‘I have a secret pot of money my partner doesn't know about'
From secret stashes of cash to unspoken debts, money remains one of the final relationship taboos. While most couples are happy to share everything from streaming passwords to toothbrushes, they're far less forthcoming when it comes to their finances.
New research from insurer Aviva has revealed just how widespread the secrecy is – and how rarely couples are having honest conversations about money. The survey, which polled 2,000 people in relationships, civil partnerships or marriages, found that 47 per cent of adults are hiding at least one pot of money from their partner, often referred to as a 'rainy-day fund'. While the majority (53 per cent) claim full financial transparency, the rest admit to keeping savings – sometimes significant ones – under wraps.
On average, individuals with secret accounts had £6,495 squirrelled away. The most common motivation? A desire to maintain a degree of financial independence (31 per cent, of all Britons). However, nearly as many cited wanting to fund a holiday (27 per cent), and a striking one in four said they kept hidden savings to avoid feeling 'trapped' in their relationship.
Despite this secrecy, nearly half of respondents (45 per cent) said they believed they knew everything about their partner's finances – a notable contradiction. A further 30 per cent said they had some idea, though they didn't suspect any deception. When it comes to communication, the picture is mixed. Just 8 per cent talk to their partner about money daily, while 18 per cent discuss finances around once a month. Alarmingly, 5 per cent said they never talk about money with their spouse at all. On average, couples discuss financial matters around seven times a month – but also argue about them more than five times in that period.
The most common flashpoints? Overspending, debt, and who pays what. Some say their partner is too extravagant, others say they're too tight. It seems financial opposites don't just attract – they also argue. With gambling, debt and financial secrecy topping the list of red flags in relationships, the findings are clear: money matters, and we're not talking about it enough.
We spoke to two couples and one woman to find out how they manage their money, from completely joint accounts to independent finances — and the negotiations in between.
'I do trust him but I keep a secret stash'
Tracey, 53* has been married to David for 20 years. They have twin daughters, who are at university.
Tracey says: We've been together for over two decades, raised kids, shared mortgages and somehow muddled through. But when it comes to money? We've always been on different planets.
It started small. When our twins were born, I earned more than him. Then I stopped working to care for them – a decision we made together, but the impact hit me harder. Suddenly, I was dependent. And he, bless him, is terrible with finances. He works in IT but used to be in the navy. He was used to everything being sorted for him. He once spent £6 on a bottle of wine that nudged us over our overdraft limit, and we got slammed with £40 in fees. When the twins came along, I thought: I can't live like this. I need a fallback plan. I tried to talk to him about it but he'd go mad and we'd just end up rowing.
So I started putting money aside. Quietly. It wasn't some master scheme. It started with cash-in-hand admin work or some child-minding for friends when the twins were young. I'd come home, stick £20 in an envelope in a drawer, and forget about it – until I needed it. Sometimes it was just to get through the last week of the month. Sometimes it was to buy the kids school shoes without a row. Once the kids went to school, I retrained to work in the NHS and I made sure we had separate bank accounts.
Now, he pays the mortgage and some bills, but I cover the council tax, car insurance, water rates and all the food. I handle the essentials; he forgets what day the direct debits come out. Recently, he texted me: 'Grab me some beers on your way home – I'll pay you back.' I replied, 'Sure – if you ever paid me back for anything!' Just to wind him up. He hit the roof: 'I pay all the bills!' And I thought: you have no idea what I contribute. Or what I've saved.
After my mum died, I used part of my inheritance to pay off debts we'd built up – quietly, efficiently, without fanfare. He never asked where the money came from. I didn't offer it. There might be more money coming in from another inheritance, from my mum's brother this time. I haven't told him. Not because I'm planning to run off to the Maldives, but because I've seen what happens when women are left with nothing. A friend of mine split from her husband and he gave her £300 a month — to feed and clothe the kids. She ended up walking his dogs just to get extra cash. I won't end up like that.
So yes, I have a secret savings account. He doesn't know how much is in it. I'm not telling you how much. But yes, it's over £5,000 and it makes me feel safe. I know it's there. For me. For the girls. For emergencies. For peace of mind. Because while I might not wear the trousers financially, I know how to hem them, iron them and make them last another season. And that little stash? It helps me sleep at night.
