I took a ride in AI-powered robotaxis set to hit UK – they have more gadgets than James Bond but I missed key element

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
AS my odd-looking taxi pulled up, it was comforting to know that the driver couldn't have downed a skinful the night before.
And I was certain this cabbie wouldn't spend the journey telling me why my football team, Crystal Palace, aren't as good as I think they are.
6
Robot Jaguar I-PACE has a light on top that displays the name of the person it is picking up
Credit: Paul Edwards
6
The Sun's Oliver sitting in a Waymo vehicle waiting for it to take him on his 1.6-mile journey
Credit: Paul Edwards
6
Navigating a multi-lane highway with no one at the wheel as traffic whizzes by
Credit: Paul Edwards
That's because there wasn't a human behind the steering wheel. I was about to take a ride in an AI-powered robotaxi.
They are coming to Britain next year after driverless vehicles were given the go-ahead. Ride-hailing app Uber will be allowed to put passengers' lives in the hands of artificial intelligence in London.
For someone who has struggled to comprehend tech since the invention of the SodaStream, this ride was a frightening prospect.
Well, would you get on an airliner without a pilot?
READ MORE ON ROBOTAXIS
BUCKLE UP! Uber self-driving robotaxis are coming to UK roads NEXT YEAR
Gazing out on to the busy freeway in Phoenix, Arizona, with giant SUVs motoring past, I had a similar pang of nerves about riding in the driverless contraption that had come to pick me up.
More gadgets than Bond
I had read some horror stories about robotaxies going rogue.
In 2021, a self-driving car in the sunbelt city became confused by traffic cones then drove away from a technician sent to rescue it.
Eventually the Waymo motor had to be disabled so a human driver could get behind the wheel. The passenger filmed the 33-minute debacle and plastered it on YouTube.
Last year a General Motors-owned Cruise robotaxi struck and dragged a pedestrian 20 feet in San Francisco. The woman — who was injured — survived the ordeal.
And in 2018 a cyclist was killed by an Uber cyber car with a safety driver in Phoenix.
Watch moment passenger left TRAPPED in driverless car 'going round in circles' after robot taxi malfunctions
The back-up driver had been looking down to watch The Voice TV show which he was streaming when Elaine Herzberg, 49, crossed a darkened road in front of her.
It was the first fatal collision involving a fully autonomous vehicle.
Nevertheless, with self-driving cars being touted as the future of motoring, it was time for a test run.
Booking my ride was simple. I downloaded the app of Waymo One — a self-drive firm owned by Google's parent company Alphabet — and punched in my details along with where I wanted to go.
With the thermometer hitting 39C in this desert city, I was on the hunt for a nice, cool pint of Guinness and was told Casey Moore's Oyster House was the place to go.
At least there would be no argument about designated drivers.
Soon I was tracking the Waymo on my phone as it surged to my hotel through the early rush-hour traffic.
And then the gleaming white Jaguar I-PACE came into view — with no one at the wheel. On the roof was something that looked like a giant police blue light with my initials displayed on it.
Unlocking its door with the app, I sat in the back (no one is allowed in the driver's seat) as the Waymo played calming elevator music.
6
Screen on dashboard to greet passenger and button they must press to get going
Credit: Paul Edwards
6
Booking a ride on app, which is also used to unlock the door
Credit: Paul Edwards
I pressed a screen between the front seats saying 'start ride'. Then, a bit like KITT, the car from Eighties TV series Knight Rider, Waymo began talking.
As we pulled smoothly away from the hotel forecourt, the robotaxi told me to buckle up.
And then, with the steering wheel spinning as if by some invisible force, we eased into the Phoenix traffic as I let out an involuntary 'whoaa!'
On the opposite side of the road cars were whizzing towards us but all-electric Waymo deftly navigated the right path before pulling up at a red light.
How did it know it was red? That's one for the brainiacs. Swinging left into East Apache Boulevard, I caught sight of a couple of pedestrians ahead. How would the cyber motor react?
My Waymo One slowed and made sure to give them a wide berth.
That's because it is bristling with more gadgets than a James Bond car.
Its sensors include cameras, radars and something called lidars which use lasers to create a 3D image of the vehicle's surroundings.
The in-car computer then makes sense of all the data that Waymo is gathering.
And, learning to trust the tech, I was soon beginning to relax. All speed limits were observed and driving rules obeyed.
The ride was smooth and felt safe. Perhaps I was better off without a driver after all.
Wayve's technology operates more like a human driver would learning to drive in one city and then applying that knowledge to drive in new places.
Bill Gates
Britain's Department for Transport estimates that 88 per cent of road accidents are caused by human error. Soon we were pulling up outside the pub.
