The overlooked miracle of life
By- Jug Suraiya
All of us, even those who profess atheism, at one point or another have hoped for a miracle, an act of Divine Providence that could make our most heartfelt wishes magically come true.
I wish i could be a topper in the board exams; I wish I could land a job in an MNC; I wish I could find my ideal life partner; I wish I would win a jackpot lottery.
Our miracle list is almost as endless and as varied as we. But as we hope, and even pray, for a miracle, we overlook the greatest miracle of all, which is ourselves, the fact that we exist at all.
If you're fortunate enough to live in a place where there is little or no atmospheric and light pollution, and you look up at the night sky you'll see some 2,000 stars, each of which is like our Sun.
This is only a minuscule part of our galaxy, the Milky Way, which has an estimated 60 billion stars and is one of anywhere between 200 billion and three trillion galaxies in the universe, each with billions of Suns, which in turn have their own orbiting planets.
In order to sustain life even at the most basic level, a planet must be in what is called the Goldilocks Zone, neither too hot nor too cold. Moreover, habitable planets must have water, from which primordial life springs.
Scientists – using the Drake Equation named after astronomer Francis Drake, who in 1960 initiated the first organised search for extraterrestrial radio signals – have estimated there could be as many as 60 billion habitable planets in our galaxy alone, and in the universe as a whole as many as 50 sextillion. That's five followed by 22 zeros, or one million billion.
However, the calculus of the Drake Equation falls foul of the Fermi Paradox, named after the Italian-American physicist hailed as 'the architect of the nuclear age', Enrico Fermi.
Seeing a magazine cartoon depicting extraterrestrials rummaging through New York City's garbage bins, Fermi reportedly said, 'Where is everybody?' Why is it that SETI, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, launched in 1960, hasn't made contact with a single intelligent life form from elsewhere in the universe? Could it be that such beings deliberately avoid us, seeing the mess we've made of our own planet through environmental degradation and wars? Or is it that we are truly alone in the unimaginable vastness of the cosmos? Marvelling at the complexity of life on Earth, from bacterial, single cell microorganisms to scientists, astrophysicist Fred Hoyle compared it to the statistical probability that a storm sweeping through a junkyard would create a fully functional Boeing 747.
Who, or what, is the cause of this miraculous phenomenon that we take for granted and call life? Religion would have us believe it is God. Science would nudge us toward the Big Bang Theory and Darwinian evolution.
The greatest wonder of wonders, the greatest miracle of miracles is that there is something at all – the universe, earthworms, us – rather than nothing, existence rather than non-existence.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
22 chirps = 17°C?: How crickets became nature's living thermometers
Did you know that the cricket chirp is nature's indicator of the weather? According to the official website of Reconnect With Nature, American scientist Amos Dolbear first described this quirk of nature in 1897. In his paper 'The Cricket as a Thermometer,' he observed that the muscles crickets use to chirp move more easily in warmer temperatures than they do in cool weather. This correlation was so reliable that he was able to write a formula that connected ambient temperature to cricket chirp rates — popularly known as the Dolbear's law. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Dolbear's law states that temperature in degrees Fahrenheit is roughly equal to the number of cricket chirps in 15 seconds plus 40. Here's some cricket math: If you count 22 cricket chirps in 15 seconds, it is roughly 62 degree Fahrenheit (or 16.67 degree Celsius), because 22+40=62. If you count 35 chirps, it's about 75 degrees out (or 23.89 degree Celsius), because 35+40=75. Based on these simple equations, you can see that crickets chirp faster in warmer temperatures than they do in lower temperatures. The reason a cricket's chirp rate changes with the temperature is because they are cold-blooded, or ectothermic, meaning their body temperature is the same as that of their external environment. Chirping requires their muscles to contract, and temperature is a factor in how quickly the chemical reaction necessary for muscle contraction can occur. Muscles contract faster in warmer temperatures, allowing them to chirp at a more frequent pace. According to the Reconnect With Nature website, it is believed, however, that Dolbear was listening to a snowy tree cricket, a species that has earned itself the nickname 'thermometer cricket.' While cricket math is a useful indicator of the temperature, keep in mind the crickets generally don't chirp when the temperature is below 55 degrees Fahrenheit or above 100 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Plus a cricket's chirping rate can be affected by hunger, age, mating success and competition from other male crickets. Although we can derive useful, if not exactly precise, information about the temperature from a cricket's chirps, that's not the point of the racket. The real reason crickets chirp is because the males attract a mate. The process of chirping is called stridulation, and crickets create their signature sound by rubbing their wings together. When they want to chirp, they raise their wings, and a structure called a scraper on one wing moves across a structure called a file on the other wing. The process of rubbing these two structures together is similar to what happens when you run a finger along the teeth of a fine-tooth comb.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Is it a moon? Is it a dwarf planet? Well, it's Charon, and it could well be both!
