Congress seeks urgent Parliament session over defence chief's disclosure on Operation Sindoor

Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Congress on Sunday demanded the immediate convening of a special session of Parliament to discuss the military and foreign policy strategy in the wake of revelations made by Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan.The Congress also demanded that the government take all parties and the nation into confidence and discuss India's defence preparedness and strategy after Operation Sindoor Congress general secretary, communications, Jairam Ramesh said the prime minister or the defence minister should have informed the opposition leaders in the all-party meeting what Gen Chauhan has stated in Singapore."The Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan has made some important statements on Operation Sindoor in, of all places, Singapore. It would have been better if the prime minister or the raksha mantri had briefed opposition leaders first in an all-party meeting.""Gen Chauhan's statements strengthen the case for the immediate convening of the Parliament to discuss larger strategic foreign policy and economic issues in the post Operation Sindoor era," Ramesh told PTI.On Saturday, Gen Chauhan in Singapore said that India rectified tactics and hit deep inside Pakistani territory after suffering losses of aircraft in the recent military clashes with Pakistan. He also dismissed as "absolutely incorrect" Islamabad's claim of downing six Indian jets.Gen Chauhan, in an interview with Bloomberg TV, said India flew all its jets and carried out high-precision strikes to hit back at Pakistan after ascertaining the reasons for the initial losses.Ramesh said it is a matter of concern that such statements are coming from the CDS from Singapore, of all places."Why couldn't the prime minister have briefed opposition leaders?" he asked while referring to the statements of Gen Chauhan."We have been demanding all-party meetings and a special session of parliament precisely for this purpose," he asserted.Ramesh also reiterated his demand for a special review committee on the lines of one set up after the Kargil war on India's defence preparedness.He said three days after the Kargil war ended, the then Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, had set up a Kargil Review Committee headed by the father of External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and the report was tabled and discussed in Parliament later.Ramesh asked whether such a committee was being set up now, especially in the wake of the Chief of Defence Staff's statements about the "losses."In his interview, the CDS declined to specify the losses in terms of numbers but pointed out the fact that the Indian military struck deep inside Pakistani territory, which New Delhi said, forced Islamabad to plead to stop the hostilities.The comments by the top military officer are the Indian military's first clear acknowledgement of losses in the four-day army clashes with the neighbouring country.Congress media and publicity department head Pawan Khera said, "These issues should be discussed by calling a Special Session, taking everyone in confidence...""As America announced a ceasefire, the leaders went abroad to discuss Operation Sindoor. Who will answer the questions? The answers should not come from the armed forces, but the government," he noted.Khera said the armed forces are strong and they did what was required, but asked under what pressure the 'ceasefire' was done."Where are the terrorists of the Pahalgam attack? What were the conditions for the ceasefire? What CDS said was shocking. Now there should be clarity. They should call the Special Session and answer the questions," Khera asked, as he posed several questions to the government.Congress Deputy Leader in the Rajya Sabha Pramod Tiwari, also said that the public deserves a cohesive answer on the latest armed conflict."The entire country is asking, the leaders are speaking differently, on the other hand, the CDS spoke otherwise abroad, accepting that our jet was downed. The government should clarify."That is why we are demanding a Special Session of Parliament for talks, and an all-party meeting can be called. The PM, on the other hand, has been bent on politicising the valour shown by the armed forces in four days," he alleged.Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge had on Saturday accused the government of misleading the nation on the India-Pakistan conflict.Kharge also said his party demands a comprehensive review of India's defence preparedness by an independent expert committee.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

12 minutes ago

• First Post

Trump's MIGA push for Iran: Potus hints at regime change if Khamenei can't 'make Iran great again'

US President Trump publicly hinted at replacing Iran's regime — if it can't 'make Iran great again' — adding uncertainty to an already tense situation in the Middle East, though his administration does not appear fully confident in the idea. read more The Trump administration sent mixed signals to Iran on Sunday — with some US officials suggesting they were open to restarting talks after a surprise attack on three nuclear sites, while President Donald Trump raised the prospect of regime change. 'It's not politically correct to use the term 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change???' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'MIGA!!!' The post marked a reversal from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference, in which he detailed the aerial strikes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth stated. The Trump administration has been delivering mixed messages to Iran – issuing tough, threatening remarks while simultaneously calling for renewed dialogue. This has created uncertainty over whether the president is trying to provoke Iran or unintentionally deepening the conflict with Israel. Prior to Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, his vice president, defence secretary, top military adviser, and secretary of state all projected confidence that any fallout would be manageable, and that Iran's relatively weaker military would eventually drive it back to the negotiating table. Hegseth had stated that America 'does not seek war' with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes had given Tehran an opportunity to return to negotiations with Washington. However, the situation is not entirely within Washington's control. Tehran retains several levers it could use in response to the airstrikes, potentially escalating the conflict in the Middle East with global consequences. Iran could block oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, launch attacks on US bases in the region, carry out cyber-attacks, or accelerate its nuclear programme – which may now be seen as more essential following the US assault. This raises the question of whether the strikes will usher in a more brutal phase of warfare or lead to revived diplomacy out of caution. Domestically, the attacks quickly spilled into American politics, with Trump using part of his Sunday to criticise his opponents in Congress. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Having addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, Trump returned to social media on Sunday to lambast Representative Thomas Massie, who had criticised the president for acting without specific congressional authorisation. 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the bomb right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!),' Trump posted on Truth Social. At a joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated that 'Operation Midnight Hammer' involved decoys and deception, and encountered no Iranian resistance. Caine said the operation's objective – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — had been achieved. 'Final battle damage assessments will take time, but initial indications show all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Caine added.

