logo
NCLAT rejects Byjus resolution professionals petition in Aakash shareholding row

NCLAT rejects Byjus resolution professionals petition in Aakash shareholding row

Mint08-06-2025

New Delhi, Jun 8 (PTI) The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed a plea filed by Resolution Professional of Think & Learn, which owns edtech brand Byju's, challenging an NCLT order directing to maintain status quo regarding the company's stake in Aakash Educational Services.
A two-member NCLAT bench said that since the NCLT order is "consensual" an an interlocutory order, which is not deciding any of the rights of the parties, no interference is called for by the appellate tribunal at this stage.
"Since the impugned order takes the shape of an interlocutory order, which is not deciding any of the rights of the parties, coupled with the fact that the order takes the shape of a consenting order, no interference is called for by this Tribunal in the exercise of its Appellate Jurisdiction at this stage,' said NCLAT.
TLPL, through its RP, had moved the Chennai bench of NCLAT against the NCLT direction not to alter the shareholding, against the backdrop of plans of equity fund raising by Aakash Educational Services.
On March 27, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had passed an interim order directing to maintain status quo in respect of Aakash Educational Services as on date, till next date of hearing.
The order was challenged by Aakash before the High Court of Karnataka, which, after hearing both sides, on April 8, 2025 set aside the interim order granted by NCLT and remitted the matter to the insolvency tribunal.
This was brought to the notice of NCLT in its next hearing on April 30, 2025, where Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Counsel for Resolution Professional, alleged that not only dilution of shareholding of TLPL in Aakash was continuing but also vital assets of the company have been hypothecated.
The Articles of Association of Aakash, which protect the interest of TLPL have been materially altered, he said, while submitting that the interest of TLPL needs to be protected in all the areas of concern.
However, observing that any interim relief would not be possible as it required detailed submissions and the forthcoming summer vacation, NCLT passed a consent order, directing that stake of TLPL will not be diluted in Aakash.
".... but in the given facts and circumstances particularly when the matter is yet to be fully heard we would confine to passing a consent order that the shareholding of the Petitioner (TLPL) in the Respondent No.1 Company (percentage wise) be not diluted till the prayer of the Petitioner (TLPL) for interim reliefs are heard and decided by this Tribunal on the next date to be fixed," said NCLT while passing a three-page interim order on April 30.
TLPL has 25 per cent shareholding in Aakash Educational Services.
This order was challenged by TLPL through its RP before the appellate tribunal NCLAT, which declined to interfere in this, saying that the order passed by NCLT seems to be a "consensual order" and interlocutory in nature.
"Thus, the instant Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No. 68 / 2025 lack merits and the same is accordingly dismissed," said NCLAT bench comprising Members Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Adani Power's proposal to acquire Vidarbha Industries Power's approved by NCLT
Adani Power's proposal to acquire Vidarbha Industries Power's approved by NCLT

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

Adani Power's proposal to acquire Vidarbha Industries Power's approved by NCLT

The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Wednesday approved Adani Power Ltd 's acquisition of Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd. Before the tribunal's nod, the secured creditors of the company approved the plan in February 2024. The company has admitted liabilities of Rs 6,753 crore, and the successful resolution plan has proposed to pay Rs 4,000 crore to acquire the company. Vidarbha Industries (VIPL) owns and operates a 600-megawatt (MW) thermal power plant, with two 300-MW units each in Nagpur in Maharashtra state. 'We find that the Resolution Plan has been approved with 100% voting share. As per the CoC, the plan meets the requirement of being viable and feasible for the revival of the Corporate Debtor,' said the division bench of judicial member Nilesh Sharma and a technical member, Sameer Kakar, in its 75-page order. 'We also observe that none of the stakeholders in the process of CIRP have come forward before this Tribunal with an application objecting to the approval of this Resolution Plan,' noted the tribunal. The tribunal also observed that the resolution plan is binding on the Corporate Debtor (VIPL), its employees, members, creditors, guarantors and other stakeholders. Last year in September, the tribunal had admitted CFM Asset Reconstruction's application to admit the company under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). On February 24, Adani Power in its stock exchange filing had said that the lenders have approved its revival plan for the company and the 'implementation of the resolution plan' is subject to the 'LOI terms as well as requisite approvals from the NCLT and other regulatory approvals'. VIPL was formerly a subsidiary of Anil Ambani-owned Reliance Power . It entered insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Reliance Power had announced last year that VIPL was no longer its subsidiary. Admitting the petition, the bench appointed Bimal Kumar Agarwal as the interim resolution professional (IRP) to oversee the insolvency process, including managing VIPL's assets and inviting resolution plans. VIPL, a special-purpose vehicle, was set up by Reliance Power for building a coal-based thermal power plant comprising two units of 300 MW each at Butibori at Nagpur in Maharashtra. The project was awarded after an international bidding process run by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, and it was eventually converted into an independent power project. The Butibori project has a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA) with Maharashtra for 3085 MW, with potential for expansion. The company defaulted on loans totalling Rs. 3,872 crore to Axis Bank and State Bank of India (SBI), leading to the classification of its account as a non-performing asset in 2019. Both lenders later sold their debts to CFM ARC in 2023, as reported by ET in October 2023.