'We have separate accounts because he used to be too reckless – he pays his wage into my account and I give him spending money'
Gill Grist, 61, a carer from the Highlands, has been with her husband Steve, an administration clerk, for 13 years. They have three grown-up children between them, who have all left home and live independently.
Gill says: When Steve moved in with me, we didn't have a big sit-down conversation about finances – we just did what felt practical. I already owned my house outright, and all the household bills were in my name. So when Steve joined me, it made sense for his income to go into my account to cover our living costs. From there, I'd transfer any surplus into our respective private accounts – one for him, one for me. I have no idea how much money he has in his account. It's up to him what he spends his money on.
I've always been better at managing money, so I keep track of everything – day-to-day bills, savings for Christmas or a rainy day, even long-term planning. Steve doesn't know the balances in any of our pots, and he doesn't ask. He trusts me to handle it. That said, I don't control his personal account – he has full autonomy to spend from that as he wishes, and I wouldn't want it any other way.
We've never argued about money. We see his salary as our joint income – I manage the home and care for my mum, which is work too, even if it's unpaid. When times have been tough, for example, when I was working and we both lost our jobs right before Christmas, we adapted. We agreed to buy everyone £5 presents that year. It was hard, but the kids understood.
I wouldn't say I have a positive relationship with money. In the past, I have known what it is to live frugally, to be truly frightened about how to get through the week. But I've also learned to trust myself. I know how to make a home feel warm, how to live simply and how to stretch a budget. I bake our bread, grow vegetables from seed, make my own jam and jumpers, and find deep joy in the small things. We don't live extravagantly – our lifestyle in the Highlands is quiet, frugal and fulfilling. For us, money isn't about control or secrecy. It's about survival, trust, and living well with what we have.
Steve says: In my younger years, I was completely reckless with money. I lived for the moment – spending freely, building up debt, never planning ahead. My parents died when I was young, so it shaped that attitude. I didn't think I'd live this long, so why save?
When I met Gill, everything changed. She's practical, grounded and brilliant at financial management. I've kept my own bank account and pay my wage into Gill's account every month to cover our joint expenses. Although Gill gives me money out of the joint account to cover the likes of the odd drink with a neighbour or the occasional bit of golf kit, we talk about any big expenses and agree them together. But I do keep my own bank account separate for any emergencies. Gill doesn't know how much money is in there.
We've never had rows about money – Gill's approach is fair and sensible. If I want to do something, she'll just remind me of what's ahead: 'Let's not eat out this weekend, we've got a trip coming up.' It's not about control – it's about shared priorities. I think of our finances as a true partnership. I may be earning the salary, but Gill is working just as hard – caring for her mum, running the house, managing our money. She's brought a level of financial stability I have never had before. If anything ever happened to her, I'd manage – but I'd be lost without the balance she brings. She hasn't just steadied our finances, she's steadied me.
'We have one account – we can't even keep birthday presents or treats for ourselves secret'
Lizzie Beattie, 47, property sales executive from Seaton Delaval, Northumberland, has been married to accountant Craig Beattie, 50, for 20 years. They have three children aged 17, 16 and 13.
Lizzie says: I'm not great at admin, but I like things simple. One account. One set of incomings and outgoings. So ever since Craig and I bought our first house together – long before we got married – we've had a joint bank account. Everything goes into it. Mortgage, food, the kids' school stuff, holidays. It just made sense. I do the online banking and keep an eye on what's coming and going. I'm the one who says, 'Hang on, we can't get a takeaway tonight, the car tax is due.'
We do have the odd row – usually about small things, like a splurge when we're supposed to be saving. I'm not monitoring Craig's spending like a hawk, it's more that someone has to be the voice of reason when three teenagers are hoovering up our money like a Dyson on steroids.
We don't keep secrets – not even birthday presents. If I want to surprise him, he never looks in our joint account, so it's easy. He's less into online shopping, so it's easier for me to sneak things through like a bottle of wine with the girls or a shopping trip for a new dress.
Craig earns more than me now – I work part-time and do more with the kids – but I don't feel weird about that. At the start, we earned the same, and we've always seen it as a team effort. We make every big financial decision together. Bonuses get pooled. There's no 'mine' and 'his', it's all 'ours'.
