U.S.–China Tariff Pause Offers Temporary Relief for Automakers
A surprise 90-day truce between the United States and China is already sending shockwaves through the automotive world. The agreement, reached Monday in Geneva, temporarily slashes sky-high tariffs that had burdened automakers, disrupted supply chains, and raised production costs across the industry.
Under the deal, U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods will drop from 145% to 30%, while China will reduce its levies on American imports from 125% to 10%. Though temporary, the changes take effect May 14 and are already shifting market sentiment—and logistics planning—across the auto sector.
A Temporary Boost for American Automakers
For Detroit's big three—Ford, GM, and Stellantis—the truce offers immediate breathing room. All three saw share price gains following the announcement, with Stellantis jumping nearly 7% in Milan trading. Reduced tariff pressure means lower costs on critical Chinese components, including EV batteries, semiconductors, and infotainment systems. This could help stabilize margins and improve production forecasts for the latter half of the year.
But the relief is partial. U.S. tariffs on steel, aluminum, and many auto parts remain high, keeping pressure on manufacturing expenses. The 30% tariff still includes a 20% fentanyl-related levy and a general 10% baseline, meaning American automakers won't see full relief. Still, with key inputs facing fewer hurdles, automakers may be able to restore paused shipments, renegotiate supplier terms, and inch closer to pre-tariff pricing structures.
China's Auto Industry Cautious but Opportunistic
On the other side, Chinese automakers like BYD, Great Wall Motor, and Leapmotor are treading carefully. At the recent Shanghai Auto Show, executives acknowledged the benefits of lower U.S. tariffs but emphasized diversification. Many are expanding into Europe, Latin America, and Southeast Asia as a hedge against future trade volatility.
Volvo Cars, with deep ties to Chinese production, saw its stock rise 7%—a sign of investor optimism about resumed U.S. exports. Yet caution remains. While tariffs are lower, regulatory scrutiny and geopolitical friction continue to pose risks for Chinese EV brands eyeing the U.S. market.
EVs, Critical Minerals, and Long-Term Strategy
Perhaps the most significant impact of the tariff rollback lies in the electric vehicle space. China dominates global supply chains for EV batteries and critical minerals—especially rare earth elements used in electric motors and battery production. During the trade war escalation, Beijing restricted exports of some of these materials, rattling U.S. automakers and forcing contingency plans.
With those restrictions now suspended as part of the truce, automakers may temporarily breathe easier. However, the long-term push for supply chain diversification remains intact. Both Washington and Detroit are still aiming to reduce reliance on Chinese inputs, even as trade flows normalize for now.
Shipping companies like Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd have already announced route expansions to meet expected increases in U.S.–China freight, particularly for automotive parts and EV components. This signals a cautious rebound in trans-Pacific trade, especially for firms reactivating logistics operations paused during the tariff surge.
Market Rally, but Industry Still Wary
Investors have responded with optimism. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq surged, and auto-related stocks rallied across the board. But analysts warn this could be a short reprieve. The 90-day window may not be enough to resolve deeper disputes over intellectual property, technology transfer, and industrial policy—issues that directly affect next-gen vehicle development.
Dani Rodrik, a trade economist at Harvard, summarized the mood: 'Yes, tariffs dropped—but they're still high. U.S. consumers and automakers are still paying for the trade war.'
Jay Foreman, CEO of Florida-based toy manufacturer Basic Fun, echoed this sentiment with a supply chain twist: 'Before the deal, we were considering doubling prices. Now, it's just a 10-15% bump. It's not great—but it's manageable.' His company has resumed shipments from China—a signal echoed by several auto suppliers doing the same.
A Truce, Not a Finish Line
The Geneva agreement may be a turning point, but it is far from a final resolution. Future negotiations could extend the tariff relief—or collapse into renewed tension. For now, automakers on both sides of the Pacific are recalibrating.
As Scott Bessent, U.S. Treasury Secretary, put it: 'No one wants decoupling. We want trade—balanced trade.'
