My Hero Academia Vigilantes– Episode 4 challenges Koichi's illegal hero path

My Hero Academia Vigilantes– Episode 4 challenges Koichi's illegal hero path (credit- IMDb)
My Hero Academia: Vigilantes is a prequel spin-off to the hit anime My Hero Academia. But this time, the spotlight isn't on Deku or Bakugo it's on Koichi, a college student with a small mobility quirk who uses it to save lives.
In a world where using a quirk without a hero license is illegal, Koichi becomes a vigilante, someone doing good while breaking the law. His story asks a powerful question: Can you be a hero if society says you're not?
Vigilantes Episode 4 Ingenium guides koichi during villain attack
Episode 4 of Vigilantes slows down after last week's intense setup. A drug that dangerously boosts quirks is still spreading across the city, but instead of a big fight, this episode focuses on quiet character moments.
One standout is the return of Tensei Iida, also known as Ingenium, the pro hero and older brother of Tenya Iida from the main series. He hasn't had much screen time in My Hero Academia, so seeing him here is a treat especially for fans who know his tragic fate.
Tensei joins Koichi during a villain attack and gives advice on using his quirk more effectively. It briefly feels like a big turning point; maybe Tensei will offer Koichi a spot at his hero agency. But instead, he just says Koichi is 'right where he belongs.'
That moment could've gone deeper. Why can't vigilantes like Koichi join the pro system? Why is saving lives still considered illegal?
Koichi keeps breaking hero law
Throughout the episode, Koichi continues saving people in public, rarely hiding his identity. In a world with strict hero laws, this feels unrealistic. There's no real danger of arrest, no chase from the Hero Commission, and no moral pressure.
This could be a major source of tension. Should Koichi stop and wait until he can go legal? Or should he risk everything to help others now?
Episode 4 skips over that conflict, making the 'vigilante' label feel more like a title than a real issue.
Knuckleduster's dark side grows stronger
The most intense scenes in Episode 4 come from Knuckleduster, Koichi's rough mentor. He's reckless, possibly traumatized, and always on edge. His brief scenes add tension and mystery to an otherwise quiet episode.
Voice actor Jason Marnocha continues to shine in the English dub, making Knuckleduster sound like a man with nothing to lose. He's not just a fighter, he's someone broken, maybe even dangerous.
Fans are hoping for a bigger focus on his backstory soon.
Vigilantes Episode 4 – Drug villain returns, stakes still low
Meanwhile, the bee-themed villain reappears. She's working with a hidden supplier, trying to spread the quirk-enhancing drug more carefully.
Her dialogue feels like something from the League of Villains, but no direct connection has been made yet. And since none of these drug dealers show up in the main timeline, it's still unclear how this story fits into the bigger My Hero Academia world.
Episode 4 delivers emotional character moments, especially with Ingenium and Knuckleduster. But the story doesn't push Koichi's illegal status hard enough. Without real consequences or internal struggle, his 'vigilante' role lacks weight.
The show may be building to something bigger but for now, the pacing feels slow, and the tension remains low. Fans of My Hero Academia may enjoy the extra character depth, but they're still waiting for that big moment.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

34 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Emergency: From censorship to arrests, when culture, artists came in crosshairs

