Japan PM says Trump tariffs a ‘national crisis'
US President Donald Trump's tariffs on Japanese goods are a 'national crisis,' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Friday ahead of cross-party talks on mitigating the impact on the heavily export-dependent economy.
Japanese firms are the biggest investors into the United States, but Trump on Thursday announced a hefty 24 percent levy on imports from the close US ally as part of global 'reciprocal' levies.
The measures 'can be called a national crisis, and the government is doing its best with all parties' to lessen the impact, Ishiba said in parliament.
He called, however, for a 'calm-headed' approach to negotiations with Trump, who has also imposed 25 percent tariffs on auto imports which came into force this week.
Local media reported Friday that Japanese officials were attempting to organize a call between Ishiba and Trump, who held apparently friendly talks at the White House in February.
Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya 'strongly demanded' to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in talks in Brussels on Thursday that the 'extremely regrettable' measures be reviewed, Tokyo said.
Japan's main Nikkei 225 index fell 2.75 percent on Friday, adding to a 2.7 percent drop on Thursday after the S&P 500 on Wall Street dropped by the most in a day since 2020.
Ishiba told ministers 'to take all measures necessary, including financing support,' for domestic industries and protecting jobs, government spokesperson Yoshimasa Hayashi told reporters.
Ishiba's meetings with party leaders later Friday were aimed at laying the groundwork for the supplementary budget, The Asahi Shimbun daily reported.
'Extremely grave'
The Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (JCCI) said Trump's tariffs 'would have an extremely grave impact on the Japanese economy.'
'We strongly urge the government to continue its persistent negotiations for the exemption from tariff measures and to take all possible measures to minimize the impact on small and medium-sized enterprises and small businesses … by developing a detailed consultation system and strengthening cash management support,' the JCCI said Thursday.
The Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) also called for 'comprehensive support measures to ensure that Japan's automotive industry can maintain its foundation as a manufacturing base.'
JAMA said its members have invested a cumulative total of more than $66 billion in US manufacturing as of 2024, generating over 110,000 direct US jobs and supporting more than 2.2 million others.
Japanese carmakers ship about 1.45 million cars to the United States from Canada and Mexico, where they operate factories, Bloomberg News reported.
By comparison, Japan exports 1.49 million cars directly to the United States, while Japanese automakers make 3.3 million cars in America.
The US deficit with Japan was almost $70 billion last year.
Japan mostly exports to the United States vehicles, auto parts, machinery, and electrical and electronic equipment.
US imports the other way are mostly chemicals, plastics, rubber, and leather goods, as well as agricultural products and oil and cement.
The White House has said that Japan has a 700 percent tariff on US rice imports, a claim Japan's farm minister called 'incomprehensible,' local media reported.
In Japan, the auto sector employs about 5.6 million people directly or indirectly.
Vehicles accounted for around 28 percent of Japan's 21.3 trillion yen ($142 billion) of US-bound exports last year.
BMI (Fitch Solutions) estimated that in a worst-case scenario, there could be a hit of 0.7 percentage points to Japan's economy this year.
Capital Economics was less pessimistic, predicting a 'quite small' impact of perhaps just 0.2 percent, saying that 'Japan isn't all that dependent on US demand.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
11 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
NATO Leaders Are Set to Agree a Historic Defense Spending Pledge, But the Hike Won't Apply to All
NATO leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5 percent of their gross domestic product on defense–except the new and much-vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them. Spain has reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5 percent of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the US, only its allies. In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the spending pledge language in NATO's final summit communiqué–a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs–would no longer refer to 'all allies.' It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance, like Belgium, Canada, France, and Italy, that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars. On Friday, Trump insisted the US has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain.' Trump also branded Canada a 'low payer.' NATO's new spending goals. The 5 percent goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5 percent of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2 percent, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count. A further 1.5 percent would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports, and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks, and preparing societies for future conflict. The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5 percent on core spending is a massive challenge. Last year, Spain spent 1.28 percent of GDP on its military budget, according to NATO estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sánchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to NATO by spending 2.1 percent of GDP on defense needs. Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros (920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022. Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern, and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election. Why the spending increase is needed. There are solid reasons for ramping up spending. The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks, and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3 percent, NATO experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these. Each country has been assigned capability targets to play its part. Spanish Foreign Minister José Albares said Monday that the debate must be 'not a raw percentage but around capabilities.' He said Spain can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organization with 2.1 percent. Countries much closer to Russia–Belarus and Ukraine–all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday. The Netherlands estimates NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5 percent to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros (18 billion to 22 billion). Setting a deadline. It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2 percent target that they agreed to in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years. The US insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge, and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5 percent target. The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among NATO envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, NATO diplomats have said.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Pakistan Condemns Trump for Bombing Iran a Day after Recommending Him for a Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan condemned US President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the US, resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the US for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the US Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan condemns Trump for bombing Iran a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan condemned US President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the US, resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the US for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the US Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.
