Brutal murder of Northpine grandfather leads to life sentences for attackers
Hashim Dennis, 75, was washing before prayers when the robbers struck.
Image: Supplied
The killer who murdered Northpine grandfather Hashim Dennis has been sentenced to two life terms.
Reagan Davids was convicted by the Western Cape High Court in March for his role in the brutal murder of the 75-year-old and the attempted murder of his wife, the then-69-year-old Kulsoem, at their Northpine granny flat in January 2020.
Daughter Ibtisaam Williams said her traumatised mother Kulsoem rushed into the main house, covered in blood, shortly after 4am to say their father had been stabbed and beaten to death.
The grandmother survived by playing dead after she was stabbed and Ibtisaam also escaped with her life after being attacked by an unknown second intruder in the main house.
During the investigation, it was established that the attackers had been hired by Ibtisaam's husband Brent Williams to kill his in-laws and make it look like a robbery gone wrong.
Although Williams and Davids denied any involvement in the attacks, Williams was captured on the CCTV surveillance cameras dropping off the two men close to his home on the morning of the attack.
Williams died shortly before the conclusion of his murder trial, while the third perpetrator is still unknown.
Davids was found guilty for housebreaking with intent to commit murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, two counts of attempted murder and murder.
He was sentenced to life for the murder of Hashim Dennis and the attempted murder of his wife, while he got 10 years for attempted murder of Williams' wife and 15 years each for his other crimes.
He will effectively serve 40 years, as the South African Police Service praised the work that put Davids away.
They said in a statement: 'The suspects attacked the wife's parents, fatally stabbing the father-in-law. The wife who was running late that morning, heard the commotion and managed to lock the suspects outside the main house.
'They fled the scene over the garage roof and were picked up by Brent Williams nearby.
'Following an intensive investigation led by Detective Captain C. Louw and Detective Sergeant T. Rapiya, both Williams and Davids were arrested and charged.
'Williams died in custody in February 2025 due to a heart attack and the case proceeded against Davids alone.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
38 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Hitman jailed for brutal attack on elderly couple planned by son-in-law
A man who was paid R1,000 to kill an elderly couple as they prepared for Fajr — a sunrise prayer — has been sentenced to life imprisonment for the contract killing in Cape Town. Reagan Davis, 35, was handed two life sentences and 15 years' direct imprisonment by the Cape Town high court for the murder of 75-year-old Hashim Ahmed Dennis and attempted murder of his 70-year-old wife Kulsoem at home in Northpine, Brackenfell, on January 31 2020. Davis was a co-accused with the elderly couple's son-in-law Brent Williams — who died in February before the state closed its case. 'Senior state advocate Evadne Kortje proved the murder was a contract killing and the accused was paid R1,000, which he used to buy takkies,' said National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila. Evidence was led by 10 witnesses which revealed Williams and his wife Ibtisaam Dennis, who lived with the elderly couple, had marital problems. Williams hired Davis and an unknown accomplice to invade and attack his in-laws to 'neutralise' his marital problems. Williams drove the hitmen to the property and they gained access via a security gate at about 4am and entered the couple's flatlet. '[Kulsoem Dennis] heard the voice of an intruder asking where the money was in Afrikaans before brutally attacking her. The intruder hit her on the head, neck and chest with a gun. She chanted, 'Allahu-Akbar' [God is Great] until she hit the floor. Severely injured and in shock, she lay on the floor, pretending to be dead as her [headscarf] fell softly over her face and she kept her eyes closed,' said Ntabazalila. Her husband was attacked as he came out the bathroom and died after being stabbed 15 times. Ibtisaam Dennis called the police, whose investigation confirmed her husband was the mastermind behind the attack.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Reagan Davids sentenced to life for contract killing of elderly couple in Cape Town
Hashim Dennis, 75, was preparing for prayers when his contract killers struck. Image: Supplied 'This court is mindful of the horrors which would have gone through the young minds of the two minor children and the gruesome events which will forever be etched in their memories.' These were the sentiments of Judge Gayaat Salie-Da Silva of the Western Cape High Court when she handed down two life sentences plus 15 years imprisonment to Reagan Davids for the brutal murder of 75-year-old Hashim Ahmed Dennis, and the attempted murder of his 70-year-old wife, Kulsoem Dennis. Davids faced charges of housebreaking with intent to commit murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, attempted murder of Kulsoem, attempted murder of Ibtisaam Dennis, and premeditated murder of Hashim Ahmed. The main accused in the matter, Brent Williams, died on February 10 shortly before the conclusion of the murder trial. Williams was the son-in-law of the Muslim couple who were attacked in their Northpine home near Brackenfell, Cape Town. The elderly couple was getting ready for their morning prayer when the vicious attack occurred, and the now-widowed wife, Ibtisaam, barely survived the assault. According to details that emerged during the trial, Williams had arranged the contract hit to 'neutralise' his marital problems he had been experiencing with Ibtisaam. National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson, Eric Ntabazalila, said the two life sentences would run concurrently. 'Senior State Advocate Evadne Kortje proved that the murder was a contract killing and the accused was paid R1,000, which he used to buy takkies. Advocate Kortje presented evidence from 10 witnesses, which revealed that Brent Williams and his wife, Ibtisaam Dennis, stayed with the elderly couple on 6 Conifer Close, Northpine, Brackenfell. 