In January 1976, state-owned television broadcaster Doordarshan started airing a show called Geeton Bhari Shaam. A brainchild of Sanjay Gandhi, the son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, it brought together some of the most popular singers and actors of the time to extol the 20-point programme, a set of socio-economic development initiatives initiated by the government. Actor Dilip Kumar delivered a four-minute speech on the importance of population control. Singer Asha Bhonsle and music composer RD Burman sang the popular number, Ek Main Aur Ek Tu, from the 1975 film, Khel Khel Mein, with a full-instrument orchestra that included Rishi Kapoor on the tambourine. Another popular singing duo, Lata Mangeshkar and Mukesh, performed a song from the hit film, Kabhie Kabhie, as Amitabh Bachchan, Shashi Kapoor and Rakhi (the cast of the film) stood beside them. But what Doordarshan didn't show was the sordid truth about why the most popular singer of the time was missing. PREMIUM Movies like Kissa Kursee Ka and Aandhi, which had characters that seemed to be based on then PM Indira Gandhi and peopleclose to her, were banned after Emergency was imposed. (IMDB) On June 25, 1975, President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed signed the Emergency proclamation on account of 'internal disturbances' that 'threatened the security'. Indira Gandhi's government censored the press, jailed opposition leaders, and sterilised thousands of people. Cinema, the stage and the canvas bore the brunt, too. Outspoken playwrights and actors were vindictively crushed or harassed. Films like Kissa Kursi Ka and Aandhi were banned, and artistes were made examples of. Kishore Kumar was one of them. 2 In April 1976, then information and broadcasting minister Vidya Charan Shukla deputed CB Jain, joint secretary in the ministry, and PV Krishnamoorthy, the director-general of Doordarshan, to visit Bombay (as Mumbai was then called) and meet industry representatives. The meeting took place on April 29, and included producers and directors such as GP Sippy, BR Chopra, Subodh Mukherjee and Sriram Bohra, the head of the All India Producers Council. However, Kumar refused to show up. When Jain phoned Kumar asking to pay him a visit at home, Kumar replied that his doctor had advised against meeting people on account of heart trouble, and in any case, Kumar did not want to sing on stage or television. Incensed, Jain hung up. A witch hunt ensued. On May 4, 1976, Kumar's songs were banned by the Air India Radio and Doordarshan. Overnight, his voice was written out of all broadcasts — authors Aniruddha Bhattacharjee and Parthiv Dhar wrote in the book Kishore Kumar: The Ultimate Biography (2022)that even duets were played with only the female singer's voice. In 1977, the Janata Party-led government , formed after Indira Gandhi's defeat in the general elections, instituted a commission headed by former Chief Justice of India JC Shah to investigate the excesses committed during the 25-month-long Emergency. Shukla admitted to the commission that 'the team of I&B ministry officers [...] were unhappy over the attitude displayed by one of the leading artistes, Shri Kishore Kumar. Because of the feeling that Shri Kishore Kumar was not willing to cooperate with Akashvani and Doordarshan, some action was contemplated.' 'The harsh measures taken against Shri Kishore Kumar had a 'tangible effect' on film producers,' the commission's interim report read. 'Apart from the constitutional responsibility, [Shukla] is actually responsible for gross misuse of power,' it stated. Kumar wasn't the only one caught in the crosshairs of the then government. The censor board rationed raw film negative, and imposed arbitrary rules on what could be depicted on screen — images of liquor bottles and blood were cut; action sequences were limited to only 90 seconds at a time, with a total of only six sequences permitted — and it routinely asked directors to re-edit their films. In April 1975, Amrit Nahata, a film producer and Congress MP, submitted Kissa Kursi Ka, starring Shabana Azmi, Raj Babbar and Manohar Singh, to the censor board. The film was a parody on Indian politics and featured characters who seemed to be based on individuals close to Indira Gandhi. There was also a clear reference to Sanjay Gandhi's small-car project, and the alleged favouritism that helped set up his Maruti factory in Haryana. However, a review committee and the I&B ministry banned the film. All prints, including its masterproof, were burnt. Gulzar's Aandhi, starring Suchitra Sen and Sanjeev Kumar, was banned because the leads apparently bore an uncomfortable resemblance to Indira Gandhi and her husband, Feroze. 3 Ideological differences were subjected to worse punishment. On June 25, 1975, Snehalata Reddy and her husband, Pattabhirama Reddy, had just finished filming the Kannada film, Chanda Marutha (Wild Wind), which was based on the play by P Lankesh, Kranti Bantu Kranti, and dealt with themes of people's protests and state dictatorship. The film was shot in the couple's home, which was a well-known Bangalore landmark, where all manners of writers, artists, and filmmakers were welcome. Snehalata was soon picked up under the Maintenance of Internal Securities Act (MISA) after the Central Bureau of Investigation argued that she was a close associate of George Fernandes, a fellow socialist and later member of the Janata Party. She was eventually released in January 1977 due to her deteriorating health and died within days. The Emergency also saw artists create hard-hitting political critiques on stage and canvas, often at great risk. In the 1970s, Navjot Altaf, was a member of the Progressive Youth Movement (PROYOM), which was sympathetic to the Communist Party of India (Marxist - Leninist). The police used the Emergency to crack down on who it saw as sympathisers of the Naxalbari movement, an uprising of the rural and urban youth against the state. Navjot recalled hiding the cyclostyle machine on which they made PROYOM posters, and burning documents. In 1977, one of her drawings made in response to the Emergency showed a citizen wrestling with the monstrous tentacles of the state, Nancy Adajania said in the artist monograph, The Thirteenth Place. On stage, too, actors and playwrights responded to the corrupting influence of unchecked power. Utpal Dutt produced Bengali plays such as Barricade, Duswapaner Nagari (City of Nightmares), and Ebaar Rajar Pala (Enter the King), which were banned by the government. Vijay Tendulkar's Dambadweepcha Mukabala used a folk tale to satirise the Emergency and Indira Gandhi. 4 At the same time, the 1970s was a good decade for the business of films. In 1975, over 13,000 theatres dotted the country and box office collections of mainstream Hindi cinema crossed a billion dollars annually for the first time. Films such as Deewar and Sholay, depicting Bachchan as the Angry Young Man — devoid of political angst, but fuelled with the desire to do good — became blockbuster hits. The government also course-corrected its own media strategy during the Emergency. In order to recover loans from defaulting filmmakers, a report on New Indian Cinema brought out by the government in 1976, proffered the Film Finance Corporation (later the National Film Development Corporation) new criteria, such as 'Indianness in theme and approach', 'human interest stories', 'approachable characters', among others, to grant loans. According to film scholar Ashish Rajadhyaksha, this period complicated the state's influence on New Cinema, which emerged in the 1960s fuelled by FFC. The films, which already possessed an 'aesthetic of state control', were able to take on political issues and offer social and political critique, such as Satyajit Ray's Charulata (1964), Nayak (1966) and Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne (1968) as well as Mrinal Sen's Bhuvan Shome, Mani Kaul's Uski Roti and Basu Chatterjee's Sara Akash, all produced in 1969. During the Emergency, the Films Division, set up in 1948 to educate the public through short films and documentaries, was tasked with making 20 films to extol the virtues of the government's 20-point programme. The FD separately also made short films with titles such as Freedom from Fear, Kidhar Ja Rahe Ho [where are you going], Kaisa Andhera [what kind of darkness], and Our Indira that depicted young people who had lost their way through protests and violence. 'From colonial times, the state has been afraid of the cinema, because of its potential for disruption of law and order and thus, it has practised regulation in the name of public order. Indira Gandhi was an important figure in that she had made possible the New Cinema Movement of the late 60s-early 70s, with the formation of Film Finance Corporation that was not only aesthetic and well-made but also spoke for the state, as it were. So when the Emergency came along, the idea of cinema that was more supportive of the state was not a new one,' said Rajadhyaksha.

