Windsor Framework structures ineffective and overly bureaucratic
Mr Robinson said that the post-Brexit trading deal could never be effective until fundamental issues around lack of consent from unionists are addressed.
The SDLP's Stormont leader Matthew O'Toole said while he supported the framework, he believed there needed to be improvements in how Northern Ireland voices were heard within its structures.
The House of Lords Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee has been holding evidence sessions examining the operation of the framework.
The Windsor Framework was agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amending the Northern Ireland Protocol. It governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region.
The DUP later reached the Safeguarding the Union deal with the previous UK government to further reduce some checks and paperwork on goods moving from the rest of the UK into Northern Ireland, leading to the restoration of the powersharing Executive at Stormont last year.
However, many unionists remain opposed to the framework, stating it creates a new regulatory border within the United Kingdom and because Northern Ireland continues to follow some EU laws relating to goods.
During his appearance before the committee, Mr Robinson was asked to assess the extent to which voices in Northern Ireland could be heard through the structures of the framework.
He said: 'I don't have a lot of faith in the current structures.
'When you consider the ability for politicians, parliamentarians, stakeholders, businesses, to engage with them.
'The structures around the Windsor Framework, though they may have evolved, are ineffective, opaque and overly bureaucratic.
The UK and EU agreed the Windsor Framework in 2023 (PA)
'They frustrate the ability for ordinary, routine and at times complex and serious engagement to either satisfy, resolve or ameliorate some of the harmful impositions that Northern Ireland finds itself in under these arrangements.'
The DUP leader added: 'I believe it cannot ever be effective until the fundamentals are resolved around the imposition that Northern Ireland was placed in without the consent of any elected unionist in Northern Ireland, without the consent of party colleagues in Westminster.'
In December, MLAs at Stormont voted to continue with the current arrangements for at least another four years in a democratic consent motion, which was part of the arrangements agreed between the UK and the EU.
However, unlike other votes at Stormont, there was no requirement for cross-community support for the motion.
Mr Robinson told peers: 'Though we have gone through a cycle of a parliamentary vote in Assembly terms in December of 2024, an inversion of cross-community protections.
'A false choice, do you wish this imposition to continue for a period of eight years or four years with a potential review.
'I don't believe they have been effective at all and if the Government were serious about increasing the opportunity to have voices heard and engage fundamentally in the propositions that are causing material impact, both constitutionally and practically in Northern Ireland, then they wouldn't only find an effective mechanism for that engagement but they would look at the fundamentals.'
He added: 'We have at the heart of this an agreement between the UK and the EU where they decide what is going to happen to Northern Ireland without any recourse to the citizenry of Northern Ireland or the elected representatives.
'Then you have the attempt or the added aspects of inclusion and participation but without any substantial or meaningful outworkings of that participation or inclusion.'
Stormont opposition leader Matthew O'Toole of the SDLP said Brexit had caused political division in Northern Ireland (Liam McBurney/PA)
Mr O'Toole told the committee that Brexit had led to 'real political division and controversy in Northern Ireland'.
He added: 'I do think there can be a degree of, if not consensus, then some degree of agreement that we can improve the mechanisms by which stakeholders in Northern Ireland, be they politicians, business groups, trade unions, other parts of civic society, can have their voice heard in relation to the provisions of the protocol/Windsor Framework.
'I think they improved somewhat after the Windsor Framework was agreed in spring 2023, but I don't think they are there yet.
'Northern Ireland is in the position of being subject to a cohort of EU law, obviously I strongly support that as a necessity, but I probably do agree that our voice could be better heard in terms of making those laws or at least understanding how they are going to apply in Northern Ireland.'
