Rainn Wilson commended for critique of ‘bias' mainstream media
President of the Centre of the American Experiment John Hinderaker discusses Rainn Wilson's recent interview with MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle.
'Who knew that Dwight Schrute could be so sensible,' Mr Hinderaker told Sky News host Caleb Bond.
'The press has lost the confidence of the vast majority of Americans.
'They have lied to us time after time, year after year.
'The bias in the so-called mainstream media is so palpable, so obvious.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I was turned back at the US border after a 12-hour interrogation
Last Thursday, I departed Melbourne on QF93 for a two-week holiday in New York. I never made it. After landing at LAX, I disembarked with everyone else and made my way towards the famously long passport queue. I was eager to get through, collect my bags, and board the second leg of my journey. But as soon as I stepped into the snaking line, a voice came over the loudspeaker, calling me out by name. They had been waiting for me. 'Alistair Kitchen, please report to the officer at the back of the arrival hall.' I turned back and was met by a Customers and Border Protection Officer I found disquietingly polite. He asked me to follow him, and we walked together past that long line, down a special queue where my passport was quickly scanned, and then into a room some passengers will know as 'secondary processing'. The officer, who I later learned was Officer Adam Martinez, asked for my phone. He asked if I wanted to use the water fountain, as Americans call it, and if I wanted to use the bathroom. Over the course of the two interrogations that were to come, and in my 12 hours of detention, I was asked many times if I wanted to use the bathroom, as if the customs officers had been taught that availability of a toilet would make up what they were about to do. Then he asked for my phone, and told me I would be immediately deported if I did not give him my passcode. I made the mistake of complying. I may have been visiting only for a short holiday on this occasion, but I know the US well – I lived there for six years, studying and working. Last year I moved back home, to Castlemaine, in regional Victoria, but for the years 2022 to 2024 I was studying a master of fine arts in nonfiction writing at Columbia University. In April 2024, months into the Israeli war on Gaza, students at Columbia began to protest the university's investment in Israel. Columbia is famously the 'activist Ivy', and proudly advertises its history of student protest, such as the 1968 occupation of university buildings to protest the war in Vietnam, and the fight against apartheid in South Africa. One day, I stepped onto campus to discover that students had erected tents on the lawn. At that moment, they began a protest movement that rapidly swept around the world, including to the lawns of universities here in Australia. I began to write down what I saw. Over the days and weeks that followed I posted reports to my Substack, Kitchen Counter. I wrote plainly about what I observed: from Jewish and Muslim students holding hands, singing together for peace, to faculty mounting their own protests opposing university administration. In the end, it was how militarised police used siege vehicles to storm the campus. All of this I watched with my own eyes, and reported as a witness, and a journalist. I wrote, too, about my best guesses for why the university, and the NYPD, were making choices disproportionate in their fierce violence to the peaceful behaviour of the students. I wrote against the swirl of misinformation that rose rapidly, driven from powers a long way from campus. Because the university went into lockdown, professional media were not on the ground. I realised then that my first-person accounts were as important for describing what I saw as they were for describing what I did not see. And what I did not see, in my time observing the protests, were instances of antisemitism from Columbia student protesters. That was why I was detained at LAX. I didn't need to guess the reason – Officer Martinez had told me. As he sat down for the first interrogation, he said, 'We both know why you're here.' I was there because of what I 'wrote online about the protests at Columbia'.
