Sen. Padilla claps back after JD Vance calls him ‘Jose': ‘He knows my name'
LOS ANGELES - Sen. Alex Padilla blasted the Trump administration Saturday, calling it "petty and unserious" after Vice President JD Vance referred to him as "Jose" during a news conference in Los Angeles the previous day.
"He knows my name," Padilla said in an appearance on MSNBC on Saturday morning.
Vance visited Los Angeles on Friday for less than five hours after several weeks of federal immigration raids in the city and surrounding areas, sparking protests and backlash from state and local officials.
Padilla was thrown into the heated nationwide immigration debate when he was dragged to the ground by federal law enforcement officers and briefly detained when he attempted to ask U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question during a news conference earlier this month.
Vance characterized the move by California's first Latino senator as "political theater" in his remarks.
"I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theater, and that's all it is," Vance said.
Vance served alongside Padilla in the Senate and is now the president of the upper chamber of Congress. Vance's press secretary, Taylor Van Kirk, told Politico that the vice president misspoke and "must have mixed up two people who have broken the law."
Padilla, in his TV interview, said he broke no laws.
He suggested the misnaming was intentional - and a reflection of the administration's skewed priorities.
"He's the vice president of the United States." Padilla said. "You think he'd take the the situation in Los Angeles more seriously."
Padilla said Vance might instead have taken the opportunity to talk to families or employers affected by raids carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Other California Democrats rallied behind Padilla after the misnaming incident.
"Calling him 'Jose Padilla' is not an accident," California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Friday post on the social media platform X.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass highlighted racial undertones in Vance's comments.
"I guess he just looked like anybody to you, but he's not just anybody to us," she said during a press conference on Friday. "He is our senator."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oregon lawmakers consider strengthening National Guard oversight
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Oregon lawmakers are considering a bill aiming to strengthen the state's oversight of the Oregon National Guard amid 'increasing instances of federal overreach,' when deploying the military, Oregon House Democrats announced Tuesday. In April, Representatives Paul Evans (D-Monmouth), Dacia Grayber (D-SW Portland) and Willy Chotzen (D-SE Portland), introduced House Bill 3954, which would create limits on when and how the National Guard can be mobilized for federal service. In a press release announcing the bill, the House Democrats said the bill would protect the integrity and readiness of Oregon's forces. Architectural Digest names Oregon coast town among best in the U.S. 'The Governor of Oregon should have a ready, reliable National Guard for answering catastrophic disasters. The National Guard is really a partnership. There are missions the National Guard can, and should, fulfill as a part of our National Defense Forces Structure. There are also some missions, the current president has talked about, that are not an appropriate fit for National Guard personnel. The bill merely clarifies the expectations of the Governor in an availability status of the National Guard, and of National Guard personnel on what duties they may and may not be called to perform,' said Rep. Evans. Under the bill, the Adjutant General would be banned from authorizing any deployment that compromises the Oregon National Guard's ability to respond to in-state emergencies, such as wildfires, earthquakes and public safety threats. The bill states that the Adjutant General cannot assist, facilitate or allow communications between the Department of Defense and individual service members or units of the Oregon National Guard for active service unless for certain reasons — including, a congressionally authorized military contingency, in support of a national catastrophe, or in support of another state or territory with permission from the governor or executive civil authority. Oregon chef, bakery take home trophies from esteemed James Beard Awards The bill comes as President Trump mobilized California's National Guard last week amid protests over the administration's immigration enforcement — a move the Oregon House Democrats called 'politicized deployment.' 'We should use our state's resources to serve our state's needs. At a time when the president is weaponizing the National Guard against U.S. citizens, this bill is aimed at ensuring that the Oregon National Guard is used lawfully and in service of all Oregonians,' said Rep. Chotzen. 'Deploying the military against our country's citizens is an affront to our democratic principles,' Rep. Grayber added. 'Ensuring that the Guard can only be mobilized in keeping with their congressionally-authorized functions is a common-sense safeguard to ensure separation of responsibility between our military and our local law enforcement.' The bill passed out of the House Rules Committee on Tuesday in a 4-2 vote and now heads to the House floor for consideration by the full chamber. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now When reached for comment on the bill, a spokesperson for the Oregon Military Department emphasized the department's unbiased position in policymaking, stating, 'The military is bipartisan. We support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Oregon. It is up to our elected officials to pass laws, who were duly elected by the people. The Oregon National Guard's job is to protect Oregonians and defend America.' Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Oregon Governor Tina Kotek's Office told KOIN 6, 'The Governor will review all bills passed by the legislature that reach her desk for signature.' KOIN 6 News also reached out to House Republican Leader Christine Drazan (R-Canby) for comment on the bill. This story will be updated if we receive a response. 