
Big Don's boss officially launches election campaign
The Big Don's Smoked Meats boss has officially launched his election campaign for local government in the upcoming October elections.
Big Don's boss Donovan MacDonald has launched bayswaterdon, an Instagram page dedicated to his campaign for the election.
He said his decision to run for council came after years of ongoing issues with the City of Bayswater while owning his successful smoked meat business.
Your local paper, whenever you want it.
'I did a lot of yelling the last few days, now it's time to actually walk the talk,' he said on Instagram.
His post was flooded with words of encouragement and support.
'Mate you've got a hell of a lot of support,' one commentator said.
'Having you as a voice for the Bayswater area would be refreshing.' Donovan MacDonald is running for a West ward position on Bayswater council. Credit: Instagram: Bayswaterdon
'Let us know if you need volunteers for the campaign trial — we are in!' said another.
'Considering moving to Bayswater just to vote,' added another.
Last week, Mr MacDonald shared on the Big Don's Smoked Meats social media page his frustrations with what he called the city's lack of support and asked followers for suggestions for a new home for his business, which has since been deleted.
The post went viral, triggering a follow-up post explaining the situation in more depth and telling followers that he planned on running for Bayswater council's vacant West ward position in October.
Mr MacDonald told PerthNow he wanted to represent small businesses in local government and to help avoid 'over-governing'.
'It felt to me like I may as well do it — at least be a small business voice within the council itself. It seems like it should be more community minded,' he said.
When asked about Mr MacDonald's running for election the City of Bayswater CEO Jeremy Edwards did not comment.
Although Mr MacDonald said the city's CEO Jeremy Edwards and some councillors had been supportive, city officers were making things difficult — especially when he recently applied to make a whiskey distillery next door, saying it was a 'passion project' for him.
The problem surrounded the council having an 'issue' with the installation of three portable toilets, saying that the toilets required a building permit, which Mr MacDonald could not believe.
'They were literally forklifted in. No plumbing, above ground. But that's what triggered all this,' he said at the time.
Mr Edwards told PerthNow last Thursday that the sanitary facilities did require a permit and the works on the property were considered unauthorised.
Mr MacDonald said in his post that the City of Bayswater were also threatening to prosecute him, Mr Edwards said the city has not commenced a prosecution in relation to the installation of the sanitary facilities.
'While working collaboratively with local businesses, the city must also ensure compliance with State legislation, covering food safety, planning and building, to protect public safety,' he said.
Bayswater mayor Filomena Piffaretti said in a statement on Friday that the owner had recently approached the city for advice on the new venture next to his existing premises and is continuing to work 'collaboratively' with Mr MacDonald to to support a 'safe and compliant outcome'.
'City officers met with the business owner onsite and outlined the necessary approvals,' she said.
'The city is working proactively with the business owner to help secure the necessary approvals as efficiently as possible.'
Mr MacDonald said he planned to stay in Bayswater for the next 20 years as his family was set up in the area and his business had seven more years on its lease.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
21 hours ago
- Perth Now
Lidia flips off King Charles in new stunt
Senator Lidia Thorpe has sparked controversy after sharing photos of herself standing outside Buckingham Palace making a rude gesture. The independent senator, who made international headlines after gatecrashing an event during King Charles III's visit to Australia and yelling 'you are not my king', was in London this week to attend a conference. During her trip she donned a 'blak sovereign movement' shirt and was pictured outside the gates of Buckingham Palace holding an Aboriginal flag, making a rude gesture with her middle finger and standing with her hands on her hips. She shared the three images to social media with the caption: 'Dropped by to collect all the stuff this lot stole, but Charlie wasn't in.' The post sparked division among her followers. On Instagram, the reception was largely positive, with multiple users calling Senator Thorpe 'the only Queen I'll recognise' or 'our Queen'. 'This made my day,' one follower wrote, while another said it was 'great to see you delivering your middle finger for his bday in person!' The King's birthday was celebrated on June 14 in the UK. On Facebook, where comments on the post were blocked, others shared the post with less enthusiastic commentary. 'What a shock she did not get an invite into the palace,' one user wrote. 'What a bloody embarrassment,' another said. While the Senator's actions sparked debate online, they were less disruptive than her shock protest during the King's visit to Australia last year. Senator Thorpe made international headlines after disrupting a speech from King Charles III at Parliament House in Canberra on October 21. NewsWire / POOL / Lukas Coch Credit: News Corp Australia The Indigenous MP sparked international outrage after screaming out 'f**k the colony' in the Great Hall at Parliament House in Canberra shortly after the King had given a speech praising Australia. 'You are not our king. You are not sovereign,' she yelled at the monarch, 'You committed genocide against our people. Give us our land back. 'Give us what you stole from us: our bones, our skulls, our babies, our people. 'You destroyed our land. Give us a Treaty. We want a Treaty in this country. You are a genocidalist. This is not your land. This is not your land. You are not my king. You are not our king. F. k the colony, f. k the colony, f. k the colony.' She was evicted by security guards who had been watching her throughout the proceedings, continuing to yell as she was removed from the room. She continued to yell at the King as she was removed from the room by security. NewsWire / David Beach Credit: NewsWire


Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Belle Taylor: Reborns, Labubus and Annabelle — the whole world is playing with dolls
