logo
The future of snacking starts in Indianapolis

The future of snacking starts in Indianapolis

Axios15-05-2025

What your pantry looks like in a few years could be shaped by high-level candy conversations happening this week in Indianapolis.
Why it matters: With an estimated economic impact of $13 million, the annual Sweets & Snacks Expo at the Indiana Convention Center represents an important long-term partnership for Indy's convention industry that contributed to last year being an all-timer.
Zoom in: More than 15,000 people are expected to attend the four-day gathering, organized by the National Confectioners Association (NCA) and billed as the "Super Bowl" of the snack industry.
This is where the biggest brands unveil their latest products and budding snack makers strut their stuff in a showcase of startups.
The big picture: Key conversations will center on serious industry challenges, particularly consumer spending habits and food policy changes under the Trump administration.
Those include the Robert F. Kennedy Jr.-influenced " Make Indiana Healthy Again" effort, which prompted a response from NCA leaders, who called the initiative, which includes restricting candy and soft drinks from SNAP benefits, "misguided and not needed."
"One thing that is really important to keep in mind is that in terms of permissible indulgence and differentiation, we have never promoted chocolate or candy as a meal replacement," NCA president and CEO John Downs told Axios. "It's a treat, and consumers in America consume our products that way. So there is common sense there."
State of play: The trends Downs expects to dominate expo conversations this week and future store shelves come down to three big concepts:
🌶️ Bold flavors: Consumers are really into snacks with big, impactful, international flavors. No plain chops over here.
🎄 Special occasions: Products tied to holidays, traditions and celebrations are hot. Think limited-run and "get them before they're gone" offers.
💡 Innovation: Downs said this year's event has more than 400 products in 12 categories in a special presentation of new ideas happening this week.
Yes, but: You can't head to the show floor to get a taste of the next big thing in snacking. The expo is not open to the general public.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netherlands Defence Minister: NATO-wide 5% defence spend would be "historic"
Netherlands Defence Minister: NATO-wide 5% defence spend would be "historic"

Bloomberg

time34 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Netherlands Defence Minister: NATO-wide 5% defence spend would be "historic"

Ruben Brekelmans, Netherlands Minister of Defence said they and their European partners support President Donald Trump's calls to encourage Iran to the negotiation table in order to "come to a sustainable solution". Speaking about the upcoming NATO meeting, he told Bloomberg's Oliver Crook "if we agree to 5% spending on core defence and defence-related matters, that would be a historic step" and said it would be of particular significance "if 32 allies in unity agree on this". (Source: Bloomberg)

The Cost Of Trump's Tax Plan: Sapping Clean Energy And 790,000 Jobs
The Cost Of Trump's Tax Plan: Sapping Clean Energy And 790,000 Jobs

Forbes

time40 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Cost Of Trump's Tax Plan: Sapping Clean Energy And 790,000 Jobs

