News From New Mexico: A Cauldron Of Energy Uncertainty
Oil and gas production is one ingredient in New Mexico's cauldron of energy uncertainty, and it's a big one. This analysis points to several dilemmas, in recent news, that are simmering, and explains what may happen in the near future.
35% of New Mexico's revenue comes from oil and gas fields in the Delaware basin, part of the Permian basin that stretches into West Texas. Crude production exceeded 2 MMbopd (million barrels per day) in 2024, which was double that in 2019 before the Covid dropout in 2020. The entire Permian basin reached 6 MMbopd in 2024, about half of total U.S. crude production.
But what will happen if the price of oil stays low? If the WTI price of oil stays at $63/barrel, Permian drilling of well inventory will last seven - ten years. This is better than three - four years for the Eagle Ford in East Texas, and the Bakken in North Dakota. But it illustrates one potential downside if the price of oil stays low.
Another downside is a projection by Vicki Hollub, CEO of Occidental, who said crude production in the Permian could peak by next year, due to cutbacks in capital spending.
Oil and gas production is one ingredient in the cauldron of uncertainties because 35% of New Mexico's revenue comes from the Delaware basin. Another ingredient is that oil and gas globally produces about 50% of greenhouse gases (GHG) that cause global warming. The oil and gas industry is responsible for the largest fraction of emissions in New Mexico at 41%.
Although there is a growing industry of renewable energies in New Mexico, and lots of government support, the revenue from this will never replace the revenue from oil and gas.
Another dilemma faced by New Mexico is the enormous volume of water that flows to the surface along with oil and gas—so called produced water. 2 billion barrels or 84 billion gallons are produced each year. Right now, this water is left in evaporation ponds, or disposed of in injected wells, or recycled and cleaned to be used in the next frac job. Disposal by deep injection is problematic because it has created earthquakes of magnitude 5, although this has been more of an issue in West Texas.
The dilemma is exacerbated because the Permian basin is largely a desert, and New Mexico is in a drought—some say a 20-year drought. A solution that cries out loud is to purify the produced water enough that it can be used in agriculture, or perhaps even drinking water. There are a range of systems from multi-stage filtration up to commercial desalination that can be used, but to achieve the required purification would be costly.
Twelve pilot projects are underway to test the effects of treated water on agriculture and manufacturing. But the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission stepped in last month to prohibit the next step—discharge of treated water to ground or streams. The Commission fears that chemicals still in treated produced water will be toxic, but there are no regulations governing their use.
As well as water treatment, the state would need to oversee storage, transport, and disposal of the water. Although there are no regulations for this, NMED (New Mexico Environmental Department) plans to use results from the pilot projects to design new standards, technical and operational, that would allow re-use of produced water to help resolve the fresh water problem in New Mexico.
Chaco Canyon was a central gathering place of Indian tribes around 1100 A.D. Eight man-made roads extended radially outwards, some for 50 miles or so. The large collection of ruins at Chaco include separate multi-story buildings and many circular kivas, underground religious centers. Carvings in sheltered sandstone clefts and alignment of structural walls reveal native knowledge of yearly seasons of the sun and moon.
Chaco Canyon lies in the San Juan basin, once the largest gas basin in the U.S. Chaco has been simmering in the New Mexico cauldron for a number of years. In 2023, Secretary of the Interior, Deb Haaland issued an order to restrict drilling or development of oil and gas operations to outside a 10-mile radius around Chaco. This was to enlarge the area of protection around Chaco Canyon, which is sacred to many Indian tribes. But not all tribes, as the Navajo Tribe did not live in the region until hundreds of years after 1100 A.D.
The details of this issue have been spelled out separately. Chaco sits close to the southern edge of the oily window of the San Juan basin. In 2023, the Navajo Nation had wanted to specify a smaller radius of 5 miles, because some members owned mineral rights to some of the land around Chaco. They filed a lawsuit against the Interior Department and BLM (Bureau of Land Management) in January of 2025, arguing to revoke the 10-mile limit because it harmed the profits of lessees who were economically small operators.