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
I was turned back at the US border after a 12-hour interrogation
Last Thursday, I departed Melbourne on QF93 for a two-week holiday in New York. I never made it. After landing at LAX, I disembarked with everyone else and made my way towards the famously long passport queue. I was eager to get through, collect my bags, and board the second leg of my journey. But as soon as I stepped into the snaking line, a voice came over the loudspeaker, calling me out by name. They had been waiting for me. 'Alistair Kitchen, please report to the officer at the back of the arrival hall.' I turned back and was met by a Customers and Border Protection Officer I found disquietingly polite. He asked me to follow him, and we walked together past that long line, down a special queue where my passport was quickly scanned, and then into a room some passengers will know as 'secondary processing'. The officer, who I later learned was Officer Adam Martinez, asked for my phone. He asked if I wanted to use the water fountain, as Americans call it, and if I wanted to use the bathroom. Over the course of the two interrogations that were to come, and in my 12 hours of detention, I was asked many times if I wanted to use the bathroom, as if the customs officers had been taught that availability of a toilet would make up what they were about to do. Then he asked for my phone, and told me I would be immediately deported if I did not give him my passcode. I made the mistake of complying. I may have been visiting only for a short holiday on this occasion, but I know the US well – I lived there for six years, studying and working. Last year I moved back home, to Castlemaine, in regional Victoria, but for the years 2022 to 2024 I was studying a master of fine arts in nonfiction writing at Columbia University. In April 2024, months into the Israeli war on Gaza, students at Columbia began to protest the university's investment in Israel. Columbia is famously the 'activist Ivy', and proudly advertises its history of student protest, such as the 1968 occupation of university buildings to protest the war in Vietnam, and the fight against apartheid in South Africa. One day, I stepped onto campus to discover that students had erected tents on the lawn. At that moment, they began a protest movement that rapidly swept around the world, including to the lawns of universities here in Australia. I began to write down what I saw. Over the days and weeks that followed I posted reports to my Substack, Kitchen Counter. I wrote plainly about what I observed: from Jewish and Muslim students holding hands, singing together for peace, to faculty mounting their own protests opposing university administration. In the end, it was how militarised police used siege vehicles to storm the campus. All of this I watched with my own eyes, and reported as a witness, and a journalist. I wrote, too, about my best guesses for why the university, and the NYPD, were making choices disproportionate in their fierce violence to the peaceful behaviour of the students. I wrote against the swirl of misinformation that rose rapidly, driven from powers a long way from campus. Because the university went into lockdown, professional media were not on the ground. I realised then that my first-person accounts were as important for describing what I saw as they were for describing what I did not see. And what I did not see, in my time observing the protests, were instances of antisemitism from Columbia student protesters. That was why I was detained at LAX. I didn't need to guess the reason – Officer Martinez had told me. As he sat down for the first interrogation, he said, 'We both know why you're here.' I was there because of what I 'wrote online about the protests at Columbia'.
Sky News AU
14 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Global Islamic politics expert says Israel's claims about Iranian nuclear weapon 'at odds' with intelligence reports as Netanyahu 'desperate' to involve Trump in war
An Australian global Islamic politics expert has urged the world to be "sceptical" of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claims after numerous intelligence reports concluded that Iran is not "close at all" to building a nuclear weapon. Professor Greg Barton from Deakin University told Sky News Netanyahu's strategy to close down Iran's nuclear program may not be as "clear cut and simple", as he would present it to be to President Donald Trump, in an attempt to persuade the US to join the Israeli assault. "I think that the way that Benjamin Netanyahu will sell it to Trump is that you just send in a couple of B2s over Fordow and it's done," Mr Barton told Sky News host Steve Price. "You've closed down the nuclear program and we're good. "But of course, it is not likely to be so clear cut and so simple." According to Axios, President Trump believes the US has leverage over Iran due to its bunker buster munitions – which Israel does not have – that are capable of destroying the Fordow nuclear enrichment facility that sits deep under a mountain. Mr Barton added the bunker buster bombs are unlikely to demolish Iran's nuclear program and could instead result in dangerous escalation of war in the Middle East. 'First of all, those B2 strikes with massive ordnance, penetrator bombs over Fordow, 90 metres underground, that likely wouldn't finish Iran's nuclear program,' he said. 'They'd probably scramble to take what they have left and actually move towards nuclear weapons. 'In the meantime, they're likely to strike out against US targets all around the Middle East and use their proxies to do so. 'So a very dangerous risk of escalation and a prolonged conflict.' When questioned about the validity of Netanyahu's claims about Iran's existential threat to Israel, Mr Barton said they were 'at odds' with other publicly available intelligence reports have said, including what Trump was briefed on by his own security adviser. Mr Barton highlighted Israel's remarkable capabilities at penetrating Iranian society and its defence apparatus, but noted other intelligence reports suggest 'Iran is some way off, it's not close at all' to building a nuclear weapon. 'It is possible they know something that no one else knows, but what all the other intelligence reports are saying is that Iran is some way off, it's not close at all,' he said. 'We can't know, we're sort of making a claim from Netanyahu who is desperate to involve Trump and America in this programme, and on balance you sort of want to be a bit sceptical about what he's saying for that reason.' Israel has been trading missiles with Iran since last Friday in an attempt to shut down any efforts of Tehran building an atomic weapon to wipe out the existence of the Jewish state. Netanyahu said the operations were to "strike the head of Iran's nuclear weaponisation program". White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a media briefing on Thursday, local time, she had been asked to pass on a 'direct quote' from President Trump on the possibility of US intervention in the Israel-Iran war. 'Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' she said, quoting the President. Ms Leavitt also urged sceptics of US involvement to 'trust' in President Trump's judgement, before emphasising his 'top priority' was to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.
