Mark Carney, Canada's cosmopolitan man of steel, has given liberals a new playbook
We all knew
Donald Trump
can win elections, we just didn't know he'd be winning them outside the USA. Last Monday,
Trump won the Canadian election for Mark Carney
. There is no other way of interpreting the resurrection of the Liberal Party and the reincarnation of the uber-technocrat, Jesuit-educated Carney. In January, Carney was an out-of-work, itinerant central banker for hire, intellectually and temperamentally very much out of step in the new Maga world of ethno-nationalist populists. Today, he is the liberal world's man of steel who will square up to Trump, the very man who enabled his election win.
Carney turned the Canadian election into a referendum on Trump.
Canadians responded enthusiastically. Before Trump began dismissing Canada as an American state in waiting, the Liberal Party's support plummeted to a low of 16 per cent. This week it won 43 per cent of the vote. Trump has managed to create something the world has never seen: virulent Canadian nationalism.
Ironically for a committed cosmopolitan - he got an Irish passport years ago but has recently relinquished his Irish and British citizenship - a walking, talking Davos-man, Carney wrapped himself in the Maple Leaf and rode the nationalist wave. Bigging up his ice hockey credentials – Canada's real game – he deployed resolute rhetoric against the US to sell ordinary Canadians a firm but fair vision of themselves and their country. And they bought it.
Liberals all over the world are taking Carney's victory as evidence that
the juggernaut of ethno-nationalism can be beaten by facts, reason and an appeal to the better side of the electorate's nature
. Canadian nationalism is the acceptable face of nationalism in the liberal world because it is ... well, Canadian and decent. It presents itself as a middle-of-the-road, rule-of-law, Molson-lite nationalism. Defined not by what it is, but what it is against, this new Centrist Dad jingoism knows who the enemy is: Donald Trump.
READ MORE
Canadians have given liberals a new playbook. Stand up to Trump and your people stand behind you. All around the world, conservatives are realising that Trump and proximity to Trumpism is a massive liability. This fact alone changes the global background noise.
The new Canadian Confederation was proof that the antagonism between the 1 million Canadians of French origin and the two and a quarter million Canadians of British origin could dwindle as they found common ground
So it turns out those nice Canadians are harder than most imagined. But now that the campaign is over, how does Carney, a brilliant economic mind, negotiate from here? He must find a way to deal with America, not just because the US and Canada are neighbours, united by history and geography, but because they are, for all intents and purposes, two nations with one economy. Around
76 per cent of exports
(representing around
one-fifth of Canadian GDP
) flow southward – making Canada particularly vulnerable to
US tariff policies
.
According to ScotiaBank, Canada imports roughly 34 per cent of its inputs (ie intermediate goods) from the US, and exports roughly 75 per cent of total goods it produces to the US. Energy is
Canada's single largest export to the US by value
, with crude oil and natural gas making up roughly one-third of Canada's total exports flowing south. Around one in six jobs in Canada are linked to exports, with some estimates suggesting incomes are 15 to 40 per cent higher thanks to freer trade.
Mark Carney needs a deal. The one thing in his favour is the growing realisation that,
when faced with stern opposition, Trump always caves in
. Carney just has to hang tight, fly the flag, follow the puck and wait for the phone call.
Whatever happens, it is clear that Carney's ascension to power within the Liberal Party represents not merely a change in leadership but a recalibration of Canada's economic and political identity. That identity was officially created at midnight on July 1st, 1867, when church bells rang out from Nova Scotia to Ontario, signalling that nearly four million people would wake up as citizens of the new Dominion of Canada. The official population of 3.8 million was only 10 per cent of the bustling nation to the south.
At that stage, many Canadians doubted whether their garrison country would survive, wondering just how long Canada could remain without the Americans, driven by their 'manifest destiny', ruling the entire continent. After all, the Americans had just slaughtered each other in the civil war, so Canadians were under no illusions about what the recently victorious Union army could do if it turned around and switched its attentions from the warm south to the freezing north.
