Chiefs' Motaung in hot water
'The indebtedness as it currently stands at the end of January 2024 is in the sum of over R4.3-million,' reads an affidavit from Costa Couremetis.
Kaizer Chiefs football manager Bobby Motaung is subject to court papers aiming to have his estate sequestrated, according to a report from sundayworld.co.za.
ALSO READ: Nabi drops hint over Chiefs future
The news website reports that Pent Up Investment CC have filed papers in the Johannesburg High Court, with the company's boss Costas Couremetis claiming Motaung still owes him over R4.3 million with regards to a property deal.
'indebtedness'
An affidavit submitted by Couremetis claims that Motaung has not paid almost half of the R9 million that he was ordered to pay in November 2009.
'Pursuant to a failure by Lakeshore (Motaung was listed as the sole director of Lakeshore Trading) to make payment of the purchase price for the property in full, the applicant instituted proceedings in the above honourable court and obtained judgment on or about November 12, 2009 in a sum exceeding R9-million, plus interest and legal costs,' read the papers.
'The indebtedness as it currently stands at the end of January 2024 is in the sum of over R4.3-million.
'In fairness to the respondent, he has not sought to dispute the indebtedness since the judgment was granted against him. However, he has clearly not been able to pay the full sum, as and when it was due, even after having been given various reasonable and generous indulgences over many years.
'The respondent has over all of these years lived a very opulent lifestyle, driving a Bentley motor vehicle; owning and living in a large immovable property in a very prestigious area, namely Houghton; wearing very expensive clothing and different, very expensive watches at our various meetings and generally portraying the image of a very successful businessman, who is extremely well off; and who occupies a considerable position in the eyes of society, throughout South Africa, by virtue of the prominent position which he occupies at Kaizer Chiefs Football Club.'
ALSO READ: Nabi is wrong, Chiefs' league position is inexcusable
This is not Motaung's first brush with the law. In 2016 a five-year long fraud and corruption case in which he was implicated, with regard to the building of Mbombela Stadium, was struck off the roll due to insufficient evidence.
Tax bills?
According to the Sowetan Live, Motaung was also slapped with a R44.7 million tax bill by the South African Revenue Service (SARS) in June 2016.
In September 2021, the Sunday World also reported that SARS had asked liquidators to recover R90 million owed to them by a company in which Motaung was one of the directors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town tax fraudster sentenced to three years for defrauding SARS
Faried van der Schyff has been jailed by the Cape Town Regional Court to three years for defrauding SARS to the tune of R60.000. Image: File Bogus tax practitioner, Faried van der Schyff, has been sentenced to three years' direct imprisonment for defrauding the South African Revenue Service (SARS) to the tune of R60,000. Van der Schyff, 59, was sentenced in the Cape Town Regional Court on Friday. Hawks spokesperson, Zinzi Hani, confirmed that he was convicted on five of the seven criminal charges he had faced. Van der Schyff is also a co-accused in the mammoth trial against Nafiz Modack and 14 others in the Western Cape High Court, where the accused face approximately 3,000 criminal charges, which include counts of murder, extortion, and contraventions of POCA. Modack was recently also convicted in the Cape Town Regional Court on corruption charges. Van der Schyff was found guilty of income tax fraud, contravention of the Tax Administration Act, and contravention of the Correctional Services Act, and will serve three years in jail. It was reported that Van der Schyff committed fraud from 2016 to 2019 by operating illegally as a tax practitioner without being registered with SARS. 'The accused made clients believe that he was authorised to submit tax-related documents to SARS on behalf of the clients. Due to the accused's criminal activities, SARS suffered actual loss of R60,000,' said Hani. Van der Schyff was sentenced to three years' imprisonment for fraud, two years for contravention of the Administration Act, and two years for the contravention of the Correctional Act for the illegal possession of a cellular device while in custody.
