Buying a home 5 times harder now than in 1980
It is now five times harder for young Queenslanders to buy their first home than it was for their Boomer and Gen-X parents, according to shock new analysis exposing the enduring impact of the nation's longest property boom.
Extensive PropTrack analysis over 45 years shows a typical house in Brisbane, which cost just $32,750 in 1980, is now valued at an astounding 420 per cent more in 2025 when adjusted for inflation.
That's because the $32,750 spent on a home in 1980 equates to about $174,600 today, but the current median house price has skyrocketed to $910,000.
The analysis reveals how much harder it is for the current generation to buy property compared to their parents' era, and has prompted experts to sound the alarm for first home buyers as saving for a deposit becomes more out of reach than ever before.
SEE WHAT HOMES REALLY USED TO COST IN YOUR SUBURB
PropTrack economist Angust Moore said young people were taking longer to enter the market, relying more on family support, or accessing government incentives to buy with a smaller deposit.
'The deposit hurdle is just unequivocally harder than it was four or five decades ago, and that has manifested in home ownership rates which have fallen over those years,' Mr Moore said.
He said lower interest rates now than the 1980s and early 1990s, when they surged to a high of 17 per cent, had helped drive up property prices in that time due to greater competition and demand.
Brisbane's median value surged from $32,750 in December 1980 to $95,000 in December 1990, $152,000 in 2000, $465,000 in 2010, and $910,000 by March 2025.
Brisbane units show a slightly less dramatic trend, rising from $38,750 in 1980 to $636,000 today.
The trend played out differently across suburbs, with blue-chip as well as entry-level areas included among the most striking examples of real price growth.
A typical home in inner-city Hawthorne, priced at $2.125m in 2025, is worth more than ten times its inflation-adjusted 1980 value of $164,500.
In Woodridge, homes cost $24,950 45 years ago – equal to about $133,000 today. But the Logan suburb's current median house price is $650,000.
The long boom on the back of the Covid-19 pandemic has seen prices rise even more sharply than in the 1990s, when rates plummeted and the real estate market flourished.
Newstead locals and engineers Toby Tremain and Georgia Stel, both 25, said they were being pushed out of their preferred suburb by astronomical house prices and currently preferred to rent and live in the city.
'We are both open to owning an apartment, we're not like we must have a house and live in the city,' Mr Tremain said.
'I understand that's not feasible.
'But I think the trade-off is, like living in this area right now for us is really enjoyable.'
Rising prices aren't exclusive to the capital, with regional and coastal centres also recording huge real growth.
On the Gold Coast, houses in Surfers Paradise were already more expensive than Brisbane in 1980 at $74,500. That figure would be equivalent to $397,200 considering rising living costs, yet a typical home in the Glitter Strip now costs $1.35m.
Another Gold Coast example, Ashmore, was closer to Brisbane's median in 1980 at $43,950 — $234,300 in today's dollars. Its current house price is $1.138m.
Further north, a house in Aitkenvale, Townsville had a median of $29,625 in December 1980, or $158,000 adjusted. It's now worth more than three times that amount at $514,000.
Real Estate Institue of Queensland (REIQ) CEO Antonia Mercorella said price growth was driven by a chronic undersupply of housing.
'Scarcity continues to put upward pressure on prices, particularly impacting first-home buyers who now face a vastly different affordability landscape than previous generations,' Ms Mercorella said.
'If we want to enable sustainable price growth and ensure future generations the same opportunity to own a home, housing policy must be squarely focused on supply.
'Any attempt to improve affordability without significantly increasing housing stock is doomed to fall short.'
Byron Bay's Beach Hotel sold for $140m
Buyers agent Alex Pope said Baby Boomer and Gen X homeowners were unlocking equity in their properties to help younger family members buy through a guarantor loan.
'First-home buyers are often getting support from mum and dad, and in some ways it's very easy for the older generation who have fared really well from the market to do this,' Mr Pope said.
'As a young person who may have just started in a career, recently moved out of home and paying rent, you're in a really expensive time of life while your income is probably still quite low, so getting the deposit is the hardest part.'
Mr Pope advised young buyers to treat their first home as a stepping stone – 'your first home isn't your last, but it does catapult you to the next'.
By starting in a duplex, unit, or renovator, young buyers could build equity and eventually move into a more ideal property as their careers and incomes grew, he said.
Only a tiny number of suburbs across Greater Brisbane remained at 2000 or even 1990 prices. Russell Island was most frequently highlighted in the data as having current prices comparable to historical values of various other suburbs.
Prices in a handful of other outer suburbs including North Booval, Logan Central, Goodna and South Brisbane units were now on par with some values from 20-plus years ago.