Into the breach has stepped the Trump administration. New Interior Secretary, Doug Burgum, has told the BLM to reconsider the 10-mile limit. The All Pueblo Council of Governors has resisted this, but not the Navajo Nation. Given the Trump government's directive to revise or rescind actions that are an 'undue burden on the development of domestic energy resources', it's hard to see the BLM keeping the 10-mile protective limit at Chaco.
New Mexico was a hotspot of uranium mining back in the 1950s and 1960s when the cold war was at its height. Over 1,000 uranium mines came into existence, many that employed miners from the Navajo Nation. The uranium was bought by the U.S. government to be used for nuclear defense purposes. Church Rock just outside Gallup was an active mining site, and the scene of a bad flood that polluted the Rio Puerco in 1979—the largest-ever radiation accident in the U.S.
The health effects of mining, notably lung disease due to radon gas attached to mining dust, is a dark chapter in the history of mining. Lack of epidemiological studies and government bureaucracy delayed cleanup efforts for surface tailings radiation, and underground contamination of aquifers.
The U.S. Congress eventually passed RECA, an act that provided reparations to people affected by uranium mining and by nuclear tests in Nevada. The law was due to expire in June 2024, but the Senate passed a bill to extend it by six years. However, the House never brought it to a vote, so the law has expired. Under RECA, the government has paid claims of 41,000 people, and paid $2.6 billion in reparations, the majority to recipients from the Nevada nuclear testing site.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 opened a door to nuclear power as an alternative energy source, to the tune of $30 billion. This would include reopening of old mines, many of which lie on Native land, as well as new mines.
The Trump government appears to have taken another giant step toward uranium mining by another new executive order on May 23 that prioritized nuclear fission reactors, traditional and SMRs (small modular reactors). This was ostensibly to provide burgeoning new electricity needed for U.S. data centers. According to the Secretary of Energy, 'Nuclear has the potential to be America's greatest source of energy addition. It works whether the wind is blowing, or the sun is shining, is possible anywhere and at different scales.'
Given the state's history, a lot of tension will arise if uranium mining is allowed to resume in New Mexico. Untrammeled growth of uranium mining and nuclear generation of electricity may ignite a spark to the ever-present fear of radioactivity in mining and disposal of nuclear waste, which are always simmering in the New Mexico cauldron of uncertainty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This millennial was rejected from 200 jobs—now he makes millions charging wealthy families six-figures to get their kids into the Ivy Leagues
Like many Gen Zers today, after graduating from college, Christopher Rim was rejected from more than 200 job applications—including at top firms like Goldman Sachs and BCG. But, he says, 'that was the best thing that could have happened to me.' Now, he's making millions disrupting the $3 billion college consultancy industry. How much would you pay to help your child get accepted into Harvard, Stanford, or MIT? $10,000? What about $100,000, or even $750,000? Hundreds of families are paying six-figure price tags to a young millennial named Christopher Rim to get their kids into their top college choices. As the founder and CEO of college admissions consultancy group Command Education, Rim has become a wizard of sorts for how to crack the Ivy League code. Over the last five years, 94% of his clients have been accepted into their top three college choices. And while the $3 billion college consultancy industry may sound like another leg-up the rich have to get their children into schools, Rim says it's about helping students reach their dreams and unlock their potential. After all, on average, only about 5% of pupils who want to go to an Ivy League school actually get in. 'You have one chance. That's it,' the 30-year-old tells Fortune. 