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Sars enforcement: the new era of tax compliance in South Africa
Tax Discover how the South African Revenue Service has transformed into a powerful enforcement agency with Project AmaBillions, and learn how to navigate the new landscape of tax compliance to protect your finances. The South African Revenue Service (Sars) is no longer the passive revenue service many South Africans remember. With the injection of R3.5 billion from the national budget and the ominous launch of 'Project AmaBillions,' Sars has entered its most aggressive phase of enforcement in years and is quickly turning into one of the most sophisticated, assertive, and unrelenting revenue authorities in the world. Welcome to the new high-stakes era of tax compliance, which marks the end of the era of any perceived leniency. It is now the time of relentless enforcement. If you've received a surprise assessment or an additional tax bill, doing nothing could be financially and legally disastrous. Sars has flipped the switch: compliance or consequences South Africa's budget is strained, and Sars has one clear mandate: collect at all costs. The days of informal engagement are over. Today, Sars is functioning as a well-resourced enforcement agency, driven by targets and backed by increasingly automated systems that flag non-compliance in real-time. Their legal tools of collection include: - Final demands; - Civil judgments; - Third-party appointments are issued directly to your bank without having to inform you; - Garnishee orders issued directly to your employer; - Instructing the Sheriff to collect; - Asset seizures; and - Criminal prosecution. If you disagree with an assessment, silence is surrender. Unless formally and timeously disputed, Sars will pursue recovery. And they don't knock, they act. From garnishee orders to default judgments, Sars is now executing collections swiftly and with minimal notice. Once the machine is in motion, it becomes significantly harder and more expensive to reverse. There's a process, but it's not forgiving Yes, there is a dispute process. And yes, it exists to protect taxpayers, but only if used strategically and correctly. You have 80 business days from the date of assessment to object. Miss this window, and you must beg Sars to condone your lateness, and they're under no obligation to say yes. Even if the assessment is wrong, Sars is entitled to collect unless and until a dispute is lodged and the debt is suspended. Without this, enforcement proceeds. Your bank accounts, salary, or even those who owe you may be targeted. Sars has shown no hesitation in using every legal mechanism at its disposal, and you must thus use every legal mechanism at your disposal to protect your interests. Disputes must be strategic - this is a legal battlefield This is not the time for 'DIY' tax disputes. In the enforcement era, objections need to be drafted like legal pleadings, not complaints. Sars doesn't respond to emotion; it responds to evidence, statute, and precision. A skilled tax attorney can mean the difference between a successful objection and irreversible enforcement. This is especially critical when multiple years are at stake or where Sars alleges serious non-disclosures. Sars Commissioner Kieswetter has made their philosophy clear: compliance will be facilitated; non-compliance will be punished. The playing field may be fair, but it is also ruthless to those who don't act timeously. Every single day counts, and delay is dangerous In today's enforcement climate, an assessment is not a suggestion; it's a trigger. It signals the start of Sars' collection clock. If you don't respond with speed and legal force, you may find your finances, assets, and reputation under siege. Every day you delay, Sars gains ground. An assessment isn't an invitation to negotiate. It's a legal action, and if you fail to act swiftly and strategically, Sars will act for you through your bank, your employer, or the courts. Dispute on time. Dispute strategically. Or prepare for the full force of Sars enforcement. Act now, those who wait, lose. * Daniels is the head of tax controversy and dispute resolution at Tax Consulting SA. PERSONAL FINANCE
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Multi-billion Limpopo mega-project has ground to a halt
Makhado Special Economic Zone, announced in 2018, was intended to attract investments of R40-billion. The mega industrial project in the Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone has ground to a halt. Photos: supplied by Living Limpopo The Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone in Limpopo, announced in 2018 by President Cyril Ramaphosa, was intended to attract investments of more than R40-billion. But seven years later, the project has all but ground to a halt. Only one company has made a firm commitment to invest. Though more than R100-million has been spent, there are no roads, electricity or water connections; and the company contracted to build roads has terminated the contract. However, the chair of the board says a turnaround plan is in place and construction on the first infrastructure projects will start in September. Seven years after its launch by President Cyril Ramaphosa, the multi-billion Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone (MMSEZ) in Limpopo is at a standstill. R67.5-million has been spent on consultants and R50-million on roads and infrastructure. But there is no infrastructure, no electricity connection, no roads and no water. Described on its website as 'a flagship of the Limpopo Provincial Government' the MMSEZ is 'a green field investment platform consisting of two sites' – Artonvilla, near Musina, intended for light manufacturing, and Mopani, near Makhado, intended for heavy industry. The zone claims to offer 'state of the art logistics facilities promoting operational excellence' But though the MMSEZ was touted to bring in R40-billion in investments, so far only one company has made