Elderly parents can claim maintenance from kids

Chittoor: Senior Civil Judge and Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), MS Bharathi noted that elderly parents who are neglected by their sons or daughters are legally entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
She held an awareness programme at an old age home in Tapovanam in Chittoor on Friday, which was organised as per the directives of the Supreme Court and the State Legal Services Authority.
During the event, Judge Bharathi interacted with the elderly residents, inquiring about their health, the medical services being provided, pension disbursement, and any other issues they may be facing.
She encouraged them to voice their concerns, assuring that legal help is available free of cost through the DLSA.
Speaking at the event, she highlighted that in many cases, elderly parents transfer property to their children through gift deeds, expecting care and support in return. However, when the children fail to fulfill their responsibilities, the parents have the right to approach the court under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure to revoke such deeds.
Judge Bharathi reiterated the commitment of the District Legal Services Authority to provide free legal services to the elderly in such matters.
She also stressed the importance of awareness about the constitutional rights and protective laws available to senior citizens.
Former president of the Retired Employees Welfare Association Kesavulu, Murali, staff nurse Aruna from the Disabled Welfare Hostel, and several elderly residents of the ashram participated in the programme.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

3 hours ago

• Time of India

‘Serious threat to public health': Telangana HC upholds preventive detention of bootlegger

HYDERABAD: The Telangana high court upheld the state govt's decision to detain a habitual bootlegger under the PD Act, observing that the manufacture and sale of illicitly distilled liquor can have irreversible and dangerous consequences for society. A division bench comprising Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao made these remarks while dismissing a petition filed by a Warangal woman challenging her husband's preventive detention. The bench said that the man's repeated involvement in bootlegging posed a serious threat to public health and safety, thereby warranting detention under section 2(A) of the PD Act, 1986. "His actions endangered the health of the public and created a sense of fear and insecurity," the court said in its judgment. The court further observed that the sale of spurious liquor goes beyond mere law and order concerns and directly undermines public health and societal stability. In arriving at its decision, the bench cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Pesala Nookaraju versus govt of AP (2023), which upheld preventive detention in similar cases involving habitual bootleggers.

Time of India

4 hours ago

• Time of India

Hyderabad woman duped of Rs 22 lakh: fraudsters pose as cops; use fake court notices

Representative Image HYDERABAD: A 65-year-old woman from Kapra lost 22 lakh to fraudsters posing as Delhi police officers. Threatening to arrest her on charges of drug trafficking and money laundering, the fraudsters coerced the victim into transferring the money with a false promise to return it after 'RBI verification'. Based on the victim's complaint, Rachakonda police registered a case on Friday. The victim, a retired private-sector employee, told police she received a call on June 16 from a man who introduced himself as inspector Gopesh Kumar. Claiming her Aadhaar was linked to a money laundering case, he showed her fake Supreme Court and RBI notices through WhatsApp video calls and threatened immediate arrest unless she complied with his legal instructions. The caller ordered her to wear white clothes and remain on video for a virtual appearance before the judge. She was forced to disclose bank balances for an asset assessment. She transferred 2 lakh on June 17 and 20 lakh on June 19 after being assured the money would be returned after investigation. When the fraudsters demanded additional payments, the victim consulted relatives and realised the documents were fraudulent. Police are analysing call data records and bank transaction details to trace the accused.

Time of India

13 hours ago

• Time of India

Two women duped in online job scams

Udupi: Two women from Udupi fell victim to separate online job scams, collectively losing more than Rs 14 lakh. Bharathi,48, a resident of Hiriyadka, in a complaint, stated that she was searching for employment when she came across an Instagram advertisement offering work-from-home opportunities. After clicking the ad, she was contacted by a person named Nisha, who claimed the job involved boosting product ratings for Flipkart traders in exchange for a 20%-30% commission. To register, Bharathi was sent a link and instructed to pay Rs 200 via UPI. The transaction, made on June 15, reflected the name Neeraj Kumar Singh. Subsequently, a tutor named Vaishali Raj shared another link through which Bharathi completed a task and received Rs 300 as a reward. Later, she was added to a WhatsApp group named 'VIP Investment Members Only,' where she was shown a list of investment options with attractive commissions. Trusting the offer, she initially invested Rs 20,000. After completing additional tasks, she was told she could only withdraw her earnings if she deposited another Rs 40,000. Over time, the complainant allegedly transferred a total of Rs 5.6 lakh to various bank accounts, expecting returns that never came. Instead, she continued to receive messages demanding more payments. A case was registered at Hiriyadka police station under Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. In another case, Sushma,31, a resident of Marne village, received a Telegram message on June 10 from a user named Vanya, offering a part-time job. After she accepted, she received further instructions from Vanya and mentor Kuldeep, also on Telegram. Her task involved sending screenshots of hotel listings, and she was assured payment after every three tasks. Once the tasks were completed, Sushma encountered an error while trying to withdraw her earnings. She was informed that 30% of the displayed amount had to be deposited to release the funds. Believing this, she allegedly transferred a total of Rs 8.5 lakh to various accounts provided by the scammers. Based on her complaint, a case was filed at Ajekar police station under sections 319(2) (cheating by personation) and 318(4) (cheating) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and Section 66(D) of the IT Act.