Adani Power's proposal to acquire Vidarbha Industries Power's approved by NCLT
Adani Power's proposal to acquire Vidarbha Industries Power's approved by NCLT

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

Adani Power's proposal to acquire Vidarbha Industries Power's approved by NCLT

The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Wednesday approved Adani Power Ltd 's acquisition of Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd. Before the tribunal's nod, the secured creditors of the company approved the plan in February 2024. The company has admitted liabilities of Rs 6,753 crore, and the successful resolution plan has proposed to pay Rs 4,000 crore to acquire the company. Vidarbha Industries (VIPL) owns and operates a 600-megawatt (MW) thermal power plant, with two 300-MW units each in Nagpur in Maharashtra state. 'We find that the Resolution Plan has been approved with 100% voting share. As per the CoC, the plan meets the requirement of being viable and feasible for the revival of the Corporate Debtor,' said the division bench of judicial member Nilesh Sharma and a technical member, Sameer Kakar, in its 75-page order. 'We also observe that none of the stakeholders in the process of CIRP have come forward before this Tribunal with an application objecting to the approval of this Resolution Plan,' noted the tribunal. The tribunal also observed that the resolution plan is binding on the Corporate Debtor (VIPL), its employees, members, creditors, guarantors and other stakeholders. Last year in September, the tribunal had admitted CFM Asset Reconstruction's application to admit the company under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). On February 24, Adani Power in its stock exchange filing had said that the lenders have approved its revival plan for the company and the 'implementation of the resolution plan' is subject to the 'LOI terms as well as requisite approvals from the NCLT and other regulatory approvals'. VIPL was formerly a subsidiary of Anil Ambani-owned Reliance Power. It entered insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Reliance Power had announced last year that VIPL was no longer its subsidiary. Admitting the petition, the bench appointed Bimal Kumar Agarwal as the interim resolution professional (IRP) to oversee the insolvency process, including managing VIPL's assets and inviting resolution plans. VIPL, a special-purpose vehicle, was set up by Reliance Power for building a coal-based thermal power plant comprising two units of 300 MW each at Butibori at Nagpur in Maharashtra. The project was awarded after an international bidding process run by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, and it was eventually converted into an independent power project. The Butibori project has a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA) with Maharashtra for 3085 MW, with potential for expansion. The company defaulted on loans totalling Rs. 3,872 crore to Axis Bank and State Bank of India (SBI), leading to the classification of its account as a non-performing asset in 2019. Both lenders later sold their debts to CFM ARC in 2023, as reported by ET in October 2023.

Byju's RP's suit claims directors owe compensation to company under IBC laws
Byju's RP's suit claims directors owe compensation to company under IBC laws

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

Byju's RP's suit claims directors owe compensation to company under IBC laws

An EY-backed resolution professional (RP) has filed lawsuits at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) claiming former Byju's directors owe compensation to the company for fraudulent transfers of the company's assets, according to people familiar with the matter. The lawsuits invoke a provision under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code which provides legal recourse to reverse transactions undertaken by a company's previous management. Shailendra Ajmera, the RP of Think and Learn, which houses Byju's ed tech business and is undergoing insolvency, has claimed in the lawsuits filed in late April that two separate sets of transactions were detrimental to the company. One of them resulted in a $533 million investment held by a US subsidiary moving to related companies and the other involved a sum of Rs 130 crore moving from Think and Learn to its subsidiary in India, said the people. Think and Learn was, therefore, deprived of these funds, it is claimed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo The lawsuits implicate the company's three former directors – Byju Raveendran , Riju Ravindran and Divya Gokulnath . Ajmera has demanded that the sums be made good to the company by the former directors. ETtech Live Events Riju Ravindran had in early April filed a petition with the NCLT claiming Ajmera should be removed as the RP of Think and Learn because EY has been an adviser to the company prior to its admission into insolvency proceedings, raising the issue of conflict of interest. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Further, he claimed that EY was perpetuating a fraud and acting in the interest of Glas Trust, which claims to be representing the majority of Think and Learns creditors, and not in the interest of the company. In a recent petition filed with the NCLT, Riju Ravindran claimed that Glas Trust, which is the lenders' agent that forms 99% of the committee of creditors of Think and Learn, is not legally entitled to represent the lenders. He claimed that Glas Trust didn't have the support of 50% of the lenders as required in the borrowing agreements entered between Think and Learn and its lenders. He also claimed that it had no authority to instruct Ajmera or undertake any acts towards the company's insolvency. Ajmera, his lawyers Chandhiok and Mahajan, Byju Raveendran and Riju Ravindran did not respond to ET's queries. One of Ajmera's two lawsuits follows a recent Delaware court ruling in the US where Byju's Alpha's move to transfer a $533 million ownership interest in a set of funds called Camshaft Funds to related entities was under question. Byju's Alpha is a US subsidiary of Think and Learn. The Delaware court termed the transfers illegal and demanded their reversal. The former directors have appealed the ruling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store