a firm commitment to invest. ALSO READ: Revival of job-creating initiative in Limpopo A report by the chair of the MMSEZ board, Nndweleni Mphephu, to the Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism department, shows how little has happened in what was to be a mega industrial park in the heart of the Limpopo Valley. The report, dated 28 May, follows questions in Parliament and an oversight visit to the area by members of the Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism portfolio committee. According to the Minister of Trade Industry and Competition Parks Tau, R2.27-billion would be needed for bulk infrastructure on the site, and R1.07-billion had been set aside between 2020/1 and 2026/7 in the provincial budget. In response to a question in Parliament in May from the DA's Toby Chance, Tau added that the DTIC's Industrial Zones Programme was helping the MMSEZ with advisory support. Some of the money has already been spent, much of it on consultants. In his report, Mphephu gives a list of consultants, service providers and contractors who have benefited to date. Spending of just over R85.2-million was approved for consultants, of which just over R67.5-million has already been paid to 17 consultants, including engineers, planners, quantity surveyors, project managers and horticulturists. Just under R40-million has been paid to service providers, including Eskom. ALSO READ: Limpopo's special economic zones expected to create 21,000 jobs According to the report, three contractors have so far benefited, including Tshiamiso Trading 1 and Tshiamiso Trading 2, which received a R200-million contract for roads and stormwater infrastructure and a R99.3-million contract for bulk sewer and wastewater treatment works. A contract for R134-million was awarded to Rembu Construction, also for the construction of bulk sewer and wastewater treatment works. But though some earthworks have been done by Tshiamiso on the northern site, there are no finished roads, electricity or water on either site. After being paid just over R50.4-million, Tshiamiso had to stop work on the northern site, after beginning bush-clearing, because the land belonged to a different organ of state and transfer had to take place first, the report says. Tshiamiso has now terminated the contract and is claiming more money from the MMSEZ, citing non-payment for standing time. This dispute is currently in litigation. Tshiamiso Trading is also accused of unlawfully removing white rock materials from another site to the MMSEZ site without the owner's consent or any formal agreement or compensation. ALSO READ: Limpopo unveils R1.8 billion budget boost for economic development The MMSEZ southern site was gazetted as a Special Economic Zone in 2017, but it turns out that the northern site at Artonvilla has yet to be gazetted, according to a response by Tau to a question in Parliament. Tau said the Limpopo government had indicated it would submit a request before the end of June 2025 to gazette the northern site. In his report, Mphephu noted fierce 'oppositions, dissenting views and pushbacks' mostly from environmental groups, over the southern site. Some of these were challenging the Environmental Impact Assessment in the Polokwane High Court. But in the absence of an interdict, the report says, 'all activities leading to the development, including township establishment processes are expected to proceed.' Tshiamiso Trading is one of the contractors which has been paid. When President Cyril Ramaphosa publicly announced the MMSEZ in September 2018 following his return from the Forum for Africa and China Cooperation, it came with the promise of an initial investment value of more than R40-billion. To date, little of that money appears to have materialised. ALSO READ: It's war on power, water theft to save Limpopo economic zones Responding to questions in Parliament in May, Tau gave a list of investment pledges amounting to more than R8.64-billion, of which R2.1-billion has been verified and validated from eight prospective investors. But according to the report, only the China-based Kinetic Development Group has come to the party, with a R16-billion promise of a ferrochrome smelter on the southern site, once township development on the site is approved, and subject to EIA approvals. If investors do come, one of the biggest questions will be: where is the water going to come from in this semi-arid area? The MMSEZ has approached the Water Services Authority (Vhembe) and the catchment management agency (the Department of Water and Sanitation, DWS) in the region to determine whether they have capacity, either from treated or raw water, to supply the developments. According to the report, Vhembe agreed to provide the MMSEZ with some of its allocation for raw water to kickstart development on the northern site. The DWS said treated water could be brought from Zimbabwe by pipeline for the future development of the site. 'For the south, a few boreholes were drilled in order to start the development of the site. For further development, a pipeline needs to be built to connect to the bulk pipeline from Zimbabwe. Furthermore, two dams are earmarked to be constructed in future to specifically provide water to the site as it grows,' the report says. According to the report, the MMSEZ has now implemented a 'turnaround plan' including a review of the design of roads and stormwater. A division of the Industrial Development Corporation has been appointed as implementing agent, with four professional engineers assigned to the MMEZ full-time. Construction on the first projects will start in September, the report says. This article is published in association with the Limpopo Mirror/Zoutpansberger. Correction on 2025-06-19 09:53 This article has been amended to clarify that the visit to the site was by members of the Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism portfolio committee, not by MPs. This article was republished from GroundUp. Read the original here.
