logo
How Private Investors Can Fill In The $27 Billion Climate Gap

How Private Investors Can Fill In The $27 Billion Climate Gap

Forbes5 hours ago

The Thomas family, new Georgia Bright clients stand in front of their yard grow beds and residential ... More solar installation. The Trump administration's economic policies have been summarized by most major financial institutions under the industry's greatest pejorative: uncertainty. It's bad enough when applied to yo-yo-ing tariffs that can send the economy teetering toward recession. And perhaps even worse when playing with the future of the planet: $27 billion in funding for companies and funds addressing the climate crisis that, if unabated, the World Economic Forum has estimated costing society as much as $75 trillion by 2050. Why was this funding frozen, and what can private investors do about it?
GGRF Funds in Limbo
Over the past 100+ days, there has been a bitter battle over the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), a $27 billion vehicle approved during the Biden administration designed to 'finance clean technology deployment nationally, finance clean technology deployment in low-income and disadvantaged communities while simultaneously building the capacity of community lenders that serve those communities, and spur adoption of clean distributed solar energy that lowers energy bills for millions of Americans in low-income and disadvantaged communities.'
One of the goals of this fund was to more effectively de-politicize what has too often been a hot potato industry in Washington: renewable energy, by focusing on the concrete, economic benefits that climate change mitigation and technological development can bring to communities. As noted in Forbes, clean energy jobs have historically grown at twice the national rate, and are more accessible to the average American: 'Clean energy jobs create economic mobility, with 21% higher wages than average, increasing access to unions, and expanding accessibility – 75% of expected jobs from IRA [Inflation Reduction Act]And yet, despite this strong economic data, on March 11, The EPA ordered Citibank to freeze the fund, in a move Senator Schumer, Markey, Warren, Whitehouse, Van Hollen and Merkley referred to as ' jeopardiz[ing] private investment, job creation, and economic opportunity in communities across the country' in a subsequent letter to Citibank.
Citibank, very much stuck in the middle, first received a judge's order saying they should proceed with funding, with presiding Judge Tanya Chutkan ruling that the EPA 'acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it failed to explain its reasoning and acted contrary to its regulations in suspending and terminating Plaintiffs' grants.' The very next day, however, an appellate court granted a stay to the EPA that refroze the funds until the courts can arrive at a long-term solution.
An EPA spokesperson responded to a request for comment via email, stating: 'Unlike the Biden-Har[r]is administration, this EPA is committed to being an exceptional steward of taxpayer dollars. In March, Administrator Zeldin notified National Clean Investment Fund and Clean Communities Investment Accelerator recipients of the termination of their grant agreements under the Biden-Harris Administration's $20 billion 'gold bar' scheme. This termination is based on substantial concerns regarding the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) program integrity, the award process, and programmatic waste and abuse, which collectively undermine the fundamental goals and statutory objectives of the award.'
Private Investment Steps Up
Caught in the middle are companies across the country in the business of getting clean energy into communities, or in the case of many Native Americans who live off-grid, like 30% of the Navajo Nation, any source of energy at all. Many entrepreneurs who were either approved or in the process to receive GGRF funds refuse to sit on their hands waiting to see what the courts decide and are forging a path with the support of private investors—a process I know well, given my firm Candide Group launched Afterglow, a climate justice debt fund, in 2024. The stories of these organizations not only exemplify the value potentially being destroyed by the delay of the GGRF, but also, represent opportunities for private capital to step in.Solar Holler (West Virginia)
Boyd County High School sports part of its new solar array in a partnership with Solar Holler.
Solar Holler is a West Virginia-based solar developer and installer serving Appalachia, including Virginia, Kentucky and Ohio. Working with households, churches, schools and other non-profit organizations, Solar Holler has sought to build on the region's history as an energy producer, without the staggering long-term threats to public health generated by coal. This month, it completed five of seventeen intended solar projects installed on the roofs of West Virginia public schools.
Their CEO, Dan Conant, commented on LinkedIn, 'It's these sorts of projects that get me out of bed in the morning—the kind that cram as much good into one place as possible. The kind that provide educational opportunities for West Virginian kids to stay home. The kind that support American manufacturing and union labor. The kind that lower bills for organizations doing God's work.'