But the overwhelming majority of homes had now well-surpassed those old benchmarks, cementing a major decline in affordability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
The truth about Melbourne, Sydney ‘exodus'
In the years since the pandemic first began to unfold, the perception of Melbourne and Victoria more broadly in the nation's collective imagination has changed dramatically. Prior to the pandemic Victoria had the fastest rate of population growth in the nation in both nominal and per capita terms, while the state's economy was one of the fastest growing of any in the nation. Yet despite Victoria's relative economic strength prior to the pandemic, today the perception of Melbourne and Victoria could scarcely be more different. But is that reputation deserved? Or is Victoria experiencing a hangover of pandemic era perceptions that are no longer reflective of reality, years after the pandemic drew to a close. In an attempt to provide a concrete answer to this question, we'll be looking at three quantifiable metrics, comparing today's Victoria not only with the other states and territories, but also with where Victoria was at the eve of the pandemic. Housing In recent years Victoria has often made headlines for an exodus of property investors. Weaker than average growth in housing prices, a lowering of the land tax threshold and higher land taxes have all been put forward as reasons for investors exiting the market. For the sake of argument, we will assume that the rental bond data used to underpin claims of an exodus is correct, despite the extremely high likelihood of seeing the number of rentals in Victoria revised upward. If there has been an exodus of property investors from Melbourne, no real downside is being realised relative to other states and territories. As of the latest data from property data firm SQM Research, Melbourne has the highest rental vacancy rate of any the nation's capital cities and in relative terms has a vacancy rate 83 per cent higher than the average rate of the nation's other capital cities and 42 per cent higher than the national average. This not what you would expect to see if an exodus of property investors was negatively impacting Melbourne's renters. In recent years, an increasingly widespread perception of a mass exodus from Melbourne has developed, arguably as a response to the state's more protracted and more severe lockdowns than the national average. It is correct that population flows in and out of Melbourne have shifted since the pandemic. During the 2021-22 financial year, 24,450 people left Melbourne in net terms as a result of domestic migration. However, the largest loss of residents to domestic migration of any city during 2021-22 was experienced by Sydney, where 49,800 people exited the harbour side city in net terms. Fast forward to the latest data from the ABS which covers up to the end of the last financial year, Melbourne saw a loss of 7580 residents to net internal migration. Meanwhile, Sydney saw a significantly larger exodus of residents to domestic migration, with 41,100 exiting during 2023-24. While Melbourne has certainly seen a major shift from the pre-pandemic norm of domestically driven population inflows, the outflows it is now experiencing are a fraction of what became the norm in Sydney over a decade ago. The labour market When it comes to the labour market Victoria's performance is significantly less impressive. But first some good news, Victoria's unemployment rate is 0.47 percentage points lower than it was at the end of 2019 (4.85 per cent then vs. 4.37 per cent today). The bad news is that despite the strong improvement in the labour market compared with pre- pandemic, its improvement is the weakest of the nation's five most populous states. As of the latest data from the ABS, Victoria also has the highest unemployment of the five most populous states, with 4.37 per cent of the labour force out of work compared the best performing state, Queensland where 3.69 per cent are unemployed. While things are not going as well for Victoria compared with the other states on this metric, there is a silver lining. Since January, the unemployment rate in Victoria has reduced by 0.3 percentage points, even while the unemployment rate in New South Wales and South Australia has increased. The takeaway While Melbourne has seen domestic migration turn negative since the onset of the pandemic, claims of a mass exodus are overstated, at least when put into context with Sydney, which saw 5.4x residents exit to elsewhere in Australia in 2023-24. On the other hand, the news from the labour market is more mixed, unemployment in Victoria is significantly lower than where it was prior to the pandemic, but is 0.31 percentage points higher than the national average. Meanwhile, the best news for Victoria stem from its housing market, where it holds the title of highest rental vacancy rate in the nation and simultaneously the lowest cost house rents of any major city. Victoria certainly faces challenges on the road ahead, most notably from its state budget, as the Allan government attempts to get the state on a more sustainable fiscal path after facing a particularly damaging period during the pandemic. Ultimately, despite its other challenges, Victoria is not facing the problems claimed to the degree that is often perceived and in some important ways Victoria is excelling to a degree unseen in the rest of the nation's large states.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
MCoBeauty founder: ‘I didn't spend any time at home'