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 03: Workers put solar panels down during an installation May 3, 2106 in ... More Washington, DC. The installation marked the one millionth in the U.S. in the past 40 years. It has been predicted that the U.S. will reach 2 million installations in two years. (Photo by) While the U.S. House of Representatives has passed a Trump-endorsed tax bill that rolls back clean energy incentives, the Senate's refusal to support it as is offers a temporary reprieve. But buried in this legislation is a deeper threat to America's clean energy economy—one that could derail innovation, job growth, and climate progress across red and blue states alike. The bill is causing a stir because it wants to keep the tax breaks from the 2017 bill that the president had during the administration's first term. But here's the catch: it's trying to undo all the progress made under the Biden Administration when the Inflation Reduction Act was passed. This proposed bill doesn't just abolish the incentives for the future; it also takes back the money that's already been set aside or approved for renewable energy projects. This is causing a lot of trouble in boardrooms and construction sites nationwide. According to an E2 and Atlas Public Policy analysis released in May, over $14 billion in projects have already been delayed or canceled due to uncertainty since the law was passed in 2022. Additionally, the bill would reduce the investment tax credit provided to renewable energy projects. If a project costs $100, it would receive a $30 credit upfront to encourage the development of solar and wind farms. 'We have a product that competes with natural gas and coal, making them less profitable. So, reversing the IRA will make us grow less, but we will still be an ongoing company; it doesn't kill us. It restricts our growth at a moment when the grid needs these projects because of so much incremental demand from AI and digital computing. Renewables are here to stay. We compete on price. All we ask is an orderly wind down of the subsidies—not pulling the rug out from under it, because no industry appreciates that,' says Jorge Vargas, CEO of Aspen Power, in a virtual chat with me. Consider Aspen's completion of 10 solar farms in Pennsylvania. With a combined capacity of 42.5 megawatts—enough to power 8,500 homes with electricity each year—these projects generate long-term rental income for local landowners and enhance regional infrastructure. They have also created over 800 local jobs, excluding those related to engineering and procurement firms. The Solar Energy Industries Association said the sector employed nearly 280,000 people nationwide in 2023, and in 2024, it generated $70 billion in private investment for the American economy. Energy Innovation, a nonpartisan climate policy think tank, estimates that if Trump's tax bill goes into effect, the country could lose 790,000 clean energy jobs by 2030. For instance, in Texas, the repeal of the IRA is projected to lead to the loss of over 115,000 jobs by 2035, along with a $20.32 billion decrease in the state's GDP. 'Texas, California, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Georgia stand out as the biggest losers from IRA repeal due to their poor combination of lost jobs and increased household energy costs.' The Credit Brings In Deals OAKLAND, MARYLAND - AUGUST 22: In this aerial view, turbines that are part of Constellation ... More Energy's Criterion Wind Project stand in a row along the top of Backbone Mountain on August 22, 2022 in Oakland, Maryland. The 70-megawatt wind farm runs along eight miles of the mountain ridge and consists of 28 Clipper 2.5 MW Liberty Turbines, each one 415-feet tall. As of 2016, wind power accounted for only 1.4 percent of all in-state electricity generation in Maryland. Two large off-shore wind projects are currently in development. (Photo by) The main target is Section 45X, the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit. This credit has helped America bring solar, battery, and wind supply chains closer to home. It's attracted billions of dollars in investment for states like Georgia, Texas, and Ohio, often in Republican-led areas. Trump's bill would eliminate these credits, freezing hiring and stopping factory construction in the middle of projects. Electric vehicles are also in the crosshairs. The bill would ditch the credits for them, although these breaks would be available for U.S.-made cars. However, policy experts warn that many parts inside the vehicles are foreign-made. Given the global supply chain, it is nearly impossible for a car to be wholly produced in this country. Meanwhile, the tax bill would also nix the federal tax incentive under Section 30C, which encourages the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The credit reduces the cost by 30% and is now available through 2032. 'Prematurely eliminating 30C will take options away from drivers, especially in rural and underserved communities where fueling choices are already scarce,' says Jamie Hall, Director of Policy for EV Realty, in an email. 'This abrupt policy shift will slow EV adoption, increase pollution levels, and threaten construction, engineering, and electrical jobs across the country by pulling the rug out from under projects already under development.' Then, there's the potential elimination of the 30% investment tax credit for solar installations. 'We need a stable regulatory framework,' says Aspen Power's Vargas. 'Don't take a wrecking ball to it; instead, use a scalpel.' NextEra Energy, First Solar, and Sunrun are among the clean energy and solar companies that could be impacted. At the same time, IRA incentives for battery manufacturing and domestic sourcing have bolstered Tesla's margins and U.S. production scale, all of which would disappear if this bill passes. The Impact On Energy Markets? CARTERET NEW JERSEY, NJ - NOVEMBER 17: Vehicles move along the The New Jersey Turnpike Way while a ... More Factory emits smoke on November 17, 2017 in Carteret, New Jersey. The United States is still contributing to the global greenhouse gas emissions as the Trump Administration has dismantled the U.S. foreign-policy to reduce carbon pollution. Political divisions in the United States over climate change have spilled over to the outside world as seen at the COP23 United Nations Climate Change Conference that ends today in Bonn, Germany. (Photo by Kena Betancur/VIEWpress/Corbis via Getty Images) Trump defends the legislation as a way to cut federal spending and return to 'free market principles.' He reasons that the energy market should thrive by rolling back clean energy incentives. But here's the catch: the fossil fuel industry still gets many subsidies, while the more nimble clean energy sector, which is growing faster and creating more jobs, would be left to fend for itself. Fossil fuels benefit from substantial direct and indirect subsidies. Oil Change International calculates that the United States spends about $20.5 billion annually on fossil fuel subsidies. Meanwhile, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported that federal subsidies for renewable energy totaled $15.6 billion in 2022. CEO Vargas says the biggest irony is that the landowners who hosted his solar projects voted for Trump in 2020. They are now some of the leading green energy advocates; solar farms provide the revenue they need to keep farming and the power to energize their complexes. Although Trump may have convinced Red districts of a 'Green New 'Scam,'' many now champion the cause because they profit. "Leasing our land for solar has brought financial stability to our fourth-generation family farm," says Judy King, a Mercer County, Pa., property owner, in an email. 'It provides a reliable yearly source of income that helps us plan for the long term—covering expenses, making improvements, and ensuring the land remains productive and intact for future generations. We didn't have strong opinions about renewable energy before this project." But they learned about solar and voted to proceed, which they say also serves the environment and the community. The economic benefits are one aspect. The environmental advantages are another. The Rhodium Group estimates the U.S. will produce 500-730 million metric tons of additional greenhouse gases by 2035 if Congress repeals parts of the IRA. Even if this tax bill is revised, it sends a troubling message: policy commitments to a cleaner, more competitive energy economy can be reversed overnight. Investors need certainty, innovation requires stability, and U.S. policy in the next-generation energy economy must incorporate both. The practical effect of such sudden strategic changes is that they will impede the transition to green power, making energy more costly and much dirtier.

Support for solar energy, offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents: poll

timean hour ago

Support for solar energy, offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents: poll

Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes ... the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store