. Households on standard variable tariffs without a smart meter should make it a priority to submit their electricity and gas meter readings to their supplier as close to July 1 as possible. This ensures they are billed accurately at the new, lower rates. Failing to submit readings could mean some of your usage after this date is charged at the previous, higher rates. Suppliers who have not received meter readings rely on estimated usage, which could lead to households being overcharged. How to take a meter reading However, even if you take your meter readings near July 1, you don't need to submit them immediately. Many suppliers allow extra time for customers to provide their readings. Some offer a few days after the price cap changes to submit backdated readings, while others may allow up to a week or more. We've explained the deadlines for submitting your reading to your supplier and provided guidance on how to read your meter. When to submit a meter reading You should try and take a meter reading as close to today as possible to show how much energy you used up until this date. Once you have taken the reading you have a certain amount of time in which to send it to your supplier. The amount of time you have to submit it depends on who your energy supplier is. For example, British Gas customers have until July 14 to send in a reading. They can do this online, via its app, telephone or web form. At Ovo Energy you can send in your reading in your online account, via its app or by telephone and you need to do so by July 11. Next customers need to submit a meter reading before July 6 through their online account, via the app, telephone or email. Households who are supplied by Octopus Energy have until July 8 to submit their reading online, through a web form, via the app or by email. EDF customers need to send in a reading before July 10. They can do so online, via its app, online form, email Whatsapp, text or over the phone. At Utility Warehouse, customers can give a reading in the five days leading up to July 1 and submit it in their online account, through its app or by phone. How to take a meter reading The easiest way to take a meter reading is to take a photo of your gas and electricity meters. This means you have evidence in case you need to dispute a bill. You can send in your meter reading online via your energy account. Some providers will also let you send in the numbers by text or through their app. Check which options your supplier offers on their website. Electricity meters If you have a digital electricity meter then you will see a row of six numbers. Five of them will be in black and one will be in red. Write down the five numbers in black, which are shown from left to right. If you are on an economy 7 or 10 tariff, which gives you cheaper electricity at night, then you will have two rows of numbers. You need both to take a reading. If you have a traditional dial meter then you need to read the first five dials from left to right. Ignore any red dials. If the pointer is between two numbers then write down the lowest figure. If it is between nine and zero then write down the number nine. Gas meters If you have a digital metric gas meter showing five numbers followed by a decimal point then you need to write down the first five numbers. If you have a digital imperial meter then you will see four black numbers and two red numbers. Write down the four black numbers only. If you have a digital gas meter, follow the same steps as the digital electricity meter. Smart meters If you have a smart meter then you do not need to send your supplier a meter reading as it will be sent automatically. Check that your smart meter is in "smart mode" and is working properly to make sure you are accurately charged. What energy bill help is available? There's a number of different ways to get help paying your energy bills if you're struggling to get by. If you fall into debt, you can always approach your supplier to see if they can put you on a repayment plan before putting you on a prepayment meter. This involves paying off what you owe in instalments over a set period. If your supplier offers you a repayment plan you don't think you can afford, speak to them again to see if you can negotiate a better deal. Several energy firms have schemes available to customers struggling to cover their bills. But eligibility criteria vary depending on the supplier and the amount you can get depends on your financial circumstances. For example, British Gas or Scottish Gas customers struggling to pay their energy bills can get grants worth up to £2,000. British Gas also offers help via its British Gas Energy Trust and Individuals Family Fund. You don't need to be a British Gas customer to apply for the second fund. EDF, Octopus Energy and Scottish Power all offer grants to struggling customers too. Thousands of vulnerable households are missing out on extra help and protections by not signing up to the Priority Services Register (PSR). The service helps support vulnerable households, such as those who are elderly or ill. Some of the perks include being given advance warning of blackouts, free gas safety checks and extra support if you're struggling. Get in touch with your energy firm to see if you can apply.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bayesian: Mike Lynch's superyacht seen on surface for first time since tragedy
Water is being pumped from the superyacht belonging to Mike Lynch, which has been seen upright for the first time since it tragically sank off the coast of Sicily last month. The 56-metre (184ft) vessel, named Bayesian, was spotted in an upright position near the fishing town of Porticello on Saturday morning, held by one of Europe's most powerful sea cranes. The sinking on August 19 led to the deaths of seven individuals, including billionaire Mr Lynch, 59, and his 18-year-old daughter, Hannah. A project insider said: 'The vessel is on surface, but not clear of the sea as yet. 'Pumping out of water will continue, and it will be lunchtime – following a series of lifting and resting procedures – before she will finally be fully and finally out of the water.' Salvage workers could be seen on the vessel, which is covered in mud and algae, while the canopy and guard rails are mangled. Investigators in the UK and Italy say raising the vessel is crucial to fully understanding what happened. The yacht's 72-metre (236ft) mast was cut off on Tuesday using a remote-controlled tool and rested on the seabed to be picked up later. Over the last few days, salvage teams have worked to ease the hull into an upright position and give access to the yacht's right side, which had previously been lying flat on the seabed 50 metres below the surface. The vessel is expected to be brought to Termini Imerese – where Italian prosecutors investigating the sinking are based, and on Monday it will be lifted on to a specially made steel cradle on the quayside. It was originally expected to be raised last month, but salvage efforts were delayed after a diver died during underwater work on May 9, prompting greater use of remote-controlled equipment. About 70 specialist personnel had been mobilised to Porticello from across Europe to work on the recovery operation, which began last month. Inquest proceedings in the UK are looking at the deaths of Mr Lynch and his daughter, as well as Morgan Stanley International bank chairman Jonathan Bloomer, 70, and his wife, Judy Bloomer, 71, who were all British nationals. Marine Accident Investigation Branch investigators said in an interim report that the Bayesian was knocked over by 'extreme wind'. The yacht had a vulnerability to winds, but the owner and crew would not have known, the report said. US lawyer Chris Morvillo and his wife Neda Morvillo, and Canadian-Antiguan national Recaldo Thomas, who was working as a chef on the vessel, also died in the sinking. Fifteen people, including Mr Lynch's wife, Angela Bacares, were rescued. Mr Lynch and his daughter were said to have lived in the vicinity of London and the Bloomers lived in Sevenoaks in Kent. The tycoon founded software giant Autonomy in 1996 and was cleared in June last year of carrying out a massive fraud over the sale of the firm to Hewlett-Packard (HP) in 2011. The boat trip was a celebration of his acquittal in the case in the US.