[
A win 'for democrats all around the world'. Canada's Mark Carney prepares to take on Trump
Opens in new window
]
But the new Canadian Confederation was proof that the antagonism between the one million Canadians of French origin and the two and a quarter million Canadians of British origin could dwindle as they found common ground. The rest – the indigenous peoples, the original inhabitants – didn't get a look in. The hope was that the differences, be they regional, racial or religious, could be gradually ameliorated by prosperity.
Can 'technocratic daddy' Mark Carney solve Canada's deep-rooted problems?
Listen |
40:48
Apart from the linguistic and cultural clash between French and English speakers, the major fault line in the new Canadian Confederation was sectarian. In the first Canadian census, 8 per cent of the population were neither French nor British. Of this group, 200,000 were German and the census turned up only 125 Jews, 11 Hindus and three Chinese.
The Irish were the largest group with the 'British' cohort, and we brought to Canada our sectarian 'green and orange' hatred that would play out in regular riots from Montreal to Toronto and Halifax. Ulster Protestant emigrants joined forces with Scottish farmers to form an Orange phalanx against the surge of Irish Catholic migration from the 1830s onwards. Today there are more Orange Lodges in Canada than anywhere else in the world outside Northern Ireland. (In fact, I witnessed my first and last Orange 12th of July march in Toronto back in 1986!)
More than 600,000 Irish emigrants arrived in Canada in the 20-year period between 1830 and 1851, making the Irish the second-largest ethnic group after the Quebecois. We kept coming to the new Confederation and, by 1931, more than a quarter of all Canadians were Irish-Canadians, one third Catholic and two-thirds Protestant. Today, there is scarcely a family in Antrim that doesn't have people in Canada, particularly Ontario.
Maybe a reason that I am interested in the country is that, but for last-minute cold feet, I would have been a French-speaking Canadian. In the late 1950s, my just-married parents got Canadian visas. My mother had secured a teaching job in Montreal, but a week before they were due to sail from Cobh they got the heebie-jeebies and stayed put. Between 1830 and 1970, 1.3 million Irish people moved to Canada. As a result, Irish-Canadians are about 14 per cent of the Canadian population today, Mark Carney included.
[
The Canadian election: Trump effect a major factor
Opens in new window
]
Today's Canada is no longer divided between French and English speakers. It is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. Many Canadians, including lots of the 41 per cent who still voted Conservative last week, believe immigration must be reduced, citing runaway house prices as evidence that the country can't cope. Similar arguments could be plausibly made here.
Canada is in essence two economies and cultures: the resource-based 'cowboy' commodity economy in the culture of western Canada and the service, 'social democrat' society of eastern Canada. Imagine a fusion of Texas and Belgium and you get the picture.
