Investor caution lingers as Trump-Xi call offers no trade breakthrough

SINGAPORE, June 6 (Reuters) - Chinese markets had a muted response on Friday to the rare leader-to-leader call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping that left key issues to further talks, keeping investors cautious about simmering trade tensions.
China's blue-chip CSI300 Index (.CSI300), opens new tab was down 0.1%, while the Shanghai Composite Index (.SSEC), opens new tab was flat. Hong Kong benchmark Hang Seng Index (.HSI), opens new tab dipped 0.4%.
Here are some comments from analysts and investors:
GUO JIANWEN, PARTNER, HEDGE FUND HAIYI CAPITAL, SHANGHAI:
"If you look at the conversation between Chinese and U.S. presidents, there's nothing concrete that's positive. So little impact on stocks. There's only some trading opportunities in the market."
WILLIAM XIN, CHAIRMAN, SPRING MOUNTAIN PU JIANG INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, SHANGHAI:
"The only good news is that things are not getting worse. If Trump can come to China for a visit in the short term, that would be hugely positive."
GARY NG, SENIOR ECONOMIST, NATIXIS, HONG KONG (VIA EMAIL):
"Although the likelihood of a U.S.-China deal increases with more high-level dialogues, investors remain skeptical that both sides are merely buying time to address some pressing issues.
"The call does not offer much comfort in cutting tariffs but only touching on access of critical materials and tech export control. Therefore, there is no certainty of what kind of deal to make, and it may only be a partial one given the wide range of issues between the U.S. and China."
CHARLES WANG, CHAIRMAN, SHENZHEN DRAGON PACIFIC CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CO, SHENZEN:
"The news is positive to the market, but investors should not over-interpret it. Both sides are still struggling to adapt to each other in a broad confrontational trend."
Wang added that the most profound implication from the talks was Chinese President Xi Jinping's warning to his U.S. counterpart, Donald Trump, against taking provocative steps on Taiwan - a signal, in his view, that China is not prepared to conquer the island by force anytime soon.
"This shows that China is not ready to take back Taiwan in the near term using force. Otherwise, China doesn't need to warn the U.S. against such a scenario."
WANG ZHUO, PARTNER, ZHUOZHU INVESTMENT, SHANGHAI:
Wang said direct communication between China and the U.S. is certainly conducive to removing some misunderstandings, especially following recent finger-pointings.
"However, Trump fickleness has made such talks less and less meaningful to the market."
GAO LE, INVESTMENT ADVISOR, GALAXY SECURITIES, BEIJING:
"It means China's market sentiment will continue to heal.
"Recent yuan appreciation also signifies expectations of China's economic resilience."
He said the fact that U.S. shares fell after the news while U.S.-listed China stocks rose shows investors are more optimistic toward China's economy amid the trade war.
CHARU CHANANA, CHIEF INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, SAXO, SINGAPORE (VIA EMAIL):
"Markets are relieved the Trump-Xi call didn't escalate tensions further but that's not quite a reason to cheer either. While it appears that the tensions of rare-earths minerals and student visas may have been dialled down, investors see the strategic rivalry, particularly around AI and tech dominance, as far from over.
"New issues can flare up anytime, and a comprehensive deal remains unlikely. As long as things do not get worse, markets are content to move on, for now, that means shifting focus squarely to the jobs report due later in the day."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

4 hours ago

• Times

Trump tariffs leave UK firms scrambling to renegotiate contracts

British companies are looking to renegotiate supplier contracts as they scramble to find savings that can protect them from the impact of escalating US tariffs, according to new data. A survey of firms with more than 5,000 employees found that 90 per cent fear that President Trump's import duties would hurt their revenues and profits, with businesses looking at a series of ways to manage rising costs. More than half (55 per cent) said their main tool to deal with tariff threats was to review existing contracts to find savings or renegotiate better terms with break clauses that could account for the imposition of new levies, according to Acertis, which provides contract management software. Bernadette Bulacan at Icertis said companies' first resort 'to protect margins is to take a critical look at customer and supplier relationships. For many companies, the path to surviving tariff disruption starts not with policy lobbying but with a forensic look at what's already been committed to on paper.' She said firms were taking measures to include rules of termination and force majeure clauses in contracts to deal with costs caused by tariffs, while also seeking out new suppliers in countries that were not affected by sweeping US levies. The Trump administration applied a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs he had announced on most of the world economy on April 8, which is due to expire in early July. The president has signed a partial tariff deal with the UK, but most British goods will still be subject to a 10 per cent tariff when selling to US markets, raising the average US tariff rate from about 1 per cent last year to more than 6 per cent. The European Union is also in talks with the White House about avoiding a potential 55 per cent tariff on all its goods exports. • Britain's exporters at a loss over US tariff turmoil The debate over contractual terms between suppliers and customers is part of a swathe of legal complexities about who should shoulder the cost of import taxes. In April, Howmet Aerospace, an American supplier of components to the sector, declared a force majeure event that would allow it to stop shipments if it remained subject to US tariffs. Although the full gamut of threatened tariffs has not yet been applied on most countries, recent data has shown a spike in invoice rejections as businesses attempt to delay supplier payments until they have more certainty about US trade policy. Icertis's survey, which included 1,000 companies across Britain, the United States and India, found that just under half of them were 're-evaluating' where to find suppliers to avoid tariffs, restructuring their supply chains and manufacturing plants, and also considering 'sunsetting relationships that no longer serve under new cost and compliance pressures'. About 40 per cent of UK firms said they would absorb higher costs into their margins and just over a third said they were planning to raise prices charged to consumers to deal with tariffs. Bulacan said companies should also consider price adjustment clauses that account for tariff changes. 'In the same way that force majeure clauses changed fundamentally during the pandemic, these clauses could be invoked against new tariffs to prevent potential losses,' she said.

