Wales' new history GCSE to be delayed as teachers 'not ready'
A new-look history GCSE due to be introduced in September will be delayed for a year, teachers have been told.Qualifications Wales said it would now be taught from September 2026 because many teachers are "not ready or confident" in delivering it, meaning a likely negative impact on learners. The change is part of an overhaul of all GCSEs under the new curriculum for Wales. Neil Butler from the NASUWT teaching union welcomed the new timescale and said teachers needed more time to plan.
Last year it was announced that a new sciences GCSE would be introduced a year later than planned and plans for a British sign language GCSE were also suspended.Reacting to the announcement on the GCSE history delay, Mr Butler said: "Teachers' workloads are already unmanageable and adding extra pressure is not ethical or productive."Teachers and pupils will benefit massively from this extra year of development."In its letter to schools, Qualifications Wales said that unions and the Association of Directors of Education in Wales had raised concerns that the scale of the change and workload facing history teachers was greater than in other subjects.It added that Qualifications Wales, along with the WJEC exam board and the Welsh government, had listened to concerns and delayed the introduction of GCSE history until September 2026, when a second wave of subjects will be phased in.The new history course will include more focus on Welsh history and a broadening of the range of eras and topics covered, including history from outside of Europe and North America, Qualifications Wales said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Assisted dying: One NI MP backs law change in England and Wales
Only one of Northern Ireland's MPs has supported controversial new assisted dying legislation in a key vote in the House of Eastwood, of the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP), backed the bill, which would allow terminally ill adults with six months or less to live to get medical assistance to end their own legislation will only apply in England and was voted through the final stage in the commons by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23. The Democratic Unionist Party's (DUP) five MPs voted against the legislation, along with Ulster Unionist MP Robin Swann, Alliance MP Sorcha Eastwood, Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) leader Jim Allister and Independent MP Alex leader Claire Hanna was absent from Westminster but has abstained in previous MPs narrowly back legalising assisted dying in England and WalesOpposing the legislation, DUP leader Gavin Robinson said it was a not a bill which offered "light or hope or dignity".He added: "It is not a safeguard for the dying, but it is the removable of protections for the vulnerable." 'More comfort' But Eastwood said it was right that people "get the opportunity in a very limited and very protected circumstances to die a in a way which gives them more comfort than we are doing now"."We all know these things are happening, people with lots of money can go to Switzerland," he added."We need to ensure that it is available to more people, and it is important that a legal framework is put around this."Swann said the bill "seriously lacks" any safeguards for those with disabilities."This now means doctors can raise ending a patient's life, no matter how vulnerable the patient is, including those with learning disabilities and doctors only need to be 51% sure the patient is not being coerced," he said the bill was "unsafe" and did not provide safeguards for vulnerable people as he called for more funding for palliative described the vote as a "sad day for our nation"."For the first time since the abolition of capital punishment, the state is set to be involved in facilitating the death of its own citizens," he said. Assisted dying drugs While the legislation will not apply in Northern Ireland, MPs passed an amendment which will allow the lethal drugs used in assisted dying to be manufactured in Northern the amendment, Swann said that, unlike elsewhere in the UK, workers will not be able to decline working on those drugs for personal beliefs."The conscious clause has been extended to England, Scotland and Wales but not to Northern Ireland," he added.A ban on adverts promoting assisted dying will also be extended to Northern Ireland. Sinn Féin's seven MPs do not take their seats in the House of Commons but a spokesperson said the party supported assisted dying under "limited grounds"."Given the sensitivity and complexity of this issue it would be most appropriate that the health minister would bring forward legislation on assisted dying," the spokesperson in a statement the Northern Ireland Department of Health said it had "no plans to bring forward legislation on assisted dying"."In Northern Ireland, assisting or encouraging suicide or killing someone on compassionate grounds remains a criminal offence," the statement said.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch: The moment MPs vote in favour of assisted dying bill after emotional debate
