logo
US ocean imports plunged in May on 145% tariffs on China

US ocean imports plunged in May on 145% tariffs on China

Reuters11-06-2025

LOS ANGELES, June 11 (Reuters) - Imports at several of the busiest U.S. seaports dropped sharply in May, after President Donald Trump's short-lived 145% tariffs on many goods from China stalled trade, according to data from Descartes Datamyne.
The world's two biggest economies overnight announced a trade deal framework that sets tariffs on China at the prior 30% rate, subject to final approval. That rate would be combined with the 25% tariffs imposed during Trump's first term, bringing the total China rate to 55%.
China is the top U.S. supplier of goods that arrive by sea. That cargo is often for retailers like Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab, as well as for major manufacturers, including automakers.
West Coast ports handle a significant percentage of China shipments and suffered large year-over-year volume hits in May. In California, Long Beach imports dropped 20.9% and Los Angeles fell 8.5%. In the state of Washington, Seattle was off 17.3% and Tacoma plummeted 39.4%.
On the East Coast, import volume at the Port of New York and New Jersey declined 15.3%. Norfolk, Virginia, dove 14.7%, and Wilmington, North Carolina, dropped 17.6%.
Gulf of Mexico ports Houston and Mobile, Alabama, were down 3.4% and 20.4%, respectively.
Overall U.S. imports of goods from China dropped 28.5% year-over-year in May, according to supply chain technology provider Descartes (DSG.TO), opens new tab.
Importers raced to secure bookings for paused China shipments after the first U.S.-China tariff truce lowered rates to 30% last month. Nevertheless, the head of the Port of Los Angeles, the nation's largest, said he does not expect a deluge of freight because 30% tariffs still translate into meaningfully higher costs for importers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zuckerberg's political shift didn't shock Meta staff: ‘The whole time this was all one inch underneath'
Zuckerberg's political shift didn't shock Meta staff: ‘The whole time this was all one inch underneath'

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Zuckerberg's political shift didn't shock Meta staff: ‘The whole time this was all one inch underneath'

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg 's recent public support for President Donald Trump did not come as a shock to those who know or have closely worked with him, with dozens of people saying some changes at the company are part of the tech billionaire's long-held beliefs. Dozens of people who have either worked with or known Zuckerberg told the Financial Times that the CEO's more public shift toward Trump is just Zuckerberg displaying the more 'authentic' version of himself to the world, even though he was once known to support liberal ideology and voiced opposition to Trump's policies during the first administration. 'Mark was trying to keep his real feelings tight inside and put on a suit and cut his hair and be a good boy. But the whole time this was all one inch underneath,' an unnamed Meta insider told the outlet. 'Then he said, 'F*** it. I might as well be the person I really am.'' Since Trump was elected in November, the Meta CEO has met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, donated $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund, attended the inauguration, co-hosted a reception, and changed company policy to align more closely with the administration. Insiders told the newspaper that the tech billionaire's unapologetic pro-'masculine energy', free speech-loving shift is only a shift to the public. 'The public is seeing him more how we have, internally, since the beginning.' Andrew Bosworth, Meta's CTO, told FT. Bosworth suggested that Zuckerberg's former suit-wearing, government-obeying self was just the Meta CEO doing what he thought he was supposed to be doing. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Meta declined to comment for this story. Zuckerberg's private shift toward more conservative figures, such as Trump, was reportedly a slow movement that was seemingly triggered by constant pushback against Facebook – Meta's former name – from both the public and lawmakers, especially those seeking to regulate the tech industry. One major shift came in 2020, when Biden administration officials pressured Zuckerberg to censor misinformation about Covid on his social media platform, which he did and later regretted. But under the Trump administration, Zuckerberg appears less concerned with appeasing the public. Appearing on Joe Rogan's podcast recently, the Meta CEO said he believes 'masculine energy is good.' Even when executives challenged Zuckerberg's comments, he refused to apologize. Those familiar with Zuckerberg told FT that his decision to lean into hobbies such as Brazilian jiu-jitsu or wear more streetwear or cozy up to the administration is all part of Zuckerberg's efforts to get people to like him. 'He saw that Elon Musk was popular among the tech bros,' a former insider said. 'There was a push to make him cool. The core of the Social Network movie is true — he just wants people to like him.'

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud
Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud

Walmart has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a U.S. Federal Trade Commission civil lawsuit accusing the world's largest retailer of ignoring warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars. The settlement was filed on Friday in Chicago federal court, and requires approval by U.S. District Judge Manish Shah. Walmart also agreed not to process money transfers it suspects are fraudulent, or help sellers and telemarketers it believes are using its services to commit fraud. 'Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it's sent, it's gone for good,' said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC consumer protection bureau. 'Companies that provide these services must train their employees to comply with the law and work to protect consumers.' The Arkansas-based retailer did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. Walmart did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In its June 2022 complaint, the FTC accused Walmart of turning a blind eye to fraudsters who used its money transfer services to cash out at its stores. Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram and Western Union. Money can be hard to trace once delivered. The FTC said fraudsters used many schemes that included impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings. Shah dismissed part of the FTC case last July but let the regulator pursue the remainder. Walmart appealed from that decision. Friday's settlement would end the appeal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store