Bosses of Octopus Energy and SSE clash over 'postcode pricing' proposals

The head of Britain's biggest energy supplier has claimed his competitors oppose proposals for so-called postcode pricing because they financially benefit from the current system.
Octopus Energy chief executive Greg Jackson told Sky News his business's rivals were against customers being charged based on where they lived, rather than on a national basis, because they would lose out on profits.
He said: "A very small number of companies that today get paid tens of millions, sometimes in a single day, to turn off wind farms and generate gas elsewhere, don't like it.
"The reason you're seeing that kind of behaviour from the rivals is they are benefiting from the current system that's generating incredible profitability."
The government is currently considering whether to introduce the policy, which is also known as zonal pricing. Energy secretary Ed Miliband is expected to make a decision on the proposals by this summer.
Octopus has become Britain's biggest supplier with more than seven million customers.
Mr Jackson has been a vocal proponent, as he said he wants to charge customers less and boost government electrification policies by having cheaper electricity costs.
What is postcode pricing?
Zonal pricing would mean electricity bills are based on what region you live in.
Some parts of Britain, like northern Scotland, are home to huge energy producers in the form of offshore wind farms.
But rather than feeding electricity to local homes and businesses, power goes into a nationwide auction and is bought to go across Britain.
As the energy grid is still wired for the old coal-producing sites rather than the modern renewable generators, it's not straightforward to get electricity from where it's increasingly produced to the places people live and work.
That leads to traffic jams on the grid, blocking paid-for electricity moving to where it's needed and a system where producers can be paid a second time, to power down, and other suppliers, often gas plants, are paid to meet the shortfall.
Zonal pricing is designed to prevent paying the generators for power that can't be used.
It would mean those in Scotland have lower wholesale energy costs while those in the south, where there is less renewable energy production, would have higher wholesale costs.
Whether bills go up or down depends on implementation.
Savings from one region could be spread across Britain, lowering bills across the board.
Mr Miliband has said he's not going to decide to raise prices.
However, SSE's chief executive Alistair Phillips-Davies described the policy as a "distraction" and said it could affect already agreed-upon upgrades of the national grid that will lower costs.
"I think you've got a very, very small number of people who are asking for this. It's just a distraction. We should remove it now," he said.
While Octopus Energy estimates that said postcode pricing could be introduced in two to four years, Mr Phillips-Davies said it could take until 2032 before it was implemented, by which time Britain would have "built much of the networks that are required to get the energy from these places down into the homes and businesses that actually need it".
"We just need to stay true to the course," he added.
Unions, as well as industry and energy representatives, have also spoken out against the policy. Opponents include eco-tycoon Dale Vince and trade body UK Steel.
A joint letter signed by SSE, UK Steel, Ceramics UK and British Glass, along with the unions GMB, Unite and Unison, said zonal pricing could lead to scaled-back investment due to uncertainty and higher bills.
A separate letter signed by 55 investors, including Centrica and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, has also criticised the policy.
1:21
However, Mr Jackson said many investors had not voiced opposition, with thousands of small and medium businesses instead backing the policy in the hope of paying less on energy bills.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

28 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Amazon data centres to consume ‘as much electricity to power Burnley'

A complex of huge data centres being built by Amazon in Britain will consume as much electricity needed to power a town the size of Burnley, campaigners have claimed. The proposed data centres, near Houghton Regis in Bedfordshire, are projected to consume around 114.8 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity a year. This equivalent to the power consumed by more than 42,500 UK households, according to researchers at Global Action Plan, which is campaigning against the development. It exceeds the number of homes in Burnley, which stood at 41,955 after the most recent Census in 2021. Planning documents show the two data centres in the development will include 42 back-up diesel generators, each around 25 metres tall, that need to be fired up fortnightly to check they are working. It is estimated this will produce the same emissions as 1,079 homes heated by gas. The plans were lodged with Central Bedfordshire Council by Colliers Properties, a known partner of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the retail giant's cloud computing division. The documents name Amazon Data Services UK as the site's eventual operator. Known as Linmere Island, the project would sit on an empty 22-acre greenfield site. While the plans also include 140 solar panels, it is not clear how much power they will supply to the data centres.

Times

33 minutes ago

• Times

Trump tariffs leave UK firms scrambling to renegotiate contracts

British companies are looking to renegotiate supplier contracts as they scramble to find savings that can protect them from the impact of escalating US tariffs, according to new data. A survey of firms with more than 5,000 employees found that 90 per cent fear that President Trump's import duties would hurt their revenues and profits, with businesses looking at a series of ways to manage rising costs. More than half (55 per cent) said their main tool to deal with tariff threats was to review existing contracts to find savings or renegotiate better terms with break clauses that could account for the imposition of new levies, according to Acertis, which provides contract management software. Bernadette Bulacan at Icertis said companies' first resort 'to protect margins is to take a critical look at customer and supplier relationships. For many companies, the path to surviving tariff disruption starts not with policy lobbying but with a forensic look at what's already been committed to on paper.' She said firms were taking measures to include rules of termination and force majeure clauses in contracts to deal with costs caused by tariffs, while also seeking out new suppliers in countries that were not affected by sweeping US levies. The Trump administration applied a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs he had announced on most of the world economy on April 8, which is due to expire in early July. The president has signed a partial tariff deal with the UK, but most British goods will still be subject to a 10 per cent tariff when selling to US markets, raising the average US tariff rate from about 1 per cent last year to more than 6 per cent. The European Union is also in talks with the White House about avoiding a potential 55 per cent tariff on all its goods exports. • Britain's exporters at a loss over US tariff turmoil The debate over contractual terms between suppliers and customers is part of a swathe of legal complexities about who should shoulder the cost of import taxes. In April, Howmet Aerospace, an American supplier of components to the sector, declared a force majeure event that would allow it to stop shipments if it remained subject to US tariffs. Although the full gamut of threatened tariffs has not yet been applied on most countries, recent data has shown a spike in invoice rejections as businesses attempt to delay supplier payments until they have more certainty about US trade policy. Icertis's survey, which included 1,000 companies across Britain, the United States and India, found that just under half of them were 're-evaluating' where to find suppliers to avoid tariffs, restructuring their supply chains and manufacturing plants, and also considering 'sunsetting relationships that no longer serve under new cost and compliance pressures'. About 40 per cent of UK firms said they would absorb higher costs into their margins and just over a third said they were planning to raise prices charged to consumers to deal with tariffs. Bulacan said companies should also consider price adjustment clauses that account for tariff changes. 'In the same way that force majeure clauses changed fundamentally during the pandemic, these clauses could be invoked against new tariffs to prevent potential losses,' she said.

Times

33 minutes ago

• Times

High earners face surge in tax investigations

High earners face a surge in tax investigations after HM Revenue & Customs doubled revenues from inquiries into the wealthiest Britons last year. A freedom of information request has revealed that HMRC's wealthy and mid-sized business compliance directorate, which examines the tax affairs of those earning more than £200,000 a year or with assets above £2 million, yielded more than £1.5 billion in 2024, double the amount raised the previous year. The success of the unit has led to a decision to hire an extra 400 specialist compliance officers, who will be added over the next four years. The government hopes the move will bring in at least another £500 million in tax revenues by 2030. Accountants have said the number of investigations into wealthy individuals will inevitably increase.