Hindustan Times

14 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Indian airspace used by US to attack Iran nuclear sites? PIB fact-checks

The government on Sunday categorically denied reports circulating on social media that the US military used Indian airspace to carry out Operation Midnight Hammer against Iran, during which it attacked three nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The B-2 stealth bombers, designed for long missions, feature microwaves, restrooms, and refrigerators for pilot comfort during their 37-hour operation from Missouri to Iran.(REUTERS) In an official statement, the Fact Check unit of the Press Information Bureau (PIB) debunked the claims as "FAKE" and clarified, "Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation Midnight Hammer." The statement comes after several X users on Sunday claimed that the United States used Indian airspace to strike Iran, suggesting New Delhi's participation during Sunday's attack. Israel Iran war LIVE Updates However, the PIB cited a press briefing by the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, who detailed the alternative routes taken by US aircraft, dismissing the claims as baseless. Also Read: US warns Iran against closing Strait of Hormuz: 'It's economic suicide' "Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian Airspace was used by the United States to launch aircrafts against Iran during Operation Midnight Hammer. This claim is FAKE. Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation Midnight Hammer. During the Press Briefing Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine explained the route used by US aircraft," the Fact Check unit of the government said in a post on X. What is Operation Midnight Hammer? Donald Trump on Sunday said that the United States struck three key Iranian enrichment facilities — Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, calling the attack 'spectacular military success.' The US move to directly intervene in the Iran-Israeli conflict has escalated tensions of a larger escalation in the Middle East. Also Read: Oil soars as Trump's attack on Iran ramps up risks to supplies During the operation, B-2 stealth bombers were used to drop bunker-buster bombs on two sites and Tomahawk missiles on the Isfahan nuclear site. What General Dan Caine said on US strikes? Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, while addressing a press briefing at the Pentagon, presented a detailed map and timeline of Operation Midnight Hammer, which showed that none of the US aircraft entered the Indian airspace. "At approximately 6:40 PM EST, 2:10 am Iran time, the lead B-2 two dropped GBU 57 MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) weapons on the first of several aim points at Fordow," General Caine said. He said that during the operation, a total of 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOPs) were dropped against two nuclear target areas, while Tomahawk missiles striking Isfahan site. "As the President stated last night, the remaining bombers then hit their targets as well, with a total of 14 MOPs dropped against two nuclear target areas. All three Iranian nuclear infrastructure targets were struck between 6:40 PM and 7:05 PM EST (2:10 AM local time Iran), with the Tomahawk missiles being the last to strike at Isfahan to ensure we retain the element of surprise throughout the operation," he added. The US military used "several deception tactics", including decoys, to maintain tactical surprise, the general said. He further said that at the intervening night of Friday and Saturday, a large B-2 strike package was launched from the US, while the B-2 bombers deployed into the Pacific was used as a decoy. "The main strike package, comprised of seven B2 Spirit bombers, each with two crew members, proceeded quietly to the East with minimal communications," he added.

United News of India

25 minutes ago

• United News of India

Op Sindhu: Another flight arrives from Iran bringing 285 Indian nationals

New Delhi, June 22 (UNI) India's evacuation efforts under Operation Sindhu to bring back its nationals from conflict-hit Iran continued, with a second flight landing late on Sunday night, with 285 Indian nationals on board. With this, 1,713 Indian nationals have been brought home from Iran. The MEA spokesperson said in a post on X that Minister of State for External Affairs Pabitra Margherita was at the airport to receive the Indian nationals who arrived from Mashhad. 'India's evacuation efforts continue under #OperationSindhu.' MoS Shri @PmargheritaBJP received 285 Indian nationals evacuated on a special flight from Mashhad that landed in New Delhi at 2330 hrs on 22 June. 'With this, 1,713 Indian nationals have now been brought home from Iran.' Earlier in the evening, a special flight arrived from Iran, bringing 311 Indian nationals. The MEA spokesperson said in a post on X: 'Operation Sindhu continues. '311 Indian nationals arrived in New Delhi on a special flight from Mashhad at 1630 hrs on 22nd June. '1428 Indian nationals have now been evacuated from Iran.' On Saturday night, a flight had arrived bringing 290 Indian nationals back from Mashhad in Iran. India has launched Operation Sindhu to bring back its nationals from Iran and Israel amid the escalating war situation between the two nations. UNI RN