Ortagus to make her last visit to Beirut before being replaced
by Naharnet Newsdesk 02 June 2025, 13:02
U.S. Deputy Special Envoy for the Middle East Morgan Ortagus is expected to visit Lebanon at the end of this week, in a visit that might be her last before she moves to another post in the U.S. administration, media reports said.
'Any replacement will be certainly better than her regarding the Lebanese file, after she showed harsh diplomacy in dealing with it,' diplomatic sources told al-Joumhouria newspaper in remarks published Monday.
The Nidaa al-Watan newspaper meanwhile quoted diplomatic sources as saying that Ortagus' replacement is 'not imminent.'
'The U.S. diplomat is active on the level of the Lebanese file and diplomatic circles do not have the impression that she is preparing files for her successor,' the sources said.
The daily added that Ortagus will 'insist on getting clear answers regarding the issue of Hezbollah's arms and wants the answers to include a timetable for arms handover.'
The newspaper also said that Ortagus' visit to Lebanon could be her last visit to the country and that her replacement 'took place due to matters related to the U.S. administration and not to the Lebanese file.'
U.S. journalist Laura Loomer said in a post on X that Ortagus 'will be cordially reassigned to another role in the Trump administration.'
'She wanted to be the Special Envoy to Syria, but the position was instead given to Tom Barrack,' Loomer added.
'Morgan's replacement will be announced this week by (U.S. Special Envoy for the Middle East) Steve Witkoff, according to White House sources,' she said.
Ortagus had been named as Amos Hochstein's successor as the request of some Republicans, although U.S. President Donald Trump was not enthusiastic about her appointment.
"Early on Morgan fought me for three years, but hopefully has learned her lesson," Trump wrote at the time.
Ortagus is close to many senior Republicans like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Senator Lindsey Graham, former national security adviser Mike Waltz and Trump's envoy for special missions, Ric Grenell.
She also worked closely with Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner during Trump's first term in office, and they remain close. During the Republican presidential primary before the 2016 elections, Ortagus criticized Trump's "isolationist" foreign policy and his personal behavior.
After noting that past criticism, Trump said he decided to appoint Ortagus regardless of their differences because "she has strong Republican support."
"I'm not doing this for me, I'm doing it for them. Let's see what happens," he added in January.
In Israel, a Channel 14 journalist said Ortagus' departure would not be in Israel's favor, seeing as she is an avid supporter of Israel and has 'firmly worked on the file of disarming Hezbollah.'
Al-Akhbar newspaper meanwhile noted that Ortagus has 'a very bad relation with Army Commander Rodolphe Haykal' and that President Joseph Aoun had expressed to U.S. officials 'his unease over her approach and her way in talking to officials.'
'She later criticized a large number of politicians, including a clear insult to ex-MP Walid Jumblat which embarrassed the majority of the friends of the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon,' the daily added.
Sources close to Aoun meanwhile told al-Akhbar that Ortagus' replacement could be Joel Rayburn, an anti-Iran hawk and one of the most prominent U.S. officials who followed up on the Syrian file throughout the past decade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
4 hours ago
- LBCI
Middle East on edge: Hezbollah holds fire for now as Iran warns it is not alone
Report by Ghida Fayad, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi Tensions in the Middle East are escalating rapidly, with the region inching closer to a broader conflict amid the deepening confrontation between Iran and Israel. As threats of American intervention loom, concerns are mounting that Tehran's allies could soon join the battlefield. Secretary of Iran's Expediency Discernment Council, Mohsen Rezaee, underscored in a statement that Iran has so far used only a fraction of its capabilities. He said, "We've used just 30% of our power. We haven't activated our land or naval forces, our oil leverage, the Strait of Hormuz, or our friends in the countries surrounding the occupied territories—though they've expressed willingness to help." That willingness has started to manifest in clear warnings from Iran-aligned groups across the region. Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah faction has threatened to target American bases and interests in the event of U.S. involvement, vowing also to shut down the vital Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab straits. In Yemen, the Houthis—who previously fired missiles toward Israel in support of Iran—reportedly told Reuters they would strike American interests if Washington entered the fray. In Lebanon, Hezbollah has not declared a definitive stance on entering the war. Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem stated that the group is "not neutral" and will act as it deems necessary. However, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri adopted a more decisive tone, insisting Lebanon will not participate in the war "200%," saying the country has no interest in joining the conflict and that Iran does not need its support. He emphasized that the real threat stems from Israel, which he accused of seeking to expand the scope of the battle. According to sources close to Berri, Qassem's comments were seen as a politically symbolic gesture of solidarity rather than a military commitment. For its part, Israel continues to issue stern warnings. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz criticized Hezbollah's Naim Qassem, accusing him of failing to learn from the past and threatening severe retaliation. "Israel's patience has run out with those who threaten us," Katz declared.
LBCI
6 hours ago
- LBCI
Two weeks, one choice: Can diplomacy stop a US-Iran clash?
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Two weeks—or a fortnight. It seems this isn't the first time U.S. President Donald Trump has given a two-week deadline. This time, he needs it to decide whether to enter the war against Iran directly. But why did Trump grant a two-week deadline? According to some observers, he chose this specific time frame—not shorter—to give diplomacy enough time to work. Trump is trying to send a message: he does not rush into decisions about war but rather gives diplomacy priority before resorting to military action. According to Reuters, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff held several calls with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in an attempt to reach a diplomatic solution to the crisis. They also discussed a U.S. proposal to establish a regional consortium—including Iran and Saudi Arabia—that would enrich uranium in a neutral third country under international supervision to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program. Tehran has so far rejected the proposal, preferring that the consortium be based on its own soil. Araghchi, however, denied that the call even took place. If diplomacy fails, the military option moves to the forefront. The two-week deadline could be enough time to complete military preparations, including the deployment of U.S. assets to the region. According to Politico, if Washington decides to strike only the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, the situation might be contained and escalation avoided. But if the U.S. opts for broader strikes, Iran faces two choices: return to the negotiating table or escalate by targeting oil facilities belonging to Washington's allies and potentially closing the Strait of Hormuz. Still, Politico notes that military force alone cannot eliminate Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. That would require an agreement with Tehran. In the end, all options remain on the table during these two weeks. The deadline ends July 3—just one day before the U.S. Independence Day.
LBCI
6 hours ago
- LBCI
Israeli airstrikes target Lebanon's Iqlim al Tuffah region
Israeli warplanes launched a series of airstrikes Friday targeting the Iqlim al Tuffah region in southern Lebanon.
