What is Fordow nuclear facility? Iran touts that all nuclear material is ‘in a safe place'
The atmosphere in Iran and Israel worsens each day, and now the world is looking at one of the most clandestine and highly secure nuclear installations of the Iranian state, the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant.
Although Israel has struck the facility in recent offensive action against the Iranian nuclear facilities, it is still unclear whether there was any damage to the facility and the extent of danger the facility can still pose.
ALSO READ| Israeli PM Netanyahu sparks uproar with his remark on 'personal loss of war': What did he say?
Located deep inside a mountain about 30 kilometres northeast of Qom, Fordow was originally a military base run by Iran's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
But in 2009, Iran announced publicly that it had taken the facility and changed it to a nuclear facility, only after knowing that Western intelligence agencies already knew about its presence.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have found uranium enriched to nearly weapons-grade levels in Fordow. During an unannounced inspection in early 2023, the IAEA detected uranium particles enriched to 83.7 per cent purity, just short of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear bomb.
'At the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, we found particles of high enriched uranium with enrichment levels well beyond the enrichment level declared by Iran,' IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said in March 2023, per AL Jazeera.
Despite Israel's airstrikes on Fordow last week, Grossi clarified on Monday that 'no damage has been seen at the site of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant or at the Khondab heavy water reactor.'
ALSO READ| 'Moral victory for Iran', says scientist as missile hits Israel's main Science institute
Recently, the site (Fordow), intended to become a non-nuclear research centre, has been unofficially bestowed again with the task of uranium enrichment, following the U.S withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA). In 2023, the IAEA stated that Iran had now linked centrifuges in a manner that would permit enriched levels to reach 60 per cent purity.
Iranian commander Mohsen Rezaei reassured citizens that 'all nuclear material is in a safe place,' per Daily Mail, brushing off concerns about the potential for conflict or sabotage.
Many experts believe that even if Israel wanted to fully neutralise Fordow, it likely lacks the firepower to do so from the air. The underground site is designed to withstand heavy bombardment.
Only the US has the kind of weapons, or rather the kind of bomb, namely the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which is a 30,000-pound bunker-busting bomb that can possibly bring down the reinforced walls of the place.
ALSO READ| Israel Iran conflict: Iran to meet EU leaders for nuclear talks, US still weighing options
Former U.S. President Donald Trump said earlier, 'I'm not looking to fight.'
'But if it's a choice between fighting and having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do. I may do it. I may not do it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IEAE) has confirmed that Israel's strikes on Friday resulted in damages to key buildings at the partially constructed Khondab (formerly known as Arak) Heavy Water Production Plant including its distillation unit. The nuclear watchdog's statement comes a day after the global body said no damages were 'initially visible'. 'While damage to the nearby Heavy Water Production Plant was initially not visible, it is now assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit,' the IEAE's latest statement on 'Updates on developments in Iran' said. No damage has been observed at Iran's other nuclear sites so far, it added. No radiological consequence was expected, IEAE's Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. This has been attributed to the reactor not being operational and not containing any nuclear material. 'There is a lot of nuclear material in Iran in different places, which means that the potential for a radiological accident with the dispersion in the atmosphere of radioactive materials and particles does exist,' he added, stressing on the possible nuclear safety risks. IAEA, in its statement, also sought to receive timely and regular technical information about the nuclear facilities and their respective sites in the country. 'This information is needed to promptly inform the international community and ensure an effective response and assistance to any emergency situation in Iran,' Director General Grossi said. He added that the agency was also in constant contact with other countries in the region amid the ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The Khondab reactor was hit on Thursday (June 19) as the both Israel and Iran continued to trade strikes on the seventh day of the conflict. The Israeli strikea also damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. So far, Israel has announced that its attacks have hit prominent Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. With AP inputs