Charon's discovery The story of Charon's discovery takes us back to 1978 – a time when even astronomers were still thinking that Pluto was a planet. Little was known about Pluto and its system, but all that was about to change in the decades that followed. On the morning of June 22, American astronomer James Christy already had his head whirling around. If you were under the impression that he was zeroing in on the solution for an astronomical problem, you couldn't be further from the truth. Christy was sharpening his plans to move his house, getting ready for a week's leave from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona – his workplace. It was under these circumstances that Robert Harrington, his boss, handed him a set of six photographs of Pluto. Christy and Harrington were looking to refine Pluto's orbit around the sun – a journey that takes Pluto 248 Earth years. Pluto's average distance from the sun is 5.9 billion km. The technology available at that time meant that even the best photographs of it hardly revealed anything. What's more, these six images – acquired in pairs over three nights in the month between April 13 and May 12 – were labelled as 'defective.' Odd blobs The reason why these pictures were labelled thus owed to the fact that they revealed Pluto to be oddly elongated. Viewing them under a microscope, Christy noticed that the fuzzy blob that was to be Pluto stretched in a northern direction in two of those pairs, while the final pair showed a southward direction. The defects were attributed either to atmospheric distortion or improper optical alignment in the telescope used for observations. After ruling out an explosion on Pluto as an unlikely explanation – especially as it lasted a month – Christy searched for other plausible reasons. There was a chance that Pluto itself was irregular in shape. Or could there be an unseen moon, even though one of his former professors, celebrated Dutch-American astronomer Gerard Kuiper, had searched for exactly the same decades earlier without any success? When Christy went over to the archives to check through older plates from 1965 onwards, there it was... the same elongation. What's more, all these images had also been dismissed as defective on every occasion. Correct conclusions Christy and Harrington, however, realised that they were onto something. By reviewing all the images with the elongations, they were able to state that the bulge occurred with a predictable frequency. This frequency of the unseen moon's orbital period – 6.4 Earth days – matched with what astronomers believed to be Pluto's rotational period, suggesting a synchronously locked binary system. The duo ruled out other possible reasons for the bulge and concluded correctly that Pluto had another companion at a distance of 19,640 km. The discovery of 'S/1978 P1' was announced by them through the International Astronomical Union (IAU) on July 7 and their findings were published in the Astronomical Journal. What started out as reviewing six defective images, served as the seeds for a whole new discovery. As Christy himself once pointed out, 'Discovery is where the scientist touches nature in its least predictable aspect.' What's in a name? As the discoverer, Christy wanted to exercise his rights for naming Pluto's companion. And he had his mind set on naming it after his wife. The Naval Observatory he worked for had suggested the name Persephone, the wife of Hades. Hades, the god of the underworld in Greek mythology, was the equivalent of the Roman god Pluto after which it is named. As luck would have it, Christy came across a reference to Charon, a boatman who ferried the dead across a river in the underworld to Hades. Charon's close mythical association with Hades, or Pluto, made it a great option for the newly discovered astronomical object. It was the perfect option for Christy as his wife's name was Charlene. In addition to sharing the first four letters, 'Char' was the nickname that friends and family used to call his wife. Just like how protons and electrons have the 'on' suffix, Christy saw Charon as 'Char' with the suffix 'on' and submitted his name. Eclipses and occultations By the time this name was accepted by IAU in January 1986, Pluto and Charon had a series of mutual eclipses and occultations. Studying them enabled astronomers in general, and Harrington in particular, to confirm the existence of Charon as he observed the eclipses and occultations to occur as predicted. Observing Pluto and Charon in this manner also enabled astronomers to arrive at Charon's diameter to be about 1,200 km, while also arriving at better estimates of the size and mass of Pluto. From a small dot in a photograph, Charon had become much much more – almost a world in its own right. It definitely meant the world to Christy in more ways than one, as he was also able to gift his wife the moon! Charlene Christy probably summed it the best when she said 'A lot of husbands promise their wives the moon, but Jim actually delivered.' Charon fact sheet Most of what we know about Charon, or even Pluto for that matter, is thanks to NASA's New Horizons mission. Approved in 2001 as the first flyby of Pluto and its largest moon Charon, it was launched in January 2006. This was months before IAU's decision in August the same year to demote Pluto's designation from a planet to a dwarf planet. Despite the fact that Pluto was plutoed, the mission went on, providing us invaluable information. Before New Horizons' closest approach to Pluto on July 14, 2015, the spacecraft captured plenty of images of Charon. While the images revealed a striking reddish north (top) polar region, Charon's colour palette wasn't as diverse as Pluto's. The origins of this red colouration is a mystery for now and no other icy object in the solar system sports a similar feature. Charon is 1,214 km across and is at a distance of 19,640 km from Pluto. As Pluto's equatorial diameter is about 2,377 km, Charon is nearly half the size of Pluto. This makes it the largest known satellite relative to its parent body for most astronomers. It is this same size, however, that forces other astronomers to consider Pluto and Charon as a double dwarf planet system. Charon's orbit takes 6.4 Earth days to go around Pluto. Charon neither rises or sets, however, but instead hovers near the same region on Pluto's surface. The same surfaces of Charon and Pluto always face each other due to a phenomenon called mutual tidal locking.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Why is Trump slashing US STEM education at a time of global tech competition?
