Artificial solar eclipse created by 'driverless' spacecraft in world first

Two "driverless" spacecraft have flown in perfect formation to create a small artificial solar eclipse and "achieve what no other mission has before", the European Space Agency (ESA) has said.
The synchronised flight orbiting Earth allowed one of the satellites to cast an 8cm-wide shadow onto its sister craft, flying 150 metres away, by blocking its view from space of the sun's surface.
The technique helped the space agency to capture detailed images of the sun's fiery outer atmosphere, called the corona.
Scientists increasingly need to study the corona, but find it hard to do so without an eclipse because the sun's surface is one million times brighter.
Solar wind, the flow of matter from the sun to outer space, and coronal mass ejections, the eruptions of plasma from the sun, can both interfere with modern technology like satellites – as well as cause displays of the Northern and Southern Lights.
It is hoped that studying the corona more closely will help scientists better understand solar weather, as well as answer questions about the sun itself.
The images from the Proba-3 mission were taken in March but have only been released by the space agency this week.
"We can create our eclipse once every 19.6-hour orbit, while total solar eclipses only occur naturally around once, very rarely twice a year," said Andrei Zhukov from the Royal Observatory of Belgium.
"On top of that, natural total eclipses only last a few minutes, while Proba-3 can hold its artificial eclipse for up to six hours."
The two satellites are able to align with the sun so that the 1.4-metre disc carried by one of the spacecraft, the Occulter, covers the bright disc of the sun and casts a shadow.
The other spacecraft, the Coronagraph, then takes a series of photographs with different exposure times.
The satellites flew within 150 metres of each other, with a precision "equal to the thickness of the average fingernail", according to the ESA.
Rather than relying on human drivers, who would have an "uncomfortable" delay of a fifth of a second while steering, the spacecraft autonomously lined themselves up with the sun in a manner "akin to driverless cars", the space agency said.
When the spacecraft blasted off in December last year, they had enough fuel to keep going for around two years.
After five years, it is expected they will burn up in the Earth's atmosphere.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

2 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Scientists issue urgent warning over drinking bottled BEER – as they discover a single glass bottle contains 50 times more dangerous microplastics than a plastic bottle

With temperatures set to hit 32°C in parts of the UK this weekend, many Brits will be looking forward to cracking open a cold beer in the sunshine. But a new study might make you think twice before reaching for your favourite bottle. Scientists fom the French food safety agency, ANSES, have discovered that drinks sold in glass bottles - including water, beer, and wine - contain more microplastics than those in plastic bottles. Initially, the researchers were baffled with this finding. However, they soon worked out that the microplastic particles were getting into the drinks through the paint on the outside of the bottles. 'We expected the opposite result,' Iseline Chaib, who conducted the research, told AFP. 'We then noticed that in the glass, the particles emerging from the samples were the same shape, color and polymer composition—so therefore the same plastic—as the paint on the outside of the caps that seal the glass bottles.' Worryingly, the long-term effects of these microplastics on human health remain unclear. Initially, the researchers were baffled with this finding. However, they soon worked out that the microplastic particles were getting into the drinks through the paint on the outside of the bottles. For the study, the team set out to evaluate the levels of microplastics in various popular drinks sold in France. Their analysis revealed an average of around 100 microplastic particles per litre in glass bottles of soft drinks, lemonade, iced tea, and beer. That was between five and 50 times higher than the rate detected in plastic bottles or metal cans. The researchers inspected the glass bottles, and discovered small scratches on the caps, likely created due to friction between the caps when they were stored. For water, both flat and sparkling, the amount of microplastic was relatively low in all cases, ranging from 4.5 particles per liter in glass bottles to 1.6 particles in plastic. Wine drinkers will also be relieved to hear that wine contained few microplastics — even glass bottles with caps. Soft drinks however contained around 30 microplastics per liter, while lemonade had 40 microplastics per liter. Beer was the worst offender, with a whopping 60 microplastics per liter. As it stands, the researchers do not know whether these microplastics represent a health risk. However, researchers are increasingly concerned about the capacity of such particles to be internalised within cells causing alterations in cellular function, particularly when interacting with organs in children and causing definitive alterations in adult life. There is a growing body of evidence that plastics could play a key role in early-onset cancer genesis, where healthy cells turn cancerous. Last year, a study found cancer cells in the gut spread at an accelerated rate after contact with microplastics. Experts have also raised the alarm about a potential between microplastics and reproductive health. Scientists warned in June that they found tiny plastic particles in men's sperm. Thankfully, the researchers say that drink manufacturers could easily reduce the amount of microplastics shed by bottle caps. As part of the study, the team tested a cleaning method involving blowing the caps with air, then rinsing them with water and alcohol. This was found to reduce microplastic contamination by 60 per cent. WHAT CAN MICROPLASTICS DO TO THE HUMAN BODY IF THEY END UP IN OUR FOOD SUPPLY? According to an article published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, our understanding of the potential human health effects from exposure to microplastics 'constitutes major knowledge gaps.' Humans can be exposed to plastic particles via consumption of seafood and terrestrial food products, drinking water and via the air. However, the level of human exposure, chronic toxic effect concentrations and underlying mechanisms by which microplastics elicit effects are still not well understood enough in order to make a full assessment of the risks to humans. According to Rachel Adams, a senior lecturer in Biomedical Science at Cardiff Metropolitan University, ingesting microplastics could cause a number of potentially harmful effects, such as: Inflammation: when inflammation occurs, the body's white blood cells and the substances they produce protect us from infection. This normally protective immune system can cause damage to tissues. An immune response to anything recognised as 'foreign' to the body: immune responses such as these can cause damage to the body. Becoming carriers for other toxins that enter the body: microplastics generally repel water and will bind to toxins that don't dissolve, so microplastics can bind to compounds containing toxic metals such as mercury, and organic pollutants such as some pesticides and chemicals called dioxins, which are known to causes cancer, as well as reproductive and developmental problems. If these microplastics enter the body, toxins can accumulate in fatty tissues.

