Soaring UK crime costing up to £250bn a year, says thinktank

Soaring levels of crime are costing Britain's economy as much as £250bn a year, according to a report that blames austerity for a breakdown in policing and criminal justice.
The report by the centre-right thinktank Policy Exchange, backed by the former Conservative chancellor and home secretary Sajid Javid, said that years of cuts to funding for the police, prisons and courts had contributed to a dramatic rise in crime which was holding back the economy.
The report said an 'epidemic' of shoplifting, alongside other crimes, was hitting businesses, the public sector and individuals hard, with a direct cost to the economy of about £170bn a year, or about 6.5% of gross domestic product (GDP).
In addition, it estimated there were intangible effects on behaviour derived from a fear of crime. Although this is difficult to quantify, it warned that actions being taken by businesses and individuals to avoid being a victim of crime – such as not visiting the high street, or deferring investment – could take the total cost to as much as £250bn, or 10% of GDP.
With the government under pressure to find money for public services and defence spending, Policy Exchange said Labour needed to invest an additional £5bn a year into tackling a crisis in prison capacity, the size of the policing workforce and clearing backlogs in the courts.
Alongside highlighting austerity, the thinktank recommended reforms to sentencing, including automatic tougher sentences for prolific offenders and deportation of foreign offenders.
The report, which was also backed by the former Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane, urged the government to increase public spending on policing and the criminal justice system to help underpin the economy.
Official figures show a steady increase in levels of crime over recent years, while Britain's largest retailers have warned of a rise in shoplifting with huge costs for the industry. Last year, Sharon White, the former chair of the John Lewis Partnership, described the increase as an 'epidemic'.
Police-recorded shoplifting has increased by 51% relative to 2015 and is at its highest level in 20 years. Police-recorded robberies and knife crime offences are up 64% and 89% respectively over the same period.
Javid, who was home secretary between 2018 and 2019, before briefly serving as chancellor until early 2020, wrote in the foreword to the report that he was proud of his record in government for tackling crime, but added: 'that said, there's clearly more to do.'
'History teaches us that economic activity flourishes in societies that value law and order. When consumers and businesses know that contracts will be honoured, and that the fruits of their labour will be protected from theft and the threat of violence, they have the confidence to work, to earn and to build something of value. Without this confidence we all suffer.'
Labour has sought to crack down on crime, with Keir Starmer having said in opposition years of cuts to police funding and changes to sentencing rules were a 'Tory shoplifter's charter' for the rise in crime rates across the UK.
However, there are concerns that a tight position in the public finances and the government pushing to increase defence spending could lead to funding restraint for public services in chancellor Rachel Reeves's spring spending review later this month.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Policy Exchange said it recommended cuts to other areas of public spending, while suggesting that defence funding must take priority. This however would complicate Labour's promises not to return to austerity, as well as campaign pledges to fix battered public services.
Haldane, who is now the chief executive of the Royal Society of Arts, said: 'We are approaching what will almost certainly be a brutal, and what could be an electorally defining, public spending review.
'In an era of acute anxiety, this report is an arresting clarion – and wake-up – call to all political parties on the true and rising economic costs of crime and the societal consequences of continuing malign neglect of that most foundational of government responsibilities – the security of citizens.'
Diana Johnson, the minister for crime and policing, said: 'In the next decade, this government plans to halve violence against women and girls and knife crime, and restore public confidence in policing and the criminal justice system, as part of the Safer Streets Mission.
'Through the Plan for Change, we will also bring visible policing back to communities, with 13,000 extra neighbourhood police officers, PCSOs and specials. Alongside this, the government will build 14,000 more prison places by 2031 to lock up dangerous offenders.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