Trump proposes deep cuts to US STEM education despite global tech competition In a controversial move that has drawn sharp criticism from educators, tech leaders, and policy experts alike, US President Donald Trump has proposed a sweeping reduction in funding for STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. His administration's recent budget plan includes a 75% cut to STEM education funding through the National Science Foundation (NSF), along with an overall reduction of more than 50% to the NSF's total budget. The timing of this proposal is especially striking. Just days after delivering his 100-day address at Macomb Community College in Warren, Michigan—where he emphasized economic opportunity and the promise of technical education—Trump's budget puts at risk one of the few remaining affordable pathways for Americans to secure middle-class, future-proof jobs. As reported by Forbes , this move stands in stark contrast to Trump's stated goal of bolstering American leadership in emerging technologies. A direct threat to community colleges and technical training Community colleges are a cornerstone of US workforce development, particularly in STEM fields that require more than a high school diploma but not necessarily a four-year degree. These institutions play a key role in training the 37 million skilled technical workers who power critical industries such as manufacturing, aerospace, and healthcare. NSF funding has long supported these efforts by providing crucial grants and recognition that also help attract private and philanthropic investment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "For 75 years, the NSF has funded STEM workforce training at America's community colleges," Forbes reported. Without this support, institutions like Macomb and others across the nation may be forced to cut programs that directly prepare students for high-demand jobs in AI, biotech, cybersecurity, and semiconductors. AI and biotech education at risk The proposed cuts threaten emerging technology programs that are already yielding results. Miami Dade College, for example, has seen booming enrollment in its AI education programs, developed through NSF support. As Forbes noted, students from a wide range of backgrounds, including working adults with bachelor's degrees, are turning to community colleges to gain practical, industry-relevant skills. Under another NSF grant, Miami Dade has partnered with Houston Community College in Texas and the Maricopa Community College District in Arizona to build a nationwide AI education consortium. This effort, involving major employers like Microsoft and Google, now faces uncertainty due to the budget proposal. Biotechnology is also under threat. A recent report from the Congressional National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology, chaired by Sen. Todd Young, urged the US to significantly increase investments in biotech education over the next three years. NSF's long-standing support in this area includes more than $1.5 billion invested across over half of the nation's 1,200 community colleges since 1992. These investments support cutting-edge workforce training in regenerative medicine, textiles, automotive tech, and more. Undermining national security and economic growth As Forbes reported, leading economists, venture capitalists, and tech executives, including Microsoft President Brad Smith, have warned that cuts to the NSF will undermine national security, economic growth, and the country's global standing in tech innovation. They argue that no other federal agency matches the NSF's ability to support community colleges in advancing science and engineering education. Janet Spriggs, president of Forsyth Tech Community College, told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that her college's biotechnology impact "would not be possible without NSF funding," Forbes reported. A puzzling shift amid global competition The US is already in a tight race with other nations to lead in artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other high-stakes fields. The NSF's role in launching initiatives like the $3 million program co-funded with philanthropy—designed to enhance community college training in areas aligned with the CHIPS and Science Act—represents one of the most forward-looking federal investments in recent years. Forbes emphasized that pulling back now could jeopardize years of progress. As global competitors increase their own investments in tech and workforce development, the Trump administration's budget proposal raises a stark question: Why would the US step away from the very tools that power its innovation, security, and economic resilience? Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
