Inside Asa Ellerup and Gilgo Beach suspect husband Rex Heuermann's marriage, and why she still loves him

Asa Ellerup breaks into a smile as she remembers her husband Rex Heuermann revealing that he had a 'big surprise' waiting at home.
It was July 2009 and Ellerup had gone to Iceland for five weeks to visit family with her two children, Victoria and Christopher.
Heuermann stayed behind on Long Island, saying he was busy with work at his Midtown Manhattan architecture firm.
'He said to me: "I made a big mess,"' Ellerup beams fondly in the new Peacock docuseries 'The Gilgo Beach Killer: House of Secrets'.
Heuermann had gutted the basement bathroom, totally remodeling it from the tiles to the toilet.
'That was Rex. He's a problem solver,' she says of her beloved husband of 27 years.
To Ellerup, this was a romantic gesture from a doting family man, her 'tall, dark and handsome hero who had taken her and Christopher in when she was a young, single mother working at a 7-Eleven.
But, according to authorities, it was something far darker: a calculated move by a suspected serial killer intent on covering his tracks and destroying forensic evidence of the murder of a young woman inside his own home.
Another 14 years would pass before Heuermann, now 61, was arrested in July 2023 and later charged with murdering seven women - many of them sex workers -between 1993 and 2010. He pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial.
Prosecutors allege in court documents that he lured victims to his house when his wife and children were away.
It was during Ellerup's July 2009 visit to Iceland - and Heuermann's sudden surprise bathroom makeover - when Melissa Barthelemy went missing.
Barthelemy, 24, told a friend she was going to meet a client and was never seen alive again. Her remains were found in December 2010 wrapped in burlap along Ocean Parkway, near Gilgo Beach, beside three other victims.
In the days following her disappearance, Barthelemy's teenage sister received taunting calls from her sibling's phone.
The male caller branded Barthelemy a 'whore' and gloated he had 'killed her'.
The calls stopped when Heuermann flew out to join his family in Iceland.
Inside the remodeled bathroom, where Barthelemy may have died, Ellerup appears more upset at the state in which investigators left it than by the horrors that might have happened there.
'They took it - brand new,' she says in the show, gesturing to where the door used to be.
'They ripped it up looking for trace evidence of blood,' she adds, as the camera reveals a panel in the bathtub cut out during a police search.
A family rift
The docuseries marks the first time that Heuermann's relatives have spoken publicly since his arrest - and it exposes an explosive split at the home over his potential guilt.
Throughout the episodes, Ellerup doesn't waver in her belief that the man she married could ever be a serial killer.
She lights up when talking about their lives together, proudly referring to him as her 'hero' and takes issue with the suggestion that he used sex workers.
'They're telling me that he was soliciting sex with sex workers? I don't have sex with my husband? I don't satisfy him?' she asks incredulously.
'He comes home, he eats my dinner. It's not good enough? No, I don't believe my husband did this.'
Even after Heuermann has spent two years behind bars, Ellerup describes seeing him at court hearings as 'comforting' and likens her prison visits to going 'on a first date'.
When confronted with DNA, timelines, his chilling computer hard drive and cellphone data, she refuses to consider that the allegations are true.
'I would need to hear it from Rex, face-to-face, for me to believe he killed these girls,' she says.
Meanwhile, their daughter Victoria, 28, is less certain.
In a bombshell moment, after reviewing case files, she admits to having reached the gut-wrenching conclusion that her father is 'most likely' the notorious Gilgo Beach serial killer.
Attorney Bob Macedonio, who represents Ellerup, tells the Daily Mail that 'time will only tell' if she will ever accept she may have been married to an alleged serial killer for almost three decades.
'After Victoria viewed the information and after it was explained to her, she was able to process and form her own opinion that her father most likely is the Gilgo beach serial killer,' Macedonio says.
'Asa, on the other hand, maintains the belief that Rex, the father of her children and her ex-husband of 27 years, is not capable of committing these horrific acts.'
But attorney John Ray isn't convinced by Ellerup's denials.
Ray represented some of the victims' families and, for years, kept attention on the case - loudly criticizing the investigation when it was being hampered by corrupt law enforcement.
He tells the Daily Mail that he finds it hard to believe that mother and daughter are living under the same roof while being at odds over Heuermann's guilt.
'You mean to tell me that they are just happily getting along?' he questions.
'One person said my husband did not slaughter women and chop them up in that house or anywhere, and the other one says yes he did.