My house is full of babies. The toy baskets are full of them. There is one face down on the living-room floor and I suspect one or two under the couch. They seem to sprout, mushroom-like, from the deep recesses of doll-ville. These are my daughter's babies. I guess that technically makes me their grandmother but I'm usually assigned the role of sister, which seems to involve setting up the tea party while mum vigorously jiggles baby while yelling 'STOP CRYING' before declaring 'BABY HAPPY NOW' and flinging it head first to the corner of the room. It's probably important to point out my daughter is three. Although when it comes to dolls, age is no guarantee people won't get a little weird. There has been a spate of doll news of late. The strangest might be the rising craze for 'Reborn' dolls. These are incredibly lifelike baby dolls collected mainly by adults. A trend has emerged where people take these dolls out for walks in the pram, to the park and even on hospital visits. There are multiple videos online of people showing their 'evening routine' with their dolls — bathing them, dressing them, putting them in their cot for the night. It's all very calm and serene and at no point is anyone screaming: 'I'm not reading that book a sixth time! No! In the bed, not under it! I don't know why elephants have trunks. Wait, how did you get naked?' So it's not exactly true to life. The trend is particularly big in Brazil, where the craze has sparked something of a moral panic. Politicians across the country have filed at least 30 Bills to bar the dolls from accessing public services, with concerns the doll owners will try to take their charges to doctors or attempt to enrol them in day care. Other politicians are less worried, with MP Manoel Isidorio bringing his reborn 'granddaughter' into parliament, arguing that it was 'not a sin' to play with dolls. Pfft, Australian politicians would never take a doll to parliament. A lump of coal, a burqa, a full-sized dead salmon and a cardboard cut-out of Kevin Rudd maybe. But not a doll. Camera Icon Labubu Plushies. Credit: Instagram / TheWest At least the Reborn dolls are cute. The other doll craze sweeping the globe are Labubus — ugly, furry elf-like creatures with nine fang-like teeth. Labubus are sold by the Chinese chain store Pop Mart, but have become a global consumer phenomenon with people lining up to purchase the popular dolls. They have 'become a benchmark for China's pop culture making inroads overseas', according to China's Communist Party mouthpiece newspaper, People's Daily. 'The enthusiasm over Labubu may pass like any other viral trend,' The New York Times opined this week. 'But it could also be another sign that China, which has struggled to build cultural cachet overseas amid longstanding concerns about its authoritarian politics, is starting to claim some victories.' A headline in Foreign Policy in Focus this week: 'Labubu's rise mirrors declining trust in US leadership'. Sheesh. It's never just about the doll, huh? While Brazil nurtures their Reborns and China queues to buy Labubus, in the US it is one particular doll making headlines — a Raggedy Ann doll called Annabelle. Camera Icon The doll Annabelle in the movie Annabelle Comes Home. Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures / AP The doll, which has featured in several horror movies, is supposedly haunted. It was part of a travelling exhibition of 'spooky' objects called the Devils On The Run tour when it supposedly went missing in New Orleans. By complete coincidence, the doll's disappearance coincided with a local fire and a jail break, leading people to blame the doll. That's a great example of taking two and two and getting 5 million. Of course Annabelle had nothing to do with either of those things. It's just a doll, a blank vessel on which to project our innermost desires and fears. Cuddle them, collect them, accuse them of arson. Dolls are just tiny mirrors and here we are, all over the world, staring back at them.


Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
Tech speedbumps may frustrate social media ban for kids
There is no guarantee that technologies aimed at blocking young kids from social media will always work, according to early trial results. A ban on children younger than 16 from accessing platforms like Snapchat, TikTok and Instagram is expected to commence in six months, and yet, there are glaring questions about how and whether the plan will work. While the early findings of a federal government-commissioned trial found age assurance technologies are available, there's no silver bullet. "Age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective," the report found. "We found a plethora of approaches that fit use cases in different ways. "But we did not find a single ubiquitous solution that would suit all use cases, nor did we find solutions that were guaranteed to be effective in all deployments." Under the social media ban, platforms will have to take reasonable steps to prevent under-16s from creating new accounts and could face millions in fines for systemic breaches of the new rules. Cabinet minister Murray Watt maintained the need for restrictions around social media. "The Australian people believe that we do need to see some restrictions around social media use when it comes to young people," he told ABC News on Friday. "Unfortunately, it has become an insidious force, both for young people and more widely." Australia's ban is world-leading and, in the aftermath of the November passage of federal laws, other nations indicated a desire to emulate the measure. However, the legislation does not indicate how exactly the ban will be executed. The report found parental control and consent systems could be effective when first introduced. But there is "limited evidence" that they would be effective as children grow up or allow kids the right to participate in the breadth of digital experiences. Even after the coalition helped secure an amendment to ensure Australians wouldn't have to provide any form of government identification to verify their age, the trial found there was a risk of privacy breaches. Some age assurance service providers had over-anticipated the needs of regulators and built tools that led to an "unnecessary and disproportionate collection and retention of data". Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh has urged Labor to confirm what technology or verification tools will be used to protect kids online. "No more young lives can be lost or families destroyed because of the toxicity of social media," she said in a statement. The Age Assurance Technology Trial's final report is expected to be published later in 2025.