'Luxury' apartments deceived low-income seniors, Washington attorney general alleges As the bill makes its way through the Oregon legislature, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is challenging the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles — filing a lawsuit alleging the president breached state sovereignty and wasted resources, as reported by the Associated Press. Newsom's lawsuit was supported in a legal brief by a handful of state attorneys general, including Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, who described the deployment by the Trump administration as unconstitutional. 'Our Guard members aren't tools for political theater – they're trusted partners in our day-to-day public safety,' said Attorney General Dan Rayfield. 'This attempted power grab undermines the state's ability to respond to disasters and protect citizens. It's not just unconstitutional – it's a threat to the systems we rely on.' Last week U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco ruled that the administration violated Title 10, which allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service if the country is invaded or there is rebellion against the government. However, that decision was taken to a federal appeals court, which heard arguments on whether the trump administration should return control of the National Guard troops to California on Tuesday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers respond to U.S. launching strikes on 3 Iranian nuclear facilities
Washington — Lawmakers across the political aisle offered a mixed response Saturday following President Trump's announcement that the United States launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Immediately following Mr. Trump's announcement, Congressional Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. Ted Cruz, backed Mr. Trump's actions, while a number of leading Democrats condemned his decision to launch the attack without consulting Congress. In a televised address Saturday night, the president described the strikes as a "spectacular military success" and said "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." He warned of "far greater" attacks if Iran does not "make peace." "There is not another military in the World that could have done this," Mr. Trump said in a social media post. "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!Thank you for your attention to this matter." Here's what lawmakers are saying: Many Republican lawmakers back U.S. strikes in Iran, but not all "Good. This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done, President @realDonaldTrump," Sen. Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a social media post that "the military operations in Iran should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says." "The President gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement," Johnson said in the post. "President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated. That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity." Texas Sen. Cruz, who has backed of Israeli strikes against Iranian targets, said in a statement: "As long as Iran was able to access and conduct activities at Fordow, they could still rush to build a nuclear arsenal. Tonight's actions have gone far in foreclosing that possibility, and countering the apocalyptic threat posed by an Iranian nuclear arsenal." Rep. Rick Crawford, Republican chair of the House Intelligence Committee, praised Mr. Trump in a statement and said, "I have been in touch with the White House before this action and will continue to track developments closely with them in the coming days." The strikes announced by Mr. Trump Saturday evening further escalated the conflict between Iran and Israel that started June 13. Mr. Trump, on Wednesday, was still mulling over whether the U.S. military would join Israel's ongoing attacks on Iran. Before the announcement of the strikes, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia was among the few Republicans who opposed the U.S. action, arguing on social media, "This is not our fight." "Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war," she said in a post on X. "There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first." Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, reshared Mr. Trump's post on the strikes with a terse comment: "not constitutional." Massie introduced a resolution on Tuesday to prohibit U.S. involvement in the conflict. A few days earlier, He pointed out that the power to authorize use of military force rests with Congress, and said of the Israel-Iran conflict on X, "This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution." Some Democrats say U.S. strikes in Iran are unconstitutional House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democrats agreed with Massie that the president should have consulted Congress, and on Saturday demanded that lawmakers be "fully and immediately" briefed on the attacks in a classified setting. "President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East," Jeffries said. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also called for Congress to enforce the War Powers Act. "President Trump must provide the American people and Congress clear answers on the actions taken tonight and their implications for the safety of Americans," Schumer said in a statement. "No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy. Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity. The danger of wider, longer, and more devastating war has now dramatically increased." Sen. Mark Warner, vice chair of the Select Committee on Intelligence, said that while there is "no question that Iran poses a serious threat to regional stability," the president's actions threaten to drag the U.S. into an open-ended conflict "without consulting Congress" and "without a clear strategy." Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, who cosponsored Massie's resolution seeking to limit Mr. Trump's war powers, said in a statement early Sunday that Congress "needs to come back to DC immediately to vote" on the resolution "to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation." "Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk," Khanna said. Democratic Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts called on Congress to return to Washington to vote on Massie's legislation "to stop this madness." Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Mr. Trump's decision to bomb Iran without congressional authorization "is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers." "He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations," the New York Democrat wrote. "It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have been trying to limit Mr. Trump's ability to order U.S. strikes on Iran amid its ongoing war with Israel, emphasizing that only Congress has the power to declare war under the Constitution. The extent of the president's authority to enter foreign conflicts without the approval of the legislative branch has been questioned in recent years. The last time Congress authorized the use of military force was in 2002, against Iraq. A year earlier, days after the 9/11 terror attacks, Congress passed a bill approving the use of military force against nations, organizations or individuals the president determines "planned, authorized, committed, or aided the 9/11 terrorist attacks." Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan urged Democratic colleagues in a post, "Don't make another mistake in dragging our country into another war," and added, "You can stop the President and the war mongers in Congress by signing on to our War Powers Resolution." In contrast to other Congressional Democrats, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania said he fully supports the U.S. strikes on Iran. "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS," Fetterman said in a social media post. "Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." Sen. Bernie Sanders, who's on a tour this weekend in red Southern states, announced the news of the U.S. attacks on Iran to his supporters and was met the chants of "no more war" from the crowd. "It is so grossly unconstitutional," Sanders said. "All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right." Sneak peek: The Life and Death of Blaze Bernstein Some key Democratic congressional leaders left out of Trump's Iran attack plans Netanyahu reacts to U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alabama leaders speak on US attack on Iran
ALABAMA (WHNT) — Leaders across Alabama are voicing their opinions about the U.S. attack on three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday. President Trump announced the attack on social media. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.' President Trump Trump held a brief news conference to address the nation following the events in Iran, saying the effort was a 'spectacular military success.' He said the Pentagon will hold another briefing at 7 a.m. on Sunday. Since the bombings, Alabama leaders have voiced their opinions on various social media platforms. US has struck 3 Iranian nuclear sites, Trump says, joining Israeli air campaign Sen. Katie Britt posted a statement on X voicing her support for Trump. 'I stand by President Trump. Strong and surgical. Please pray for peace.' Senator Katie Britt On Facebook, Representative Robert Aderholt said on social media that he stands by Trump's decision, believing the president's actions could end U.S. conflicts with Iran. 'I fully support President Trump's decision to take out Iran's nuclear facilities. As I have said, I believe that if Iran gets a functioning nuclear weapon they would not hesitate to use it against Israel or the United States. When they say death to Israel and death to America, we have no reason not to believe them. I pray this action has made the world safer. President Trump has pledged to get us out of 'forever wars.' This could be a step toward ending the war we have been in with Iran since 1979. They have killed hundreds and hundreds of Americans in the past half century.' Representative Robert Aderholt Despite the support Trump has received, Representative Terri Sewell voiced her concerns about his actions against Iran. 'The Constitution is clear. Only Congress has the power to declare war. President Trump's unilateral military action in Iran, without congressional approval, is unconstitutional. It puts U.S. forces and our diplomatic personnel in peril, and brings us dangerously close to all out war in the Middle East. The Trump Administration must immediately brief Congress and take steps to prevent furter escalation of this conflict.' Representative Terri Sewell on X In contrast, Representative Dale Strong said on X that he supports Trump's actions. 'A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat to the entire world. They had ample time to come to the table and make a deal, but forced President Trump to take action to ensure the safety of our country and our allies.' Representative Dale Strong Lieutenant Governor of Alabama Will Ainsworth said he trusts Trump's decisions. 'I trust President Donald Trump and believe he is taking the steps necessary to protect our country, promote its interests, and put America first. Iran has been a bad actor for 46 years, and bad actions reap bad consequences. Support our President, and ask God to bless America.' Lieutenant Governor of Alabama Will Ainsworth on X Family of missing Albertville teen offering $3,000 reward for information leading to safe return Representative Barry Moore said he stands with Trump. 'I stand with President Trump. God bless him and our brave service members.' Representative Barry Moore on X Senator Tommy Tuberville voiced his support for Trump. 'God bless our Troops. God bless President Trump. And may God continue to bless the United States of America.' Senator Tommy Tuberville on Facebook Representative Gary Palmer released a statement on X. 'I fully support President Trump's decision to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. This decision was forced upon us by the refusal of the Iranian leadership to accept the reality that the U.S. would never allow them to have a nuclear weapon. With this action, American resolve to eliminate any and all threats against our country and our allies was put on full display.' Representative Gary Palmer In addition to state leaders speaking out about the attack, Auburn Basketball Coach Bruce Pearl voiced his support for Trump on social media. 'Thank you Mr president for your strength and vision, keeping us safe. Proud of our troops! You did what no one has had the courage to do for far too long. You were patient and clear. Pray for Peace through prosperity in the Middle East, expand now on the AA. You prevented a War.' Bruce Pearl on X Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