Daily Mail​

4 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom's explosive row over 'cringeworthy' space flight... as Lauren Sanchez's wedding escalates tensions

Orlando Bloom and Katy Perry 's relationship imploded after the singer made her embarrassing journey into space — and now the embattled couple is sparring over who will attend the wedding of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez. The pair were already on the rocks when Perry made the widely-derided 11-minute trip to space in April. The Blue Origin flight, led by Sánchez, quickly became a PR disaster. Perry, in particular, became the internet's punching bag for her eccentric actions, hogging the camera while holding up a daisy - a nod to her daughter - in zero gravity, before bizarrely dropping to her knees and kissing the ground on touchdown. But she received little to no support from Bloom who blasted the 'embarrassing' debacle during an explosive row. 'He told her the whole thing looked ridiculous,' a source in Perry's camp told the Daily Mail. 'He said it was cringeworthy. Embarrassing. This was in the middle of a fight, and it hurt her feelings.' 'Of course she was hurt,' the source continued. 'Imagine going to space — motherf****** space — and your partner isn't impressed. She hoped he'd be more supportive.' Far from resolving their issues, tensions heightened as talk turned to who was going to attend Bezos and Sánchez's upcoming nuptials. The three-day celebration will reportedly kick off on June 24 in Venice, Italy. Bloom, 48, is on the guest list, but Perry, 40, will not be present at the celebrations, according to TMZ. 'She does have prior commitments, but it goes deeper than that,' our insider said, noting that the singer will still be on tour in Australia, which she first announced months before the wedding date and location were unveiled. 'Katy feels like they're really her friends more than his, and yet he's the one going to the wedding' they continued. 'And he's insistent that he goes, which annoys her because he's not particular close to either of them. She feels like it's a 'f*** you' to her from him.' What really stings is his apparent hypocrisy. 'He complains about her going to space, and then wants to go to the wedding of the people who made it possible for her to do this in the first place,' our insider said. 'That's difficult for her to accept. They're already spiraling and now the wedding is another thing that they have to fight about.' Their rocky patch comes at a time of professional turmoil for Perry, who has become the subject of hundreds of insulting internet memes. Earlier this month People claimed Katy's poorly-performing album 143 has caused 'tension' in her relationship with her fiancé. The singer's seventh studio album, 143, was released in September 2024, and received a largely negative response from fans as well as critics, who claimed the record sounds 'generated through AI.' While the album was meant to be empowering to women, critics slammed it as being reductive. Additionally, Perry shared snaps of a topless Bloom and talked freely about the couple's sex life, despite previous agreements to keep their personal life private, with sources at the time telling the Daily Mail that she was leveraging their romance amid the backlash. Her Lifetimes world tour has struggled to shift tickets in some countries, and clips of her futuristic stage show have been posted on Tiktok and Instagram hundreds of times, sparking millions of critical comments and jokes about the singer. A second source close to the couple told the Daily Mail that Bloom is annoyed that Perry is not listening to his advice. 'Katy has not been the same person for over a year now and Orlando has had enough,' they said. 'He advised her against this album. She did it. He advised her against space. She did it. He advised her against this tour and she did it.' 'From where Orlando stands, all he ever wanted was for Katy to be herself,' the source continued. 'He fell in love with her and who she is inside but this past year, he believes, has brought out the worst in her.' Perry and Bloom first met in January 2016. They had a brief breakup in 2017, but later reconciled by March 2018. The pair got engaged on Valentine's Day in 2019 and welcomed their daughter Daisy Dove in August 2020. They were reportedly set to marry in Japan in summer 2020 but were forced to postpone due to the coronavirus pandemic. It is unclear if the couple will survive this rough patch, but Bloom feels that Perry needs to center herself on the things that are important. 'He wants her to be happy and he wants her to be authentic,' the insider continued. 'He just wants her to stop and enjoy the life that she has built.'

