
New Flamingo Land theme park planned for top UK tourist beauty spot – and people aren't happy
A NEW theme park wanting to open in the UK has been delivered another blow.
An emergency meeting has been set up to discuss the development of Flamingo Land in Scotland which is set to gain planning permission after 49 conditions were added to the new application.
3
Back in 2018, plans for a new attraction were submitted by Flamingo Land for the banks of Loch Lomond in Scotland.
However, the following year they were withdrawn due to a lack of support - which seems to have also continued ever since.
In 2020, updated plans were resubmitted, insisting that the new attraction would be a "major step away" from its other resort - which includes a theme park and zoo in Yorkshire, reports the BBC.
The theme park operator wants to build a £40million resort on Lomond Banks that would include a waterpark, monorail, hotel and restaurants.
Despite this, the Loch Lomond park authority board ruled that even the updated plans still conflicted with both regional and national environmental polices.
The lake in southern Scotland, which is part of the Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park, is known for boasting red deer and oak woodlands.
Among the risks listed, Stuart Pearce from the park authority noted how the plans would create an "unacceptable risk" of flooding of the River Leven.
Following the release of the updated plans, more than 174,000 people signed a petition against the project.
The current Flamingo Land resort on north Yorkshire opened back in 1959 - originally as a zoo.
The attraction got its name from the popular pink bird, which were among the first animals on the site in Yorkshire.
The perfect Haven holiday park for a kid-friendly break - with direct beach access, indoor waterpark and neighbouring seaside theme park
Now a public meeting has been set for May 30 to discuss the proposals for the banks of Loch Lomond.
The meeting follows news that the Scottish government approved permission for the development - overturning the decision of the national park authority.
Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer, who does not support the plan, said that the development would cause "irreversible damage" and the decision was an "anti-democratic outrage".
He added: "Their destructive plans were unanimously rejected by the National Park's board, opposed by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, the National Trust for Scotland, the Woodland Trust, the Park's expert planning officers and 155,000 people who joined our Save Loch Lomond campaign."
He labelled the developer as "greedy" and that it would not take "no for an answer".
"We are urgently considering our options for continuing this fight. I will leave no stone unturned in the campaign to save Loch Lomond," he concluded.
3
The Balloch and Haldane Community Council also noted how they were "deeply disappointed" in the Scottish government's decision which it said "contradicts the expressed will of the community".
In an 80-page document on the site, an evaluation noted how there has been a lot of opposition to the plans.
However, it also said that the site could operate safely despite the risk of flooding and added that there could be benefits to the local community in terms of jobs and a boost to the economy.
If the project did go ahead it would likely have two hotels, more than 100 lodges, a waterpark and a monorail built.
bird-inspired £5million adventure play park is also planned for a UK attraction, and is 'to be a place of wonder for families'.
Plus, a major UK theme park is to get a huge new land by 2027 with rollercoasters, kids rides and indoor attractions.
3
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It is time to suspend Dominic Grieve's anti-Islamophobia group
There have been too many casualties in the grooming gang scandal. Yet so far, the political consequences have been few. It is far from clear however that Dominic Grieve's Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Definition Working Group can, or should, survive this week's fall out. What a few weeks ago was dismissed as 'dog-whistle' politics or the agenda of the 'far-Right' – the scandal of mass grooming of girls by mostly Pakistani origin males – is now viewed very differently. This shifting ground greatly impacts attempts to establish a definition of 'Islamophobia ' – controversially signposted by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in February. A new Policy Exchange report How Not to Tackle Grooming Gangs: The National Grooming Gang Inquiry and a Definition of Islamophobia details just how difficult it has been, for over two decades, to describe openly what people could see about grooming gangs with their own eyes. Let four examples suffice here. For her past work on Rotherham, Louise Casey was put forward for an 'Islamophobe of the year award' by one activist group. The late journalist Andrew Norfolk was vilified, as was then Labour MP for Keighley, Ann Cryer. In 2020, when broadcaster Trevor Phillips was suspended by Labour for alleged Islamophobia, the first charge listed was journalism where he had written of 'the exposure of systematic and longstanding abuse by men, mostly of Pakistani Muslim origin in the North of England.' How ridiculous this orthodoxy now looks. On one level, Government appears to accept this new reality. On Monday the Home Secretary declared 'those vile perpetrators who have