Judge spars with Trump administration over release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia: ‘My head is spinning'

More than a month after the Supreme Court agreed that Donald Trump 's administration must be ordered to 'facilitate' the release of a wrongfully deported Salvadoran immigrant, the government is refusing to do so — and arguing with a federal judge that they don't have to.
The weeks-long court battle is leaving a judge's head 'spinning,' Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis told attorneys on Friday.
Last month, Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed that the government's removal of Kilmar Abrego Garcia was 'illegal.'
Now, government attorneys are sparring with Judge Xinis to try to conceal what, if anything, the administration is doing to return him, and why that information needs to be kept secret.
Meanwhile, administration officials are 'shouting from the rooftops' in public about ensuring that Abrego Garcia never returns to the United States, according to his attorneys.
'He will never walk freely in the U.S.,' Department of Justice lawyer Jonathan Guynn told District Judge Paula Xinis in a Maryland courtroom on Friday.
'That sounds to me like an admission you will not take steps' to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return,' Xinis replied.
'That's about as clear as it can get,' said Gyunn.
Despite government attorneys and the White House admitting that Abrego Garcia was deported from Maryland 'due to an administrative error,' the Justice Department is now clashing with its own determination — and multiple court rulings from federal judges in the Supreme Court — about the legality of his removal.
'Abrego Garcia was removed without lawful authority — you conceded it,' Xinis told Justice Department lawyers on Friday.
'Not to split hairs with your honor, but he was removed lawfully,' Guynn said. 'He shouldn't be in the United States.'
'He was removed in error,' Xinis replied.
Guynn later conceded that he was reported in 'error' but said it did not rise to government 'misconduct.'
Government attorneys have produced more than 1,400 documents in the case, but Abrego Garcia's legal team has only received 164, most of which are photocopies of their own filings.
'My head is spinning,' Xinis told the court at one point.
Lawyers for Abrego Garcia's family asked the judge to keep the government on 'as tight a leash as possible' to ensure the administration is responding to court-ordered questions.
Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador as a teenager in 2011 and was working as a sheet-metal apprentice in Maryland, where he has been living with his wife and 5-year-old child, both U.S. citizens. The couple is also raising two other children from a previous relationship.
After a traffic stop in March, he was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and then deported to El Salvador's brutal Terrorism Confinement Center. He was later moved to another prison designed to imprison non-gang members.
Trump's allies and administration officials have repeatedly sought to justify his detention over allegations of criminal activity and gang membership, which were raised only after he was summarily deported. Democrats and legal analysts argue the administration could return Abrego Garcia and then use that alleged evidence against him in normal immigration court removal hearings, but the government is refusing to do so.
Instead, Justice Department lawyers and Trump administration officials have raised a 'state secrets' privilege to try to avoid answering questions about the government's relationship with El Salvador and conversations about the arrangements among officials.
Abrego Garcia's lawyers argued that the government hasn't shown even 'the slightest effort' to fulfill court orders to retrieve him, and even cited Trump's interview last month with ABC News in which he said he could bring Abrego Garcia back but won't.
On Friday, Xinis described the government's reasoning for withholding that information as 'take my word for it.'
'There's simply no details,' she said. 'This is basically 'take my word for it.''

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

22 minutes ago

• The Independent

The ‘inappropriate' post over Iran that led the LA County Sheriff's Department to apologize

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) apologized for an "offensive and inappropriate" social media post regarding recent U.S. strikes in Iran. The initial post, published hours after U.S. bombings, referenced "victims and families impacted" despite no reported fatalities. The LASD faced significant public backlash, with social media users criticizing the statement as a "slap in the face" to the U.S. military. The department first edited the post, then issued a formal apology, stating the original message was "unacceptable, made in error, and does not reflect the views of Sheriff Robert G. Luna or the Department." The LASD is conducting an internal review into the post's creation and publication, and is reviewing its social media oversight protocols.

Daily Mail​

25 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Iranian-Americans' praise Trump for bombing of their home nation