'The couple had two children and were experiencing marital problems. Brent Williams hired Davis and another man, unknown to the State, to invade and attack his in-laws to 'neutralise' his marital problems. At the time, the elderly couple stayed in a flatlet in the couple's yard,' said Ntabazalila. The court heard that in the early hours of January 31, 2020, Williams was observed through CCTV footage driving with the two co-perpetrators in his red maroon bakkie to the vicinity of 6 Conifer Close. He dropped them and drove off to wait until they finished the job. They gained access to the property through a security gate, which was not forced open. The early hours of the morning, around 4am, are the time the devout Muslim worshippers prepare for Fajr - a sunrise prayer. During the attack, Hashim suffered multiple stab wounds, while Kulsoem faked being dead after being hit on the head, neck, and chest with a gun before dropping to the floor, where her burka covered her face. Ibtisaam heard a noise and noticed the bright light from her parents' flatlet. She went to investigate and met a knife-wielding intruder who charged at her. She quickly turned around and closed the sliding door to the main house, saving herself and her two children. Moments after the attack, CCTV footage captured the two attackers running back to Williams, getting in the bakkie, then driving off. Judge Salie-Da Silva in judgment said: 'These offences are marked by exceptional brutality, targeting vulnerable elderly victims in a sanctified setting. The level of violence, disregard for human life, and the psychological terror inflicted upon the surviving victims and, so too, the surrounding community, warrant the imposition of a long period of direct imprisonment… 'The proverbial saying that fact is stranger than fiction is a startling and disturbing feature of the events which took place in the early morning hours of Friday, 31 January 2020, and at the home of the victims. This court is mindful of the horrors which would have gone through the young minds of the two minor children and the gruesome events which will forever be etched in their memories.' [email protected]
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town father challenges R172,000 maintenance order, citing financial strain despite over R1 million bonus
A Cape Town father who receives over R1 million in bonuses challenged a ruling which ordered him to pay over R172,000 maintenance. Image: Pexels A Cape Town father who reportedly receives over R1 million in annual bonuses, has challenged the mother of his children and refused to produce his proof of income. The parents, who divorced in August 2010, have been at odds over financial responsibilities, as the mother continues to care for their children, aged 15 and 19. In February 2025, the maintenance court ordered the father to pay R172,188.63, which, amongst other things, will go towards the tuition cost of their older child. The money had to be paid before the end of March 2025. He was further ordered to pay over R20,000 towards the annual school fees of their second child. The total amount he had to pay was over R222,000. However, following the court's ruling, the father swiftly filed an urgent application in the Western Cape High Court to suspend the maintenance order. He argued that the amount was nearly double his net salary, asserting his financial inability to honour such payments. The high court granted a temporary suspension of the order, while simultaneously requiring the mother to demonstrate why this suspension should not become permanent pending the appeal hearing. The mother took further legal action, serving both the father and his employer with a subpoena duces tecum. A subpoena duces tecum is a court order requiring a person to appear in court and produce specific documents or other physical evidence relevant to a legal case. According to the mother, the father misled the court in his application to suspend the maintenance order. She argued that the maintenance court granted the order in line with what was provided by the father in terms of his monthly salary as well as his annual bonus which amounts to over R1 million. She further argued that the father did not provide proof to support his claim that he cannot afford to pay maintenance. He also didn't provide any evidence to support that his financial position had changed for the worse since the order was made. Furthermore, she said the father lied in his affidavit as his IRP5 showed that he had received more than R1 million in March 2025. With this information, she sought to have the interim order suspending the maintenance order to be dismissed. Furthermore, the mother highlighted discrepancies in the father's affidavit, alleging that his IRP5 tax document, which revealed earnings exceeding R1 million as of March 2025, illustrates his capacity to pay the mandated maintenance while still maintaining a comfortable lifestyle. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In response, the father approached the high court again, seeking to have the subpoena set aside. He claimed the documents requested by the mother were irrelevant and warned that such disclosures would cause irreparable harm. Presiding over the matter, Judge James Lekhuleni said the previous maintenance court order revealed that the mother battled to coerce the father to honour his maintenance obligations. He only provided financial support to the children when it suited him. He commented on the mother's diligent efforts, recognising that she was an unrepresented litigant trying to safeguard her children's welfare. The judge made it clear that the mother's attempts to compel the father to meet his obligations should not be viewed as an abuse of the legal system. Moreover, judge Lekhuleni emphasised that denying the subpoena would unduly harm the mother and the children, while the father would not suffer significant prejudice from its continuation. "As I see it, there is no prejudice that the applicant (father) will suffer if the subpoena is not set aside. While on the other hand, setting aside the subpoena will have deleterious effects on the first respondent (mother) and the children," he said. The father's application was dismissed. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