'They made it sound like an academic debate. It is impossible for those two people to live together and not have a completely dramatic falling out if they maintain those positions.'
Ray also doubts Heuermann's family didn't know what the man they lived with was allegedly doing.
'It's a sham,' he says, adding that Ellerup's outright denial and Victoria's turmoil before reaching her conclusion is all about them 'creating [their] innocence' in the case.
'They are both very cleverly distancing themselves from any responsibility to what happened - and that is a consistent theme.'
In the Peacock series, Ellerup and Victoria say they didn't notice any signs of Heuermann's alleged crimes and they have not been accused of having any information prior to his arrest.
Horror in the family home
But regardless of how much they may wish to distance themselves, the women in Heuermann's life have been thrust into the heart of the case.
While his family is not suspected of any involvement in the crimes, the home where Ellerup, Heuermann, Victoria and Christopher shared so many family memories is also believed to be the place where other families' sisters, daughters and mothers took their last breaths.
In the docuseries, the two women are seen in the basement where authorities believe victims were held, tortured and killed.
As a child growing up in the home with his parents, the basement was a space where a young Heuermann had his bedroom.
As an adult living there with his wife and children, it became the site of a large gun vault - and, inside that, a hidden room that no one else was ever allowed to enter.
The vault - dubbed the 'kill room' - was a focal point in the police searches. A chilling planning document found on Heuermann's computer hard drive allegedly indicated it was where his victims died.
Heuermann's wife and daughter have also been unwittingly allegedly linked to several of the murdered women through DNA evidence.
Hairs found on six of the seven murdered women have allegedly been matched to Heuermann, Ellerup Victoria or a woman he lived with between 1990 and 1993.
According to prosecutors, hairs belonging to Victoria were found on the bodies of victims Amber Costello and Valerie Mack.
Victoria was just three years old when her father allegedly murdered and dismembered Mack in 2000.
Despite DNA evidence thrusting Ellerup and Victoria into Heuermann's criminal case, according to criminal defense attorney Sam Bassett, the family's public comments could impact whether they are called as witnesses.
While witnesses cannot testify about their 'general opinions', Bassett says - if he were Heuermann's defense attorney - he would be paying attention to what Victoria and Ellerup say about his innocence or guilt.
'It could impact their testimony on cross-examination for example if the daughter takes the stand and says: 'I think he's absolutely innocent.' Then they could be cross-examined on any contradictory statements they made in the documentary,' he tells the Daily Mail.
However, while Victoria's belief may make her an unfavorable witness to the defense, Bassett believes she is unlikely to be called anyway, due to her age at the time of the killings.
Ellerup, meanwhile, married Heuermann two years after he allegedly killed his first victim, Sandra Costilla.
A fairytale love story
Ellerup looks back fondly on her love story with the man now accused of being a serial killer.
She was 18 and working in a 7-Eleven when she first met the 'tall, dark and handsome' college boy.
Despite being 'madly in love', both Ellerup and Heuermann ended up marrying other people.
Ellerup reveals her first marriage 'did not go well at all', and that her ex-husband 'became somebody completely different' after their son Christopher was born.
When she tried to seek a divorce, she says he 'wasn't very nice about it' and made it clear he wouldn't accept her being happy with someone else.
The way Ellerup tells it, Heuermann was something of a knight in shining armor, accompanying her to pick up her son and helping to take her ex-husband to court.
'So fast forward, I got my divorce. There was no reason to hold back. You know what I mean?' she says of her relationship with Heuermann, smiling.
Following her divorce, Heuermann took her and Christopher into his home. Not long later, Ellerup became pregnant with Victoria and the couple married in 1995.
'There's a picture of me and I'm looking up going: "I finally got him. He's mine,"' she says, thinking back on their wedding day.
Ellerup describes their love story like a fairytale - where Heuermann rescued her and they lived happily ever after.
'He's my hero,' she says.
Choosing 'weak wives'
Dr Gail Saltz, clinical associate professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College, tells the Daily Mail that serial killers deliberately choose certain types of spouses - 'weak wives who are malleable, with low self esteem, who will believe or at least go along with what they say and can be controlled.
'Mostly they marry docile, passive, controllable partners. Partners who won't question them or push back,' she says.
'The wife may, for her own needs, feel her husband is good and decent because believing he is a murderer would make being with him intolerable and she needs him.'