This is the country Mark Carney must unite. And nothing unites better than a common enemy. For Canadians, that man is Donald Trump, who this week proved he can win elections anywhere in the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Vance, in LA, says troops need to stay, blasts Newsom over immigration
Republican Vice President JD Vance met troops who have been deployed in Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids, as he accused Democratic state and city leaders of encouraging immigrants to cross the US border illegally. Mr Vance, who met some of the 700 US marines and 4,000 National Guard troops recently deployed to Los Angeles by President Donald Trump, also accused the Democratic leaders of failing to support local law enforcement. Mr Trump deployed the California National Guard troops to Los Angeles earlier this month, against the wishes of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, to quell protests triggered by immigration raids on workplaces by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. A US appeals court let Mr Trump retain control of California's National Guard. Mr Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on US soil and inflamed political tension in the country's second most-populous city. Mr Vance said the court's decision made clear that Mr Trump's troop deployment "was a completely legitimate and proper use of federal law enforcement." Mr Vance gave no indication of when the Marines and National Guard would leave Los Angeles, and hinted that they might stay in the city for some time. "The soldiers and Marines are still very much a necessary part of what's going on here, because they're worried that it's going to flare back up," Mr Vance said. He accused Mr Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to crack down on people in the city illegally, and of failing to support local and state law enforcement. "They have treated Border Patrol and border enforcement as somehow an illegitimate force, instead of what they are, which is the American people's law enforcement trying to enforce the American people's laws," he said. Mr Newsom is tipped to mount a presidential bid in 2028, and could conceivably face off against Mr Vance. Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Mr Newsom, called the vice president's claim "categorically false." "The governor has consistently condemned violence and has made his stance clear," she said. She cited posts Mr Newsom made on X, including one on 9 June when he said, "Foolish agitators who take advantage of Mr Trump's chaos will be held accountable." Mr Newsom has said Mr Trump's deployment of troops exacerbated the protests, increased tensions and is unconstitutional.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Mick Clifford: The USA is adopting a totalitarian attitude to free speech
Donald Trump's toxic orbit is now reaching directly into Ireland. Most recently, there were two specific areas in which this has come to pass. Last week, it emerged that officials in Coimisiún na Meán, the media regulator, could face potential restrictions on entry to the USA if the American administration deems that they are interfering with 'free speech' by regulating social media. This is an unprecedented move. Ordinarily, such visa restrictions might apply to corrupt officials in a dictatorship or rogue state. Now, in Trump's America, officials in a friendly European country could be banned from entry for simply doing their job. 'Free speech' is a movable feast for Trump and his followers. For instance, soon after assuming office in January, Trump declared that the Gulf of Mexico should heretofore be known as the Gulf of America. The PA news agency refused to do so, referring instead to its long-standing style book that determined it was still the Gulf of Mexico irrespective of what Trump might wish it to be. The king was not pleased. PA reporters were banned from the White House and from accompanying him on Air Force One. There have been similar instances where Trump and the gang he surrounds himself with have had issues with free speech. Elsewhere, Jess Casey reported this week in the Irish Examiner that new US visa screening protocols require international students travelling on a J1 visa to adjust privacy settings on all their social media profiles to public. The US state department announced it would now 'conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants' under the new guidance. This will allow immigration officials to check the social media of students in case there is anything incriminating on their devices. And what could be incriminating in Trump's America? Anything that is deemed to conform to the kind of broad policies that the current authoritarian administration is pursuing. So, if, for instance, a young student has something on their phone that might show support for Palestinians who are being massacred, that can be deemed contrary to US interests, and the student told to turn around and go home. Similarly, entry might be denied if the student is displaying anything that is supportive of the rights of minorities, such as the transgender community. As of now it is unclear if a student has, for instance, a screenshot or meme portraying Donald Trump as a buffoon whether this would be incriminating enough to warrant exclusion. One way or the other, the restrictions suggest that the USA is adopting a totalitarian attitude to any kind of speech that might be contrary to Trump's precious, and sometimes, venal, interests. So much for free speech. As with all totalitarian regimes, there is a different attitude to any kind of free speech that might fit neatly into the category of propaganda. Thus, Trump is a believer in social media companies having a free rein over what appears on their platforms. What could be incriminating in Trump's America? Anything that is deemed to conform to the kind of broad policies that the current authoritarian administration is pursuing. Picture: David Dermer/AP In the first instance, it