Perth Aldi store granted planning approval for third time
Perth and Kinross Council's Planning and Placemaking Committee gave its overwhelming support to the now £5.5 million development on Necessity Brae
Perth and Kinross councillors have voted - against planning officers' recommendation - to approve a new £5.5 million Aldi in Perth, creating around 16 new jobs.
It is the third time councillors have approved plans for the German-based supermarket chain to replace its Glasgow Road store with a larger, modern, fit-for-purpose store on Necessity Brae.
On Wednesday, June 12 the Planning and Placemaking Committee convener Ian Massie moved for approval with the support of all bar one on the committee.
Aldi has two Perth stores and, as part of a legal agreement, its new store at Pickembere, Pitheavlis would not open until the existing Glasgow Road store closes.
Planning permission for the replacement Perth store was initially granted - by Perth and Kinross Council's (PKC) Planning and Placemaking Committee - in May 2022. But in February 2023, councillors were asked to re-assess Aldi's application taking account of the latest National Planning Framework (NPF4). Again, councillors voted for approval.
But the approval was then subject to a judicial review - following a legal challenge by Tesco - and the Court of Session quashed Aldi's planning permission on April 26, 2024.
Following the judicial review, Aldi submitted a revised application to PKC this year. There were 22 letters of objection - including one from Tesco, which has three Perth stores as well as a petrol station store in Scone . The rival supermarket submitted an objection on the grounds: it was not a small-scale neighbourhood retail development; the site was allocated for employment use, and the "limited benefits" were not "adequate to determine the application other than to refuse".
Perth Community Flood Aid also objected, raising concerns about flood risk saying the area next to the site had flooded at least five times in recent years.
PKC planners recommended refusal of the application - citing NPF4 policy 28 - saying it was "an out of centre location and is not allocated for new retail development" and "would encourage diversion of existing footfall and spend away from the city centre".
There were 19 letters of support for the application, as well as a petition with over 800 signatures calling for the new Aldi to be built.
Cherrybank resident Seamus Farren - who launched the petition - addressed the committee on Wednesday outlining the strong local support for the development.
He said it would "greatly benefit" his neighbourhood, particularly elderly residents "who currently have to rely on public transport or taxis to reach the city centre for their grocery needs".
Speaking on behalf of Aldi, Stantec flood risk engineer Gary Spence told councillors measures taken as part of the development would reduce flood risk.
He said: "We've calculated the discharge rate into the downstream catchment of this area of land and our proposed system would restrict flows and provide betterment of 77 per cent at least."
PKC's Flood team did not object to the proposal.
Moving the plans for approval convener Ian Massie referred to the Court of Session decision following Tesco's legal challenge.
He said: "The court concluded that the proposal did not meet the definition of small scale neighbourhood retail development under policy 28c of NPF4.
"But I am satisfied this revised application has been carefully prepared in response to that ruling with a clearer and more comprehensive policy justification.
"I'm also satisfied the proposal addresses all relevant technical matters including potential flooding and drainage issues."
In March 2025 the committee voted by nine votes to two to grant Lidl permission to build a second Perth store on Crieff Road, also opposed by Tesco. They rejected council officers' recommendation to refuse the application, arguing the development would give residents "more choice" and supported the National Planning Framework 4's (NPF4) 20-minute neighbourhoods.
Following the March decision, the committee's convener SNP councillor Ian Massie wrote to Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee saying the current national planning policy "lacks coherence" and "will not strengthen town centre High Streets".
In his response, Mr McKee said: "As you will know, NPF4 and the wider development plan must be considered as a whole, then taking account of material considerations, when reaching a planning judgement."
Using this direction from Scotland's Public Finance Minister, Cllr Massie argued Aldi's application "aligns with local and national policy objectives and makes effective use of an under-utilised site".
He said the brownfield site had been designated for employment use on PKC's local development plan "but has remained undeveloped for over 17 years due to abnormal building costs and market conditions."