Sky News

6 hours ago

• Sky News

Iran has little choice but to retaliate against US - as Russia faces urgent decision on how to back Tehran

Donald Trump's decision to attack Iran could trigger a wider regional or even global war, but much will hinge on how Russia and China - Tehran's most powerful allies - respond. Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, said he will hold "serious consultations" with Vladimir Putin on Monday morning in Moscow. His country is also in contact with Beijing. Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are regarded by Western allies as a new axis of authoritarian powers, increasingly aligned and supportive of each other. Donald Trump, though, has broken ranks from his country's traditional democratic partners to forge a closer relationship with Mr Putin than any other US leader in recent years. How much that might affect the Kremlin's calculations, as Moscow weighs up how to respond to his actions in Iran, adds a new layer of unpredictability to the crisis. 0:54 Another limiting factor is the Russian military's physical capacity - should it wish - to bolster Iran with military support given its war in Ukraine. Unlike the NATO alliance, there is no formal agreement between Moscow, Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang to come to each other's assistance in a crisis. However, the weakening of one member of the quartet would impact on the vital national interests of the other three, making it mutually beneficial to help each other out - including with military force or at the very least by supplying weapons. 0:40 Iran has little choice but to retaliate directly against the United States after three of its main nuclear facilities were struck overnight. But its ability to launch ballistic missiles and drones has been severely degraded by waves of Israeli strikes since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went to war with Iran a week and a half ago. What are Iran's options? US bases, warships, and aircraft across the region are well within range of Iranian missiles and drones, but the Pentagon has significantly strengthened its air defences in anticipation of an Iranian counterattack. There are plenty of softer targets, though, such as American embassies or other diplomatic missions. 1:40 Iran could also choose to mine the Strait of Hormuz - a move that would have global ramifications by disrupting the flow of large amounts of oil and gas, as well as other trade. In addition, the military assets of American allies could be viewed as legitimate targets. The UK has said it played no part in the US attack. But Britain's Ministry of Defence has further increased "force protection" measures for its military bases and personnel in the Middle East to their highest level in the wake of the US strikes, it is understood. 3:34 What was hit in US attack? In an operation that has been in the planning for years, American B-2 stealth bombers dropped enormous bunker-busting bombs - the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator - on the Fordow nuclear fuel enrichment plant, around 70 miles (110km) southwest of Tehran. It was built under a mountain - about 80 to 90 metres beneath the ground - to be beyond the reach of Israel's armed forces. Only the US Air Force carries munitions large enough to penetrate the rock, earth and concrete to inflict meaningful damage. Also targeted with the enormous munitions was Iran's main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, 155 miles (250km) southeast of the Iranian capital. In addition, US submarines launched TLAM cruise missiles against Natanz and at a site outside the city of Isfahan, which is 260 miles (420km) south of Tehran. Near-bomb-grade nuclear fuel is thought to be stored here. 1:41 The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, however, said the six buildings at Isfahan that were hit contained little or no nuclear material. Mr Trump has said he ordered the attack to destroy Iran's ability to enrich uranium to a level that could be used to make a nuclear bomb. Tehran has always insisted its nuclear programme is purely for civilian purposes. Analysts warn, though, that it would be very difficult to stop the Iranian nuclear programme through military action alone and that such a move may spur Iran to accelerate efforts to make a bomb if it has managed to protect key components. The Russian foreign ministry on Sunday strongly condemned the American strikes against Iranian nuclear sites as a "dangerous escalation" that could further undermine "regional and global security". "The risk of an escalation of conflict in the Middle East already beset by multiple crises, has increased significantly," it said in a statement. Last week, the Russian government warned the US against joining Israel's war in Iran, saying this "would be an extremely dangerous step with truly unpredictable negative consequences". The remarks came after Mr Putin held a call with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. It means the Russian government in particular - given Tehran's military support to Moscow in the Russian invasion of Ukraine - faces an urgent decision about how to support Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, whose very existence is under threat from Israel.

Reuters

6 hours ago

• Reuters

US urges China to dissuade Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz

WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Rubio's comments on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo" show came after Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20% of global oil and gas flows. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," said Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser. "If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours." Rubio said a move to close the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the U.S. and others. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately provide comment. U.S. officials said it "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. The strikes mark an escalation in the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict. Tehran has vowed to defend itself. Rubio on Sunday warned against retaliation, saying such an action would be "the worst mistake they've ever made." He added that the U.S. is prepared to talk with Iran.