Iranian insider acknowledges country weakened, but insists Iranians remain united against Israel
Analyst close to Iranian regime says time for negotiation over, missiles will do the talking
Unity and strength are the official lines coming from Iran's theocratic government in the face of President Trump's demand for "unconditional surrender" and the possibility that he could order the U.S. military to join Israel's attacks on the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities.
Israel's daily, nearly weeklong bombardment of Iran's nuclear and missile sites, and its assassinations of top commanders and senior scientists, have compounded the dilemma for Iran's leaders — especially as they face the potential of internal unrest from a population under attack.
At least 639 Iranians have been killed and more than 1,300 wounded over the past six days, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists in Iran organization, which relies on a network of contacts in the country. Tens of thousands of Tehran's roughly 10 million residents have now fled the capital, and other cities have also emptied out to some degree, with many people seeking safer spaces in the countryside.
But Iran's ruling Muslim clerics and their adherents don't talk about an exodus. Instead, they project solidarity, and even mock President Trump and his ultimatums.
"I just laugh at how negligent he is," Hamidreza Gholamzadeh, director of the Iranian think tank Diplo House, told CBS News in a remote interview from Tehran on Thursday. "He does not know anything about Iranians, either in history, or the characteristics of the Iranian nation."
"Even Iranian dissident figures are now pro-Iran," he claimed, "because they know it is about [maintaining] the integrity of Iran, the whole being of Iran."
An Iranian Red Crescent ambulance hit in an Israeli strike on June 16, 2025, in Iran's West Azerbaijan province, is displayed in Haft-e Tir Square in Tehran, Iran, June 19, 2025.
Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu/Getty
But after a week of bruising attacks by Israel, and with the threat of more to come and even possible direct U.S. intervention looming on the horizon, the optimism and bluster may be getting harder to maintain.
"Let's say, the power of Iran in the region has been weakened. It's not something that you can deny," acknowledged Gholamzadeh. "But the government itself has not been weakened at all. The Iranians are very united right now. The social cohesion is very strong right now."
At most, Gholamzadeh claimed 20% of all Iranians would be happy to see their government fall.
"There might be 10% to 15% who are against the state, but not all of them would be participating in any activities" against the regime, he said, suggesting only 5% of Iranians would actually come out onto the streets "to actively participate."
But recent surveys conducted before the current war, by independent organizations based outside Iran, found quite the opposite.
In 2023, following mass anti-government protests sparked the previous year by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in religious police custody, a survey by the Netherlands-based Group for Analyzing and Measuring Attitudes in Iran found that 81% of the country's residents were against the cleric-led Iranian regime.
The 2022 anti-government protests were quashed, brutally, and nothing like them has been seen in Iran since. Censorship is rife, and Iran's government has significantly curbed internet access over the last week, citing cyberthreats.
Gholamzadeh repeated warnings issued by Iran's leaders, against the U.S. becoming actively involved in the conflict.
"Americans have a lot of military bases in different countries here in the region," he noted, calling them "very easy targets."
President Trump has warned repeatedly that any Iranian attack on American assets in the Middle East would be met with a swift response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Venezuelan government supporters march in favour of Iran following Israeli air strikes
Supporters of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his government took to the streets of Caracas on Thursday in support of Iran, Palestinians and peace in the region. (AP video/ Juan Arraez)
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump: Iran Decision to Come Within Two Weeks
President Trump sees a 'substantial chance of negotiations' and will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. gets involved in the Israel-Iran conflict, says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump can retain control of California National Guard for now, appeals court rules
Trump can retain control of California National Guard for now, appeals court rules Show Caption Hide Caption LA mayor says Trump is 'usurping' Gavin Newsom's authority Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is asking the Trump admin to stop immigration raids in order to curb responses from protesters. A U.S. appeals court let Donald Trump retain control over California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests and unrest in Los Angeles. A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 19 extended a pause it placed on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that Trump had called the National Guard into federal service unlawfully. Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by Gov. Gavin Newsom. Breyer ruled that Trump violated the U.S. law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor, and also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist. Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel put the judge's move on hold temporarily. Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on June 7 took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops against the wishes of Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps mobilization. At a court hearing earlier this week on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops. The law sets out three conditions under which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws. The Justice Department has said that once the president determines that an emergency that warrants the use of the National Guard exists, no court or state governor can review that decision. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second most-populous U.S. city. The protests in Los Angeles lasted for more than a week, but subsequently ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed. California argued in its June 9 lawsuit that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The lawsuit stated the situation in Los Angeles was nothing like a "rebellion." The protests involved sporadic acts of violence that state and local law enforcement were capable of handling without military involvement, according to the lawsuit. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Kanishka Singh in Washington, Editing by Will Dunham and Alexia Garamfalvi)