Daily Mail​

7 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

HMP Mars: Living on the Red Planet will be like life in PRISON, expert warns

When humans finally settle on Mars, they will be stepping out into one of the most hostile environments in the solar system. But if we want to understand what life will really be like on the Red Planet, we should look to a hostile environment much closer to home. Life for astronauts in a Martian colony will be extremely similar to the conditions inside today's prisons, according to a leading space scientist. From isolation and a lack of personal space to bad food and a rigid routine, astronauts' conditions will be much closer to those of prisoners than explorers. Space agencies have spent decades studying extreme environments like Antarctic research bases to learn how humans might react to living in space. However, Professor Lucy Berthoud, a space systems engineer at the University of Bristol, says that prisons are already the closest parallel to life on Mars. Professor Berthoud told MailOnline that prisoners and astronauts both face: 'Too little personal space and privacy, overcrowding, poor food, unnecessary risks, rigid regimes with no autonomy, little variation in daily activities.' With astronauts trapped 140 million miles from home (225 million km), Professor Berthoud warns they may feel even more isolated than those locked in cells here on Earth. The biggest difference between astronauts and prisoners is obviously that one voluntarily takes a highly sought-after position, while the other has their freedom removed as a punishment. However, once the astronauts actually make it to a Martian colony, their conditions would be remarkably similar. Most obviously, both prisoners and astronauts will be physically trapped inside a cramped, dangerous environment with the same small set of people. In prisons, the European standard for a cell is four metres square per person, but overcrowding means that there is often much less space. On a Martian colony where resources are scarce and survival is the primary goal, astronauts are likely to face similarly cramped quarters. For example, NASA's Apollo Command and Service module, which took astronauts into lunar orbit, had just 6.2 cubic metres of space for three astronauts. This lack of privacy, combined with close proximity to other people, can lead to heightened stress and a much greater risk of conflict. Those tensions are only made worse by the fact that both prisons and Mars are extremely dangerous environments. While the sources of danger are extremely different, this persistent level of threat has the same effect on someone's psychology. Professor Berthoud says: 'Living in a high-risk environment would mean that your threat situation would be constantly switched on, which takes a toll on you psychologically and physically over the long term. 'Astronauts are specially selected to be good at dealing with emergency situations, unlike prisoners, but over the mission length this would still have an effect.' In addition to their living conditions, astronauts and prisoners may find themselves with similar lifestyles. In prisons, those incarcerated have their schedule planned out down to the minute with restrictions on everything from eating and sleeping to working and resting. This is exactly the same situation faced by the astronauts currently living on the International Space Station (ISS). Astronauts on the ISS h ave 15-hour working days with two hours of compulsory exercise, eight hours of work, and only a single hour of personal time. Professor Berthoud points out that this lack of control can lead astronauts to rail against or even disobey NASA's rigid mission guidelines. NASA's astronauts are subject to a gruelling daily schedule with just a single hour of personal time per day Likewise, for both prisoners and astronauts, one of the biggest issues is the availability of fresh, tasty, nutritious food. The UK government standard for prisoners' meals is set at £2.70 per person per day, which means that food is often of low nutritional value and famously unpleasant. While astronauts on Mars are likely to have much more expensive and pleasant food than prisoners, a lack of variety and fresh ingredients will still be a major restriction. On the ISS, NASA has invested huge resources into trying to make space food palatable. However, astronauts losing their appetite and failing to keep their weight up is a constant concern. However, the most important similarity is that both prisoners and astronauts on Mars would face heightened levels of isolation. Prisoners, just like astronauts on a remote planet, are taken away from society and have their contact with friends, family, and the outside world cut to a minimum. Even though astronauts willingly subject themselves to this isolation, they still face the same effects. Professor Berthoud says: 'I feel that the effects of isolation will be similar, but for Mars there will be the added factor of feeling very remote from everyone you care about and love. 'The fastest you could get home would be 6 months, so that would add to the isolation.' Although Professor Berthoud says that life on Mars could be similar to a prison, this doesn't mean NASA should model its Mars colonies after the prison environment. Mars bases should be equipped with measures to maximise privacy and autonomy, while astronauts should be given meaningful activities to help combat monotony. Ultimately, fixing these problems on Mars might even help us make prisons more habitable back here on Earth. Professor Berthoud says: 'I would suggest we would want to rethink prisons to be more like the ideal space base! 'I would imagine that more space, more autonomy, more personalisation, more sense of purpose would help anyone deal better with a stressful situation, even if they are there to keep society safe.' Mars has two miles of WATER buried at its equator - and scientists say it could support the first settlers on the Red Planet Despite once being home to lush oceans of liquid water billions of years ago, any traces of H2O on Mars today are well hidden. But experts say there's two miles of water buried beneath the surface in an area of the planet's equator, known as the Medusae Fossae Formation (MFF). The water is frozen as ice in a layer measuring over two miles (3.7km) thick, according to new data from the Mars Express spacecraft. If melted, the water would cover the whole of Mars in a layer of liquid up to 8.8 feet (2.7 metres) deep, and would be enough to fill Earth's Red Sea.