Keeping the rear door open a little too long, an actual human called Brian came through on Waymo's intercom to check I was OK.
He was certainly more amenable than Johnny, the robot driver of the taxi in 1990 sci-fi flick Total Recall, who Arnold Schwarzenegger ripped out of the cab in frustration be- cause he was not listening to his in- structions.
My 14-minute journey over 1.6 miles had cost $9.33 (just over £7). And, unlike most things in America, there was no need to add a tip.
Waymo One serves 180 square miles of Arizona's capital — that makes Phoenix the largest fully autonomous ride-hail service zone in the world.
After a couple of pints, I decided to summon another Waymo.
Not arriving at the front of the pub as I had imagined, it headed to- wards a park- ing lot at the back. Would the robotaxi be able to navigate this manoeuvre?
In May this year another empty Waymo trying to pick up its ride collided with a telephone pole in a Phoenix alleyway.
No one was injured but pictures show a fire crew attending the scene with the robotaxi suffering a crumpled front grill.
Hunk of metal
Waymo voluntarily recalled its 672-car fleet for a software update in what the company called a 'safety-first approach'.
The crash was put down to the robotaxi's software having 'assigned a low damage score' to the pole. It had misjudged the danger because there was no kerb or clear road edge.
My Waymo pulled into the parking lot smoothly and confidently.
But, unlike many humans, could it parallel park? Indeed it could and reversing is no problem either.
And — despite having sampled some local beverages — there was no barked warning: 'Mate, you're not going to be sick in my cab, are you?' Soon this taxi was traversing the two miles to Society restaurant like a London cabbie with The Knowledge.
The 11-minute ride cost $13.31 (£10.25). Again, no tip required by the computer chip and its hunk of metal.
With millions employed as drivers across the globe, tech titans are investing billions in robo vehicle technology for what they see as a lucrative driverless future.
6
Johnny drives Arnold Schwarzenegger in 1990 sci-fi flick Total Recall
Last year Elon Musk unveiled Tesla's Cybercab at the Warner Bros studio lot in Hollywood.
The world's richest man insisted that the sleek, golden two-seater car without a steering wheel or pedals will be on sale 'before 2027'.
Meanwhile Amazon-owned Zoox's self-driving cars will soon be available to the public in Las Vegas.
In Scotland a robobus with a back-up driver plies a route over the Forth Road Bridge. Wuhan in China — where Covid was first detected — has more than 400 self-driving Apollo Go cars taking passengers.
Tech giant Baidu delayed increasing the fleet to a thousand after complaints by human taxi drivers.
A cab firm in the city accused the robotaxis of 'taking jobs from the grass roots'.
It will be far from the last time humans protest about losing their jobs to AI-powered robots.
Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world leaders in new technology.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander
Over here, the UK start-up Wayve will be teaming up with Uber for its taxi service next spring.
If all goes well, the plan is to roll out these services across the country in the second half of 2027 when last year's Automated Vehicles Act comes fully into force.
Founded in 2017 by New Zealand-born Alex Kendall, Wayve believes it can produce robocars that are safer and cheaper than anyone else by giving the car 'its own brain.' Its AI-driven software can be used to make any car self-driving using cameras.
The live images are used to train itself to drive by visual observation.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates went for a ride to get fish and chips in a Wayve-powered motor — with a back-up driver — while in London.
The tech giant said: 'Other self-driving technologies work only on specific mapped streets.
'Wayve's technology operates more like a human driver would learning to drive in one city and then applying that knowledge to drive in new places.'
In May, Wayve raised $1.05billion (£840million) in funding, with Microsoft and Nvidia, a leading chip-maker, among investors.
It is the largest known investment in an AI company in Europe to date.
According to the Department for Transport, the UK cybercar industry could be worth £42billion and create 38,000 jobs by 2035.
This week, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'The future of transport is arriving.
'Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world leaders in new technology.'
Back in Phoenix, I summoned another Waymo for a ride back to my hotel.
By now I was relaxed enough to enjoy the experience of being driven through the night-time streets by a machine seemingly with a mind of its own.
Yet, as the journey progressed, I realised I was missing something.
There was no round-up of the Champions League scores and no chat about the most famous person to ride in the cab.
Waymos don't do banter. You still need a human driver for that.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NBC News