He cited NPF4 policy 9a which "supports the reuse of such land to promote regeneration and effective land use".
The Perth City North councillor said the development would support active travel "within a residential area" as well as "advancing the principle of local living and 20-minute neighbourhoods".
Conservative councillor Keith Allan seconded the motion to approve.
SNP councillor Ken Harvey attempted to table an amendment to refuse the application but got no support.
He said: "I think it's contrary to policy 28 [of NPF4]. I think some of the other reasons are valid but I don't think any of them outweigh the characteristics of policy 28, particularly the 20-minute neighbourhoods. This kind of development was definitely not what was intimated on that."
Cllr Harvey's amendment fell and the motion to approve the planning application - subject to planning conditions and a legal agreement - was approved.
Following the meeting, Real Estate director for Aldi in Scotland Andy Doyle, said: "We are delighted that councillors have again backed the overwhelming support from the local community and approved our plans for a new store at Necessity Brae.
"We look forward to delivering a larger store for our loyal customers in Perth, while creating new local jobs and bringing significant investment to the area.
"We are grateful to everyone who took the time to voice their support, and look forward to welcoming customers to the new store."
All existing Aldi staff will move from the Glasgow Rd store to the Necessity Brae Aldi with around 16-20 new jobs being created. According to Mr Doyle, the new store is expected to open around the end of 2026, beginning of 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
33 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
I sold my £140k flat and started renting in my sixties – I save £12,000 a year and don't pay energy bills
We explain how to become a property guardian HOUSE THAT I sold my £140k flat and started renting in my sixties – I save £12,000 a year and don't pay energy bills Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HANDING the final paperwork to the conveyancing solicitor completing the sale of his £140,000 two-bedroom flat Ian Horton, feels a wave of relief. After months of stress, Ian is swapping home ownership for renting as a property guardian at the age of 61 to beat the high cost of living and save for his impending retirement. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Ian Horton sold his flat at the age of 61 to beat the high cost of living Credit: Ian Horton 6 He now rents a room in a pub Credit: Ian Horton 6 It's allowed him to cut his bills and save for retirement Credit: Ian Horton 6 The pub is awaiting redevelopment and is located within London's commuter belt Credit: Ian Horton 'I sold my flat due to Covid and skyrocketing energy costs,' Ian said. 'If I kept the flat, I'd face a debt crisis caused by rising electricity, fuel, and household bills.' Now Ian is renting as a property guardian living in a pub in London's commuter belt. He pays just £350 a month including electricity, water and council tax, saving £1,000 a month, or £12,000 a year compared to owning his own home. 'It's a miracle cure for OAPs battling the cost of living,' Ian said. 'I could never have done that if I hadn't sold my two-bed flat in my sixties. 'It may sound bonkers but becoming a property guardian is the best financial decision I ever made.' Self-employed courier Ian lives behind the bar in the former hotel in Bedford, Bedfordshire - an hour and a half outside of London with his partner Maureen, 61. The retired admin staffer and Ian pay £350 each as part of their property guardian rent. The German village where yearly rent costs less than £1 They're among 10,000 people in Britain who have become property guardians due to the rising cost of living, the rental crisis and property shortages. Property guardians live in an empty building or part of a building that would otherwise be empty to ensure it is not broken into and safeguarded. In return, guardians like Ian get to rent the property at up to 70% below its market value often with the cost of gas, electric, water and council tax included. When Ian first heard about the scheme through a friend, he knew it was the 'miracle cure' he needed to be able to cut costs and save for retirement. Ian said: 'I know people will say selling a property at my age to start renting again is crazy at my age. 'I discovered it's not bonkers but bankable because being a property guardian actually covers your costs and allows you to rent amazing properties at a tiny fraction of market value. 'It made the decision to sell my two-bed first floor flat so much easier,' he said. The self-employed courier and former postie bought his two-bedroom leasehold flat in Dunstable, Bedfordshire, in 2006 for £100,000. 'Like most people my age I was told buying was critical to retirement. 