News18
42 minutes ago
- News18
What Is Operation Sindhu? Why Was It Launched? Top Queries Demystified Amid Israel-Iran War
Last Updated: Unlike Operation Sindoor, Operation Sindhu is not a military strike. It is non-combatant and evacuation-focused. Months after Operation Sindoor, the government of India has launched Operation Sindhu. The similar sounding names have led to confusion among some people. While Operation Sindoor was in retaliation to Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Operation Sindhu has been initiated amid the Iran-Israel conflict. What's The Difference Between Operation Sindoor & Operation Sindhu Unlike Operation Sindoor, Operation Sindhu is not a military strike. It is non-combatant and evacuation-focused. Sindhu was launched on June 18 to evacuate Indian nationals from Iran amid rising fears of an all-out Israeli-American military strikes on Iran. What Was The Need For Operation Sindhu? The operation was initiated following the June 13 Israeli airstrikes on Iranian territory, a significant escalation in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, which heightened safety concerns for foreigners in Iran. Facing growing instability, the government launched this mission to quickly evacuate citizens before the situation escalated further. Who are being evacuated as part of the mission? Indian students, professionals, seafarers, pilgrims and others located in Iran's conflict zones. The first group of 110 Indian students was moved overland to Armenia, then flown to New Delhi on Wednesday. They landed at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport on Thursday. Among them, 90 are from Jammu and Kashmir. Flights have been planned, possibly via Turkmenistan, to evacuate more Indians. Meanwhile, the MEA control rooms are operating round-the-clock for people in distress. Why Was Operation Named 'Sindhu?' While there has been no official word on the reason, historically Sindhu is known as a river. In Sanskrit, 'Sindhu' literally means 'river' or 'ocean'. It's also the name of Indus river, one of the major rivers in the Indian subcontinent. Another historical significance is that India is said to derieve its name from Sindhu. The Persians pronounced 'Sindhu' as Hindu, which eventually became India in Greek and Latin usage. The operation's title likely symbolizes a large journey — representing India's commitment to crossing borders for the safety of its citizens. Execution Strategy Of Operation Sindhu Evacuation Routes & Transport The primary route is the overland escorted travel from northern Iran (e.g., Urmia) into Armenia, then onward by chartered flights from Yerevan to New Delhi. An arrangement has been made for alternate corridors too, which includes transit through Turkmenistan, leveraging commercial or special flights. Who Are Involved In Evacuation Mission? The Indian Air Force and commercial carriers like IndiGo are involved in flying back Indian citizens from Iran. There are Ministry of External Affairs-led 24×7 embassy helplines and crisis-control centers. The government has been coordinating with Armenian, Iranian, and Turkmen authorities for safe passage of Indian residents. First Published: June 19, 2025, 13:20 IST
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel's missile shield is failing, and shows Trump's Golden Dome unlikely to protect US from Russian and Chinese hypersonic nuke threats
Israel much-vaunted multi-layered defensive system to protect from aerial attacks including missiles, drones, rockets and artillery shells has blunted the enemy attack on several occasions, starting 2011 when it was first deployed. Taking a cue from Israel's success, US President Donald Trump in May 2025 announced the Golden Dome missile umbrella for America, an ambitious space-based defensive system. Israel claims threats from terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, and countries like Iran, Syria, Türkiye, Jordan and Egypt. None of them posses any technological/ military edge over or even parity with Israel. Unlike Israel, which has nuclear weapons, the others have no nukes in their arsenal. Israel's Iron Dome is designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and artillery shells at a range of 4 to 70 kilometres, while David's Sling, and Arrow 2 and 3 along with the US Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) batteries can take out threats at a longer range, even in space. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Yet, after one week of missile and drone barrage by Iran following the June 13, 2025, strike by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Jerusalem's missile shield seemed to be overwhelmed and bleeding, in terms of their response time as well the cost. From a claimed success rate of almost "80 to 90 percent" in the first couple of days of Iranian attack, the Israeli defense is now able to only intercept only 65% of the incoming missiles. NBC News quoted a "senior intelligence official in Israel" as stating that on June 19 only 65 per cent of Iranian missiles launched in the last 24 hours were intercepted. Live Events You Might Also Like: Sejjil, Iran's highly maneuverable new missile a major threat to Israel; know all about it The Iranians, too, seemed to have changed their strategy. Starting with ballistic missiles and drones, Iran is now launching highly maneuvrable hypersonic projectiles to hits targets in Israel. As revealed by the Israeli defense officer above, from just 10 percent of Iranian missiles finding their targets, the percentage has gone up to almost 35. Israel also claims that Iranians are now firing a lot less missiles than they did in the first couple of days. From a reported 150 on the first day on June 13, the number of Iranian missiles flying towards Israel has come down to about three dozen. But many of attacks in the last couple of days have seen Iran firing hypersonic missiles like Fattah-1 and Sejjil, which have tested Israel's defense to the extreme and also punched holes through it. Stopping one missile costs several interceptors, sometimes going up to even double digits. Yet, as the Israelis are increasingly finding out, there is no guarantee that the incoming missile will be blown up in the skies by its interceptors. According to Israeli financial daily The Marker, Jerusalem is spending nearly 1 billion shekels ($285 million) each nigh in defending the country from Iran's barrage. The cost an Arrow interceptor is $3 million. Moreover, there is a limited number of interceptors left with a Wall Street Journal report on June 18 claiming for Israel has just enough for the next 10 to 12 more days if the Iranian armed forces continue with their current rate of firing missiles. You Might Also Like: Hypersonic missiles are stirring fears in the Iran-Israel conflict. Here's why Lessons for Trump's proposed Golden Dome US faces formidable adversaries like Russia and China, and to a lesser extent North Korea and Iran. Russia, China and North Korea have nukes as well as the means to deliver them at targets thousands of miles away. While the Americans claims to have better technology and a massive military, which can hit a target anywhere on the globe, its rivals are no pushover. Compared to Israel, the US have a near-equal and in some areas a technologically advanced enemy. Russia is the world largest nuclear power with a huge array of intercontinental ballistic missiles. The country has in the last few years rapidly developed and deployed highly maneuvrable hypersonic missiles. It's almost a similar case with China which is going ahead with rapid military expansion and the use of cutting-edge technologies. North Korea, too, has tested missiles which can reach the western coast of the US. You Might Also Like: Blind radar, blistering speed: How Israeli jets crippled Iran's air defence in 48 hours, something Russia couldn't do in 3 years To counter such threats, Trump in May 2025 announced the Golden Dome defence system. Estimated to cost around $175 billion, Trump stated that the shield would be operational by 2029, just before his term as the 47th President of the United States comes to an end. Mirroring Israel's system that has been active since 2011 but is essentially able to intercept short and medium range rockets and missiles, the US shield will face ICBMs and hypersonic missiles. As seen in the ongoing Israel-Iran was, a salvo of missiles can overwhelm a defensive shield leading to some of the projectiles hitting targets on ground. Golden Dome's big advantage is touted to be the ability to keep and eye from space and detect a missile in the boost stage, the short span of time when it is being launched. A boost phase lasts about a minute, and is detectable even from space-based assets. While it's theoretically possible to target missiles during the boost phase, to be able to track missile launches by Russia and China, both of which can do so from almost any part of the globe, is a Herculean task. American Enterprise Institute senior fellow in the Foreign and Defense Policy program Todd Harrison says such a capability needs hundreds, even thousands of satellites. "It takes about 950 interceptors spread out in orbit around the Earth to ensure that at least one is always in range to intercept a missile during its boost phase," he to told Citizen Tribune news portal. If Russia or China fire multiple missiles simultaneously, the number of US satellites required goes up exponentially. A launch of five missiles together by any one of the US rivals means over 4,500 spy satellites. Moreover, any US move to operationalize the Golden Dome will be countered by Russia and China with the deployment of more missiles, many of them nuclear tipped, and use of their space-based capabilities. You Might Also Like: Golden Dome to guard US from 'anywhere, even Space': What you need to know about Trump's $175 billion missile shield
