Mantashe pulls back on BEE proposals for mining exploration

Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front.
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has changed clauses in the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) that would have imposed BEE requirements on previously exempt exploration companies and projects in the mining space.
The BEE requirements on the high-risk exploration arm of the mining sector provoked backlash from the mining industry, and Mantashe made comments last month that suggested he was not aware that the draft Bill contained such provisions — but if it did, he would correct them.
'Now, and in the future, there's no provision for BEE on exploration,' Mantashe said in late May during a media briefing at the conclusion of the AGM for the Minerals Council SA.
Earlier this week, Mantashe issued an erratum notice to correct the draft and remove the BEE requirements for exploration and prospecting.
'The granting of such rights will further the objects referred to in section 2(d) and comply with the broad-based socio-economic empowerment prescribed elements,' was in the original wording regarding prospecting, but that has now been removed.
South Africa's share of global exploration spend has collapsed from around 5% two decades ago to less than 1% in the face of a range of challenges, including massive applications backlogs that the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources hopes to address soon with a new mining cadastre.
Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front.
'The Minerals Council South Africa notes the gazetting of … corrections to the Draft Mineral Resources Development Bill,' said the council, the main mining industry body, in a terse statement.
'The Minerals Council continues to review the Bill amending the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and we will submit our perspectives within the scheduled timeline of 13 August 2025.'
Overall, the industry is not happy with the Bill, which once again moves the goalposts at a time when investors are crying for certainty in a sector that remains crucial for South Africa's low-growth and high-unemployment economy.
One bone of contention is embedding the Mining Charter into the legal framework, which could again unleash the 'once empowered, always empowered' debate, which the industry has already won in court.
'Once empowered, always empowered' means that once a company meets a threshold for black ownership, it does not have to keep topping up endlessly if black shareholders sell their stakes.
'The Bill in its current form does not encourage or sustain the growth and investment that the mining industry needs to realise its full potential to create employment, stimulate the economy and fulfil its social mandate,' said the Minerals Council. DM

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The South African

13 hours ago

• The South African

MTN under fire as senior management fills its pockets as share price falls

Telecommunications giant MTN Group is under fire from shareholders after nearly R249 million was paid to its executives and board members during 2024 – a year in which the company's share price fell by 21%. At its most recent Annual General Meeting (AGM) in late May, 40.82% of shareholders voted against the company's remuneration implementation report, falling short of the 75% approval threshold required for the non-binding advisory resolution to pass. The company's remuneration policy itself also faced scrutiny, with 24.34% voting against it. The 2024 Remuneration Report shows: Group CEO Ralph Mupita earned R64.75 million earned Group CFO Tsholofelo Molefe received R33.6 million received MTN SA CEO Charles Molapisi took home R26.3 million took home Senior VP Ebenezer Asante earned R37.8 million In total, MTN's top executives were paid nearly R198 million. Meanwhile, non-executive directors collectively received R51.4 million, with Chairman Mcebisi Jonas earning R7.37 million. The generous compensation packages stood in sharp contrast to MTN's 2024 stock performance. The share price declined from R117.00 on 1 January to R91.99 by year-end, prompting dissatisfaction among shareholders who saw their investments shrink. This disconnect between executive remuneration and shareholder returns has been a long-standing point of contention. Many investors argue that pay should be more closely tied to company performance and shareholder value creation. Following the AGM, MTN issued a statement via the JSE's Stock Exchange News Service (SENS) acknowledging the shareholder dissent. The company invited those who voted against the resolution to submit concerns in writing and attend a scheduled engagement session on 26 June 2025. 'We value the insights from our shareholders and remain committed to aligning executive pay with long-term strategic goals,' said Dr Khotso Mokhele, chair of MTN's Human Resources and Remuneration Committee. Despite defending the remuneration structure as 'fair, competitive, and performance-driven,' MTN now faces mounting pressure to rethink its pay philosophy, especially in light of lackluster returns to shareholders. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