'But when the lockdown hit and energy prices and food costs started skyrocketing, I knew I had to find a solution to making the money I earned stretch further if I ever was to retire.' Ian admits he was terrified about skyrocketing gas and electric prices. As a courier Ian was also hit with escalating fuel costs. How Ian's costs changed after becoming a guardian WHEN Ian sold his flat in 2022, he was paying £300 a month for his mortgage, £50 for electricity, £30 for water and his council tax was £100 with a single person's discount. Ian also had to stump up £100 a month leasehold fee for his flat and budget another £50 a month for extra leasehold fees including roofing and emergency funds. His other monthly fees include Wi-Fi at £25 a month, phone bill of £30, groceries cost £150 and fuel was more than £300. Plus, he was paying property and vehicle insurance costs of over £200 a month, £100 for repairs and £100 in parking costs. In total, Ian was faced with monthly costs of almost £1,900 a month. After moving to the pub, he pays £900 a month including all living costs, fuel, insurance on his van and accommodation. Ian's new home As Ian completed the £140,000 sale of his two-bedroom flat in 2022, he also applied to be a property guardian. He signed up with Live in Guardians, which works with property owners and potential guardians to find the right property for the right person. 'I filled out a questionnaire, provided my renting history, exchanged questions and was acccepted,' Ian said. 'It was like applying to rent a property. I didn't need any special skills. 'The fact I was older, had owned property and was dependable was a big bonus for me. 'Once I was approved to be a guardian on their books, I got to apply for the range of properties they had on offer,' he says. His new home is a pub earmarked for redevelopment, but Ian can live there until redevelopment begins which isn't expected for at least two years. Ian said: 'Live in Guardians can find me a new property whenever I want. 'They have properties all over the country from old fire stations to former nursing homes, pubs, posh houses and form office blocks available as a place to call home.' The traditional British pub with the familiar white facade, dark brick tints and red door has leaded glass windows, an original bar, wood floors and fireplaces. There are four rooms available to rent, but Ian said they don't always see the other guardians. Included in Ian's rent is the gas, electric, heating, water, council tax, insurances, parking costs and hotel repairs. Ian and Maureen have got their own Wi-Fi for £35 a month, but they share a big kitchen and bathroom and separate toilets. In return for the cheap rent, Ian keeps Live in Guardians informed of any repairs which need doing until developers begin their work. Ian said: 'The energy bills are thrown in. I can enjoy a long shower and turn on the food whenever I want. 'It's a huge relief to not worry about the electric or gas bill. 'Before I was a property guardian, the cost of living meant I had to stop making monthly private pension payments so that on top of my government pension means I can have a little extra. 'It's not a huge amount but just being able to make monthly payments means I can breathe again. 'The fear of monthly bills has gone, and I can budget sensibly. 'I don't know when I will retire. I know it's years off. 'I do know when I finally stop working it will be possible thanks to living locally at 'my local.' Live in Guardians says it has 700 guardians currently in properties, although it has 32,500 in its database alongside £500million worth of property. Property terms can range from three months to seven years. Arthur Duke, its managing director, said: 'People are seeking out new and affordable places to live. 'We also have more companies than ever before wanting us to provide live in property guardians to stop their empty properties being scattered in, vandalised or not properly being cared for, Property guardianship agencies say the scheme allows businesspeople to pay reduced insurance and maintenance costs, generate an income on the empty premises, diversify its portfolio, and ensure the properties are well cared for. How to become a property guardian First research the different property guardian agencies. It's also important to know you're not a tenant. Instead you're a licensee which can mean fewer rights, and that it's easier to be evicted. You'll need to be over 18 years old, while some agencies prefer over 21. You'll need to be employed, self-employed or a student with income. Families are not suitable but single people or couples are accepted - but in some cases guests or pets aren't allowed. Then simply apply online via the guardian agency website - you'll need to provide ID documents, proof of income/employment and sometimes references. You might also need to attend an interview or information session. If accepted, you'll be offered viewings of available properties - most are advertised on the agency's websites. You should be prepared to move quickly if a place becomes available — unusual properties go fast. Once moved in, simply keep the agency updated on any concerns and issues with the building. How to choose a guardian agency Make sure the company is a member of the Property Guardian Providers Association (PGPA) or has good reviews. Here are some of the more established agencies: Live-in Guardians - Property Guardian Protection - Dot Dot Dot - Global Guardians - Lowe - Blue Door Property Guardians - Ad Hoc - 6 Ian and the other property guardians share a kitchen Credit: Ian Horton 6 They also have a communal bathroom but have individual toilets Credit: Ian Horton Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Arne Slot breaks golden Jurgen Klopp transfer rule by doing something he avoided