NDTV

8 hours ago

• NDTV

"Did A Lot Of Gymnastics...": Ex-Cricketers React To Rishabh Pant's Viral Somersault Celebration

Swashbuckling India batter Rishabh Pant's perfect somersault after smashing a breathtaking century in the first Test against England has caught the fancy of his legion of fans, while former players felt the acrobatic act that has since gone viral was a statement of his "unique" ways. Pant hit an entertaining 178-ball 134, his seventh Test ton, as India amassed 471 against England under new skipper Shubman Gill on Day 2 of the opening Test here on Saturday. Former India head coach Ravi Shastri said Pant probably had been doing gymnastics from a very young age. "Nothing wrong in that. That's him. Let him be. You know, he's different. At a very young age, he did a lot of gymnastics," said the cricketer-turned-commentator. "Even if I might have tried it, I think I might have... (but) it would have been to go into the pool," Shastri joked in a video posted by BCCI. Pant was involved in a horrific car accident in 2022, which left him grievously injured and his return to professional cricket is one of the most heartwarming stories in sport. To perform a somersault like that after undergoing several surgeries is indeed awe-inspiring. "Rishabh being Rishabh, he does something unique. He does it really well. I think it was unique. No one expected him to do that. I've never tried it. I'll need a lot of practice because that is something if you haven't tried, you can't do it," said India batter Cheteshwar Pujara. Former India cricketer Dinesh Karthik said he was in awe of Pant, as the wicketkeeper-batter was made of a different stuff. "Neither could I do the somersault like him, nor can I bat like him. I think on both fronts (keeping and batting) he has exceeded expectations. It's quite an effort to do that, actually. And he does it consistently," said Karthik, himself a wicketkeeper-batter. "When I was very young, my parents did make me participate in gymnastics and I did try and I was an utter failure at that. So, let's just leave it there because he (Pant) is doing it so much nicer when he celebrates it," added Karthik. "I think I've never seen anything like that in my life. With pads on as well. Amazing," said an English fan.

India.com

12 hours ago

• India.com

This 3-episode crime series will leave you numb, 18 women were hunted by..., climax will send chills down your spine, series is...

OTT platforms keep dropping a bunch of web shows, films, and a few docuseries every now and then, and we are here to help you binge-watch them. And today, we will be sharing another docuseries that will crawl under your skin and stay there. Some stories aren't just disturbing; they're nightmarishly real. Indian Predator: Beast of Bangalore, released in 2022, is one of them. An unflinching look into the twisted life of Karnataka's most feared serial killer: Umesh Reddy. Once a man in uniform, Umesh turned predator, hunting and brutally murdering women between 1996 and 2002. While 18 lives were reportedly lost to his savagery, he was convicted in just nine cases. Bengaluru's years of fear Reddy's crimes weren't just about murder—they were layered with horrifying details: sexual assaults, the chilling pattern of stealing women's clothes, and multiple escapes from police custody. He didn't just commit crimes—he haunted an entire city. His most infamous act? The 1998 murder of a widow in Peenya gripped Bengaluru in a wave of panic. The docuseries captures the fear and chaos through testimonies from victims' families, journalists, and police officers who witnessed the horror unfold firsthand. About the docuseries Directed by Ashwin Rai Shetty and produced by Vice Studios, the three-part docuseries uses dramatic reenactments to immerse viewers in the tense atmosphere of late-'90s Bengaluru. While some viewers felt the dramatisations lacked punch, the series succeeds in tracing Reddy's deeply disturbed psyche and the institutional lapses that let him slip through the cracks more than once. Streaming on… Each episode runs about 40–45 minutes and is available in multiple languages, including Hindi, English, Kannada, Tamil, Telugu, and Malayalam. With a modest IMDb rating of 6.2, it may not be flawless, but it's a hard-hitting chronicle of crime, fear, and a city held hostage by one man's monstrous instincts.