'You can't go back to college or apply to these selective universities again.' Unlocking potential is something that hits home in Rim's own story toward success, both in his own journey trying to attend an Ivy League school as well as trying to find his footing as a young graduate. As a public high school student in New Jersey, Rim was told he'd never be cut out for an Ivy League institution. While he admits himself that he wasn't the smartest kid in his class, he had a mission to attend Yale University, and decided to apply even when his guidance counselor pleaded with him to settle for Rutgers University, an in-state public school. Out of the nearly two dozen students from his school who applied to Yale, he was the only one who got in—despite having a lower GPA than the rest. As a student, he kept the ball rolling by charging high schoolers $50 to edit their admissions essays and advising them on how to strengthen their resumes and 'authentically stick out.' After his first two clients got into MIT and Stanford, he realized he might have a gift, and thus Command Education was born in 2015 in his New Haven, Conn., dorm room. However, Rim still wasn't sure it was the key to a post-grad career. Then came the time to apply for jobs. 'I applied to over 200 jobs senior year. All my friends were getting jobs at Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, BCG, major corporations. I got none. I got zero,' he says. 'And that was the best thing to have that happen to me.' Instead of letting the rejection defeat him—like what happens to millions of young adults each year—Rim used it as motivation to help others reach their dream college, too. 'Everyone has this potential, and I was able to instill that confidence and belief and motivate them through the process,' Rim says. 'I think that was a major reason as to why my students succeeded, which, of course, led me to succeed with the business.' So far, Command Education has guided over 1,500 students into top-tier schools, with acceptance rates that soar far above the national average—more than seven times higher at places like Harvard, Caltech, and the University of Chicago. And with parents investing close to $100,000 on average for his services, Rim isn't just shaping student futures, he's built a booming business in the process. While he declined to comment on his company's revenue, his average fee and high demand would put that figure in the millions. (Rim also explained that the $750,000 price tag was a one-off example that included working with a student starting in middle school and having unlimited access to services.) With or without professional help, getting into a top institution is no easy feat. In fact, over the last decade, colleges have only gotten more selective in the students they accept. However, it's not because schools have gotten much smaller in size, it's because more students are applying. For Harvard's class of 2028, who just finished their first year of college, over 54,000 applicants battled for just 1,970 seats; an acceptance rate of 3.6%. That's up from about 37,000 applicants competing for 2,080 spots for the class of 2019, an acceptance rate of 5.6%. Even then, not all accepted students ultimately choose to attend that school. At the same time, college is only getting more expensive. Tuition and fees at private universities have increased by about 41%, when adjusted for inflation, according to U.S. News and World Report. And while some colleges have made attempts at softening the burden for many lower-income students—like Harvard making tuition free for families making less than $200,000—attending a top college remains an uphill battle for many students. However, Rim says services like his aren't making the process less equitable, but rather helping young people find their true calling. 'I know I am not helping my student take a spot away from a middle-class student or a lower-income family student,' Rim adds. 'I'm helping other wealthy families and their kids compete against other wealthy families.' And despite some students feeling that their degree wasn't worth the cost, Rim says demand is higher than it's ever been before. But young people are expanding their interests outside of the traditional Ivy Leagues to other top-ranked schools like Duke University, Vanderbilt University, and the University of North Carolina. 'If you want to get a specific job at a bank, consulting firm, or become a doctor or lawyer, your school is going to matter a lot,' he tells Fortune. But at the end of the day, he says it's about finding students' passions and interests. 'I really will never tell a student, join the debate team, join band club, join newspaper club, because we think that's what colleges want. In fact, it's the total opposite,' Rim says. 'Do what you want.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You Can Only Buy 1 Cathie Wood Stock in 2025, It Should Be This