The automotive industry, more globalized than ever, is watching closely. Because while the tariffs may have dropped, the road ahead is still full of uncertainty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Would you hail a 'robotaxi'? Musk bets cabs will give Tesla a lift after boycotts and sales plunge
Elon Musk promised in 2019 that driverless Tesla robotaxis would be on the road the following year, but it didn't happen. A year later, he promised to deliver them the next year, but that didn't happen either. Despite the empty pledges, the promises kept coming. Last year, in January, Musk said, 'Next year for sure we'll have over a million robotaxis.' Would you settle for 10 or 12? Musk appears to be on the verge of making his robotaxi vision a reality with a test run of a small squad of self-driving cabs in Austin, Texas, starting Sunday. Reaching a million may take a year or more, however, although the billionaire should be able to expand the service this year if the Austin demo is a success. The stakes couldn't be higher, nor the challenges. While Musk was making those 'next year' promises, rival Waymo was busy deploying driverless taxis in Los Angeles, San Diego, Austin, and other cities by using a different technology that allowed it to get to market faster. It just completed its 10 millionth paid ride. Boycotts related to Musk's politics have tanked Tesla's sales. Rival electric vehicle makers with newly competitive models have stolen market share. And investors are on edge after a $150 billion stock wipeout when Musk picked a social media fight with a US president overseeing federal car regulators who could make the robotaxi rollout much more difficult. The stock has recovered somewhat after Musk said he regretted some of his remarks. Tesla shareholders have stood by Musk over the years because he's defied the odds by building a successful standalone electric vehicle company–self-driving car promises aside–and making them a lot of money in the process. A decade ago, Tesla shares traded for around $18. The shares closed Friday at $322. Musk says the Austin test will begin modestly enough with just 10 or 12 vehicles picking up passengers in a limited area. But then it will quickly ramp up and spread to other cities, eventually reaching hundreds of thousands, if not a million vehicles next year. Some Musk watchers on Wall Street are skeptical. 'How quickly can he expand the fleet?' asks Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA. 'We're talking maybe a dozen vehicles initially. It's very small.' Morningstar's Seth Goldstein says Musk is being classic Musk: promising too much too quickly. 'When anyone in Austin can download the app and use a robotaxi, that will be a success, but I don't think that will happen until 2028,' he says. 'Testing is going to take a while.' Musk's tendency to push up the stock high with a bit of hyperbole is well known among investors. In 2018, he told Tesla stockholders he had 'funding secured' to buy all their shares at a massive premium and take the company private. But he not only lacked a written commitment from financiers, according to federal stock regulators who fined him, he hadn't discussed the loan amount or other details with them. More recently, Musk told CNBC in May that Tesla was experiencing a major rebound in demand. A week later, an auto trade group in Europe announced sales had plunged by half. Musk has come under fire for allegedly exaggerating the ability of the system used for its cars to drive themselves, starting with the name. 'Full Self-Driving' is a misnomer. The system still requires drivers to keep their eyes on the road because they may need to intervene and take control at any moment. Federal highway safety regulators opened an investigation into FSD last year after several accidents, and the Department of Justice has conducted its own probe, though the status of that is not known. Tesla has also faced lawsuits over the feature, some resulting in settlements, others dismissed. In one case, a judge ruled against the plaintiffs, but only because they hadn't proved Musk knowingly made false statements. Musk says the robotaxis will be running on an improved version of Full Self-Driving and the cabs will be safe. He also says the service will be able to expand rapidly around the country. His secret weapon: millions of Tesla owners now on the roads. He says an over-the-air software update will soon allow them to turn their cars into driverless cabs and start a side business while stuck at the office for eight hours or on vacation for a week. 'Instead of having your car sit in the parking lot, your car could be earning money,' Musk said earlier this year, calling it an 'Airbnb model for cars.' 'You will be able to add or subtract your car to the fleet.' Musk says Tesla also can move fast to deploy taxis now because of his decision to rely only on cameras for the cars to navigate, unlike Waymo, which has gone a more expensive route by supplementing its cameras with lasers and radar. 'Tesla will have, I don't know,' Musk mused in a conference call with investors, 'ninety-nine percent market share or something ridiculous.' Given Waymo's head start and potential competition from Amazon and others, dominating the driverless market to that extent could be a reach. But Dan Ives, a Wedbush Securities analyst and big Musk fan, says this time Musk may actually pull it off because of Tesla's ability to scale up quickly. And even skeptics like Morningstar's Goldstein acknowledge that Musk occasionally does get things right, and spectacularly so. He upended the car industry by getting people to buy expensive electric vehicles, brought his Starlink satellite internet service to rural areas, and more recently performed a gee-whiz trick of landing an unmanned SpaceX rocket on a platform back on Earth. 'Maybe his timelines aren't realistic,' Goldstein says, 'but he can develop futuristic technology products.'
