logo
Lacrosse hits a high in Bangladesh as global surge powers Olympic return

Lacrosse hits a high in Bangladesh as global surge powers Olympic return

Reuters23-04-2025

Summary
Bangladesh joins Asia-Pacific Lacrosse Union, boosting South Asian presence
Lacrosse to return as medal sport in 2028 Olympics after 120 years
APLU to host upcoming World Lacrosse championships in Asia
April 23 - The lacrosse world map expanded further east this week as Bangladesh became the 94th country to join the sport's global governing body, continuing a remarkable growth trajectory for a game set to make its Olympic return after a 120-year absence.
Lacrosse will feature in the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, marking its return as a medal sport for the first time since 1908.
Bangladesh became the 21st member of the Asia-Pacific Lacrosse Union (APLU), which celebrates its 21st anniversary this year, and joins neighbours Pakistan and India in forming a growing South Asian presence in the sport, World Lacrosse said on Wednesday.
"We're grateful for the effort of those in Bangladesh to foster a playing community, and look forward to new and exciting possibilities for competition in this region," said World Lacrosse Director of Sport TJ Buchanan.
The addition marks the second new member country for World Lacrosse in 2025, following the inclusion of Armenia in February. The global governing body has enjoyed a rapid recent expansion with 21 new nations joining since the start of 2022.
The APLU has been developing membership across various regions of Asia, with particular focus on creating competition opportunities for newer members in South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East, a development which will be showcased at the second Asian Lacrosse Games, scheduled for September in Saudi Arabia.
The region is also becoming a championship hub, with the APLU set to host the next three World Lacrosse Championships – beginning with the men's U20 event on Korea's Jeju Island in August, followed by the men's and women's championships in Japan in 2026 and 2027.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harry Brook smiles and riles India's attack with swagger and fortune
Harry Brook smiles and riles India's attack with swagger and fortune

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Harry Brook smiles and riles India's attack with swagger and fortune

Scientists say that the typical human can recognise 21 distinct facial expressions. After seven years of Test cricket, Jasprit Bumrah has grown to know a good handful of them about as well as any man can, from awe, through disgust, to fear, sadness, surprise and all their many combinations. You would guess it's been a while since he's seen a happy batsmen looking back at him from 22 yards, but if you had the binoculars on Harry Brook first thing on Sunday morning, you could see he was wearing such a big, goofy grin that his teeth were glinting through the gloaming. You don't want to kink-shame him, but you'd think there must be easier ways to get your kicks than to go running down the pitch to hit a man bowling 90mph bouncers. But Brook's brain seems to be wired a little differently. On the third ball Bumrah bowled him on Sunday, he decided to take two quick steps forwards and wallop it through the covers for four. It was an extraordinary shot, in an innings studded with them. Brook picked up one of Prasidh Krishna's short balls from outside off and heaved it into the stands beyond mid-wicket; he walked down the pitch to launch Mohammad Siraj over the silly mid-off he's just set to try and deter exactly that shot, and even played Rishabh Pant's roly-poly scoop over the wicketkeeper to score a four off Ravindra Jadeja. It was like watching a kid copying the trick he'd just seen on TV, except he got away with it. These aren't strokes your typical batsman could imagine, let alone execute. But then Brook is the most richly gifted shotmaker England have had since Kevin Pietersen was in the team. Time was, and not so long ago, when you would have been told off for trying them. But Brendon McCullum is the only England coach Brook has ever known – he has grown up being encouraged to play this way. By the time the second new ball came around, India's bowlers had had just about enough of it. They already thought they'd got Brook out once when he couldn't help himself but try to hook one of Bumrah's bouncers and was caught at midwicket off what turned out to be a no-ball, and then they thought they had got him a second time when he edged a ball from Jadeja through to Pant, who couldn't hold on to the catch. They had spent all morning trying, and failing, to persuade the umpires to let them change the soft ball they'd been working with, and now they finally had a shiny new one by right. They gave it to Siraj. He is one of those bowlers who likes to pick a fight, and always seems to be pissed off with his lot. The Telangana police recently swore him in as an honorary deputy constable, and he has the air of a man you wouldn't want to make ask twice to see your licence. Siraj beat Brook once outside off, when Brook swung so hard at a cut that he threw himself off his feet, then he beat him again when he hit his inside edge and the ball ricocheted away off his thigh. He was starting to warm up, then Brook went and belted his next two deliveries for four, and he reached a boil. Siraj banged the next ball in short at Brooks's ribs, and hit him on the elbow. He followed the delivery in and, while Brook winced, Siraj stood in the middle of the pitch, staring at him. He shot him a couple of kind words – exactly what is between the two of them – and then a length delivery which Brook spanked back over his head for six. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion He might as well have flicked him on the forehead. Siraj fired the next one in so quick that even though Brook missed it, it shot off his pads for four leg byes. When Siraj overcorrected himself and dropped the next one wide on the off-side, Brook hammered him for four more through point. That made it 18 off the over. And it was at this point that Pant decided everyone needed a time out, and called a trainer on to strap up his ankle. His teammates gathered in a huddle. Apart from Siraj who stood, hands on hips, staring into the distance. He looked as if he was going to blow up if anyone came within three feet of him. Somewhere in among all this, Brook was dropped yet again when he cut one of Bumrah's away-swingers to gully. He was finally out on 99, caught in the deep. You sometimes wonder if there's a thought in his head at all, except to belt the ball. In this, at least, he is part of a long Yorkshire tradition – Geoff Boycott, Herbert Sutcliffe and Norman Yardley all got out one shy of a Test hundred in their time, too, though you have to guess they probably weren't trying to belt a six when they did it.

