UK votes to decriminalise abortion in England, Wales, ending 1861-era law

UK lawmakers have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales, removing the threat of criminal prosecution for women who end their pregnancies, a move seen as a 'crucial milestone' for reproductive rights. The House of Commons passed the landmark amendment on Tuesday (local time) as part of a broader crime bill, with 379 MPs in favour and 137 against. Supporters say the change will protect vulnerable women from being prosecuted under a Victorian-era law. Abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019, and campaigners have long urged similar reform in the rest of the United Kingdom.
UK abortion reform seeks to end 1861 law
Although abortion has been legal in England, Scotland and Wales since 1967, up to 24 weeks of pregnancy, or later in specific cases, the 1861 law has technically allowed prosecutions in cases that fall outside that framework. Specific high-profile cases in the UK spurred urgency for reform, with critics arguing that women were being penalised while undergoing deeply distressing situations.
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who introduced the amendment, said prosecutions under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act were outdated and inhumane. Over the past five years, police have investigated more than 100 women in England and Wales for suspected illegal abortions, including women who had suffered miscarriages or stillbirths.
'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' Antoniazzi said during the debate. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty, and it has got to end.'
UK backs abortion decriminalisation
In contrast to the UK's decriminalisation; the US is witnessing growing restrictions. Since the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organisation, states have enacted abortion bans—some with no exceptions after cardiac activity is detected (around six weeks).
Nineteen states now impose near-total bans, with others limiting abortions to six to twenty weeks. For instance, in Georgia, a brain-dead pregnant woman was kept on life support until delivering via C-section due to a strict six-week ban defining fetal personhood and offering limited exceptions.
The UK crime bill must now pass a final vote in the Commons before heading to the House of Lords, where peers may delay but not block it.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

37 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Blinded by devotion to power and her son

Wednesday is the 50th anniversary of Indira Gandhi's Emergency. Her most authoritative and profound biographer, Srinath Raghavan, whose book Indira Gandhi and the Years That Transformed India is published this month, believes the Emergency was 'the single most traumatic experience in independent India's political history'. Today let's remind ourselves of how terrible it was. The truth is, as Srinath Raghavan's book points out, Indira Gandhi never thought very highly of democracy The cold facts of the Emergency are chilling; 34,988 people were detained under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act whilst 75,818 were arrested under the Defence of India rules; practically the entire Opposition was jailed; the press was censored; the Constitution brutally amended; and even the judiciary accepted that the right to life had been suspended. At the height of the Emergency, LK Advani wrote in his diary that Indian democracy was over and done with. At the time, most people would have agreed with him. There can be little doubt that the Emergency was declared to protect Gandhi's political career after the Allahabad High Court struck down her election and the Supreme Court only gave her a conditional stay. Her claim that it was necessary because the Opposition was trying to paralyse the government and Jayaprakash Narayan had called on the Army and the police to disobey orders was just a trumped-up excuse. Raghavan believes the actual declaration of the Emergency on June 25, 1975 was 'a coup d'etat'. First, under the Constitution there can only be one emergency at a time and in 1975 there was already an external emergency going back to the Bangladesh war of 1971. Second, under Article 352, the President can only proclaim an emergency on the written recommendation of the council of ministers. President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed didn't wait for that. He did it at the Prime Minister's personal request. Third, the mass arrests and the cutting of power to newspaper establishments on the night of June 25 /26 'had no legal basis and were done entirely at the behest of the Prime Minister'. At this point let's ask if Indira Gandhi was justified in claiming there was an 'imminent threat to the security of India'? The Intelligence Bureau had not submitted any such report nor did the state governments convey such information to the Union home ministry. So, did Indira Gandhi make up and manufacture this alleged internal threat? It seems like it. The truth is, as Raghavan's book points out, Indira Gandhi never thought very highly of democracy. She once wrote to the violinist Yehudi Menuhin: 'Democracy is not an end. It is merely a system by which one proceeds towards the goal. Hence democracy cannot be more important than the progress, unity or survival of the country.' Most people remember the Emergency for the two campaigns it is closely associated with – sterilisation and slum clearance. Both had at their head Gandhi's younger son, Sanjay. And both destroyed the credibility of the Emergency and Gandhi's personal reputation. Yet so dependent was Indira Gandhi on Sanjay that she was blind to this. She's even on record claiming he was like an elder brother. Certainly, she considered him her strongest and most loyal supporter after the Allahabad High Court verdict. As her principal secretary, PN Haksar, points out: 'She was absolutely blind as far as that boy was concerned.' To everyone's astonishment, in January 1977 Indira Gandhi called elections even though they weren't due for another year. It led to the collapse of her rule and the end of the Emergency. Did she do it because she thought she could win and legitimise the Emergency? Or was this a way of accepting it was a mistake and getting off the tiger's back? The truth is Indira Gandhi never apologised for the Emergency nor accepted it was a mistake. She only regretted aspects of it which she considered excesses. Asked by Paul Brass on March 26, 1978: 'Would you have done anything differently in relation to the Emergency?', her answer began with the word 'No'. It couldn't have been more pointed. Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal

Hans India

an hour ago

• Hans India

Vijay Shah advocates weekly yoga sessions in MP's Khandwa to restore social harmony

Khandwa (Madhya Pradesh): Amid ongoing controversy over his recent remarks on a senior Army officer, Madhya Pradesh Minister Vijay Shah sought to recast his public image on International Yoga Day by championing yoga as a unifying force for society. Speaking at a district-level event in Khandwa, Shah urged the city's mayor to organize 'weekly yoga sessions in every ward', emphasising that such gatherings could foster 'social harmony and goodwill' in an increasingly fragmented urban landscape. 'Yoga transcends caste, religion, and society. It uplifts the body, mind, and intellect,' Shah said, drawing a symbolic parallel between Swami Vivekananda and Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- both 'Narendras,' as he put it -- who have, in his words, 'shown the world the path of spiritual and cultural leadership.' The remarks come at a time when Shah is facing public and judicial scrutiny for his controversial comments about Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, an Indian Army officer. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had directed police to file an FIR (first information report) against him, and the Supreme Court has rebuked him for what it called 'unacceptable and insensitive' language. Later, a special investigation team was constituted to investigate the matter following orders from the Supreme Court. Yet on Saturday, Shah struck a markedly different tone. Addressing over 600 students from 20 schools gathered at a private school for the 11th International Yoga Day, he spoke of yoga as a tool to reconnect people in the digital age. 'We rarely visit each other's homes anymore. These yoga sessions will give us a reason to gather, to check in on one another, and to rebuild the bonds of community,' he said. The event, organised by the district administration, was attended by public representatives, officials, and educators. It echoed the national theme of 'Yoga for One Earth, One Health,' reinforcing India's vision of yoga as a bridge between personal well-being and collective consciousness.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Assam govt to move SC against HC order on 'scam-tainted' officers' reinstatement: CM Himanta Biswa Sarma

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Guwahati: The Assam government will move the Supreme Court against a Gauhati High Court order, directing it to reinstate 52 officials dismissed in the cash-for-job scam in the Combined Competitive Examination (CCE) conducted by APSC, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on also termed the high court order "painful" at a time when the state government was ensuring only merit-based Gauhati High Court had on Friday asked the state government to reinstate 52 of the 57 dismissed civil, police and allied service officials of 2013 and 2014 batch, who were involved in the cash-for-job scam in the Combined Competitive Examination conducted by the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC).The court directed that the dismissed officials, who had completed the probation period, be reinstated within a period of 50 days while allowing the state government to not assign them any duties for the next 30 days and conduct any departmental inquiries if to reporters at Baksa on the sidelines of an International Day of Yoga event, Sarma said, "The judgement by the division bench on the APSC matter is painful and has led to disappointment for us."He maintained that the order has come at a time when only merit-based recruitments are being done in the state."I haven't seen the judgment but from what I have read in newspapers, if it is correct, it (the judgement) is unfortunate," Sarma added."We will definitely appeal before the Supreme Court and will try the last moment to ensure that no one who had got their job through the wrong way are reinstated," the chief minister APSC's cash-for-jobs scam came to light in 2016 and over 70 persons, including its former chairman Rakesh Kumar Paul and 57 civil service officials , were arrested during the course of investigation by the police.