Do I sometimes get tired of the constant budgeting, especially when I'd love a shiny new handbag? Yes. But I've learned it's often better to go for experiences over stuff. And besides, we're proud we've raised three kids, kept things steady, and never had to panic about money. That's worth more than any designer label.
Craig says: I've worked in finance all my life. But at home? Lizzie's the one managing the money. She does the online banking and keeps us on track. I joke that she runs the books – and I just fix the WiFi.
We've always shared a bank account. We set it up when we bought our first house, and never looked back. Everything goes in there: wages and bonuses. And everything comes out: bills, school trips, the lot. We don't have separate accounts – which means total transparency. If I spend £30 on takeaway, Lizzie sees it.
That can be tricky. I get an annual bonus, and although it's technically 'ours', I sometimes wish I had a bit of freedom to buy her a surprise without her knowing the price tag. I wanted to get her a ring for her birthday – something lovely and unexpected – but the minute I spent the money, she'd spot it. So I didn't. The bonus is still sitting there, waiting for us to decide together whether we'll put it towards a holiday, the kids, or something else.
We've always made joint financial decisions. I've never really understood couples who split everything 50/50, or keep separate accounts with different rules. For us, everything's always been joint – the wins, the bills, the hard bits. Even during the 2008 crash, when I lost my job, we stayed unified. I took voluntary redundancy, which in hindsight, with two toddlers, was probably mad. But Lizzie backed me – and we made it through.
Lizzie's a realist. She worries more than me – especially with the current interest rates – but we've always been open about everything. No secrets. No 'his money, her money'. Just us, trying to do our best for the family.
Do I sometimes miss having my own financial space? Sure. But I'd rather have the openness we've built. Even if it means no surprise jewellery – yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Nuno Espirito Santo signs new contract but Nottingham Forest appear to make gaffe in statement announcing it
NOTTINGHAM FOREST appeared to make a major gaffe in their announcing of Nuno Espirito Santo's new contract. Forest, surprisingly, announced a new deal for their Portuguese gaffer early on Saturday morning. 3 3 3 The former Porto and Spurs boss has inked a new three-year deal at the City Ground, although you wouldn't have known it if you looked at the Midlands club's website. Eagle-eyed fans spotted that Forest had mistakenly stated that Nuno inked an "x-year deal" in their statement announcing the new contract. A snippet of the club's official statement read: " Nottingham Forest is delighted to announce that Nuno Espírito Santo has signed a new contract with the Club. "The Forest Head Coach has been handed a new x-year deal by owner Evangelos Marinakis ahead of the 2025/26 campaign." Nuno, 51, is over the moon to have extended his stay at the City Ground, which is set to host UEFA Conference League football this coming season. He said: "I am delighted to be able to continue our journey at this fantastic football Club. 'Since we arrived at Forest, we have worked extremely hard to create a special bond between the players, the fans and everyone at the Club, which helped us achieve great things last season. "I would like to thank our owner, Mr. Marinakis, for his constant support and backing. JOIN SUN VEGAS: GET £50 BONUS "It is important to me to share a strong relationship with our ownership and we have thoroughly enjoyed working together ever since I arrived at Forest. 'Now is the time to work harder than ever as we strive for more special memories together.' Marinakis said of the new deal: "Nuno has made a great impact and performed very well during his time with us so far. 'He has demonstrated that he maximises player performance and is an expert at developing players, whilst also embedding our young talent into the first team set-up. 'We enjoy a strong and solid relationship together and, above all, we share the same dream and ambition of writing a new history for Nottingham Forest, competing in the Premier League and in Europe and winning trophies for our great club!' Forest will kick off their Premier League season on Saturday, August 17, away to Brighton. The Tricky Trees will play the first leg of their Conference League play-off on August 21.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
HS2 boss took home £4.5m during ‘appalling mess' of project