Cathie Wood, founder, CEO and chief investment officer of Ark Invest, continues to make headlines for her high-conviction approach to disruptive innovation. Her flagship fund, the Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK), has posted a 52.9% return in the past 52 weeks, reflecting investor confidence. Known for identifying transformational themes early, Wood maintains focused exposure to industries like genomics, autonomous technology, and blockchain. Within this context, Natera (NTRA) has drawn sharp relevance. The company leads in cell-free DNA testing and precision medicine, aligning directly with Ark's long-term thesis. CoreWeave Just Revealed the Largest-Ever Nvidia Blackwell GPU Cluster. Should You Buy CRWV Stock? AMD Is Gunning for Nvidia's AI Chip Throne. Should You Buy AMD Stock Now? The Saturday Spread: Statistical Signals Flash Green for CMG, TMUS and VALE Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! For investors seeking a stock that fits the Ark playbook, Natera may represent one of the most fundamentally aligned additions under Wood's current investment lens. Based in Austin, Texas, stands Natera (NTRA), a pioneer in the field of cell-free DNA and genetic testing. The $23.3 billion biotech firm's arsenal includes powerful offerings like Panorama for prenatal screening, Signatera for real-time cancer surveillance, and Prospera, which sharpens the lens on transplant rejection. Over the last three months, the stock has climbed 16.9%, leaving the broader S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 5.4% gain behind. On May 8, Natera opened the books on its first-quarter, and the results exceeded Wall Street expectations. Investors responded swiftly, with the stock inching up 1.5% the same day. Natera posted $501.8 million in total revenues, a 36.5% year-over-year increase that soared past Wall Street's $443.3 million forecast. Behind those numbers were powerhouse operations. The company processed 855,100 tests during the quarter, up 16.2% year over year. Women's health volumes climbed meaningfully over the fourth quarter, but it was Signatera that stole the spotlight. The personalized, tumor-informed molecular residual disease test reached new heights, recording its highest volume quarter ever. Clinical volumes for Signatera grew 52% year over year, with a sequential gain of roughly 16,005 units over Q4, marking the most significant quarter-on-quarter growth to date. Gross margins landed at 63.1%, reflecting solid cost discipline. Moreover, Natera's net loss narrowed 1% from the year-ago period to $66.9 million. Also, the company managed to trim its loss per share by 10.7% to $0.50, outperforming analysts' projections of a $0.59 loss per share. As for liquidity, the balance sheet remained in good shape. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash climbed to $973.8 million, up from $945.6 million on Dec 31, 2024. CEO Steve Chapman has made no secret of the firm's long-term vision. He believes Signatera could ultimately generate over $5 billion in annual revenue, and he emphasized that they are still playing in the shallow end of a much deeper market pool. In a move that reinforced this optimism, Natera has raised its full-year revenue guidance to between $1.94 billion and $2.02 billion. That is a $70 million boost from the midpoint of its earlier outlook, pointing to a 26% year-over-year growth. On the other hand, analysts expect the Q2 2025 loss per share to widen 100% year over year to $0.60. For FY25, the loss per share is projected to increase 37% to $2.10, but FY26 could bring relief, with a forecast 64.8% narrowing to $0.74, hinting that profitability may finally be within reach. Analysts seem to be singing in harmony when it comes to NTRA, marking it with a firm 'Strong Buy' rating. Out of 19 analysts following the stock, 16 have given it an enthusiastic 'Strong Buy' rating, and the remaining three have placed their bets on a 'Moderate Buy.' The average price target of $200.42 represents potential upside of 17.6%. Meanwhile, the Street-High target of $251 hints at a 48% climb from current levels. Such projections do not come lightly and often reflect deep-rooted confidence in future earnings momentum and strategic execution. On the date of publication, Aanchal Sugandh did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Make Over a 2.4% One-Month Yield Shorting Nvidia Out-of-the-Money Puts