grown used to the authorities looking the other way must have no place to hide.' As she spoke, she was surrounded by female Labour MPs who appeared chastened by the weight of events. And yet, there are grounds for pessimism. For the national inquiry into grooming gangs to work it cannot be placed in a straitjacket. It will need to shine a torchlight into every Whitehall office, every stalled police inquiry, each Town Hall in England, and every licensing arrangement between a local authority and a taxi firm. Its hands cannot be tied by political, social or religious considerations. As Yvette Cooper spoke in the Commons, others were risking that very scenario. The call for evidence by Grieve's working group is underway, as he seeks to develop a new definition of Islamophobia. While ministers have said this would not be statutory, if accepted by the public and private sector (as activists will demand) it would in practice become binding policy if not law. To that backdrop, how confident would a care worker, teacher or local councillor in Rochdale or Rotherham be, about speaking openly on issues which concern them? Angela Rayner should thank Dominic Grieve and his team for their work, then put the group on ice. If the grooming gang inquiry finds fears of prejudice and Islamophobia have undermined the response to grooming gangs, then the retirement of the Islamophobia Definition Working Group must become permanent.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Eight arrests as protesters ‘attacked' outside Iranian embassy in London
Eight men have been arrested after anti-regime activists were allegedly assaulted outside the Iranian embassy on Friday morning. Scores of police officers were deployed to the scene after being alerted to reports of an altercation outside the building in Knightsbridge, west London, just before 10am. Two men were treated at the scene by paramedics before being taken to hospital. Officials said their injuries are not believed to be life-threatening. • Iran's 'propagandist-in-chief' billed to speak at Scottish mosque Police imposed conditions stopping protesters from gathering in the area until 1pm on Sunday to 'prevent serious disorder', but one man was arrested for allegedly breaching the civil order. Scotland Yard said seven men were arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm. All suspects remained in police custody on Friday afternoon. Amir, 30, a member of a pro-Iranian monarchy group, claimed one of the two injured men suffered a 'broken leg'. The construction worker, who withheld his surname, said the activists had staged a 'peaceful protest' outside the embassy since the Israeli attacks on Iran began last week. Amir claimed the members have had 'problems' with supporters of the Islamic regime during that time. The protest was said to have been an anti-regime demonstration, amid the continuing Israel-Iran conflict. The police said the rally involved both pro and anti-regime protesters. Pro-Shah protesters were seen flying different flags supporting Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, including the national flag used before the 1979 Islamist revolution. Officers were seen on patrol in the area to monitor the situation after cordons were lifted later in the afternoon. Pro-Iranian monarchy protesters told The Times they were told to disperse and dismantle flags and banners festooned on railings opposite the embassy. The Metropolitan Police said: 'Officers are on scene in Princes Gate, SW7, following an altercation during a protest. 'They were called at 9.53am on Friday. Conditions have since been put in place to prevent serious disorder.' The police said that eight men remained in police custody and that the two men treated at the scene were in hospital. London Ambulance Service added: 'We were called at 9.56am on [Friday] to reports of an assault in Princes Gate. 'We sent a number of resources to the scene including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars and our tactical response unit. We treated two patients at the scene and took one to hospital and one to a major trauma centre.' The attack unfolded as the war between Israel and Iran continued to escalate and both nations engaged in missile strikes. President Trump said that he would decide in the next fortnight whether or not the US would intervene in the conflict.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Solar farm installed at Leicestershire Police's HQ
Bosses say a new solar farm at Leicestershire Police's Enderby headquarters is forecast to generate the equivalent of £2.1m worth of energy over the next 25 force is believed to be one of the first in the country to invest in the installation of a small solar chiefs say they expect to save £63,525 in energy costs in its first year of operation based on current energy prices, with the £350,000 installation costs "likely" to be recouped within five police and crime commissioner Rupert Matthews said the force had a duty to work towards Net Zero carbon emissions. He hailed the installation a "wonderful milestone" with solar panels also in place on force buildings in Oakham, Loughborough and Hinckley Road."As a large organisation at the centre of community life, it's critical Leicestershire Police leads by example. "I'm excited by the changes underway and the opportunities for changing the way we work to protect our scarce resources and create a cleaner world for future generations," said Matthews.