suits him and his politics. He is an expert manipulator of the medium, where he is free to retail lies, distortions, and abuse at will. His current level of power in the USA implies he will brook no attempts to curtail that ability. So it was that Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook announced soon after Trump's inauguration that it was no longer deploying fact-checking on the site. So social media is destined in the USA to remain a fact-free environment. Beyond that, the 'free speech' that Trump believes in extends to far less protection of minors on social media. This leaves boys and girls exposed to material relating to sex and violence with practically no restrictions. The reasoning behind such a free-for-all is that any restrictions depress traffic on the sites, which in turn hits the profits for the social media companies. And right now, all the owners, the tech bros, are happy to play supplicant to Trump in order to ensure they remain in his favour. Now word is being conveyed across the Atlantic that regulators in Europe, and particularly Ireland where so many of these companies have offices, would be well-minded to follow the lead of the Americans or they will, in terms of visa restrictions, be treated like corrupt officials from a foreign rouge state. You could not make it up. This week, it was also reported that 25% of US companies that had previously supported Dublin Pride have now pulled out. The move is directly due to the hostility Trump has towards anything resembling diversity or inclusion. Whether or not that has anything to do with his own opinion is irrelevant. Politically, he views it as a seam to mine, and that's all that matters to him. So to be seen to be supporting minorities is, in the eyes of Trump and his acolytes, a sign of disloyalty to the king. Dublin Pride, and all the Pride festivities are important annual events. They celebrate the LGBT+ communities but also act as a reminder of how these, and other, minorities were treated at a darker time. Three years ago, however, the Pride festival showed a degree of intolerance that was not in keeping with the sentiment it espouses. Following a series of programmes on RTÉ Radio 1's Lifeline on the subject of gender dysphoria, Pride announced that it was dropping the broadcaster as a media partner. The programmes had been balanced, which required including voices from a small group opposed to the philosophical position adopted by most in the LGBT community towards gender dysphoria. Such diversity of opinion was unacceptable to the organisers of Dublin Pride, so RTÉ was dropped. Today, the level of intolerance increasingly displayed in the USA towards minority communities is of a far greater order, and is being accepted by elements of society out of nothing more than fear of reprisals from Trump and his acolytes. That such an atmosphere is now washing up on these shores through US companies running away in fear from Dublin Pride should be an issue of concern for everybody. We have problems in this country, mainly concerned with inequality, particularly in relation to housing. Those are nothing like the issues that have pertained in the USA for decades, and which led to an atmosphere where an individual like Trump could actually be elected to office, not once, but twice. Vigilance is required to ensure we don't succumb to the toxic waves from Trump's America that can wash up on these shores in various forms. Read More Donald Trump delays US TikTok ban again
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
UN questions Irish family courts over 'concept of parental alienation'
Ireland has been asked to respond to the UN on why "the concept of parental alienation" is being considered by the family law courts. Parental alienation is typically used to describe a situation where one parent wrongfully influences a child or children to turn against the other parent, usually in situations of relationship breakdown. The issue was raised on Friday afternoon by Dafna Hacker Dror of the UN's committee on the elimination of discrimination against women and girls. Ms Hacker Dror told the Irish delegation attending a hearing in Geneva: 'It seems that formal bodies are using the concept of parental alienation as if not contested, while it is highly contested on many levels including due to the risk that use of this concept holds for women and children who suffer from domestic violence.' Ms Hacker Dror asked why the concept was being used and added: 'What is done to prevent its potential harm to victims of domestic violence?" Minister for migration Colm Brophy led the Irish government's delegation and agreed to respond to that and some other questions in writing. It comes after minister for justice Jim O'Callaghan said last month that recommendations arising from a consultation process on parental alienation are currently being progressed. He said the process had resulted in a public consensus that 'the means to address parental alienation lie in improvements to the Irish family courts and family justice system'. He acknowledged that parental alienation is a highly contested and divisive concept. The consultation process on the issue was launched in 2022 by then-Justice Minister Helen McEntee. The aim of the consultation process was to seek the views of stakeholders and individuals around the issue of parental alienation. A report on parental alienation in other jurisdictions was also reviewed by the department as part of a process examining whether policy or legislative changes are required in Ireland. Meanwhile, concern was also raised during the hearing in Geneva that although Travellers make up just 0.7% of the Irish population, 15% of the male prison population and 22% of the female prison population in Ireland are Travellers. Department of Justice representative Lisa Doherty acknowledged that the 'disproportionate representation' of Travellers in the prison system is a 'cause for concern and is a reflection of the challenges facing Travellers in our society.'