Mr O'Toole added: 'The summary answer is not quite where it should be, and I say that as someone who supports the provisions of the Windsor Framework and the protocol.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Spain given power over Gibraltar visas in Brexit deal
Spain was granted new powers over visas and residency permits in Gibraltar in secret UK-EU talks over the Rock's new Brexit deal. UK and Gibraltarian ministers claimed there was no threat to British sovereignty after announcing the agreement to keep the border on the isthmus open last week. But Spanish authorities will be able to carry out checks on people moving to the British Overseas Territory and play a joint role with Gibraltar on immigration and asylum cases. That means a UK subject hoping to move to Gibraltar will be vetted by Spanish authorities working on behalf of the EU. Gibraltar's government told Bloomberg, which first reported the concession, that it retained the final decision on asylum and whether or not to grant residency permits. A spokesman said the deal 'does not compromise sovereignty in any respect, and provides huge opportunities for traders in Gibraltar'. He added that the deal protected the 'fluidity of people necessary for the continued success and expansion of our services industries, especially the online gaming, insurance and financial services sectors'. Gibraltar would be allowed to issue a limited number of visas on humanitarian grounds, which would only be valid on the Rock, an EU official said. There would be strong cooperation between police in Spain and Gibraltar, which Madrid still views as a colony that should be Spanish. The deal ensures that Gibraltar's border with Spain remains open after Brexit, and means the 15,000 Spanish workers who cross into the disputed territory every day will not have to have their passports stamped. Failure to do the deal would have meant those workers using up their quota of visa-free travel to Gibraltar, and risked long delays at the border, which would be damaging to the economies on both sides of the frontier. Border checks will be moved to Gibraltar's nearby airport after the Rock effectively becomes an entry point to the EU's Schengen zone of passport-free movement. The EU demanded the new visa powers in the long-running behind-closed doors talks to protect the Schengen Area, which includes Spain. Once inside Schengen, it is possible to cross borders within the free movement zone without showing your passport. The deal also removes physical checks on goods at the frontier with Spain. After The Telegraph revealed details of how Spanish guards would police Gibraltar's airport last week, Fabian Picardo, the chief minister, said: 'We have not ceded any control of Gibraltar to any authority.' A day later, David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, was forced to admit that Spanish border guards would be able to stop Britons entering the Rock through its airport because of the deal. Spain's government announced last week after the deal was agreed that Spanish national police 'will carry out full Schengen controls' in Gibraltar's port as well as the airport. Mr Picardo, however, claimed Madrid had agreed that its police officers could only operate within the dual-use security space in the airport, which he calls the 'Schengen shack', straddling the border between the British territory and Spain. During an interview on Gibraltar's GBC television station, he denied he had compromised on his promise to not allow Spanish 'boots on the ground' with Spanish officers being able to visit the port. He said people arriving in Gibraltar from the sea would be driven from the port to the Schengen shack in the airport, but admitted that Spanish officers could accompany Gibraltarian police in these trips to and from the marina. 'They will not be in uniform and unarmed, merely observing that we are bringing an individual to the place where the immigration checks will take place and the only place where Spain can act, which is in the Schengen shack,' said Mr Picardo. The chief minister said he was satisfied that he had 'managed to stave off Spain having a presence in Gibraltar' without the need for the EU's Frontex border security force being deployed for a four-year period, as was envisaged in the in-principle agreement that kicked off the four-year negotiations. Negotiations over a post-Brexit deal for Gibraltar dragged on for more than five years after the end of the transition period until last week's breakthrough. Talks were mired over sovereignty concerns in Gibraltar, which has been British since 1713, but were helped by warmer UK-EU relations under the Labour government. In May, Sir Keir Starmer agreed a Brexit reset deal that included a defence pact and gave the EU 12 years' access to British fishing waters. It also included a commitment to align with EU plant and animal health rules to boost trade, which critics warned was an acceptable compromise on sovereignty that would make Britain a 'ruletaker' from Brussels.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
British tourists face price hikes for holidays to Europe under planned EU travel policy
Holidays to Europe will cost more if EU proposals to increase its planned entry fee go ahead. Currently, plans are for holidaymakers from outside the bloc to pay €7 (£5.98) for an online permit when entering as part of the Etias scheme. The system is due to be rolled out from next year, following the introduction of the Entry/Exit System, which will eventually require biometric data to be provided at the border. But the European Union is considering raising the price to help with repayments on a €350 billion (£299 billion) debt used to fund the post-Covid recovery, according to Politico. Etias, which stands for European Travel Information and Authorisation System, is emerging as one of the most popular tax options ahead of budget proposals next month, the publication said. This would be a further blow to Brits, who already face longer queues and more red tape since Brexit. 'A possible adjustment of the fee' is being considered, a European Commission spokesperson told Politico. And a note seen by the website saw the Polish rotating Council presidency write: 'It seems that there is a possibility of a gradual increase of the fee, strengthening the long-term revenue potential.' The Mail has contacted the European Commission for comment. The proposed €7 fee is cheaper than the £16 charged to apply for the UK's version, the Electronic Travel Authorisation, or the $21 (£15.60) price of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization used by the US. The news comes at a time of softening of relations between the UK and EU, with hopes that tourists will face easier experiences at passport control and suffer less bureaucracy on the continent. British tourists have begun using e-gates at Faro Airport after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer confirmed an agreement with EU leaders last month. However, they are still facing queues of nearly half an hour. Mark Francois, Conservative MP for Rayleigh and Wickford as well as chairman of the European Research Group of Tory Brexiteers, is unhappy with any potential price rise for the Etias. 'This just adds insult to injury over the Government's so-called Brexit reset,' he told GB News. 'Not only has it become apparent that promises of British tourists being fast-tracked through e-gates in EU countries were largely illusory, even when they do get through immigration, they will now pay extra for the privilege.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Romanian president nominates Liberal Party leader Ilie Bolojan as prime minister
BUCHAREST, June 20 (Reuters) - Romania's centrist president Nicusor Dan nominated Liberal Party leader Ilie Bolojan as prime minister on Friday after weeks of negotiations to form a coalition government that tackles the largest budget deficit in the European Union. Bolojan is expected to ask parliament to give his four-party government its vote of confidence next week.
