China adds 100 Nuclear bombs in one year, India have 8 : Here's how many nukes Pakistan, Russia, Israel and others inducted

China adds 100 Nuclear bombs in one year, India have 8 : Here's how many nukes Pakistan, Russia, Israel and others inducted
New Delhi: Amid the ongoing tensions across the globe, nine nuclear-armed countries in the world— United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel—continued to enhance their nuclear arsenals in 2024. According to the reports, these nations have upgraded older weapons and added new, more powerful ones to their military forces. This situation is becoming a major threat to global security.
Russia and the United States continued to dismantle old weapons after the end of the Cold War. This has led to a decline in the global number of nuclear weapons. But now, this trend is changing. The speed of dismantling old arms is slowing down, while the deployment of new weapons is increasing rapidly. Here are some of the important details: An estimated 12,241 nuclear weapons existed worldwide as of January 2025.
Of these, around 9,614 were in military stockpiles and ready for use.
Approximately 3,912 weapons were deployed on missiles and aircraft, while the rest were kept in central storage.
About 2,100 deployed weapons were on ballistic missiles in a state of high operational alert, most of them belonging to Russia and the United States.
It is important to note that the Vladimir Putin-led Russia and the United States possess 90 percent of the world's nuclear weapons. As per the reports, the military stockpiles of both countries remained stable in 2024. However, the US and Russia are actively working on modernizing their nuclear arsenals. If the 2010 New START treaty, which is set to expire in 2026, is not renewed, the number of warheads deployed on missiles by both nations could increase.
India and Pakistan Situation
India, in 2024, increased its nuclear arsenal and developed new delivery systems. India's new 'canisterized' missiles, capable of carrying nuclear warheads, can be deployed even during peacetime. Some of these missiles may be capable of carrying multiple warheads.
Pakistan is also developing new delivery systems and expanding its stockpile of nuclear material. In early 2025, an armed conflict broke out between India and Pakistan, raising the threat of a nuclear crisis. SIPRI expert Matt Korda stated that this incident serves as a warning to countries that are increasing their reliance on nuclear weapons.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

39 minutes ago

• News18

Bushehr Airport Hit By Israel As Explosion Rocks Iran Province Housing Nuclear Site

Last Updated: Constructed with Russian support and powered by uranium supplied by Russia, Bushehr is considered to pose a low risk for weapons proliferation. Israel on Sunday launched strikes targeting Iran's Bushehr province, home to a nuclear reactor. The Bushehr nuclear power plant, Iran's sole operational civilian facility, is located on the southern Gulf coast, approximately 1,200 km from Tehran. Constructed with Russian support and powered by uranium supplied by Russia, Bushehr is considered to pose a low risk for weapons proliferation since Russia retrieves the spent fuel. Earlier this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that there are up to 600 Russian workers, including 250 permanent workers and others on temporary assignment at Bushehr. He said Israel had issued a promise to Russia over their safety. On June 19, the head of Russia's nuclear energy corporation warned that an Israeli attack on Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant could lead to a 'Chernobyl-style catastrophe". 'If there is a strike on the operational first power unit, it will be a catastrophe comparable to Chernobyl," the state RIA news agency cited Alexei Likhachev as saying. Likhachev was referring to the world's worst nuclear disaster in 1986, when a reactor exploded at Chernobyl in Soviet Ukraine. An attack on Bushehr would be 'beyond… evil," Likhachev added. Meanwhile, in March 2025, Qatar's Prime Minister warned that an attack on Bushehr could 'completely contaminate" Gulf waters, endangering lives in Qatar, the UAE, and Kuwait. These countries, which have limited natural freshwater, heavily depend on desalination from the Gulf. First Published: June 22, 2025, 17:55 IST

