I test headphones for a living — here's what you need to do before you buy a pair
Don't be fooled — the headphones I'm wearing in that image are some of the worst headphones I've ever used. They're proof that you need to do your research when buying new headphones.
I test headphones every single day — it's my job. Yes, it's a real job. I absolutely adore finding the best headphones in a very oversaturated market. Equally, I cruelly love finding the worst headphones and rightfully warning people against buying them in my reviews.
I come to you with this knowledge: this is everything I've learned from testing loads of headphones. I'll tell you exactly what you need to look for (and stay away from), and help you understand marketing jargon from real audio specifications.
There are so many headphones on the market right now. You could even say... too many. I'll run through some features you'll need to think about now.
That list doesn't include everything, but it's the main information you need to figure out.
I'll use myself as an example.
I need excellent audio quality. I'm not too fussed about call quality. ANC is a must for public transport. I will almost certainly not use headphones during workouts. I need customizable EQ, but don't care about game mode or spatial audio. I do have a hi-res streaming service (shoutout Qobuz), so I'd like it to come with a wired cable, but it also needs to be wireless. Budget? As low as possible.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
That gives me a few options: realistically, the Bose QuietComfort headphones, Sony WH-MX10005, or the Soundcore Space One Pro.
When I tested these headphones back in February, I couldn't believe my ears. Considering they're just $199 (cheap compared to others these days), the sound quality is excellent, and they have a range of premium features like personalized EQs, confident ANC, and a wired connection.
I don't mean to ruffle any feathers, but sometimes promises aren't exactly followed through.
Phrases like "8K sound", "Hi-res wireless audio" and capitalized phrases like "[brand name] Proprietary Cotton Pillow Cushions" are worthy of a raised eyebrow and a chin scratch. Don't be gullible — make sure specs and reviews corroborate these claims.
There's little point in a manufacturer claiming its headphones have "SilentSoundAIMic" if the actual mics are just... the same as everyone else's.
Companies may also claim things like "amazing 20Hz-20KHz frequency range". This is just the normal frequency range. If it's 5Hz-30KHz, that's more impressive (and very rare).
Similarly, "dynamic driver" is the standard. More impressive is "magnetic planar driver", but even so, that doesn't guarantee good sound quality if the hardware itself doesn't match up.
If you want higher-quality streams, you'll need to make sure headphones are compatible with the following Bluetooth codecs: LDAC, ALAC (Apple only), and the many variants of aptX. Even so, compatibility with these codecs doesn't guarantee good sound, which brings me onto my next point...
A review is just one person's opinion. Therefore, you need to read a variety of reviews — but make sure they're from reputable publications. It's worth reading a bunch of that author's reviews to make sure they don't just praise every single piece of gear under their byline.
I would read a minimum of five. Once you know exactly what you need (as we discussed in point 1), you know what to look for. Are you a massive bass lover? Make sure the reviewer discusses bass in the article. Do you need the headphones for work calls? Make sure the reviewer positively rates the microphones and call quality. Do you value comfort over all? Make sure the reviewer says the headphones are comfortable.
The brand-new Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones have universal positive ratings. We gave them 4-stars, but I've seen reviews with 5-stars too. Another unanimously-lauded option is the Bose QuietComfort Ultra, not to mention the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3.
All of these headphones have two things in common: a big brand name and a plethora of fantastic reviews.
While reviews aren't everything (everyone has different opinions), if you go into a review knowing exactly what you're looking for, they are the most helpful part of pre-purchase research.
Even so, I think reading reviews is most important for budget gear. Because budget gear tends to have a lot of bold claims, as I discussed in the "Don't fall for good marketing" section above, I think checking out reviews for cheap headphones is the most important thing you can do. There are loads of affordable headphones with terrible sound quality — I know, I've reviewed enough of them.
So if your budget is on the smaller side, I would read every single review humanly possible. There's more room for error here, as truly good budget gear can be hard to come by.
I always recommend the JLab JBuds Lux ANC headphones for epic headphones under $80.