14 hours ago

• NBC News

Everything we know about Tesla's robotaxi launch in Austin

Tesla 's long-overdue robotaxi is finally hitting the streets this weekend, but the rollout may face some roadblocks. The Elon Musk -led electric vehicle company is expected to roll out robotaxis in Austin, Texas, on June 22, with the first driverless trip from the factory to a customer house expected on his birthday, June 28. Musk shared news of the tentative debut in a post on social media platform X last week. Here's what we know about the Tesla event so far. When and where The launch will include a limited number of Tesla vehicles debuting in Austin on June 22. The initial rides will be in the Model Y and not the CyberCab that was unveiled in October. Access to the vehicles and rides is by invitation only. Some influencers on social media have reported receiving early access invites to test out the new service starting Sunday. The rides will also occur in a geofenced area of the city and remote drivers will be monitoring as a backup. Musk told CNBC's David Faber that robotaxis will only operate in the parts of Austin that the company would 'consider to be the safest' and said Tesla will be 'watching' the cars in remote operations centers. Can Musk deliver on promises? Musk has long touted a driverless robotaxi, and the pressure is on the billionaire to deliver on his promises. As early as 2019, Musk said he was 'very confident' that robotaxis would launch in 2020. In May, Musk confirmed plans to debut the service in Austin this month, with launches later set for Los Angeles and San Francisco. At the time, Musk said the service would launch with 10 vehicles circulating Austin. 'It's prudent for us to start with a small number, confirm that things are going well and then scale it up,' he told CNBC's Faber. Wall Street analysts such as Wedbush's Dan Ives believe robotaxis will usher in the 'golden era of autonomous for Tesla' that could power its market capitalization to more than $2 trillion by the end of next year. That's about double its market value from Wednesday's close. 'There will be many setbacks ... but given its unmatched scale and scope globally we believe Tesla has the opportunity to own the autonomous market and down the road license its technology to other auto players both in the U.S. and around the globe,' he wrote in a note. Tesla, once seen as a self-driving tech leader, is now a laggard, trying to catch up to Alphabet -owned Waymo in the U.S. Waymo, which said it reached 10 million trips in May, is already operating a fleet of commercial robotaxis across the U.S. and is also seeking permission to test its autonomous vehicles, with a human safety driver on board, in New York City. Regulatory hurdles and opposition Tesla faces a bumpy road ahead, littered with regulatory hurdles and pushback from lawmakers. On Wednesday, a group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas called on Tesla to push off its robotaxi launch until Sept. 1, when Texas rolls out a new slate of self-driving laws. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public transit operation,' the group said in a letter addressed to Tesla's field quality director, Eddie Gates. They also asked for 'detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law' if it goes ahead with the launch. Public safety advocates protested the launch in Austin earlier this month. A group known as The Dawn Project, a tech safety organization that is critical of Tesla's autonomous capabilities, demonstrated a Tesla Model Y with currently available 'Full Self Driving' software running past a stopped school bus and hitting a child-sized mannequin. The group said it was a situation where the software misread the elements in the road. 'Any human ... following the law would have stopped when they saw the school bus stopped with the lights flashing. They would have stopped,' Dawn Project founder Dan O'Dowd told CNBC's ' Squawk on the Street ' on Friday. O'Dowd, who also runs Green Hills Software, a company that sells technology to Tesla competitors, told CNBC that the software is 'nowhere near done' and shouldn't be taking to the streets. 'This software does not know how to recognize a school bus,' he said. Tesla's FSD capabilities, which feature a standard FSD or FSD supervised, include automatic steering and parking, but have been connected to accidents and fatalities, according to data tracked by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Tesla under fire Tesla's brand has taken several hits in recent months with a decline in sales and reputational damage linked to Musk's political activities. Musk was a major supporter of President Donald Trump, funneling hundreds of millions into his reelection campaign and later spearheading his Department of Government Efficiency effort aimed at cutting costs. He left the department at the end of May. Musk's close ties to Trump's White House have caused owners to part with the brand and in some cases led to violence, with showrooms and vehicles targeted in arson and vandalism attacks. But the relationship between Musk and Trump soured earlier this month after the tech titan berated the president's spending bill on X, leading to a drastic sell-off in the stock. He later apologized for his social media posts, saying some 'went too far.' The EV maker is also seeing a global sales decline weighing on key markets such as the U.S. and Europe. Vehicle sales in Europe tanked 49% from a year ago in April, while global first-quarter deliveries dropped 13%. The decline was tied to a combination of Musk's politics and heightened competition in the EV market.