He added, 'every panel we put up means more money for teachers and supplies, and…actual education. The electricity generated by the solar is 20% cheaper than what the out-of-state monopoly utility is charging.'
Allume (National)
Curtis, an apartment resident consuming solar energy through SolShare said, "Since I'm saving money ... More on my utility bills, that allows me to invest back into my small business or put it in my savings account." Allume Energy unlocks rooftop solar potential for multifamily buildings with its SolShare technology, expanding access to clean and affordable energy for apartment residents.
'Allume's mission is to bring rooftop solar to the more than 110 million people living in multifamily housing, many of whom are low-income,' Aliya Bagewadi, Alume's Director of US Strategic Partnerships, said in an email. 'Our SolShare technology allows solar energy to be shared across multiple units in the same building, enabling apartment tenants to directly consume solar and reduce their electricity bills by an average of 40 percent. Without the federal Investment Tax Credit, affordable housing providers won't be able to reduce financial strain or strengthen housing resilience in the communities they serve. The rollback would halt projects that deliver immediate and lasting savings to the families who need it most.'
Georgia Bright (Georgia)
Photo of lawn with sign promoting Georgia Bright with solar installers working in the background.
Georgia BRIGHT is a program of the Capital Good Fund (CGF), a Rhode Island-based nonprofit social finance organization grappling with poverty and environmental injustice in America. Capital Good Fund offers solar leases, low-interest loans, and one-on-one financial coaching for lower-income residents of Georgia, Rhode Island, Texas, Illinois, Florida, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Colorado.
This federally funded solar power program makes solar leasing more accessible for homeowners and nonprofits. In addition to helping low- and moderate-income communities save money, this work also enhances grid stability — increasingly essential as climate change strains grids.'$156 million in Solar for All funding is an amazing start, but if we are going to serve 16,000+ Georgia families over the next four years, we can't rely on public investment alone,' Alicia Brown, Georgia BRIGHT Director said. 'To unlock the full potential of rooftop and community solar, we need private capital at the table. The Georgia BRIGHT initiative isn't just about clean energy—it's about saving families money as utility bills rise, boosting Georgia's economy, and strengthening our grid that is straining under the weight of rapid load growth.'
Dollaride (New York)
Dollaride team in front of one of the orgs new EV vans. Photos Taken by Eli Jules
Dollaride is a New York-based company electrifying fleet vehicles in transit deserts, starting with New York City's locally essential 'dollar vans.' Roughly 1.4 million people in NYC live with limited access to public transit, which hinders economic mobility. Dollar vans provide an informal transit network that serves more than 100,000 riders daily in the outer boroughs of Queens and Brooklyn.
'As federal support for crucial climate projects becomes uncertain, the leadership of local governments, paired with private capital, is essential to fill the gap,' Dollaride CEO Su Sanni said. 'Ultimately, this ensures that disadvantaged communities retain access to essential transportation and breathe cleaner air. This is the kind of high-impact, scalable model that private capital can and should be amplifying nationwide.'
Companies like these who are developing climate projects in low-income communities — which are already feeling the substantial strain of climate change —may struggle if GGRF funds ultimately can't reach their intended recipients. This may lead to political ramifications in red and blue states alike.
The good news is that renewable energy not only has the potential to save money for consumers, according to the Department of Energy, but also make money for investors, with an International Energy Agency report finding clean energy outperformed fossil fuels for both 5 and 10 year periods. Private markets may rush in where the EPA fears to tread.
Full disclosures related to my work available here. This post does not constitute investment, tax, or legal advice, and the author is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided herein. Solar Holler, DollaRide and Georgia BRIGHT are investees of the Afterglow Climate Justice Fund at Candide Group. Certain information referenced in this article is provided via third-party sources and while such information is believed to be reliable, the author and Candide Group assume no responsibility for such information.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Comtech Rejoins iCERT, Deepening Commitment to Public Safety Innovation
Comtech Rejoins iCERT, Deepening Commitment to Public Safety Innovation

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Comtech Rejoins iCERT, Deepening Commitment to Public Safety Innovation