Hopefully now you can cut through the noise and figure out exactly which headphones will suit your needs. Remember: do your research, and don't fall for good marketing. Then you should be golden.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
37 minutes ago
- CNET
iPhone 16E Specs vs. Google Pixel 8A: How Apple and Google's Lower-Cost Phones Match Up
Google's A-series Pixel handsets are typically budget-friendly, but currently the cheapest Google goes is $499 for the Pixel 9A. If you do want all of Google's flagship features and are comfortable with getting a used or refurbished device, you could check out last year's Pixel 8A which is going for under $300 in the secondary market. Strangely, Google is currently selling the Pixel 8A for the same price as the Pixel 9A, so it doesn't make sense to buy a new version of the Pixel 8A. A sub-$300 Pixel 8A is an especially good deal when compared to the entry-level $599 iPhone 16E. Sure, the iPhone 16E offers a lot of features for its price and is certainly the most affordable iPhone you can get at retail. Yet, that price isn't exactly affordable when compared to the Pixel 8A. If you prefer to buy new, we'll point you to the comparison of the Pixel 9A vs the iPhone 16E. But if you're open to getting a used Pixel 8A for an even lower price, we've compared the iPhone 16E and the Pixel 8A below. The iPhone 16E. James Martin/CNET Design and display The most obvious difference between the two phones is that the iPhone 16E has a notch at the top of the screen (The iPhone 16, on the other hand, has a Dynamic Island instead), while the Pixel 8A just has a single dot for the front-facing camera. Size-wise, however, they're both pretty comparable. They both roughly measure around 6 by 3 by 0.3 inches (you can find more exact measurements in the chart below), plus both have a 6.1-inch OLED screen. The iPhone 16E, however, has a fixed refresh rate of 60Hz, while the Pixel 8A can switch between 60 and 120Hz for smoother scrolling and a more immersive gaming experience. That said, the iPhone 16E's A18 processor does run more intensive games like Death Stranding and Resident Evil 4 Remake. While those more console-level games are not yet available on the Google Play Store, the Pixel 8A's Tensor G3 should still be able to run most Android games at medium to low graphics settings. Google's Pixel 8A. James Martin/CNET Cameras One of the biggest limitations of the iPhone 16E is that it just has a single rear 48-megapixel camera. The Pixel 8A, on the other hand, has two rear cameras placed within a camera bar on the back: a 64-megapixel lens plus a 13-megapixel ultrawide lens. Even when it comes to the front-facing selfie camera, the Pixel 8A's version is better. It has a 12-megapixel front-facing lens while the iPhone 16E has a 7-megapixel one. The Pixel 8A's cameras. James Martin/CNET AI features The iPhone 16E might be an entry-level handset, but it does support Apple Intelligence, a feature that was previously only in higher-end models like the 15 Pro and the iPhone 16. Apple Intelligence isn't fully fleshed out yet, but it currently offers some benefits including a Clean Up tool for removing obstacles in photos, text summarization plus writing tools that help correct editing errors. An improved Siri is also apparently on its way, but it has been delayed. The Pixel 8A, on the other hand, has all the features of Google's Gemini that are also on the higher-end Pixel handsets. It can run Google's Gemini Nano AI model, use photo-editing tools such as Best Take and Magic Eraser, and more. Gemini will eventually be the default assistant on all Android phones, and for now you can switch between the Google Assistant and Gemini. A home screen on the iPhone 16E. Celso Bulgatti/CNET Software support Both the Pixel 8A and the iPhone 16E have relatively lengthy software support. The Pixel 8A gets a total of seven years of major Android OS upgrades and security updates from its launch last year, which means you'll get six years if you buy one now that it's a year old. That's in line with the six years of support Samsung provides its new Galaxy A phones in the $200 to $300 range, and is double the support Motorola provides to its Moto G line. While Apple doesn't publish software and security support timelines, the iPhone 16E will likely get between five and seven years of software updates based on what has been provided to prior iPhone models. Security updates could be even longer, as even the original iPhone SE from 2016 received a security update earlier this year. Check out more differences between the iPhone 16E and the Google Pixel 8A in the chart below. Apple iPhone 16E vs. Google Pixel 8A Apple iPhone 16E Google Pixel 8A Display size, resolution 6.1-inch OLED display; 2,532x1,170 pixels; 60Hz refresh rate 6.1-inch OLED; 2,400x1,080 pixels, 60-120Hz adaptive refresh rate Pixel density 460 ppi 430 ppi Dimensions (inches) 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.31 in. 6 x 2.9 x 0.4 in. Dimensions (millimeters) 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.8 mm 152 x 74 x 10.2 mm Weight (ounces, grams) 167g (5.88 oz.) 193 g (6.8 oz.) Mobile software iOS 18 Android 14 Camera 48-megapixel (wide) 64-megapixel (main), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) Front-facing camera 12-megapixel 13-megapixel Video capture 4K 4K at 30/60 FPS Processor Apple A18 Google Tensor G3 RAM/Storage RAM unknown + 128GB, 256GB, 512GB 8GB + 128GB or 256GB Expandable storage None None Battery/Charger Up to 26 hours video playback, 21 hours streamed video playback, 90 hours of audio playback. 20W wired charging, 7.5W Qi wireless charging 4,492 mAh (18W fast charging, 7.5W wireless charging) Fingerprint sensor None, Face ID Under-display Connector USB-C USB-C Headphone jack None None Special features Action button, Apple C1 5G modem, Apple Intelligence, Ceramic Shield, Emergency SOS, satellite connectivity, IP68 resistance 5G (5G sub6 / mmWave), IP67 rating, VPN by Google One, Circle to Search, 7 years Android OS updates, 7 years security updates, Best Take, Audio Magic Eraser Price off-contract (USD) $599 (128GB) $499 Price (GBP) £599 (128GB) £499 Price (AUD) AU$999 (128GB) AU$849