Besides a troubled first marriage and life as a young single mother, Ellerup - who was adopted from Iceland - had suffered other traumas at the hands of men.
She was sexually assaulted by a classmate aged 16 and tried to kill herself. At 19, she narrowly escaped a kidnapping attempt by hiding in a dumpster for hours.
As well as choosing someone who 'needs' him, Saltz says that serial killers also often marry 'to keep an appearance of normalcy to the outside world, to look non-suspicious, more than actually having a real relationship'.
And, for 27 years, Heuermann appeared to do just that, keeping up the act of being a loving 'family man' as the couple lived something of a typical suburban family life on Long Island.
They raised their children in the popular commuter town of Massapequa Park while he traveled into the city to work as an architect.
How could you not know?
Ellerup insists that she never saw any signs that her husband was leading a double life.
'I know what bad men are capable of doing,' she says. 'I've seen it, and I've heard it from other men. Not my husband. You have the wrong man.'
Victoria also insists her dad was never violent. The biggest display of rage she ever saw was when he threw plates into the sink after what she believed were stressful days at work.
Still, Ellerup faces skepticism about whether she truly knew nothing of her husband's alleged crimes.
'How could you not know? How could you not know that your husband was a serial killer?' Ellerup says.
'Know what? My husband was home. He is a family man,' she insists.
It's a question Kerri Rawson, the daughter of BTK serial killer Dennis Rader, says she and her mother have heard a 'million times'.
'I understand having reasonable questions. Is she in denial? Is she lying? Is she disassociated?' Rawson says in the show.
'The thing is, when you're sitting in the cheap seats with the popcorn, you're in hindsight-land… you're not sitting in the everyday with a normal man.'
She says that people underestimate 'the control' and 'manipulation' in such situations.
While Rawson and her mother never saw signs of her father's double life, they accepted his guilt after he was arrested.
'No matter what'
After sitting 'on the fence', Victoria appears to be doing the same - envisioning a future where she has a 'love-hate relationship' with the man who raised her.
'Whether I like it or not, he is my dad. I think if he was guilty, it would be a love-hate relationship. This is my dad and I love him as my dad,' she says. 'The hate is the other side of him that came out.'
But Ellerup's seems to be still in a place of denial about the man she has known and loved since the age of 18.
Professor Salz says that a wife may align with a suspected serial killer if she 'cannot accept this was their marriage, their partner and they feel overwhelming shame and guilt and so they deny to themselves this could be true.'
Even if Ellerup's changes down the line, she shows little sign of wanting to let go of what she thinks of as their fairytale.
To the man accused of slaughtering multiple women, she has an unwavering, romantic message: 'I love you, no matter what.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

an hour ago

• Times

The missing link in the grooming gangs report: cousin marriage

When the US Department of Defence set up an interrogation unit at Guantanamo Bay after 9/11, it conducted a detailed study on the suspected terrorists it held. Agents wanted to understand the links between them, the way they had worked together, the better to infiltrate their wider networks. They found nothing. Diddly squat. They conducted audits, led themselves on a merry dance, but achieved zilch. • 'Wrongly prosecuted' grooming gang victims denied compensation Then they hired someone who understood the culture of the people they'd apprehended; someone steeped in Arabic mores. She instantly spotted a pattern in the names of the suspects. A startlingly high proportion were from two clans: the Qahtani and the Utaybi. When she mentioned this to her DoD colleagues, their first question was: what the hell is a clan? Only after she explained the significance of these social institutions, the subtle pattern of names that indicate clan affiliations and the codes of honour and secrecy that make them powerful vehicles for group action did they see the point. The agents were then able to infiltrate the networks and prevent future atrocities. Why am I telling you this? Well, because I read Baroness Casey of Blackstock's report on the rape gangs scandal with rising levels of frustration — indeed much the same emotion with which I read her 2016 report on social integration. I don't doubt Casey's work rate or integrity. But I think that, somewhat like the DoD at Guantanamo, she couldn't see what was before her eyes because she lacked the appropriate analytical lens. • 'Whitehall tried to block Rotherham grooming scandal exposé' You see, to understand many of the most urgent failures of integration, you need to understand the clan. These groups are held together not just by ideology or religion; they are cemented by cousin marriage, a common practice in Arabic cultures and, in the UK, many Pakistani immigrant communities, particularly those hailing from Kashmir. By marrying within small, tightknit groups, they ensure everything is kept within the baradari, or brotherhood — property, secrets, loyalty — binding