The former chief of HS2 took home £4.5 million of taxpayers' money while presiding over an 'appalling mess' of a project that wasted billions. Mark Thurston was at the helm of the disgraced scheme for six and a half years before leaving in September 2023 and then becoming chief executive of Anglian Water. He has been banned by ministers from receiving a bonus at the water company for the last financial year because it was found to have polluted our rivers. While at HS2, Thurston's pay ranged from £585,000 to £676,000 a year including bonuses and other taxable benefits. During his time at the government-owned company he took home £4,449,977. He joined HS2 in 2017, shortly after parliament signed off the building of the project's first phase. He previously worked on the 2012 London Olympics and Crossrail, now the Elizabeth Line, the heavily delayed new railway through central London. Thurston's oversight of HS2 was put under the spotlight this week when his successor's initial findings into the failures of the project were published. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, told the Commons on Wednesday that the scheme had become an 'appalling mess' after years of mismanagement. She said: 'It gives me no pleasure to deliver news like this. Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management.' Mark Wild, who took over the running of HS2 in December last year, has been carrying out a root and branch review of the scheme in an bid to stem ballooning costs and restore proper oversight. Wild's salary will be declared in accounts published this summer although his base salary is said to be lower than Thurston's. The project was originally due to cost £32.7 billion — in 2011 prices — with the first leg between London and the Midlands opening in late 2026. The pared-back scheme could now cost more than £100 billion. In a letter to Alexander, published on Wednesday, Wild said: 'The position I have inherited in HS2 Ltd is unacceptable; the organisation has failed in its mission to control costs and deliver to schedule.' It was announced that Thurston, 58, was leaving HS2 in July 2023. He said the project was the 'highlight of my career', adding: 'I have agreed with the board that someone else should lead the organisation and programme through what will be another defining period for HS2.' His appointment to Anglian Water, which he joined in July last year, caused much comment, not least because of government criticisms of the financial stewardship of HS2. Responding in November last year, he told The Times: 'If customers want to challenge my appointment, all I can say is that it was a very thorough and comprehensive process. 'The board clearly thought I was a good fit. They have to account for that and only time will tell whether it was a good appointment.' Transport bosses are traditionally the highest paid public servants in the country, with those in the rail industry in particular receiving the biggest remuneration packages. The last time the Cabinet Office reported on senior civil service pay was in 2023 with figures for the previous year. The list was not updated in 2024 by the Conservatives before the election. It revealed that the 45 highest paid staff at HS2 had a combined pay packet of £8.9 million. Of the top 20 best paid, only six still work at the company three years later. It is understood that many senior executives left the company after Rishi Sunak cancelled the northern leg of the project in October 2023. A spokesman for HS2 Ltd said: ' Mark Wild is leading a comprehensive reset of HS2 to ensure the project can be delivered for the lowest reasonable cost. This includes reviewing and simplifying the structure of HS2 Ltd itself — putting more focus on front-line delivery of the railway and bearing down on unnecessary costs. 'This year, we have frozen pay and withheld all bonuses for staff in the highest grades at HS2 Ltd.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
£200m written off - lessons Everton must learn in pivotal summer
On 11 January, David Moyes was appointed Everton manager for a second spell following the sacking of Sean Dyche, with the club one point above the relegation zone. They ended the campaign in 13th place, 23 points clear of the bottom recent years of points deductions and relegation battles, there is hope that the return of Moyes, new owners and the move to a new 52,888-seater stadium can lead to a brighter future for the Toffees. With the feeling of a fresh new start across all aspects of the club, BBC Sport looks at the lessons that must be learned this summer as they prepare to begin life at Bramley-Moore Dock. £200m worth of signings leave for free Everton are currently navigating their first summer transfer window under the ownership of the Friedkin Group, who bought the club for in excess of £400m in finance expert Kieran Maguire estimates that Everton will have between £50m-100m to spend in this summer transfer window – a dramatic increase in contrast to the past four seasons when the club has essentially spent nothing, totalling £85.5m of profit from player trading. Such frugality has been a consequence of reckless financial planning that led to Profit and Sustainability Regulation (PSR) breaches, two points deductions and narrow escapes from must now learn from past mistakes in terms of getting value for near nine-year ownership of Farhad Moshiri, who bought a majority shareholding in 2016, was marred by a scattergun transfer policy and merry-go-round of seven permanent managers which saw Everton splurge money on inflated fees and huge Doucoure's decision to reject a new deal in May means that eight players signed for at least £20m during Moshiri's