CNET
37 minutes ago
- CNET
The iPad Is Almost a Mac Now. Time to Finish the Job
What's a computer? It's whatever helps me get my work done. I love new ideas for what computers can be, but traditional work tools still win out. For my job, it's generally a PC or Mac. When I travel, an iPad is often convenient, but it's not the same, so I often bring both. The "why not both" approach is exactly what Apple has been pitching with iPads and Macs for years, but Apple has also been adamant that these platforms will never merge. I remember the stage announcement that said as much back in 2018. And back then, I said MacOS and iOS needed to combine. I'm willing to take the long game here, a game Apple is often playing with its tech. And I'm ready to step a few years down the path and wait for this merge moment to happen. But really, this moment should be happening right now. And it is: I thought the latest iPad Pro was the Mac I wanted in another form, minus the software I was looking for. That software is coming now, but things need to go even further. Watch this: The One Thing Keeping iPads from Killing the Mac 04:35 iPadOS 26 is a strong sign that the merge is already underway. Lo and behold, the more Mac-like experience is already here if you explore the developer beta. (A public beta is coming this summer, ahead of a fall release, I'd suggest you wait for before downloading.) While Apple always kept conversations about Macs and iPads very separate, this WWDC, Apple described iPad OS 26 as Mac-like quite a few times. Added support for more windows, a mouse pointer that's now an arrow and not a large circle, menu bars, a Preview app that shows files just like a Mac does, and folders that can be organized like a Mac — mostly — are some of features that already have me nodding my head in appreciation. With a trackpad/keyboard attached, the iPad can now start feeling even more flexible, able to multitask, and possibly, able to get serious work done efficiently. What concerns me, though, is it's still not a Mac. The closer anything gets to an expectation point without fully getting there is a zone that's ripe for uncanny valley disappointment. When will I use the latest iPadOS 26, get into a flow, and suddenly realize there's a part of the OS that's not quite the same as a Mac, and it throws me off? I don't know yet. Maybe it'll never happen. But my suspicion is that this new almost-Mac-like iPadOS will still, in some important ways, not be a Mac. The iPad Pro with the developer beta of iPadOS 26 is already getting so much closer to being a Mac. Scott Stein/CNET It's so close now. You can finish the job, Apple! Most iPads and Macs share the same M-series hardware and work with similar-feeling keyboards and trackpads. There's absolutely no reason I can see why an iPad couldn't also be a Mac, other than Apple deciding the software should be functionally different. (As for a Mac being an iPad, well, you'd need a touchscreen for that, and you'd need Pencil support, so it would be more complicated.) Getting all the Mac and iPad apps to be truly cross-compatible across an OS that would recognize both wouldn't be easy, but Apple can do it. Mac apps had to transition from Intel to ARM-based hardware, and before that from PowerPC to Intel. This time, at least, the hardware is the same…but the goals of the apps are different. Yet, the missions are converging. Macs and iPads and iPhones and everything else are getting similar visual designs with Liquid Glass and increasingly similar notifications and widgets. I don't want every single Apple device to work exactly the same, but when it comes to iPads and MacBooks — two product lines designed to be carried around and put in a bag — I feel their overlaps are getting pretty heavy now. iPad Pro vs MacBook Air side by side in 2024. The convergence is clearly already here. Numi Prasarn/CNET I don't think iPads should stop being simple. I agree with Apple: Let the basic iPad flow be the same, and trigger the multi-windowed work mode with the press of a button. But I don't want that multi-windowed mode to just approach being a Mac. I want it to absolutely, positively become a Mac. Let me leave my laptop behind. Let the Pro models and a certain line of MacBooks converge. This convergence is going to be necessary for another reason beyond just budget and packing convenience. If Apple really wants to make future Vision headsets or lighter-weight connected glasses that become essential devices, then it should compress its product line to make room. I could see myself carrying an iPad-slash-MacBook in my bag and a lightweight pair of Vision glasses that work with it. I don't ever see myself carrying a Vision, an iPad, and a Mac. Something has to give. As I said, I'm patient. In fact, I've waited for these changes — and written about them over and over — for over a decade. I can wait another year, maybe even two, for the next moves. I'm glad the ones I've waited forever for have finally arrived, but I still don't understand why iPad Pros can't also be Macs. Apple's latest moves make me more confident of my feelings than ever, but once again, I'm probably going to have to get used to waiting a bit longer one more time.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysts reset Qualcomm stock price target, send warning