Renewed Membership Reinforces Public Safety Commitment and Expands Advocacy Platform CHANDLER, Ariz., June 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun. 20, 2025-- Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (NASDAQ: CMTL) ("Comtech" or the "Company"), a global communications technology leader, today announced that its Terrestrial & Wireless Networks ("T&W") business segment has rejoined the Industry Council for Emergency Response Technologies, Inc. ("iCERT"). Founded in 2005, iCERT is a commercial sector trade association that brings together leading technology companies to drive innovation, shape effective policy, and promote open standards that improve public safety and emergency response. This return to iCERT is part of a series of strategic moves by the T&W business segment, including the launch of Allerium Mira - a cloud-native call handling platform designed to simplify complexity and support evolving 9-1-1 needs. Together, these efforts reflect a renewed commitment to public safety and essential service providers, backed by the same trusted team, proven solutions, and industry-wide support. "We're excited to collaborate with iCERT as it expands its focus on key issues and innovations in emergency communications," said Susan Ornstein, Senior Director of Legal & Regulatory Affairs of Comtech T&W, who joined the association's board of directors earlier this month. "Under its new leadership, iCERT is amplifying the voice of its members on public policy issues and engaging partner associations like NASNA, NENA, and APCO to advance shared priorities across the public safety community. Together with iCERT, Comtech is well positioned to address pressing public safety and regulatory matters, and advocate for federal funding, legislation, and FCC policy updates." "Few organizations have meant as much to me throughout my career as iCERT," said Jeff Robertson, President of Comtech T&W. "Twenty years ago, I worked alongside two industry visionaries to establish this organization with the shared goal of fostering collaboration between the public and private sectors. I was privileged to serve as iCERT's inaugural executive director and have remained a strong advocate of its mission throughout my career. Seeing our company rejoin the iCERT community is especially meaningful. Comtech is committed to delivering results that help communities become safer, more connected, and resilient, and iCERT is a vital partner in advancing that work." "iCERT stands committed to propelling public safety forward, facilitating collaboration among its member base and industry stakeholders, and creating an environment that fosters innovation and progress," said Don Brittingham, Interim Executive Director of iCERT. "Members like Comtech play a vital role in strengthening the organization's depth and breadth of experience across the full public safety call flow. I am excited to welcome Jeff Robertson and his team back to iCERT and look forward to empowering public safety together." About Comtech Comtech Telecommunications Corp. is a leading provider of satellite and space communications technologies; terrestrial and wireless network solutions; Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) and emergency services; and cloud native capabilities to commercial and government customers around the world. Through its culture of innovation and employee empowerment, Comtech leverages its global presence and decades of technology leadership and experience to create some of the world's most innovative solutions for mission-critical communications. For more information, please visit About iCERT iCERT—The Industry Council for Emergency Response Technologies—is the only industry trade association focused exclusively on emergency response technologies and related equipment, systems, and services. iCERT is dedicated to improving public safety through innovation. For more information, please visit Forward-Looking Statements Certain information in this press release contains statements that are forward-looking in nature and involve certain significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results and performance could differ materially from such forward-looking information. The Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings identify many such risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking information in this press release is qualified in its entirety by the risks and uncertainties described in such Securities and Exchange Commission filings. View source version on Contacts Investor Relations Maria Ceriello631-962-7102investors@ Media Contact Jamie

Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students
Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students, delivering the Ivy League school another victory as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. The order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston preserves Harvard's ability to host foreign students while the case is decided, but it falls short of resolving all of Harvard's legal hurdles to hosting international students. Notably, Burroughs said the federal government still has authority to review Harvard's ability to host international students through normal processes outlined in law. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency abruptly withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas, skirting most of its usual procedures. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7,000 international students — about a quarter of its total enrollment — to transfer or risk being in the U.S. illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university said it was experiencing illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Burroughs temporarily had halted the government's action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, President Donald Trump tried a new strategy. He issued a proclamation to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move, saying the president was attempting an end-run around the temporary court order. Burroughs temporarily blocked Trump's proclamation as well. That emergency block remains in effect, and Burroughs did not address the proclamation in her order Friday. 'We expect the judge to issue a more enduring decision in the coming days,' Harvard said Friday in an email to international students. 'Our Schools will continue to make contingency plans toward ensuring that our international students and scholars can pursue their academic work to the fullest extent possible, should there be a change to student visa eligibility or their ability to enroll at Harvard.' Students in limbo The stops and starts of the legal battle have unsettled current students and left others around the world waiting to find out whether they will be able to attend America's oldest and wealthiest university. The Trump administration's efforts to stop Harvard from enrolling international students have created an environment of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion,' the university said in a court filing. Countless international students have asked about transferring from the university, Harvard immigration services director Maureen Martin said. Still, admissions consultants and students have indicated most current and prospective Harvard scholars are holding out hope they'll be able to attend the university. For one prospective graduate student, an admission to Harvard's Graduate School of Education had rescued her educational dreams. Huang, who asked to be identified only by her surname for fear of being targeted, had seen her original doctoral offer at Vanderbilt University rescinded after federal cuts to research and programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion. Harvard stepped in a few weeks later with a scholarship she couldn't refuse. She rushed to schedule her visa interview in Beijing. More than a month after the appointment, despite court orders against the Trump administration's policies, she still hasn't heard back. 'Your personal effort and capability means nothing in this era,' Huang said in a social media post. 'Why does it have to be so hard to go to school?' An ongoing battle Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after the university rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. On Friday, the president said in a post on Truth Social that the administration has been working with Harvard to address 'their largescale improprieties" and that a deal with Harvard could be announced within the next week. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right,' Trump's post said. Trump's administration first targeted Harvard's international students in April. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and on May 22 revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong. Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. ___ Collin Binkley has covered Harvard for nearly a decade — most of the time living half a mile from campus. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Collin Binkley And Albee Zhang, The Associated Press

Issa floats constitutional amendment to let Congress, SCOTUS remove president after Biden health 'cover-up'
Issa floats constitutional amendment to let Congress, SCOTUS remove president after Biden health 'cover-up'

Fox News

time27 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Issa floats constitutional amendment to let Congress, SCOTUS remove president after Biden health 'cover-up'

Rep. Darrell Issa on Friday suggested that the House should consider taking up a constitutional amendment to make it easier to remove a president who is unable to perform the job in response to the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's declining mental state. Issa, R-Calif., who is a member of the House Judiciary Committee, said that actions taken by Biden administration officials to keep Americans in the dark about his health show that the provisions in the 25th Amendment may be insufficient. That amendment allows the Vice President and the Cabinet to remove a president from his role if he is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." "The initiation was always intended to be the vice president and the cabinet based on the assumption that they would take their oath and their observation seriously and that they were closest to the president to know if that event was needed," Issa told Fox News. "It now looks as though their impartiality can be questioned." Issa added: "If that's the case, the other two branches need to be brought in in some way into the process of asserting that the president may be unable to perform his duties and determining that in a fair and, if necessary, public way." The other two branches in this case would likely be Congress and the Supreme Court. Issa's comments come as the House Oversight Committee is set to interview three Biden administration officials next week about the former president's decline. Former Domestic Policy Council Director Neera Tanden will meet with the committee Tuesday. Former Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor to the First Lady Anthony Bernthal will meet with the committee Thursday. Former White House Physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor will testify under subpoena on Friday. The committee also has interviews scheduled with former administration officials Annie Tomasini and Ashley Williams. And it's seeking interviews with several officials in the Biden inner circle, including former Chief of Staff Ron Klain and former Senior Advisor to the President for Communications Anita Dunn. Also among the questions investigators will have is whether any Biden officials used the autopen to authorize executive actions without the president's permission. The results of that investigation, according to Issa, could help inform exactly how to write this potential constitutional amendment. "What Chairman Comer is doing is extremely important because he's basically doing the fact-finding for the Judiciary Committee, which is going to undoubtedly take up a possible amendment to the 25th Amendment," Issa said. There is a very high threshold to amend the Constitution – a two-thirds vote in each chamber and ratification by three-quarters of states. So, if an amendment does materialize from the Judiciary Committee, it would face a tough road to make it through Congress, even with unified Republican control. But Issa says it's worth making an effort to improve the system. "Since it didn't work, we have to ask, is there another way to make it work better in the future?" he asked.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store