reign have now left for nothing, effectively writing off £188m in transfer fees. Should out-of-contract defender Michael Keane, signed from Burnley for an initial £25m in 2017, also depart this summer, that figure will climb well past £ Everton midfielder Leon Osman believes it's something that "must improve" going forward. "It's not ideal when you're paying for a player and getting no return," he said. "It's been a difficult 10 years with regards to bringing players in and moving them on for a profit, but that's an awful lot of money to spend on players to see them walk away." £25m for two Premier League starts Of the big money signings who left for nothing, midfielder Doucoure was arguably the best value, making 149 Premier League appearances and scoring the goal that ensured Everton's Premier League survival in other end of this particular spectrum is more congested, including the injury-plagued Jean-Philippe Gbamin, who made just two league starts after joining from Mainz for £25m before leaving for the French second tier four years Bolasie, who cost £25m from Crystal Palace, scored two Premier League goals before being loaned out four times and then leaving for Tosun scored five goals in 14 games after joining for £27m but then made 14 starts in the subsequent four seasons as he was loaned out to Palace and theme is clear: when Everton have had larger sums of money available, they have often spent it poorly, a failing that cannot be repeated if the Toffees are to build towards the European football that Moyes has said he craves. A dozen set to depart There have been transfer successes since the more chaotic days of Moshiri's ownership. Jake O'Brien and Iliman Ndiaye, both signed last summer for initial fees of under £17m, have been prudent investments – although both purchases had to be funded by the £50m sale of Belgium international Amadou Onana to Aston ability to recruit effectively, and Moyes' savviness in the transfer market, will be tested by the necessity to overhaul an entire squad, with 12 players, including 10 from the first team, out of contract this Seamus Coleman and midfielder Idrissa Gueye are in negotiations to extend their current deals, although striker Dominic Calvert-Lewin could yet leave the club, along with Young and Doucoure have already confirmed their departures, along with back-up goalkeepers Asmir Begovic and Joao Virginia, while loanees Jack Harrison, Jesper Lindstrom, Orel Mangala and Armando Broja have returned to their parent confirmed the permanent signing of Carlos Alcaraz for £12.5m in May but major gaps still exist in terms of goals, creativity and who made 437 appearances for the club between 2003 and 2016, believes that the exodus provides an opportunity for a "fresh start". "This is where we build from," said the 44-year-old. "Everton have had so many managers over the years and so many different styles of player who play different systems. David Moyes knows what Everton are." 'A demanding dressing room' Patience may be required for any rebuild as the Friedkin Group continues to navigate the implications of PSR. The club's most recent accounts for 2023-24, external show a loss of £53.2m, a reduction of £36m on the previous year, while revenue rose by 9% to £187m – an encouraging picture although one that means that money must still be spent wisely. Osman, who was given his Everton debut by Moyes in 2003, believes that Everton must retain key players such as Jarrad Branthwaite, James Tarkowski and Jordan Pickford, while recruiting more leaders to bolster a rapidly thinning squad."A Moyes dressing room is hard, demanding," he said. "Having spoke to a couple of the squad, they love the clarity and what he's asking of them. "A manager has to ask for that level and he always did that when I played for him. You also look at O'Brien, who has excelled at right-back when people thought he couldn't do it. We need to make sure these people stay on the pitch."The failed pursuit of new Chelsea striker Liam Delap, who was spoken to by Moyes, shows that centre-forward - and more goals in the team - is a priority, along with a right-back, right-winger and central midfielder. Departures, though, mean that recruitment is needed in almost every position to provide squad club are reportedly interested, external in Villareal striker Thierno Barry, who is currently playing for France in the European Under-21 have taken steps to streamline their process, moving away from a director-of-football model following the departure of Kevin Thelwell to a sports leadership team headed by new chief executive Angus has said that Everton will utilise experts in data and analytics, football operations, recruitment, talent ID and player trading as part of the club's evolving has also already met with supporters group the Fan Advisory Board – a far removal from the previous regime when former manager Dyche described communicating with then-owner Moshiri by "Whatsapp and the odd phone call". Osman has backed the new structure to succeed and added: "It's time to get behind the new hierarchy and I expect they would lean into Moyes' experience as much as they can. I trust David Moyes more than anyone."
