Two sitting Rajasthan MLAs sentenced to 1-year jail in 2014 road blocking case
Two Congress legislators from Rajasthan are among nine who were sentenced to a year in jail Wednesday for blocking a major road during a protest in 2014.
All nine, including Shahpura MLA Manish Yadav and Ladnun MLA Mukesh Bhakar, were found guilty under sections 147 (punishment for rioting) and 283 (causing danger or obstruction in a public way or line of navigation).
The court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Jaipur also imposed a fine of Rs 3,200 on the convicts, which includes Congress leader Abhishek Chaudhary, who unsuccessfully contested the 2023 Rajasthan assembly polls from Jhotwara.
Although they have been convicted, Yadav and Bhakar will not face disqualification from the Rajasthan assembly since the jail terms are under the two years mandated under The Representation of the People Act, 1951.
The convicts were part of an August 2014 protest at Rajasthan University. According to court documents, the protesters from the National Students' Union of India (NSUI) and the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) blocked the Jawaharlal Nehru Marg outside the main gate of Rajasthan University for 20 minutes, prompting the police to book them.
Police filed a chargesheet in the case on August 11, 2016. Yadav was then part of the ABVP but he eventually joined the Congress and won the 2023 assembly polls.
The others convicted in the case have been identified as Rajesh Meena, Ravi Kirad, Wasim Khan, Dron Yadav, Bhanu Pratap Singh and Vidyadhar Meel.
Since the offence is bailable, all convicts have been released on bail immediately after the sentencing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
Rahul Gandhi accuses poll body for 'deleting evidence', calls polls 'fixed match'
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday accused the Election Commission (EC) of "deleting evidence" instead of giving answers, after the poll body directed its officers to destroy CCTV, webcast, and video footage of elections 45 days after polling, if the results are not challenged in a post on X, Gandhi said, 'Voter list? Will not give a machine-readable format. CCTV footage? Hidden by changing the law. Election photos and videos? Now they will be deleted in 45 days, not 1 year. The one who was supposed to provide answers – is the one deleting the evidence.'advertisementHe added, 'It is clear that the match is fixed. And a fixed election is poison for democracy.' The Congress leader's statement came after the EC instructed its state poll officers to destroy all such data after 45 days unless a legal challenge to the result is filed. Gandhi has been demanding voter lists, polling data, and video footage, particularly in connection with alleged irregularities in the Maharashtra Assembly a letter dated May 30 to state Chief Electoral Officers, the EC said it had been using photography, videography, CCTV, and webcasting to record various stages of the election process. These recordings are not required by electoral law but serve as internal management the EC said that it has now reviewed the practice due to the "recent misuse of this content by non-contestants to spread misinformation and malicious narratives on social media by selective and out-of-context use of such content, which will not lead to any legal outcome."advertisement"Sharing of the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both the elector who has voted and the elector who has not voted vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements," Election Commission sources EC also said that making public CCTV footage from polling booths would violate the legal provisions of the Representation of the People Act and the directions of the Supreme Court of December last year, the government tweaked an election rule to prevent public inspection of certain electronic documents such as CCTV cameras and webcasting footage as well as video recordings of candidates to prevent their to the new instructions, if no election petition is filed within 45 days, the footage and images can be destroyed. An election petition must be filed in the relevant high court within 45 days of result clarified that if a petition is filed, the data is preserved and made available to the court when InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Rahul Gandhi
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pre-arrest bail pleas of Ecstasy Realty's directors rejected in ₹600 crore financial fraud case
MUMBAI : A sessions court in Mumbai on Friday denied anticipatory bail to four directors of Ecstasy Realty Private Limited in a Rs 600 crore financial fraud case. Additional sessions judge NG Shukla rejected the pre-arrest bail pleas of Pulin Bole, Shivani Verma, Shobit Rajan and Pranav Bajaj. The reasoned order was not made available as yet. The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) had registered an FIR against Ecstasy Realty and its directors based on a complaint by Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited ( EARCL ). As per the FIR, Rs 600 crore raised via secured Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) for a residential project was fraudulently siphoned off through layered transactions, benefiting promoters and related entities. The accused sought pre-arrest bail claiming they were innocent and contending that the FIR was registered with "the sole intention to harass and humiliate" them. No correct allegations are contained in the FIR, their pleas claimed. The FIR has been lodged after an "inexplicable and unjustifiable" delay for the alleged offence committed between March 2018 to March 2023, which suggests the allegations against them are an afterthought and have been falsely fabricated to implicate them, the plea added. The court, however, rejected their pleas.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC tells Delhi HC to expeditiously decide DHFL ex-promoter's bail plea
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Delhi High Court to decide within two weeks the bail plea of Dewan Housing Finance Ltd 's former promoter Kapil Wadhawan in the multi-crore bank fraud case investigated by the CBI. A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan said Wadhawan was in custody since July, 2022 and his bail plea was coming up for hearing on July 18 in the high court. The bench asked the high court to decide the bail plea within two weeks from the date of hearing. Wadhawan moved the top court aggrieved by the orders of adjournment in his bail plea by the high court and sought an expeditious disposal of his petition. Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Kapil Wadhawan, referred to his client's long custody period aside from the non-adjudication on his bail plea on multiple occasions. The Wadhawan brothers -- Kapil and Dheeraj -- were arrested in this case on July 19, 2022. Dheeraj was granted interim bail by the high court on September 9, last year on medical grounds. The chargesheet was filed by the CBI on October 15, 2022 and cognisance was taken by the trial court. The FIR in the case was based on a complaint made by the Union Bank of India. The CBI alleged that Dewan Housing Finance Ltd ( DHFL ), its then CMD Kapil, then director Dheeraj and other accused persons conspired to cheat the consortium of 17 banks led by the Union Bank of India. The accused and others induced the consortium to sanction huge loans aggregating Rs 42,871.42 crore. Much of the amount was allegedly siphoned off and misappropriated by alleged falsification of the books of the DHFL and dishonest default in repayment of the legitimate dues of the consortium banks, the CBI claimed. The complainant alleged that a wrongful loss of Rs 34,615 crore was caused to the consortium banks in as much as such was the quantification of the outstanding dues as on July 31, 2020.