Just months after her headline-making exit from billion-dollar business MCoBeauty, the company she founded in 2016, Shelley Sullivan has opened up about the realities of building and running her brand while also raising two daughters. 'I had [my two daughters] Lucy [now 19] and Emily [now 18] when I started ModelCo [launched in 2002]. I didn't spend any time at home with the girls. I was working around the clock because I passionately loved what I did, but I wouldn't have been able to do that without family helping,' Sullivan told Stellar podcast Something To Talk About. 'I was working around the clock because I passionately loved what I did, but I wouldn't have been able to do that without family helping. Work-life balance is difficult. Anyone that says that they have a great work-life balance, I'm not sure I believe [them]. 'As a woman, I found it very challenging: work-life balance, having great friends, [a] great family, it's difficult. Plus, you've got this behemoth of a business that is almost running you, you're not running it. I was fortunate when I started MCoBeauty; the girls were in their teenage years, close to finishing school, so they were more independent. I don't know how I would have coped with the acceleration of MCoBeauty with babies.' Listen to the full interview with Shelley Sullivan on Something To Talk About below: Sullivan, who sold MCoBeauty earlier this year, points out that while the brand is valued at a billion dollars, she did not walk away with that amount of money. 'We all had a vision to create Australia's fastest growing beauty brand. We just drove those sales as hard as we could and the valuation is a multiple of base earnings. So the beauty landscape and the beauty industry drives that valuation, not us,' she told Stellar. 'The business could be valued at $1 billion but that's not necessarily a reflection on what the people that are exiting get... But I don't think myself, the family and the team ever thought beyond our wildest dreams that that's what we would create.' When asked what advice she would give to Hailey Bieber, who also recently sold her beauty and skincare brand Rhode for a reported billion dollars, Sullivan was gracious. 'I don't know [Hailey Bieber's] deal structure, so it's hard to give advice. We did work with Hailey — Hailey was the face of ModelCo for a minute,' she said. 'She's a great girl who was very much, from what I understand, involved in the product development [of Rhode]. That's a great brand. I actually purchased some of their products. She's done a great job.' Read the full interview and see the shoot with Shelley Sullivan in the new issue of Stellar out today inside The Sunday Telegraph (NSW), Sunday Herald Sun (VIC), The Sunday Mail (QLD) and Sunday Mail (SA).
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Victorian Liberal leader Brad Battin says party infighting is over as focus shifts to 2026 election
Victorian opposition leader Brad Battin has conceded some Liberal Party MPs have focused more on internal rivalries than voters, but has said his team will be unified heading into the election in 2026. Mr Battin described the party's decision to provide former leader John Pesutto a $1.55 million loan to avoid bankruptcy, a policy he supported, as a "line in the sand" that signalled a renewed focus on winning government. The long-running fight between Mr Pesutto and fellow Liberal MP Moira Deeming, who successfully sued her former leader for defamation, has divided the party. It became a proxy battle in a broader ideological struggle for control of the party. In an interview with the ABC, Mr Battin said he was speaking to every MP individually following the decision to provide Mr Pesutto a financial lifeline, stressing the need for unity. "You've been elected as a local member of parliament. You've got the self-discipline to get there. You just need now to put that into team unity." Asked whether MPs who failed to be team players would face consequences, Mr Battin said voters would ultimately decide. "The consequences are, you lose the election. It's a pretty simple consequence." The Coalition has not won a Victorian election since 2010 and has been crippled by infighting. A common criticism is that too many MPs are focused more on getting to parliament rather than winning government. "I think there's always an element of that, because it's been publicly perceived as that,'' Mr Battin said. The Berwick MP said it was incumbent on MPs to reflect on why they were elected. "What things did you want to see change in the state? And can you do it from opposition? If the answer is yes … then you're probably in the wrong job." Mr Battin challenged Mr Pesutto's leadership six months ago after his supporters undermined Mr Pesutto's position, but Mr Battin reiterated throughout the interview that his team was now united. He hinted that the frontbench team could change but would not say if Mr Pesutto or Ms Deeming would be included in a revamped shadow cabinet. Ms Deeming had proposed an alternative to the party loaning Mr Pesutto money, including delaying his court order debt if her preselection was guaranteed. Mr Battin declined to comment on that or complaints to the state's anti-corruption watchdog, citing legal advice not to speak publicly on the matter. While expressing confidence in the team he would take to the election, Mr Battin said some MPs would need to reflect on their future. "People have to make decisions about time served in parliament, if they want to stay or not,'' he said. The Coalition must add 16 seats at next year's November election to win office. The task is big, but after three terms of Labor, there is a genuine chance for the Liberals, Mr Battin believed. "We've got one chance coming up in about 16 months. It's our opportunity to ensure we prove to Victorians we're ready." He said the party would now focus on policy, with internal disputes hopefully behind him. Mr Battin admitted the long-running conflict between Mr Pesutto and Ms Deeming took a toll on him, including sleepless nights. "It takes a physical and mental challenge on you … but it's resolved my drive. I know what I need to do to win at the next election." He doesn't regret how he handled the matter, stressing that it was a dispute between two individuals. Some MPs criticised Mr Battin for a lack of leadership in failing to resolve the crisis sooner, while others were angered by his decision to support the loan to Mr Pesutto, highlighting the party's ongoing divisions. "I know what I need to do to win at the next election. I need to get the right policy settings, have the right processes with my team, ensure we're a united front, and send a message to Victoria that we're ready to govern."