Mint

40 minutes ago

• Mint

Rare-earth crunch: India's quest for critical minerals must race the clock

Aditya Sinha , Aatman Shah Our EV makers face a rare-earth magnet scarcity while the country faces a steep challenge in securing local supplies of various rarely found critical minerals. But a Quad-led effort could forge a realistic action plan to create a supply chain independent of China. India should advocate a partnership within the Quad, anchored by an Indo-Pacific Rare Earth Processing Hub in India. Gift this article Globally, critical mineral development is marked by long gestation cycles, taking 15–25 years from discovery to production, given the inherently uncertain nature of exploration and hurdles at multiple stages of mine development. Australia's Olympic Dam project took 13 years and Mongolia's Oyu Tolgoi took 20 years. Globally, critical mineral development is marked by long gestation cycles, taking 15–25 years from discovery to production, given the inherently uncertain nature of exploration and hurdles at multiple stages of mine development. Australia's Olympic Dam project took 13 years and Mongolia's Oyu Tolgoi took 20 years. Even in the US, the Thacker Pass lithium project was delayed by about a decade as it faced environmental litigation. These delays reflect universal geological, regulatory, social and financial constraints. India's critical mineral strategy faces added hurdles from legacy inefficiencies, under-resourced exploration and fragmented institutional coordination. Geologically rich areas like Bastar Craton and Karbi Anglong are yet to move beyond early-stage exploration. The Geological Survey of India has historically focused on bulk commodities, resulting in inadequate pre-auction data on rare minerals under the post-2015 regime. Our lack of fully validated reserves tends to deter private sector participation. Infrastructure gaps, tribal rights issues and delayed clearances further slow progress. Also, India faces steep technical barriers in downstream processing. Rare earth separation requires up to 180 solvent extraction steps, demanding precision in chemical parameters and contamination control. Australia, while mining over half the world's lithium, processes only a fraction domestically and relies heavily on China. Indonesia's efforts to process nickel through 'high-pressure acid leach' (HPAL) plants have been marred by shutdowns, cost overruns and corrosion-related technical failures. Also Read: Rare earths: China is choking its own prospects of leadership India suffers from five critical deficits. First, process R&D infrastructure is minimal, with pilot-scale capability available only with a handful of government labs like CSIR-NML and BARC. Second, India lacks commercial-scale plants for key processing methods like 'solvent extraction-electrowinning' (SX-EW) or HPAL that are essential for extracting materials like copper, lithium or nickel from complex ores. Third, Indian facilities don't offer the ultra-high purity needed for battery-grade lithium or rare-earth magnets. Fourth, our hazardous waste handling is inadequate; the processing of some rare earths generates radioactive tailings and acidic sludge that require advanced containment systems. Finally, India lacks digitized continuous process control systems that are essential for safe, consistent and scalable refining. Without addressing these gaps, India won't be able to capture value beyond raw extraction (whenever mining starts). Also Read: China risks overplaying its hand by curbing rare earth exports Fortunately, there have been a slew of reforms lately. The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act of 2023, for instance, empowers the Centre to exclusively auction mineral concessions for 24 critical minerals. It also removes six minerals from the restrictive list of atomic minerals, thereby opening them up to the private sector. The Act also introduces a new category of exploration licences through reverse bidding, allowing private and foreign firms to undertake reconnaissance and prospecting for deep-seated, high-value critical minerals. Aimed at attracting foreign investment and explorers with advanced technology and risk capital, the regime was launched in March 2025, with auctions for 13 blocks across eight states. The government also aims to introduce viability gap funding, ease regulatory norms and fast-track rare-earth mine auctions. The aim is to capture 10% of global rare-earth processing capacity supported by incentives under the National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) 2025 and a proposed ₹ 1,500 crore recycling incentive scheme. While state-run firms are being mobilized, the real thrust must come from private participation. Magnet imports doubled in 2024-25 and tightening Chinese export controls have added to the urgency. But this is too little too late. While China has mastered the entire value chain, India has not even scratched the surface. Our processing technology is primitive and concentrated in a single state-owned company, Indian Rare Earths Ltd. Recent reforms cannot compensate for decades of lost time, inadequate research and strategic inertia. By the time we catch up, the geopolitical window may shut. Without speed and global alignment, current efforts risk being symbolic. India should advocate a partnership within the Quad, anchored by an Indo-Pacific Rare Earth Processing Hub in India. Each member can offer a unique strength: Australia has raw materials, Japan has technology and India could do the processing, while the US invests and generates demand. Under the NCMM 2025, a research stream led by the Anusandhan National Research Foundation should drive innovation across the value chain. This would include scaling advanced extraction methods like bio-leaching and solvent extraction, developing capabilities for rare earth separation and ultra-high-purity fabrication, and building digital infrastructure. Further, while restricting exports to promote downstream industries is a valid strategy, it should be pursued only after India has developed adequate processing capacity. At the same time, the planning and construction of processing facilities must begin in parallel with mining and exploration, rather than waiting for their completion. Even these efforts would barely scratch the surface. What India needs are radical, time-bound disruptions. The authors are public policy professionals. Topics You May Be Interested In

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

Iran FM shocks Trump: Abbas Araghchi set to report to Russia after US airstrikes

Published on Jun 22, 2025 06:39 PM IST Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has announced an urgent trip to Moscow for high-level talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, just hours after U.S. airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear facilities. Speaking at a press conference in Istanbul, Araghchi described the visit as a move to 'coordinate positions' with Russia, highlighting the deep strategic partnership between Tehran and Moscow.