Auto Express

21 hours ago

• Auto Express

The Corvette ZR1X is so powerful that the Ferrari F80 is in its rear-view mirror

If ever there was a collection of random letters and numbers that undersell something, it's 'ZR1X'. These unremarkable four characters aren't attached to a small Japanese SUV or high-riding electric car – but the most powerful Chevrolet Corvette ever, with no less than 1,250bhp. On the new ZR1X, the American icon has been taken to a few orders of magnitude higher than ever before, meaning that on sheer numbers alone, it is brushing shoulders with hypercars. In order to reach this figure, Chevrolet has created a hybridised powertrain that capitalises on an incredibly high-performing twin-turbocharged V8 engine and an electrified front axle, much in the way Lamborghini does on its new Temerario. Advertisement - Article continues below The difference is that the Chevrolet's 5.5-litre V8 is considerably more powerful than the Lambo's, with peak power of 1,064bhp and an astonishing peak torque of 1,188Nm – and these figures, remember, are without the e-motor being factored in. It packs cutting-edge technology, too, such as a flat-plane crank and a pair of clever turbochargers that are integrated right into the exhaust manifold. This hand-built masterpiece of an engine really is a far cry from the pig-iron pushrod V8s generally associated with General Motors, and is instead directly related to the brand's GT3 motorsport program. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Additional power is then generated from an electrified front axle, which incorporates a 186bhp electric motor and a compact 1.9kWh battery pack to drive the front wheels completely independently of the rear. There's no facility to plug the ZR1X in; its power is produced via regenerative braking, and it decouples at speeds of over 160mph. Chevrolet has not finalised official performance figures, but suggests that 0-60mph will be possible in under two seconds and the 0-400m (or quarter mile) in under nine, blowing away even the (very) theoretical '10 second cars' from the Fast and Furious franchise. As with all hybrid-powered sports cars, there's a range of different modes that change the way a ZR1X can deliver its performance. The first Endurance Mode ensures that the battery capacity is never fully depleted, ensuring that a high level of performance is possible over a long period. Qualifying Mode shortens that peak operating window, expelling more battery charge more quickly and allowing it to run empty. Push-to-Pass delivers maximum available performance. Advertisement - Article continues below To balance out this astounding potential, Chevrolet has introduced a new brake set-up that combines huge 419mm Alcon carbon ceramic discs with ten-piston calipers at the front and six-piston ones at the rear. High-performance Corvettes have long been known for their impressive braking performance, but these take things to another level, with a quoted deceleration of 1.9G between 180mph and 120mph. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below In the US, the ZR1X will be offered with two chassis set-ups that both include magnetic dampers as standard. The base car is more road-biased and is paired with a standard sports tyre, but for ultimate track performance, the ZTK package ups the spring rates by 20 per cent, and swaps in some aggressive Michelin Cup 2R rubber. It also enhances the aero package with a high-mounted rear spoiler, plus some other tweaks. This aero pack can be fitted to models on standard suspension as an option. In addition, carbon fibre wheels are available which usefully reduce unsprung mass. The exterior design is closely related to the existing Corvette ZR1, which itself utilises a wider body that was first revealed for the naturally aspirated Z06. Inside, however, the ZR1X has adopted the Corvette's new interior design, with a new triple-screen layout and the removal of the controversial climate control buttons. Just about the only number that doesn't match up to a hypercar is the price, which is $178,195, or £132,243 at current conversion rates. That's equivalent to something like a well-optioned Porsche 911 GTS, while being more powerful and even quicker than the forthcoming Ferrari F80. Come and join our WhatsApp channel for the latest car news and reviews... Find a car with the experts New Volvo EM90 2025 review: the ultimate SUV killer New Volvo EM90 2025 review: the ultimate SUV killer Volvo has made an ultra-luxurious van. Intrigued? You should be, but sadly it's for China only Groundbreaking Nissan solid-state EV batteries due on sale by 2028 Groundbreaking Nissan solid-state EV batteries due on sale by 2028 The industry is in a race to bring solid-state to the market, and Nissan isn't too far behind the leaders New Audi Q3 reinvents the indicator stalk, but there's a whole lot more too New Audi Q3 reinvents the indicator stalk, but there's a whole lot more too Audi's not taking any risks with its all-new Q3; watch it sell like crazy

