Public Protector refers tender for Lesseyton sports field to Hawks for criminal investigation
JOHANNESBURG - The controversial R23 million tender for the Lesseyton sports field in the Eastern Cape has been referred to the Hawks for criminal investigation.
On Wednesday, Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka held a media briefing to release findings of her investigations into the building of the stadium in Komani.
The report found several procurement irregularities and that the appointed contractor failed to deliver, despite going over the budget by almost R5 million.
READ: Public Protector finds some Gauteng public hospitals failed to respond to COVID-19 pandemic
Contractor Thalami Civils Pty Ltd failed to deliver on an athletics track, a soccer and rugby field, netball, tennis and volleyball courts and grandstands as outlined in the bid specification.
Public Protector spokesperson, Khulu Phasiwe, said the Enoch Mgijimi Municipality did not properly advertise the tender.
"The advertisement has to be placed in three different publicly accessible platforms. The municipality only did so in two different platforms. Even the tender advertisement itself, the period was initially 30 days, but the municipality shortened it to 14 days without informing the participants."
Phathiswe added that Thalami Civils didn't qualify for the tender as it scored the fourth-highest points among the bidders.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case
A man who allegedly made millions in cash by hacking ATMs in the Eastern and Western Cape was released on bail late last week after the Bhisho High Court ruled that the magistrate had made a mistake by not giving reasons for the decision to keep him behind bars. One of the men arrested by the Hawks in March 2025 and linked to a syndicate that has allegedly netted R7-million by hacking ATMs has been released on bail after the court ruled that the magistrate hearing his bail application had made a mistake. Mongameli Tom was arrested with another man near Peddie in the Eastern Cape after the pair allegedly hacked into two ATMs in Mdantsane, Buffalo City. At the time of Tom's arrest the Hawks said that he was also linked to a series of ATM fraud incidents in the Western Cape. Tom has denied any involvement. Tom and the other man were intercepted near Peddie on 17 March 2025 following a multidisciplinary, intelligence-driven operation led by the East London Serious Organised Crime Investigation team. The Hawks explained at the time that the suspects allegedly disguised themselves as cash-in-transit security guards, armed with a rifle, to create the illusion that they were legitimately servicing the ATM. But instead they were using 'jackpot' software to hack into the ATM and take all the money. Tom was arrested by the Hawks on 19 March 2025. On 9 April 2025 he applied for bail but this was refused. He is charged with 51 counts of fraud and 52 counts of theft which were allegedly committed between Cape Town and East London. Four of these offences were committed in the Eastern Cape and two in the magisterial district of Mdantsane, where he appeared in court. In February and March 2025 amounts of R143,500 and R236,900 were taken from two ATMs at two garages in Mdantsane. Tom, from Mitchells Plain in the Western Cape, is the director of two companies, Abakwazidenge Trading (Pty) Ltd and Khundulu Holdings (Pty) Ltd. According to Tom both companies made between R30,000 and R50,000 profit a month but had stopped operating after he was arrested. In an affidavit before court – detailing his personal circumstances – he stated that he had dependent children and had to provide for their needs. Acting Judge Aaron Zono said the magistrate hearing Tom's bail application had not dealt with an affidavit setting out his personal circumstances. Tom has no previous convictions nor pending cases. 'There is not a single reason in the magistrate's judgment why [Tom's] case or version has not been accepted or rejected. We may only assume that it was rejected for the fact that it is not referred to in the judgment,' Zono said. 'In fact, the magistrate's failure to accept or reject appellant's case is rooted in his failure to consider the same. One cannot accept or reject something he has not considered. No balancing act has been made by the magistrate. 'The magistrate did not account for the judgment he gave. He did not analyse the evidence before arriving at his conclusion. He did not explain why the evidence of the accused persons was not accepted and why that evidence did not meet the standard of being reasonably possibly true. He did not even explain on what basis he found that the state had discharged its onus of proof and why its evidence was accepted. 'A judgment without reasons is arbitrary. Equally a judgment that does not account for all the evidence is arbitrary. A judgment without balancing exercise between the two opposing versions or evidence lacks proper analysis and is consequently arbitrary. Zono also said the State had not rebutted evidence presented by Tom, who denies knowledge of any crimes, but only stated that the prosecution's case is strong and Tom's case is weak. He added that the magistrate should have given a reasoned ruling on why bail was refused.
The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
More than R13m worth of counterfeit goods seized near Clairwood
More than R13m worth of counterfeit goods seized near Clairwood THE Hawks members from the Durban Serious Commercial Crime Investigation unit executed a search warrant at a Rossburgh container depot near Clairwood, leading to the confiscation of counterfeit goods valued at an estimated R13.8m. The police confiscated the goods recently during a sting operation. Also read: Wentworth man arrested with over 300 pieces of rock cocaine Spokesperson for the Hawks, Warrant Officer Sibu Ncane, said the investigation commenced in April 2024, when the border police intercepted and inspected a container, leading to the withdrawal of product samples for further analysis. 'Brand attorneys subsequently confirmed that the inspected merchandise contained a broad array of counterfeit products bearing well-known brand names, including Adidas, Nike, Lacoste, Gucci, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Puma, Batman, Superman, Samsung, Steve Madden and Colgate. 'No arrest has been made at this stage, but the investigation continues,' said Ncane. The KZN Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation provincial head, Major General Lesetja Senona, praised the members for the good work. 'The discovery and confiscation of these counterfeit items represent a significant step forward in the fight against intellectual property infringement and the proliferation of counterfeit goods in KwaZulu-Natal,' he added. For more Southlands Sun news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and get news delivered straight to your inbox. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Hawks officers to undergo stricter integrity testing under new amendments
The Hawks' officers face more stringent integrity testing, which include polygraph, alcohol and drugs tests, after Police Minister Senzo Mchunu has tightened regulations. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers Police Minister Senzo Mchunu has tightened regulations set out to ensure members of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks) are beyond reproach. On Friday, Mchunu released amendments to South African Police Service (SAPS) Regulations for the Hawks, which were first introduced in September 2010. In terms of the regulations, Hawks officers are to be subjected to integrity testing, including polygraph, alcohol, and drug tests. In addition, every member, irrespective of rank, shall, not later than April 30 of every year, disclose to the minister his or her registrable business interests, those registrable interests of his or her immediate family members, of which he or she is aware. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The regulations also empower the national head of the Hawks to conduct or authorise any member or any other person to conduct an integrity testing programme to test the integrity of any relevant member of the directorate. Integrity testing programmes may involve an act or omission (by a person who is conducting the integrity testing) that offers a relevant member whose integrity is being tested the opportunity to engage in behaviour, whether lawful or unlawful, in contravention of the SAPS's code of conduct or contravention of any law; or constituting misconduct in terms of the disciplinary regulations. According to the regulations, integrity testing also involves testing a member for the abuse of alcohol or drugs, or using the polygraph or a similar instrument. Mchunu's amendments make provision for a report detailing the outcome of the polygraph or similar test to be submitted to the integrity section for further investigation. '(The) integrity section must, as soon as such investigation is finalised, submit the investigation report to the head of the directorate and the vetting officers for further handling,' state the amendments. Hawks members who, without good reason, fail to provide a specimen of breath as required commit misconduct, and if found guilty, may be subject to the sanction for disobeying a lawful order, command, or instruction in terms of the SAPS disciplinary regulations. Specimens of breath from a relevant Hawks member when reporting for duty, while on duty or while on call for duty, may not have any evidence of alcohol when such member is tested.