MPs in the House of Commons have voted in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The vote was 314 in favour to 219 against. The bill aims to legalise the right for terminally ill individuals in England and Wales to end their lives with medical assistance. The legislation will now proceed to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, with proposer Kim Leadbeater expressing emotion as it passed. Watch the video in full above.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Assisted dying Bill set to become law
Assisted dying is set to be legalised in England and Wales after a historic vote described as 'the most fateful' of this Parliament. MPs voted 314 to 291 in favour of allowing adults with a terminal illness and less than six months left to live to receive medical assistance to end their lives. Opponents of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill said the vote was ' on a knife-edge ' but the legislation was voted through by a majority of 23. Assisted dying is now on course to be available to eligible patients by 2029, but it remains unclear whether it will be provided as part of the NHS or an additional system will be created. Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the Bill, said her legislation would 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and offer a compassionate and safe choice '. The controversial legislation has been passed by the Commons despite opposition from the Royal Colleges of Physicians, Psychiatrists and Pathologists. Critical MPs said it lacked sufficient safeguards to protect the vulnerable and that it would transform the relationship between individual and state. Concerns were also raised about the precarious state of the palliative care system, which could deprive eligible adults of an adequate choice at the end of life. MPs from each political party gave emotive and passionate speeches on both sides of the debate, with several citing their personal experiences with the deaths of loved ones. Diane Abbott, a veteran Labour MP, said: 'This may be the most fateful Bill that we discuss in this Parliament. It is literally a matter of life and death.' She said she opposed the legislation on behalf of the 'voiceless', adding: 'What could be more unjust than to lose your life to appallingly drafted legislation?' Kit Malthouse, a Tory MP and supporter of the Bill, responded by saying that he wanted to give a voice to dying people 'not because they want to be rescued, but because time and time again, they're begging us for mercy'. The former Cabinet minister added: 'We honour life by giving it meaning and power. And the one thing that dying people ask for in their agonising final moments is control over the disease that is destroying them.' Sir James Cleverly, who spoke against the Bill, said that the legislation would fundamentally change the relationship between doctor and patient. 'We will introduce, perhaps only a small, but a permanent question mark in the minds of every patient, particularly a patient who is discussing a serious illness or perhaps a terminal diagnosis. 'What is this medical profession expecting of me, what are they thinking?'' Tom Tugendhat, the former security minister, cautioned his Parliamentary colleagues to pay attention to the precise wording of the Bill and its impact on society's most vulnerable. 'The truth is, this is the last time we're going to talk about it. This is the last time we're going to have actual authority over these words,' he said. Mr Tugendhat warned that when the first 18 or 19-year-old applies for an assisted death, ' it will be we who made that decision '. 'It will be on our consciences, and it will be a decision that has fundamentally changed the relationship between the individual and the state, in a way that can never be reversed,' he said. Eligible patients will be able to have an assisted death if they get the approval of two doctors and an assisted dying panel, made up of a psychiatrist, social worker and a legal expert. This was added to the Bill after a Second Reading in the Commons in November, after concerns were raised about the original proposal to have a High Court judge sign off each application. Sir James also cited the concerns raised by a number of professional bodies that will be involved in the provision of assisted dying. 'When people upon whom we rely to deliver this say they are not ready and they don't feel they will be ready, they don't have enough people, they don't have enough capacity, they will have to take resource from current provisions to move across to this provision, which will be driven by a statutory requirement and a locked in commencement date, we should listen.' Vicky Foxcroft, a Labour MP who served as a shadow minister for disabled people, said that in the Bill's development, 'the absence of disabled people's voices has been astonishing'. Whereas Dr Peter Prinsley said: 'As a young doctor, I found the measures that we're debating today completely unconscionable, but now I'm an old doctor, I feel sure this is an essential change.' He added: 'There is an absolute sanctity of human life, but we are not dealing with life or death, rather death or death. For there is also a sanctity of human dignity and fundamental to that is surely choice. Who are we to deny that?'