Telegraph

a day ago

• Telegraph

UK's rarest cars: 1980 Vauxhall Cavalier Sports Hatch, one of only five left

The Sports Hatch was both Vauxhall's rival to the Ford Capri Mk3 and a car with a subtly different image. If the Ford was ideal for pretending to be Lewis Collins in The Professionals, including the smirk in the rear-view mirror, the Cavalier belonged outside a provincial bistro. Today, despite the difficulty of establishing precise numbers, this 1980 example is one of only a handful remaining on the road. Vauxhall launched the Cavalier, based on the German Opel Ascona B, in 1975 with the two-door Coupé as the original 'sporting' version. At that time Opel regarded cars with three doors as utility vehicles, while Vauxhall was keen on a fastback-bodied Cavalier from the outset. The British firm's designs impressed senior management at the parent company General Motors and the Sports Hatch debuted in September 1978. The timing of the Sports Hatch's launch could not have been better planned, with Ford introducing the Capri Mk3 six months earlier. The Vauxhall's engine choices were 1.6- and 2.0-litre units, the latter capable of 112mph and 0-60 in 10.2sec. Opel simultaneously announced its new Manta Berlinetta Hatchback, which used body panels shipped from Luton to Germany. The first of the Sports Hatch were available only in top-of-the-range GLS form. Owners could boast about the 'four-spoke sports steering wheel', 'wood veneer door inserts' and 'driver's map pocket'. Those of us of a certain age will recall that in the late Seventies expectations of automotive comfort could be limited. Vauxhall preferred the phrase 'luxury without a trace of ostentation'. The Sports Hatch was mechanically identical to the Cavalier saloon, but Vauxhall promised 'swashbuckling performance' in a car 'not to cross swords with'. It advised its dealers that 'undoubtedly the Sports Hatch will add to Vauxhall's 'get up and go' image' and 'attract more and more younger buyers to the marque'. Taking delivery, one hoped, might make the proud owner feel like the Roger Moore of outer Southampton. The 2000 GLS cost £4,384, compared with £4,192 for the Capri Mk3 2.0 S. When Car magazine evaluated the pair, its testers concluded that the Cavalier was 'just as much fun, slightly better mannered and agreeably more refined' – and could teach the Ford 'a thing or two in all the right places'. They added that the 2000 GLS 'fully justifies its 'Sports' title, unlike some others', and that 'the taut springing and transmission will delight the keen driver'. Dealers could point out that, aside from the Capri, the Sports Hatch had no real rival with a British connection. Chrysler UK did not build a comparable three-door coupé, while the venerable MGB GT was a 2+2 at best. For buyers considering a foreign marque, the Volkswagen Scirocco GLS and Renault 17 TS cost £4,720 and £4,682 respectively – but both were front-wheel-drive, when many British drivers still preferred the supposed benefits of rear-wheel-drive. The £5,999 Alfa Romeo 2000 GTV and £5,710 Lancia Beta 2000 HPE were aimed at more affluent motorists. The Toyota Celica 2000ST Liftback offered strong value at £4,223, but its persona was less overtly sporting than the Vauxhall's. Ironically, the Sports Hatch's closest rival was sister company Opel's Manta Berlinetta – just £32 more than the 2000 GLS. The Cavalier Mk2 replaced the Mk1 in September 1981, after 238,980 units – and there was to be no three-door version. The Sports Hatch may have been short-lived, but its appearance at the 1978 London Motor Show alongside the new Carlton and Royales emphasised Vauxhall's radical image change. The era of the quasi-American, tail-finned Crestas now seemed very remote. And the Sports Hatch appeared to make the Capri Mk3 look faintly dated by comparison. If the Ford still seemed to belong to a realm of flared trousers and Mungo Jerry sideburns, the Vauxhall anticipated a brave new world of grey loafers and owning a home video recorder. In 1980, Autocar referred to the Sports Hatch as 'just plain nice' – a quality many owners valued. Or, to quote one dealer, it was so handsome, 'they go out of the door as soon as they come in'.