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Outcome of Israel's war with Iran is uncertain even if US joins conflict
Israel's assault on Iran, including its nuclear and ballistic weapons programme, is unlikely to secure its long-term strategic objectives, even if Benjamin Netanyahu manages to persuade the Trump administration into joining the conflict in the coming days and weeks, experts have said. According to diplomats, military specialists and security analysts, Israel – and its prime minister – is likely to face mounting headwinds in the campaign, amid warnings that it risks dangerously destabilising the region. There is mounting scepticism over whether even the US's use of massive ground-penetrating bombs would be able to knock out Iran's Fordow nuclear facility, which is buried deep beneath a mountain, and questions have emerged about Israel's ability to sustain a long-range offensive that has exposed its cities to counterattack by ballistic missiles. Experts make the distinction between Israel's operational success in targeting key Iranian sites and individuals, and its strategic objectives which appear to have expanded to regime change in Tehran, on top of destroying its nuclear programme. 'There is a dominant trend in Israel going back to the formation of the state that has suggested to politicians that violence will deliver a solution to what are political problems,' said Toby Dodge, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics. 'My gut feeling is Iranian regime is more stable than has been suggested. And because Iran has a long history of commitment to technological modernisation and proliferation, well, that's something you can't simply remove with a bomb.' Analysts are also puzzled by an Israeli strategy that appears to have gambled on triggering a conflict in the hope of pushing a highly erratic US president in Donald Trump to join, supplying the firepower that Israel lacks in terms of massive bunker-busting bombs. Experts assess that the US would probably have to use several of these bombs, which would need to be dropped relatively close to the Fordow plant, protected by up to 90 metres of bedrock, in a complex and risky operation that is not guaranteed to succeed, and would probably draw retaliation from Iran against US bases, risking further escalation. 'Subcontracting the Fordow job would put the United States in Iran's sights,' Daniel C Kurtzer, a former US ambassador to Israel, and Steven N Simon, a veteran of the national security council, wrote in Foreign Affairs this week. 'Iran would almost certainly retaliate by killing American civilians. That, in turn, would compel the United States to reciprocate. 'Soon enough the only targets left for Washington to hit would be the Iranian regime's leaders, and the United States would again go into the regime-change business – a business in which exceedingly few Americans want to be involved any longer.' The prospect of regime change, perhaps by killing Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which has been raised by Israeli officials (and reportedly vetoed by Trump) is already causing profound alarm in the region. Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the senior Iraqi cleric, made a rare intervention, warning of the profound dangers to the region. Another sceptic is Andreas Krieg, an associate professor in the Department of Defence Studies at King's College London, who has worked widely in the Middle East and is doubtful that air power can alone can make the kind of impact being sought by Israel, both in terms of destroying Iran's nuclear knowhow or removing the clerical regime. 'It's not the holy grail. We'd learned the lesson that air power alone doesn't work. And then we learned in Iraq and Afghanistan that even massive numbers of boots on ground doesn't work,' he said. 'What we're seeing is not a strategic approach but one that is operational using air power, and the operational approach is starting the consume the strategic one which is about the political endgame. 'The best Israel can best can hope for is something like the campaign against Hezbollah, which has probably delivered a short-lived success, in that it was very successful in degrading Hezbollah's network. 'Iran is very similar in that its defence strategy is built around a decentralised mosaic. Decapitation doesn't work against that kind of network. You can take out key nodes, but the best [Israel] can hope for in killing Khamenei would be to trigger the succession crisis which in any case had been anticipated.' And if Netanyahu has miscalculated, it is in an area where he has long claimed expertise: in reading and playing US politics. With American support for US intervention polling dismally, and the issue threatening to split Trump's Maga movement, Israel may find itself on the wrong side of a toxic argument that has far more salience for Trump than helping Netanyahu. Failing a US intervention to support Israel's campaign, Israel is likely to face growing challenges amid indications it is running low on some missile interceptors. Crew fatigue for the long-range sorties, aircraft maintenance cycles and the exhaustion of prepared target lists are all likely to militate against Israel's ability to maintain a prolonged conflict at the current high level of intensity. Any drop-off will be used by Tehran to suggest to Iranians that it has weathered the worst of the storm. There is a third possibility. Writing in his book Waging Modern War, in the aftermath of the Nato air campaign in Kosovo in 1999 – seen as one of the more successful uses of air power – the organisation's former supreme allied commander Wesley Clark, described the campaign as having one objective – to force the Serbs to the negotiating table. With contacts now re-established with Iranian negotiators, including talks in Geneva on Friday with European countries, Trump himself has suggested there is more time for diplomacy to run. Even if Iran is forced to a nuclear deal, Israel may find it comes with heavy hidden costs, not least the potential for survival of a clerical regime with every reason to be even more hostile to Israel and Israelis, and the limitations of Israeli military power, perhaps, exposed. 'If Khamenei has the sense to step back, if America doesn't come in,' says Dodge, 'then Israel has stuck its finger in a hornets' nest.'