41 minutes ago

• Telegraph

This is why Reform is on the cusp of victory

New polling by Ipsos-Mori has Reform on 34 points, currently heading for a working majority in Parliament at the next election. If this came to pass, it would mark the most extraordinary result in British politics in at least a century. Can we really trust polls like these? Let us consider reasons to be sceptical. The first is that all polls like this – standard, nationally representative surveys of a few thousand voters – only capture national vote share. They do not project the corresponding outcome of seats. While we can make rudimentary assumptions of a party's likely representation in Parliament, they are still assumptions. A 34 per cent vote share would return a huge number of seats, but we cannot know whether the spread of votes would be broad enough to secure the number of seats implied by this poll. A party might receive 34 per cent of the vote share, but their support might be concentrated in small geographical areas. In such circumstances, Britain's 'first-past-the-post' electoral system would limit them to a small number of seats. We know Reform will get little support in the big cities; this will artificially inflate Labour's seats next time and limit Reform's. The second reason to be sceptical of these polls is that, this far out from an election, they cannot be treated seriously as predictions. Polls are merely snapshots of public opinion at an exact moment in time. Things were different three months ago; they will be different in three months from now. Sometimes, with polls like this, there is a third reason to be sceptical: you get 'rogue' polls which put one party in an unusually high or low position. Sometimes polls randomly tap into a sample which is out-of-line with public opinion for some reason. This is why you must consider the average of all polls of a given period, and also consider whether polls reflect trends. In considering this specific point, let us now flip the analysis back over. Let us consider why this poll should be taken seriously: there are several reasons to do so. You cannot credibly write this poll off as 'rogue'. This result of 34 per cent broadly reflects other polls coming out at the moment. While it is a little higher, it is not much higher, and it confirms a clear trend that Reform is on the march. It obviously also reflects recent election results. At the mix of national and local elections in May, Reform secured a new MP, a new Mayor and a raft of new councillors across the country. They received 31 per cent of the vote share in the local elections. Ipsos-Mori's poll merely puts Reform on a slightly higher vote share than they secured several weeks ago in real elections. You must always take polls seriously if they reflect what is coming out in focus groups at the same time. Ed Shackle, Public First's head of qualitative research, confirms this to be the case. All the current momentum is with Reform. He notes that, while you used to get some hesitation from voters about admitting they were considering a Reform vote, this is gone now. People increasingly sense that Reform is surging, and it is exciting to get on the bandwagon. While Reform is surging in less-affluent areas on the coast and in towns and small cities across provincial England, their support is up across the board in the focus groups. They are currently hoovering-up most of the votes of disaffected people across the country. This recent polling result has also come after a wave of stories on issues where Reform is strong: immigration and crime, most notably. For the last few weeks, the media has been awash with stories of grooming gangs, serious crimes alleged to have been committed by asylum-seekers, the continued arrival of small boats, and all the rest. This cannot but help Reform's standing in the polls. While I am personally sceptical of anyone's ability to make a judgement on the national mood based on their own personal, random conversations, when these conversations are entirely in line with the polls, you have to wonder. And the conversations I have with ordinary people in my own personal life confirms that huge numbers of people are seriously thinking about voting for Reform. Overall, then, we should take this poll seriously; Reform is very obviously the most popular party in the country at this moment. But we still have four more years before the next election and an awful lot will change. Above all, given their recent record, it is reasonable to assume Reform will blow themselves up with internal rows and blatant incompetence. If they can make it through to the end of this year in a similar polling position but without a terrible internal trauma, it will be worth taking them very seriously.

The Independent

2 hours ago

• The Independent

Giraffe genitalia among hundreds of body parts imported by trophy hunters

Wildlife hunters took home nearly 1,800 giraffe body parts 'trophies' in a year – including from more than 100 animals specially bred in captivity to be shot, it's been revealed. Whole skins, bones, skulls, feet and tails were all popular with wealthy hunters who paid to shoot giraffes – but one even tried to smuggle back home genitalia from an animal they had shot. Customs officers in the United States discovered the genitalia in the luggage of a traveller returning from Africa. Figures from the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) show that 1,791 giraffe trophies were exported worldwide in 2023, the most recent available data. Some 120 of the animals were recorded in the database as captive-bred, to be killed by foreign hunters. British hunters imported 21 giraffe trophies into the UK that year, but other European nations also accounted for some imports, including Austria, Germany and France. US hunters imported 1,072 (60 per cent) of the global total. Plans for a ban on trophy imports into the UK remain stalled. The Tories under Boris Johnson dropped proposals for a ban, and Labour accused the government of being 'complicit' in trophy hunting when Conservative peers blocked such a plan. Campaigners are calling on the UK government to finally deliver on Labour's long-standing promise to ban the import of hunting trophies – a pledge made in election manifestos. Giraffes are classified as vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) Red List, the global system of monitoring species' statuses. It estimates there are about 68,000 giraffes left in the world. The species is outnumbered three-to-one by elephants in Africa – whose own populations are dropping – yet they have less protection, conservationists point out, calling for action to close legal loopholes. 'Giraffes have suffered about a 40 per cent decline in numbers in three generations,' said Prof Fred Bercovitch, adjunct Professor at the University of the Free State, South Africa and a leading giraffe expert. 'If the decline continues at the current rate, they will be extinct before long.' British-owned trophy-hunting companies are offering giraffe-shooting 'holidays' online. One is marketing more than 200 giraffe shoots, with 'special offers' starting at under £1,500. One worldwide site offering wildlife shooting trips in Botswana and Zimbabwe charges a fee of $1,800 (£1,336) to hunt giraffes on its estates. Prof Bercovitch, who has written giraffe conservation reviews for the IUCN, rejected industry claims that trophy-hunting boosts local economies. 'If trophy-hunting benefits the local economy and increases the socioeconomic status of people in hunting areas, then those people would have a higher standard of living than people in areas where hunting is forbidden. However, there is no evidence to suggest this is the case,' he said. He called on the UK to act. 'The trophy-hunting of giraffes produces yet further declines in endangered populations. If the UK truly wants to support conservation, it must shut its borders to these trophies once and for all.' A private member's bill banning trophy-hunting imports is due to have a second reading in the Commons on 11 July, and it's understood the government will set out its position then, but private members' bills rarely become law without government support. A spokesperson for the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: 'The government was elected on a mandate to ban the import of hunting trophies – that is exactly what we will do.'