It took Arne Slot just two summer transfer windows at Liverpool to blow predecessor Jurgen Klopp out of the water in regards to transfer spend following the acquisition of Florian Wirtz Liverpool manager Arne Slot is making up for lost time this summer after opening the transfer floodgates at Anfield. And it has taken the Dutchman just a few weeks to break the rule predecessor Jurgen Klopp sought to adhere to above all others in the market. Klopp, 58, previously made a point of stressing his morals when it came to keeping Liverpool financially solvent. And that meant not necessarily spending on a par with the likes of Manchester City and Manchester United, who copped criticism from the former Reds boss for their free-spending ways in the past. Of course that changed over time as Liverpool made allowances in opening their chequebook so Klopp could compete. But the German was staunchly against spending £100million fees on individuals when he first arrived at Anfield – a line Liverpool have now crossed with the blockbuster signing of Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen in a British record deal worth up to £116m, with £100m of that being guaranteed. "If you bring one player in for £100m or whatever and he gets injured then it all goes through the chimney," Klopp warned back in 2016 after United forked out £89m to re-sign Paul Pogba from Juventus. "The day that this is football, I'm not in a job any more, because the game is about playing together. "That is why somebody invented passes so these players can play together. It's not about running with the ball because you can do it all the time. Building the group is not my unique idea – it is necessary to be successful in football. "Other clubs can go out and spend more money and collect top players, yes. Do I have to do it differently to that? I don't know exactly how much money we could spend because nobody has told me up to this point, 'No, no, no you can't do this.' "If I spend money it is because I am trying to build a real team. You can win championships, you can win titles. But maybe there is a manner in which you want it. It is about how it is." The Merseysiders have added 22-year-old Wirtz to their armoury and could have to shell out as much as £116m if certain conditions are met. And that addition means Liverpool have now spent more money in this window than any other in their history to date. Slot recruited Jeremie Frimpong (also from Leverkusen) for £29.5m earlier in the summer, while goalkeeper Giorgi Mamardashvili has joined from Valencia for an initial £25m, along with £4m in add-ons – with that deal agreed last summer counting towards their 2025 spending. Not only that, but a £40m move for Bournemouth left-back Milos Kerkez is also in the pipeline. Provided the Kerkez deal goes through as expected, that would take Liverpool's total spend this summer to roughly £215m (providing all bonus clauses are met). And despite the fact the transfer window has been open for less than one month, that would far eclipse the previous record for total spend in any other window. The closest Klopp came to matching that sum was in the summer of 2018 when he spent around £170m on new signings. That included Alisson from Roma (£65m), Naby Keita from RB Leipzig (£53m), Fabinho from Monaco (£39m) and Xherdan Shaqiri from Stoke (£13.5m), though the investments paid off as they won the Champions League that season. Eventually, Klopp wasn't too far from overseeing a couple of nine-digit deals himself, considering Liverpool signed Virgil van DIjk and Darwin Nunez for £75m and £85m, respectively. Van Dijk became the most expensive defender in football history at the time of his move from Southampton, and Klopp later walked back his comments concerning exorbitant transfer fees. "These kind of things happen. When you want to sign a striker as exciting as Darwin is, that's the market and you have to pay the price," he conceded in 2023. "I said so many things in my life and life caught me then later and showed me that my imagination was obviously not clear enough for how quickly life can change. That's how it is. "After that [comment about Pogba], we bought a centre-half for quite a decent fee [£75m for Van Dijk], we bought a goalie for quite a decent fee [Alisson]. Our situation is always the same, we try to level it somehow [with sales], the things we invest in the boys and in the players we sell, it's kind of that it's not going out of any kind of range and that worked so far, but I know, I heard it immediately." To Slot's credit, he won the Premier League in his debut campaign despite barely spending at all last summer. It's only fair that one, therefore, takes into account that spread of cost, which brings his net spend to a more modest £100m or so per summer window so far.