Why Bumrah is most complete fast bowler ever
Why Bumrah is most complete fast bowler ever

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Why Bumrah is most complete fast bowler ever

It is getting harder and harder to reject the claim that India's Jasprit Bumrah is the most complete fast bowler of all impact he has on a match every time he bowls is remarkable and he has been a cut above anything else we have seen in the first Test at Headingley. Bumrah took 5-83 in England's first innings, along with having three catches dropped and Harry Brook caught off a Bumrah gets the ball in his hand it is box-office viewing. It feels as though something is happening every ball. He makes the bowlers at the other end look as though they are playing a different can leave the best players in the world confused about what has just happened. A whir of arms, a flick of his wrist, and the ball has hit you before you know I ever had the misfortune of facing Bumrah, he'd be done with me in a maximum of two deliveries. A good short ball, then a searing yorker would do the trick. I'd hold out hope he'd go straight for the second of those options as, by all accounts, it is incredibly hard to see the ball when Bumrah is bowling. He would cause a tailender like me some harm. Describing a bowler as "hard to pick up" is a phrase you will hear from batters about bowlers with quirky actions. Bowlers who hide the ball from a batter's view until the very last second are horrible to Bumrah, the ball starts in his unique load-up point. Imagine a clock face and Bumrah's action from behind. His fully straightened arm points to the number two. His arm then comes quickly down in to his bowling arc, but as it comes through to deliver, his elbow hyper-extends. This is where he gets some of his pace from - the ball disappears behind his elbow and the batter momentarily loses sight of the forearm then catches up with the rest of his arm, he cocks his wrist and is ready to unleash whatever delivery he has chosen. It's like a catapult. At the very last millisecond, the ball is back in the batter's view, hurtling at somewhere around challenge to batters and an advantage to Bumrah is his release point. He delivers the ball from closer to the batter than any other pace watching a fast bowler from side on. You will see most release the ball when their arm is directly above their front foot. Bumrah somehow gets his hand about 40cm ahead of his front foot, cutting the distance between himself and the batter, thus reducing the batter's reaction approach to the crease is not befitting of someone who is going to bowl fast. Bumrah has short, stuttering steps, without any sort of fluency. There is nothing in the approach that suggests he will be capable of bowling with the speed he does.A batter could watch as many hours of Bumrah footage as they like, yet still be surprised when they face him. There is no 'tell' as to what he going to bowl. No change of arm path, no change of finger position. A batter can only rely on reacting to what is coming their way. Another phrase you might hear to describe a bowler is "beyond the perpendicular". Again, using the clock face, a bowler with an over-the-top action would, from behind, have it pointing to the number 12, directly above their head. A bowler with a round arm would be at one or a bowler goes beyond the perpendicular, they are coming from the number 11, meaning the angle always feels like it is coming in to a right-hander, making them play at deliveries they might not need example of this would be the success Bumrah has had against Joe Root, dismissing him 10 times in Test cricket - only Australia's Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood have got Root makes Root push at balls wide of off stump, just like the first innings of this Test, angled in and moving away at the last second once he has opted to play at the ball, continuing in a similar vein to their duels in of the technical elements of Bumrah's bowling action, I don't think there has been a fast bowler in history able to affect matches so is like a computer constantly calibrating what is needed in any given situation, and he is able to implement almost exactly what he wants to with absolute this for versatility. Of pace bowlers from major nations to have sent down at least 500 deliveries in T20 internationals, Bumrah's economy rate of 6.27 is the best. At the same time, Bumrah has comfortably the best bowling average of any bowler in Test history with at least 200 wickets. At 19.33, Bumrah is miles ahead of West Indies legend Malcom Marshall in second place on it a stage further, the only bowlers with more than 100 wickets at a lower average than Bumrah all played before World War a climate where the disparity between the Test and T20 formats for bowlers is becoming wider and requiring a differing range of skills, Bumrah is the best in is a thinker about the game and would have been India's first choice as the new Test captain has it not been for his struggle to play in every match. He took the decision himself to not pursue the job as he did not feel it was fair on the lucky to be in an era of great fast bowlers. From recent international retirees Stuart Broad and James Anderson, to Kagiso Rabada, Cummins, Hazlewood and Mitchell sits atop of them all as the finest fast bowler to have played the game. Some accolade.