Al Arabiya
5 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Fred Smith, FedEx founder who revolutionized the package delivery business, dies at 80
Fred Smith, the FedEx Corp. founder who revolutionized the express delivery industry, has died, the company said. He was 80. FedEx started operating in 1973, delivering small parcels and documents more quickly than the post office could. Over the next half-century, Smith, a Marine Corps veteran, oversaw the growth of a company that combined air and ground service and became something of an economic bellwether because so many other companies rely on it. Memphis, Tennessee–based FedEx grew into a global transportation and logistics company that averages 17 million shipments per business day. Smith stepped down as CEO in 2022 but remained executive chairman. Smith, a 1966 graduate of Yale University, used a business theory he came up with in college to create a delivery system based on coordinated air cargo flights centered on a main hub–a 'hub and spokes' system, as it became known. The company also played a major role in the shift by American business and industry to a greater use of time-sensitive deliveries and less dependence on large inventories and warehouses. Smith once told The Associated Press that he came up with the name Federal Express because he wanted the company to sound 'big and important,' when in fact it was a start-up operation with a future far from assured. At the time, Smith was trying to land a major shipping contract with the Federal Reserve Bank that didn't work out. In the beginning, Federal Express had 14 small aircraft operating out of the Memphis International Airport, flying packages to 25 US cities. Smith's father, also named Frederick, built a small fortune in Memphis with a regional bus line and other business ventures. Following college, Smith joined the US Marines and was commissioned a second lieutenant. He left the military as a captain in 1969 after two tours in Vietnam, where he was decorated for bravery and wounds received in combat. He told The Associated Press in a 2023 interview that everything he did running FedEx came from his experience in the Marines, not what he learned at Yale. Getting Federal Express started was no easy task. Overnight shipments were new to American business, and the company had to have a fleet of planes and a system of interconnecting air routes in place from the get-go. Though one of Memphis's best-known and most prominent citizens, Smith generally avoided the public spotlight, devoting his energies to work and family. Despite his low profile, Smith made a cameo appearance in the 2000 movie 'Cast Away,' starring Tom Hanks. The movie was about a FedEx employee stranded on an island. 'Memphis has lost its most important citizen, Fred Smith,' said US Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee, citing Smith's support for everything from the University of Memphis to the city's zoo. 'FedEx is the engine of our economy, and Fred Smith was its visionary founder. But more than that, he was a dedicated citizen who cared deeply about our city.' Smith rarely publicized the donations he and his family made, but he agreed to speak with AP in 2023 about a gift to the Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation to endow a new scholarship fund for the children of Navy service members pursuing studies in STEM. 'The thing that's interested me are the institutions and the causes, not the naming or the recognition,' Smith said at the time. Asked what it means to contribute to the public good, he replied: 'America is the most generous country in the world. It's amazing the charitable contributions that Americans make every year. Everything from the smallest things to these massive health care initiatives and the Gates Foundation and everything in between,' he said. 'I think if you've done well in this country, it's pretty churlish for you not to at least be willing to give a pretty good portion of that back to the public interest. And all this is in the great tradition of American philanthropy.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
6 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Investors Weigh Market Risks as Israeli-Iranian Tensions Rise
As the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates, investors are analyzing several potential market scenarios, especially if the United States deepens its involvement. A key concern is a sharp increase in energy prices, which could amplify economic consequences across global markets. Rising oil prices could fuel inflation, weaken consumer confidence, and diminish the likelihood of interest rate cuts in the near term. This may prompt initial stock market sell-offs and a flight to the US dollar as a safe-haven asset. While US crude oil prices have surged by around 10% over the past week, the S&P 500 index has remained relatively stable, following a brief decline after the initial Israeli strikes. Analysts suggest that if Iranian oil supplies are disrupted, market reactions could intensify significantly. A serious supply disruption would likely ripple through global petroleum markets and push oil prices higher, leading to broader economic consequences. Oxford Economics has outlined three possible scenarios: a de-escalation of conflict, a full suspension of Iranian oil production, and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Each scenario carries escalating risks to global oil prices. In the most severe case, prices could soar to $130 per barrel, pushing US inflation to nearly 6% by year-end. In such a scenario, consumer spending would likely contract due to declining real income, and any possibility of interest rate cuts this year would likely vanish under rising inflationary pressure. So far, the most direct impact has been felt in oil markets, where Brent crude futures have jumped as much as 18% since June 10, reaching nearly $79 a barrel, the highest level in five months. Volatility expectations in the oil market now exceed those of major asset classes like equities and bonds. Although equities have largely brushed off the geopolitical turmoil, analysts believe this could change if energy prices continue to climb. Rising oil prices could weigh on corporate earnings and consumer demand, indirectly pressuring stock markets. While US stocks have held steady for now, further American involvement in the conflict could spark market anxiety. Historical patterns suggest any sell-off might be short-lived. For instance, during the 2003 Iraq invasion, stocks initially dropped but recovered in subsequent months. As for the US dollar, its performance amid escalating tensions could vary. It may strengthen initially due to safe-haven demand, although past conflicts have sometimes led to long-term weakness, especially during prolonged military engagements.