Analysts reset Qualcomm stock price target, send warning originally appeared on TheStreet. Keeping a business afloat is hard. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 50% of small private businesses typically fail within five years. This five-year span seems like the breaking point. If your company is still in business after five years, it means you've likely overcome many setbacks and made many tough decisions. There's plenty that can derail even the best businesses. Suppliers may go bankrupt, fail to meet deadlines, or produce shoddy items. Marketing plans may go awry. Workers may defect to rivals. Even your best customers may eventually sour on your solutions, forcing you to pivot your business company that seems to have been quite unlucky in choosing its business partners is Qualcomm. Apple is one of its biggest customers, and it is slowly but steadily ditching Qualcomm's modems in favor of its own, creating a crisis for the technology company and forcing it to rethink its business. Qualcomm was founded in 1985, and for a business to be turning 40 is an incredible achievement. The company has two different branches of business. One is Qualcomm CDMA Technologies (QCT) and the other is Qualcomm Technology Licensing (QTL). QCT revenue streams are handsets, automotive, and Internet of Things, while QTL controls the patent licensing business. According to Bloomberg and the Bank of America Global Research estimates, Apple's contribution to QCT's handset division was 15% in 2024. On June 9th, Qualcomm () announced that it plans to acquire Alphawave Semi, a producer of high-speed wired connectivity, chiplets, and custom silicon. Artificial intelligence training and inference require highly parallel, memory and bandwidth-intensive computations. Accelerators are built on GPUs or custom chiplets, and need better, more efficient interconnections and AlphaWave's technology enables that. 'Alphawave Semi has developed leading high-speed wired connectivity and compute technologies that are complementary to our power-efficient CPU and NPU cores,' said Cristiano Amon, president and CEO of Qualcomm pivot to the data center markets may prove a good plan to recoup the lost revenue due to Apple's increasing reliance on its own modems. This acquisition of Alphawave Semi is expected to be completed during the first calendar quarter of 2026 and isn't final. More Tech Stocks: Amazon tries to make AI great again (or maybe for the first time) Veteran portfolio manager raises eyebrows with latest Meta Platforms move Google plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion move According to Gartner, semiconductor revenue in data centers almost doubled in 2024 to reach $112 billion, and the firm expects global semiconductor revenue to total $705 billion in 2025. Qualcomm revenue in Q2 of fiscal year 2025 reached $10.9 billion, a 17% increase year-over-year. Majority of the revenue came from QCT part of the company, which had revenue of $9.5 billion. Handset division revenue was $6.9 billion, automotive revenue $959 million and $1.6 billion came from IoT. Bank of America analyst Tal Liani and his team recently updated their opinion on Qualcomm shares. Analysts noted that the Internet of Things and automotive have significant growth potential and were up 27% and 59% year over year in the most recent quarter. However, they warned that smartphones, representing 73% of Qualcomm CDMA revenues, have peaked. They forecast that Apple's contribution will drop from 15% in 2024 to 6% of total handset revenues by fiscal year 2027 and drop to zero beyond 2027. The analysts believe there are only limited near-term catalysts for the stock and lowered their estimates and price objectives to reflect their updated growth outlook. They set a Qualcomm stock price target of $200, down from $245, equal to 15 times their calendar 2026 earnings estimates. Previously, their target price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 17. Qualcomm's forward P/E ratio is currently they reduced their target, they still think the upside is enough to justify maintaining their buy rating on the stock. However, they did highlight three risks that could limit Qualcomm's stock in the near term: The handset market is mature and without any visible growth catalyst. They expect recent smartphone growth to reverse, as the impact of product launches and channel fill in China erodes, and share gains at Samsung will subside. Apple will start using its own modem for non-Pro phones. Analysts concluded that "AI PC and data center connectivity could contribute to growth but may take time [to] carry enough weight to offset the smartphone trends."Analysts reset Qualcomm stock price target, send warning first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 18, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