The Citizen

a day ago

• The Citizen

Tobacco Bill bans sale of loose cigarettes – informal traders fear bankruptcy

A clause in the Bill bans the sale of single cigarettes, and if a person is found selling a 'loose' cigarette, they can be fined and/or imprisoned. The Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill in South Africa prohibits the sale of single cigarettes (or loose cigarettes), which informal traders say could bankrupt their businesses. It also regulates other aspects of tobacco control, including public smoking, advertising, and packaging requirements. The Portfolio Committee on Health discussed the impact of the Bill on businesses earlier this week. Members have completed public hearings in all provinces and are now taking oral submissions in parliament. ALSO READ: Why is parliament dragging its feet with the Tobacco Bill? Tobacco Bill Mampapatla Madikoto, Limpopo Small, Medium Enterprises and Hawkers Association general secretary, told members of the portfolio committee that the ban on single cigarettes would cripple their operations, as many of their customers not only buy cigarettes but also other items. A clause in the Bill bans the sale of single cigarettes. If a person is found selling a 'loose' cigarette, they can be fined and/or imprisoned. He added that there are many reasons why people decide to buy single cigarettes, including a box being too expensive, or they are trying to control their smoking habit. Display of tobacco products Madikoto added that the clause will affect approximately two million informal traders, hawkers, spaza shop owners and home-based operators across the country. The proposed Control of Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill aims to strengthen these measures further by introducing even stricter regulations. This includes banning the display of tobacco products at the point of sale, regulating electronic nicotine delivery systems, and potentially moving towards plain packaging. He told the members that the Bill's ban on displaying cigarettes on countertops or tables is impractical. ALSO READ: Tobacco bill won't curb smoking in the least Smoking outdoors The proposed Bill also seeks to hold traders liable if their customers are found smoking near their stalls in outdoor public places that are designated nonsmoking areas. Currently, tobacco legislation prohibits smoking in indoor public places, except for designated smoking areas that can be up to 25% of the indoor area. However, the government is considering a complete ban on smoking in indoor public places and certain outdoor public areas. The owner of the restaurant/pub, or employer, will be responsible for ensuring that the public space designated as a nonsmoking area is smoke-free. Selling online Madoda Khuzwayo, CEO and founder of SIP, told the committee that the Bill discriminates against online shopping. The Bill seeks to ban the sale and offer for sale of tobacco products online. Khuzwayo, who sells alcohol and tobacco products online, said this clause is unfair, as selling such products contributes significantly to his business. He highlighted that online retailers will not be able to list any tobacco products, while larger physical retailers are permitted to do so. ALSO READ: Pressure mounts for government to pass Tobacco Bill Underage smoking One of the reasons for the strict measures is to control underage smoking, which Khuzwayo has addressed in his business. 'When someone buys alcohol or cigarettes through our business, they will need to produce a physical identification document upon delivery, which will be captured into the system. 'But it is close to impossible for underage smoking to be prevented if children need to go into the store to make a purchase, because some look older and there will be no need to ask for proof of identity,' he added. He said the government can check online retailers' data to prove that alcohol and tobacco are not being sold to minors. Additionally, most of the websites that sell these items block minors. Khuzwayo has requested that the government consider removing the clause banning online tobacco sales. He highlighted that without the necessary amendments, the Bill risks discriminating against small and medium enterprises (SMEs), as e-commerce is many SMEs' main source of revenue. 'Without amendments, the Bill entrenches inequality, especially in townships, and excludes emerging small business players,' he said. NOW READ: Budget 3.0: Alcohol and cigarette prices will increase — here's by how much

IOL News

2 days ago

• IOL News

Mantashe faces criticism over changes to mining law draft

Activists and experts have accused Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy Gwede Mantashe of bowing to pressure from powerful mining companies. South Africa's Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy, Gwede Mantashe, is facing strong backlash over his recent changes to the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill. Critics say the revisions favour big mining interests at the expense of communities, the environment and the national push for economic transformation. Two key changes in the updated draft have sparked outrage. The first is the removal of the requirement for Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) participation in applications for prospecting rights. The second is the scrapping of a clause that required ministerial approval when control of a listed company holding mining rights changes. Activists and experts have accused Mantashe of bowing to pressure from powerful mining companies. David van Wyk, a respected researcher in the field, questioned the minister's intentions. 'Prospecting is where it all begins,' Van Wyk said. 'Companies make millions by selling these rights after identifying valuable mineral deposits. Without BEE, transformation becomes just a word. And when companies change hands without any oversight, it makes it easy for them to dodge their environmental and social responsibilities.' Van Wyk also warned about the consequences of poor regulation in the sector. 'We already have more than six thousand abandoned mines in this country. These are environmental disasters, and the communities around them suffer the most. If the minister is not informed when ownership changes, there is no one to hold accountable when something goes wrong.' Christopher Rutledge, director of the organisation Mining Affected Communities in Action, said the changes show how the government has shifted its loyalty from people to business. 'The Bill's amendments are not about fixing technical errors. They are a political decision that turns away from the goals of transformation and accountability,' he said. Rutledge believes the removal of BEE requirements in prospecting is a deliberate decision to maintain control of the industry in the hands of the same elite. 'This ensures the same old faces keep control of the mineral wealth. It opens the door to secret deals, takeovers and asset sales, with no regard for the people on the ground or the environment.' He added that the state needs to play a far stronger role. 'Public ownership of minerals and the mining process is the way forward. The revenue should support a sovereign wealth fund that benefits all South Africans, not just a few. Right now, the state-owned mining company barely has a footprint in the sector, and no one knows how much has gone into the sovereign fund.' Trade union federation Cosatu has also raised concerns. Spokesperson Mathews Parks said the federation would engage with Mantashe to get clarity on the goals of the changes. 'Legislation must be aligned with economic transformation. We cannot afford to backtrack now.' Meanwhile, the Minerals Council South Africa has welcomed some parts of the draft but says more work is needed to support investment. Public comments on the Bill will close in August, but for now, the debate continues over whether the government is acting in the national interest or putting profits first.