Aamir Khan's infamous creative clashes: Before replacing 'Taare Zameen Par' director, Aamir fell out with this iconic '90s filmmaker
Agencies Bollywood actor Aamir Khan earned the reputation of being a 'perfectionist' early in his journey, but that title also brought its share of backlash — with several critics alleging that he secretly took control behind the camera, often overshadowing the official directors.
Aamir Khan has long carried the tag of a 'perfectionist'—a title earned early in his Bollywood career. Though it complimented his dedication, it also attracted significant criticism. Some within the industry began accusing him of covertly directing films under the guise of supporting roles, overshadowing official directors. While Aamir has dismissed such allegations in conversations with the media, recent remarks by Darsheel Safary have reignited this debate.
Darsheel, who played the lead role in Taare Zameen Par, recently opened up about how the film's directorial duties shifted unexpectedly. According to him, Aamir made the bold decision to re-film a major scene, despite original creative director and writer Amole Gupte being actively present on set. Aamir, who had previously not been attached as the director, asked everyone to disregard what had just been shot and announced that he would now helm the scene. Though Amole remained on set in a creative capacity, the reins of direction quietly passed to Aamir.
Darsheel recalled that Gupte had worked on set for only a few days before Aamir gradually assumed full directorial responsibilities. Describing his early experience, Darsheel admitted feeling intimidated by Aamir, whereas his rapport with Amole was far more relaxed and friendly. The two shared a close bond—Gupte had even discovered Darsheel at a dance workshop—and their sons were also close friends. Darsheel added that during the filming process, Aamir and Amole often exchanged creative opinions, with Aamir frequently offering his insights and suggestions.In an interview with Galatta Plus, Aamir expressed frustration over persistent rumors accusing him of hijacking films from other directors. He explained that many assumed he was unofficially leading productions whenever a film failed after his departure, creating a pattern of speculation that became difficult to shake. He maintained that the actual directors were the ones making the final decisions, and his own involvement was often misrepresented.
Aamir will soon return to the screen in Sitaare Zameen Par, a follow-up to Taare Zameen Par, slated for release on June 20. While he previously portrayed a compassionate teacher, this time he takes on the role of a basketball coach. Aamir's clashes with filmmakers have not been limited to one project. In a fan interaction on Rediff, he addressed his strained relationship with Rangeela director Ram Gopal Varma. Their fallout began years ago when Varma made a comment suggesting a minor actor outshone Aamir in a particular scene. This remark, misunderstood by the media, led to unresolved tensions due to lack of timely clarification. Hurt by the miscommunication, Aamir chose to distance himself from Varma moving forward.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Aamir Khan's defence of his patriotism reveals an embarrassing portrait of an anxious superstar, a pliant media, and a suspicious fandom
What does it mean to be a superstar in this country? The question is not that complex as its answer lies within reach. But to ask what it means to be a Muslim superstar, is to step into more uncertain ground. An arena that is subtle, shifting, and deeply textured. It is not a matter of stark contrast, not a truth wrapped in white or black. It resides somewhere in the gray, the in-between, where meaning evades simplicity. For those who insist that fame transcends identity, that a superstar is untouched by faith, name, or lineage, the evidence is not hard to find, but harder to reconcile. Take the recent episode of Aap Ki Adalat, where Aamir Khan arrived ostensibly to speak about his new film Sitaare Zameen Par. And yet, the subtext was clear: he was not there to promote a story, but to defend one — his own. He was there not as an artiste, but as a citizen. As if his belonging needed reiteration. As if patriotism were not his right, but a question he must answer. Just two minutes into the episode, the host, turns the conversation toward Aamir Khan's loyalty to the nation. And for the next 30 minutes, Khan is made to justify himself. As if acceptance must be earned, not lived — he explains, he recounts, he defends. It is not enough to be a citizen; he must account for it, line by line. At one point, he is asked whether his income has ever come from a foreign country, as if his decades-long presence in the national consciousness could still be doubted. At another moment, he explains why he gave Muslim names to children born of Hindu mothers. On and on it goes. And yet the tone of the show remains deceptively light-hearted. Khan responds with grace, even good humour. But anyone watching closely can see it. Behind the measured enthusiasm is fatigue. Behind the smiles, something restless. Just observe, if one is willing, the nature of the questions directed at him. Why did he not speak after the Pahalgam attack? Why does he not name Pakistan more often, more forcefully, more condemningly? What were his reasons for aligning, even momentarily, with Turkey? Why is he held in such regard by audiences in China? What are his views on marriages that cross faiths? And why, above all, have some of his films unsettled the sensibilities of the majority? They are questions that seem less concerned with understanding than with establishing something, something already presumed, already half-decided. And what stands out is not merely their content, but their weight, their repetition. These are not questions commonly posed to those who legislate or rule. The ones who wield real power are rarely asked to account in such granular, personal