Metro

3 hours ago

• Metro

I was the only out lesbian MP for 13 years - here's how Parliament has changed

When Dame Angela Eagle decided it was time to come out publicly as gay, there were two people she knew she needed to tell first. That wasn't simply out of courtesy. It was because the year was 1997, and the reaction to the news from the media had the potential to be explosive. A general election had just resulted in a landslide victory for Tony Blair. Eagle – a Labour MP since 1992, covering the final stretch of Conservative power that lasted 18 years – became a junior environment minister. The landscape for LGBTQ+ Brits was tough, typified by the Section 28 law against 'promoting homosexuality' and the devastation of the Aids epidemic. Caustic homophobia was common in the media and broader culture. Making things harder still, there wasn't much precedent for a gay politician. There had been only two openly gay MPs before, Maureen Colquhoun and Chris Smith – and only the latter had come out publicly by choice. Smith, who became the new Culture Secretary under Blair, was the first of the two people Eagle decided to tell. She needed advice. 'It took me ages to get a cabinet minister to go out for a meal with me in the evening, where I could talk to him about how he did it and what I should be doing,' she told Metro. 'We knew each other well, and we were having a nice time in this restaurant, and we got all the way through to past the sweet, and I'm thinking, 'How do I, how do I just…' 'In the end, I was thinking, 'Angela, it's taken months for you to get this bloody meeting to ask him his advice, and now here we are, we're nearly at the end of the meal, and you still haven't.' With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! 'So in the end, I just said it, and he was gobsmacked and pleased and happy to help and talk and things like that.' It took less time for Eagle to tell the second person: her boss, Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott. 'I got 15 minutes, and I told him, and he said, 'Tell me something I didn't know already, love.' 'And he said, 'Can I give you a hug?' And I said, 'Yes,' and he gave me a hug.' After a final chat with New Labour supremo Peter Mandelson, she gave an exclusive interview to Suzanne Moore of the Independent ('I didn't want to do it in the Guardian, because I thought they were all a load of public school blokes', she said) and that was that. Eagle returned to her Wallasey constituency in Merseyside for publication day, so she handle things with her local party. After all the anxiety, their reaction was 'very positive'. 'They did a vox pop [series of interviews with the general public], the local media, and they couldn't find anyone that criticised me. So when they said that, that's when I burst into tears,' she said. Astonishingly, Eagle spent the next 13 years – Labour's entire period in power – as the only 'out' lesbian in the House of Commons. Over that time, she picks out her role in proceedings for the civil partnership bill, her support for gay adoption, and her opposition to the watering-down of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination laws in Northern Ireland as proud moments in Parliament. It's now thankfully hard to imagine a gay MP having to seek the advice of Deputy PM Angela Rayner before coming out, for fear of backlash. In fact, Labour's 59 openly LGBTQ+ MPs make up 'by far the largest party cohort of any parliament, anywhere in the world', according to PinkNews. Her current role, as minister for border security and asylum, puts her in touch with some of the most vulnerable LGBTQ+ people on the planet, asylum seekers fleeing persecution for their sexuality. Eagle said: 'I just think it's much better that everybody feels that they can be out now. And so that is part of a change that I'm glad to played a part in.' She added: 'I think people are well aware, given some backtracking particularly on trans rights in a lot of democracies, that there is a backlash going on about equality issues and LGBT rights, and we've got to make sure that we are there to carry on the fight.' Metro's interview with Eagle took place before the Supreme Court's ruling on the application of the Equality Act for trans men and women. She declined to comment when contacted afterwards, due to her role as a government minister. Last year, Metro revealed a gay man from Bangladesh had his UK asylum application refused after a judge told him he was only 'trying to pass' himself as gay. Asked about that story, Eagle said: 'It's very, very difficult to assert something that often you've had to hide. More Trending 'We just have to hope that caseworkers know the right way to approach these sensitive issues, and there isn't a cliched view and that they can make a sophisticated decision that everybody wants to support. 'I can't involve myself in individual cases, because we can't as ministers, but we've got to make certain that there's an understanding of what the issues are in some places where you really can't be gay acting, because you'd be killed.' For the last three years of the previous Parliament, Eagle sat as co-chair on the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Global LGBT+ Rights. Her experience there meant she knows 'very well' the struggles people face around the world, she said, adding: 'So I don't ever take progress for granted. We have to keep winning the arguments.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: I told my date my sexual preferences and was immediately ghosted MORE: Last 'LGBT free zones' in Poland are finally scrapped – what happens next? MORE: I'm allowed to date other women – my partner isn't