Nvidia Inc. (NVDA) stock is cheap based on free cash flow (FCF) price targets. Investors can short out-of-the-money (OTM) NVDA put options to make a 1-month 2.4% yield. This is at 5% lower exercise prices, providing a cheaper potential buy-in point for investors. NVDA closed at $143.85 on Friday, June 20. In my last Barchart article on May 30, I argued that NVDA stock was worth $191.34 per share. That is still one-third (+33.0%) higher than Friday's price. The Saturday Spread: Statistical Signals Flash Green for CMG, TMUS and VALE Make Over a 2.4% One-Month Yield Shorting Nvidia Out-of-the-Money Puts Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! This article will discuss one way to play NVDA by shorting out-of-the-money (OTM) puts. That way, an investor can set a potentially lower buy-in point and get paid for this. But first, let's look at Nvidia's free cash flow and the related price target. In my last Barchart article, I showed that Nvidia's Q1 FCF of $26.125 billion represented an astounding 59.3% of quarterly revenue. That means almost 60% of its sales revenue goes straight into its bank account with no cash outlays on it (even after record-high capex spending). Moreover, I showed that over the last 12 months (LTM), its FCF margin was almost 50% (48.5%). That implies going forward its FCF could rise to a record high. For example, based on analysts' next 12-month (NTM) projections of $225 billion, using a 50% FCF margin free cash flow could exceed $112 billion: $225b x 50% FCF margin = $112.5b FCF How to value NVDA? Let's think about what the market might be projecting. For example, let's assume the market believes Nvidia will make $100 billion in FCF, slightly less than 4 times its Q1 FCF. So, given its market cap today of $3,508 billion, that represents a 2.85% yield: $100b/$3,508 = 0.0285 = 2.850% FCF yield So, using our NTM forecast of $112.5b, its market cap could rise to $3.75 trillion $112.5b / 0.0285 = $3,947 billion NTM mkt cap That represents an upside of 12.5% from today's market cap: $3,947b / $3,508b mkt cap today = 1.125 So, that makes its target price at least 12.5% more: $143.85 x 1.125 = $161.83 However, if Nvidia makes better than 50% FCF margins over the next year, its target price could be much higher. For example, even a 10% higher FCF margin leads to a 24% upside: 0.55 x $225b = $123.75b FCF $123.75b / 0.0285 FCF yield = $4,342 billion mkt cap; $4,342b / $3,508b = 1.2377 = +23.8% upside 1.1238 x $143.85 p/sh = $178 per share The bottom line is that Nvidia's strong FCF and FCF margins will lead to a significantly higher price, between $162 and $178 per share. This coincides with what other analysts are projecting. For example, 66 analysts surveyed by Yahoo! Finance show an average price target of $172.60. Similarly, Barchart's mean survey shows $174.83 per share. In addition, which tracks analysts who have written recently on NVDA stock, has an average price of $179.87 from 40 analysts. My analysis above shows you why these analysts have these higher price targets. But there is no guarantee NVDA will rise to these targets over the next year. So, one way to play this is to sell short out-of-the-money (OTM) puts in nearby expiry periods. In my May 30 Barchart article, I suggest selling short the $128 strike price put expiring July 3 for a 3.125% yield at a 3.72% out-of-the-money (i.e., below the trading price) strike. For example, the midpoint premium was $4.00, so $4.00/$128.00 equals 0.03125. That was for a one-month play (34 days to expiry or DTE). Today, that strike price has a much lower premium of just 39 cents. So, an investor has already made $3.61 (i.e., $4.00-$0.39), or a net 2.82% yield (i.e., $3.61/$128 = 0.028). It makes sense to roll this over and set a new one-month short-put play. That means buying back the short put at 39 cents and reinvesting at a slightly higher strike price one month out. For example, look at the July 25 expiration period (i.e., 34 DTE). It shows that the $137 strike price put options expiring July 25, i.e., 4.7% below Friday's price, have a $3.40 midpoint premium. That means a new short seller of these puts can make a 2.48% yield over the next month (i.e., $3.40/$137.00 = 0.0248). For less risk-averse investors, a 2.70% yield is possible at the $138 strike price(i.e., $3.72/$138.00 = 0.02696). This strike price is just 4% below Friday's close. Moreover, even after rolling the prior trade over, the net yield with the $137 strike put play is still 2.20% (i.e., $3.40-0.39 = $3.01/$137.00 = 0.02197). So, that means over two months, a short seller of these OTM puts will have made 2.82% plus 2.20%, or 5.02% total (2.51% on average for both months). In addition, an investor's breakeven point, even if NVDA falls to $137.00 over the next month, is lower: $137 - $3.40 = $133.60 p/ sh That is -7.125% below Friday's closing price. In other words, this is a good way to set a lower buy-in point for new investors in NVDA stock. For existing investors, it is a way to potentially lower their average cost, as well as produce extra income on their holdings. And don't forget, given the target price of $172.60, the breakeven point presents a potential upside of over 29%: $172.60/$133.60-1 = 1.292 -1 = +29.2% upside The bottom line is that investors can potentially make over a 2% yield over the next month shorting these out-of-the-money (OTM) puts. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