Iranian-Americans have backed President Trump's strikes on their home nation as they hope the intervention could trigger a revolt against the Ayatollah's regime. In Maryland, one of the largest Iranian communities in America where over 16,000 Iranian people live, residents have expressed a cautious optimism over the strikes. An Iranian-American DC resident called Alireza, who declined to give his second name, told the outlet that the news of Trump's 'bunker buster' bomb raid on three key Iranian nuclear weapon factories on Saturday night filled him with hope. He said world leaders in the past had ignored the oppression of the Iranian people at the hands of the regime, but after Trump's strikes, 'it shows that they can't do anything and they are weak.' Hashemi said that Iranian political identity has been 'deeply shaped by the fact that Iran has been on the receiving end and the humiliating end of external intervention.' '(This) created the social conditions for the 1979 revolution', he said, when the country's liberal shah was replaced by a hardline Islamic regime that remains in power to this day. Israel began bombing Iran last week in a bid to stop the country building nuclear weapons, after its leaders vowed to use them to obliterate Israel. On Saturday night, Trump dispatched B-2 bombers with huge 'bunker buster' bombs to try and destroy three nuclear weapons factories, including the infamous Fordow facility that sits buried under a mountain. Alireza and others hope that Trump's strikes will finally topple the country's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Pushing for regime change in Iran has long been avoided by US presidents, before Donald Trump on Sunday night stunned the Middle East again as he called to 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' In a shock post on Sunday night to Truth Social, Trump wrote: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' The message from the president directly contradicted remarks from his top allies just hours earlier, with Vice President JD Vance telling ABC: 'We don't want to achieve regime change. We want to achieve the end of the Iranian nuclear program.' A majority of Republicans support America's entry into the war - but there has been vocal criticism too, from leading MAGA figures including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene and Steve Bannon. However, direct American intervention to end to the Ayatollah's regime is exactly what many Iranians in America are hoping for. Reza Rofougaran, a 72-year-old real estate broker in Maryland, told the Baltimore Sun that he emigrated from Tehran shortly after the 1979 revolution, and worked as a journalist in his home country before the regime censored his newspaper. After being randomly arrested on the street, he said he 'decided that no matter what, I'm going to leave the country and come back to the U.S.' He said he is '100 percent against the Islamic regime in Iran and hope for a regime change.' Rofougaran, a US citizen since 1997, added that he was unsure if American intervention would have the desired effect given past foreign policy struggles in the Middle East, and would 'prefer this regime goes down by the people of Iran themselves.' 'A good majority of Iranians' oppose the regime, he said, but at the same time they 'are saddened by these attacks.' 'I am not happy with any attack on my homeland,' he said. The divide between the desired outcome of regime change and skepticism over how to achieve it follows decades of US presidents floating strikes on Iran but backing down due to the risks involved, before Trump pulled the trigger on Saturday night. 'Unfortunately, no one helped us. Obama didn't help us. Biden didn't help us,' Rofougaran added. 'The current situation, actually, I'm sort of happy, that actually, Israelis start supporting Iranian people.' A National Iranian American Council survey of Iranian Americans shortly before Israel's strikes on Iran found that 53 percent strongly or somewhat opposed US military action. The number that strongly or somewhat supported American intervention stood at 36 percent. Trump's strikes did not target or kill any civilians in Iran. Experts say many Iranian-Americans fled to the US to escape persecution, with that life experience explaining their support for potential regime change. 'Many Iranian Americans are here fled the regime because of either economic deprivation or political persecution,' Nader Hashemi, the director of the Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding and professor of Middle East and Islamic Politics at Georgetown University, told the Baltimore Sun. Rofougaran said Iranians he has spoken to both in the US and his home country say they are 'happy' with the Israeli strikes 'because of the precise attack' that only killed or injured soldiers and no civilians. 'You are not attacking civilians, people. They are attacking the mullahs, the top [IRGC] commanders and the people in charge,' he said. Now, with the world waiting for Iran's response to the US strikes, he hopes the Iranian people will see the bombings as an opportunity to push for regime change. 'The whole thing is changing in 10 days,' he said. 'They want to have a peaceful government.'

Daily Mail​

25 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

WNBA commentator Rebecca Lobo forced into bizarre on-air U-turn after praising Donald Trump

WNBA legend and ESPN commentator Rebecca Lobo issued a bizarre apology on air for calling America 'great' during the Las Vegas Aces' win over the Indiana Fever. Lobo, who was named a WNBA All-Star back in 1999, was debating a foul call in Sunday's game with play-by-play announcer Pam Ward when she used a term vaguely similar to Donald Trump 's MAGA catchphrase. 'So they disagree with you?' Ward asked her colleague about the decision made by officials on court. 'They do, and I disagree with them. And that's fine,' Lobo responded before adding, 'that's what makes America great, right Pam Ward?' After seemingly being left uncomfortable with her choice of wording, Ward stayed silent before Lobo backtracked on the comment in strange fashion. 'I should rephrase that,' the former New York Liberty star said. Ward then replied: 'Yeah, I did think differences of opinion are perfectly fine.' WNBA legend and ESPN commentator Rebecca Lobo (left) issued a bizarre apology on air for calling America 'great' during the Las Vegas Aces' win over the Indiana Fever (right) "I should rephrase that" — CJ Fogler 🫡 (@cjzero) June 22, 2025 'Yes, that's a better way to say it. Sorry about that,' Lobo added. Fans quickly took to social media to slam Lobo, Ward and ESPN over the awkward moment, which many felt was unnecessary. 'Clearly not political. Just a general statement,' one user posted on X. 'Disgraceful! There is too long a pause after Rebecca said it. Someone in the booth told her rephrase it. There is nothing wrong with what she said, get over yourself woke ESPN. Not everything is political,' wrote another. A third put: 'Imagine being offended about saying America is great. F***in losers'. While another simply commented: 'Pathetic moment.' Lobo has spent over two decades as a commentator for ESPN after joining the network back in 2004, a year after she retired from basketball. As well as playing for the Liberty, Houston Comets, Springfield Spirit and the Connecticut Sun, the iconic center also won a gold medal at the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta with Team USA.