terms. Also Read | Aamir Khan answers those questioning his patriotism: 'My film Sarfarosh was the first to take Pakistan's name, suffered losses but…' So what does it really reveal? The media indeed is not just complicit, but shallow. It will not question the architecture of silence built around power. It will not look directly at the dismantling of the plural imagination. But they will indict an actor for portraying a fictional character in a progressive film for hurting the majoritarian views. But beyond the surface spectacle, what does this moment reveal, at a deeper, more human level? One could argue, perhaps cynically, that this is less about offense and more about optics. A carefully staged act of image cleansing to make him appear on national television and clarify all the doubts surrounding him for the last few years. After all, his last film suffered from similar intolerance parading as patriotism, and this time, the stakes might be too high to ignore. So, more than anything, it reveals the strange nature of fandom today. More intimately, it lays bare a deeper, more uneasy truth about the evolving, often troubling dynamic between fandom and stardom. Fans no longer stop at admiration; they seek agreement. They ask not just for stories, but for allegiance. They map their own politics onto the people they follow and expect them to comply. They contain their idols within the bounds of their own fears, and when those boundaries are crossed, they read it as betrayal. No wonder, then in the show, an audience member rises to ask Aamir Khan how he felt about Operation Sindoor. And no wonder, too, that the answer barely matters. Because the question itself isn't really about any military operation, it's about reaffirming a gaze of doubt. A gaze that demands performance not just on screen, but off it. A gaze that insists on proof. And it is not his burden alone. Whether it is him, or Shah Rukh Khan, or Salman Khan, each of them has been caught in the same cycle of suspicion, again and again. As film scholar Richard Dyer once wrote, a star image is never whole; it is always contradictory. It is built through tension, through fragments pulled in different directions. And in that tension, different groups of fans struggle to decide where their star truly stands. So perhaps the better question is not what it means to be a star in this country, but what it means to be a fan. The answer is both plain and deeply tangled. It is the expectation of performance, everywhere. Because in today's time, subservience has become a condition of storytelling.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
‘I can Never Abuse Anyone': Aamir Khan
Popularly known as Bollywood's Mr Perfectionist, Aamir Khan, who was last seen in Laal Singh Chaddha, is finally set to return to the silver screen. The actor will soon be seen in Sitaare Zameen Par, the much awaited sequel to his iconic 2007 film Taare Zameen Par. Directed by RS Prasanna, the film revolves around specially-abled kids and features Aamir Khan as a basketball coach. What were the challenges you faced while shooting with a neurodivergent cast? I have been working in this industry for 35 years and done almost 45 films. Working with creative people, whether it is the DOP, actors, director, production designer isn't always easy. But we did not witness any trouble while shooting this film. When these ten people came on the sets, they hugged and spread their energy and made everything feel calm and positive. What was your personal experience working with a neurodivergent cast? They were very much on the same level as the neuro-typical beings on set. They rehearsed the lines very well. Instead, I would ask for a retake sometimes but not even a single moment was wasted because of their re-takes. Ashish, whose character's name is Sunil was so sharp that I apologised once saying 'it is my mistake.' He replied saying, 'koi baat nahi bade bade logon se choti choti galtiyan ho jati hai' (No worries. Popular people make such small mistakes.)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Sitaare Zameen Par' box office collection day 2: Aamir Khan and Genelia D'Souza starrer witnesses growth on Saturday, mints Rs 32.20 crores net in India
Aamir Khan and Genelia D'Souza starrer 'Sitaare Zameen Par' made it to the big screens on Friday. This highly anticipated movie was the talk of the town from the outset, and upon its release, it was warmly welcomed with positive reviews. Now coming to its box office collection, the movie has kept the cash registers ringing. Within two days, Aamir Khan's 'Sitaare Zameen Par' has crossed the Rs. 30 crore mark at the box office. Sitaare Zameen Par box office update According to Sacnilk, the movie had an opening-day collection of Rs. 10.7 crore (Hindi: Rs 10.6, Tamil: Rs 0.05 crore, and Telugu: Rs 0.05 crore). On Saturday, it saw a significant rise, collecting Rs 21.50 crore. This took the total box office collection of 'Sitaare Zameen Par' after a two-day theatrical run to Rs. 32.20 crore. Sitaare Zameen Par vs Housefull 5 With these numbers, 'Sitaare Zameen Par' has taken over the box office. Meanwhile, the earlier champion, 'Housefull 5,' featuring Akshay Kumar, Riteish Deshmukh, and Abhishek Bachchan, which has completed 16 days at the box office, is now maintaining a steady business. On Friday, June 20, it made a business of Rs 2 crore, and on Saturday, it minted 2.25 crore, as per the early estimates. Sitaare Zameen Par plot Sitaare Zameen Par shows Gulshan Arora (played by Aamir Khan), a hotheaded basketball coach who faces suspension after striking the head coach. Due to a drunk driving case, he is also looking at some jail time. As he faces the law, he is assigned to community service, where he is tasked with coaching a team of athletes with intellectual disabilities to prepare for a national basketball tournament. The journey is filled with challenges, but ultimately leads to significant personal development and important life lessons.