South Wales Guardian
5 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
I tested Whispering Angel wine to Lidl's Breath of Paradise
This 75cl light pink concoction costs £10.99 per bottle and was made as an alternative to Whispering Angel. Produced by Château d'Esclans it is made from choice grapes in the Esclans Valley and the Cotes de Provence region. It has proved to be quite a popular option for the summer season, but it's not exactly cheap. A post shared by Lidl GB (@lidlgb) Most sites I've found list it for around £22.50, which is what I picked it up for from Ocado. While I am not a massive wine drinker, the fact that Lidl had prioritised quite a bit of their marketing for Breath of Paradise in highlighting it as an alternative to Whispering Angel begged for a comparison to be done. Both wines are bottled in France, with Lidl's option being made from grenache, syrah and cinsault grapes, so it would be interesting to see if that made enough of a difference in the taste. For Lidl, a £10.99 wine is expensive for them, so it still had a lot to live up to, but the emphasis was still on Whispering Angel to justify the extra cost. As mentioned previously, I am not a big wine drinker, but I have slowly progressed from liking prosecco to white wine and rosé every now and again. I'm still not quite there with red wine yet, but I hope in the next few years my palate expands a bit and becomes more sophisticated. After purchasing the wines, it was interesting to see how much inspiration Lidl had taken in the design of the bottle. The two bottles were very similar in design (Image: Newsquest) The gold seal, white label, calligraphic writing and crest in the centre of the bottle all added up to a very similar overview. While the design was very close, how would the taste compare? I decided to try the Whispering Angel first, as it was the original, and there was a bit of trouble in getting the cork out. In my first go of it, the corkscrew got in, but then partially disintegrated the cork in the attempt to pull it out. The Whispering Angel was crisp and went down smoothly (Image: Newsquest) A second attempt was more successful, but it did mean bits of cork were now floating about in the light pink drink. After filtering the wine to make sure we got bits out, it was finally time to give it a taste. It should be said that both wines had been placed in the fridge at the same time, so they were at the same temperature. The wine was crisp, had floral notes in the taste and went down fairly easily. There wasn't much to separate the two wines (Image: Newsquest) I've not had a huge amount of rosé wine in my time, but it seemed decent, although with the price tag attached, it should be. After cleansing my palate with a bit of water (I'm told that's what wine critics do), I then went onto Breath of Paradise. What I found remarkable is outside of some subtle differences in flavour, there really wasn't much to separate them. Recommended reading: I tested Aldi's new 'wine of the summer' and almost lost all my street cred The 3 delightful Rosés from Aldi you don't want to miss and the 1 to avoid The own-brand supermarket wines that beat bottles costing hundreds Both are crisp and go down quite nicely on a warm evening, but there's not a lot to indicate that one is £11 more expensive than the other. Obviously, it should be noted I am not a professional wine critic, and I imagine there are those in the industry who would take my observations with a grain of salt, saying there's plenty to differentiate them. However, the average shopper isn't going to be at that level, and I imagine they might arrive at the same conclusion.