Sunil Gavaskar slams name of Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy: ‘It should be Tendulkar-Anderson'
Sunil Gavaskar slams name of Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy: ‘It should be Tendulkar-Anderson'

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Sunil Gavaskar slams name of Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy: ‘It should be Tendulkar-Anderson'

The legendary former India batsman Sunil Gavaskar has criticised the renaming of the trophy for the winner of the England-India series, saying it is 'jarring' to see James Anderson's name ahead of Sachin Tendulkar's. The Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy was unveiled this week, replacing the Pataudi Trophy, which had been awarded since 2007 and commemorated Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi, the only player to represent both England and India in Test cricket, and whose son 'Tiger' captained India. The Pataudi Medal will now be awarded to the winning captain of the series. Gavaskar, the 75-year-old former India captain who made 34 Test hundreds, is not happy with the change. Initially, he said it showed 'a total lack of sensitivity to the contribution made by the Pataudis to cricket in both England and India'. Now, he has gone further, arguing that Anderson's name should come after Tendulkar's, in part because he is younger (52 to the Englishman's 42). He went as far as to suggest Indian fans should deliberately misname the trophy, and described the argument that Anderson's name comes first on an alphabetical basis as 'a lame one'. Writing in a column for Mid-Day, Gavaskar said: 'The ECB [England and Wales Cricket Board] is fully entitled to call the series by any name they choose. But for most, if not all, Indian cricket lovers, it is jarring to know that Anderson's name comes first. Not only is Sachin Tendulkar along with Kapil Dev the greatest Indian cricketer, but also senior to Anderson by more than a dozen years [sic]. 'He is numero uno as far as runs and centuries are concerned in Test cricket but at the one-day level, too, he has more runs than anybody else. Anderson is third in the list of wicket-takers in Test cricket and his record is nowhere as good as Tendulkar in one-day cricket. Tendulkar is also part of a World Cup-winning team [in one-day cricket], which Anderson has not been. Jimmy Anderson was a terrific bowler but mainly in English conditions and his record away is nowhere near as good as Tendulkar's is. 'I urge all Indian cricket lovers including the India media to call it the Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store