clan members closer together while sequestering them from wider society. In her 2016 report Casey rightly talked about the failure to speak English, honour beatings and the like, but she missed the point that many of these problems are a function of marriage practices that isolate communities. The academic Patrick Nash of the Pharos Foundation has written of baradari life 'concentrated in small geographical areas spread across a few streets or nearby neighbourhoods where there is little need or opportunity to have much to do with wider society or practise the English language'. To write a report on failures of integration without seeing the link with cousin marriage is, I suggest, like writing on the power grid without noting the significance of electricity. • How the grooming gang report detailed abusers' ethnicity Casey's report on the rape gang scandal was flawed for the same reason. It was a strange experience to read her words as she edged ever closer to grasping the point without quite getting there. She noted that the problem is disproportionately concentrated among British Pakistanis. She even noted that 'two thirds of suspects offended within groups' that were 'based on pre-existing relationships — mainly brothers and cousins'. But then, stunningly, she suggested that these links were 'unsophisticated' and 'informal'. Anyone who studies these things — one thinks of Michael Muthukrishna at LSE — could have told her that this is the unmistakable pattern of clan-based crime: groups whose links are anything but informal and unsophisticated. Charlie Peters, who has investigated this problem for GB News, told me: 'The deeper you probe, the more you see the presence of clans. We know that such communities are more likely to see others as outsiders, of less moral value and, when it comes to young white girls, fair game. The perpetrators also knew that they could commit crimes without getting dobbed in since loyalty is owed to the clan but not victims. In some cases, abusers were aided by relatives in authority.' Nash put it this way: 'Cousin marriage sustains close-kin networks which incentivise clan members both to dehumanise out-group victims and to suppress knowledge of criminal activity to preserve family honour.' • Grooming gangs 'still at large, and the victims aren't believed' A couple of examples. Last year, Shaha Amran Miah, 48, Shaha Alman Miah, 47, and Shaha Joman Miah, 38, were convicted at Preston crown court of horrific abuse perpetrated in Barrow-in-Furness and Leeds. Yes, these were Pakistani men, but they were also brothers within an overarching baradari. In Rotherham in 2016, Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras Hussain groomed and raped children for nearly 20 years while Qurban Ali was found guilty of conspiracy to rape. Three of these men are brothers and Ali is their uncle. I have long advocated a ban on cousin marriage but should perhaps say that I've never regarded it as a panacea. Improving integration requires so much more: ending mass uncontrolled immigration, amending legal frameworks to stop the boats, deporting foreign criminals, not to mention other policies supported by large majorities but serially ducked by politicians. A ban on consanguinity would, though, be of huge value. American states with bans tend to be more prosperous and faster-growing. Nations with bans are richer and more integrated, with less corruption and lower rates of crime. A ban would also reduce the prevalence of the congenital diseases causing untold suffering in Kashmiri immigrant communities from Bradford to Luton. The good news is that Kemi Badenoch has adopted this as Tory policy after campaigning by her colleague Richard Holden, and a poll for YouGov last month showed that 77 per cent of the British people are in favour of a ban (only 9 per cent oppose it). But here's what astounds me: Labour remains against prohibition, despite (I am told) having read the evidence. Why? How? Permit me to suggest that I glimpse through the façade of prevarication a party still terrified of criticising any cultural practice out of fear of appearing racist. Isn't that why it was mute for so long on female genital mutilation and honour beatings and still can't bring itself to describe the burqa as a pernicious symbol of institutional misogyny? In other words, the reason the grooming scandal was not confronted for so long by both main parties (not to mention the police and social services) — namely, the fear of seeming bigoted for investigating ethnic minorities, even while they were gang-raping young girls — is still alive and well in the British government. As the son of a Pakistani immigrant who integrated into this nation (not least by marrying my mum) and came to love it, I find this sickening. One can perhaps forgive Casey for missing the significance of cousin marriage, given that it is a custom with which she is unfamiliar (although, frankly, she should have done her homework), but there can be no excuse for politicians who put cultural sensitivities before basic decency. So I say to Starmer, Hermer, Cooper et al: examine your consciences. Did you really go into politics to be apologists for the worst kind of moral relativism, to acquiesce in the nihilistic pretence that all cultural practices are of equal value, when they emphatically are not? If not, find your backbone, confront the Muslim bloc vote and ban cousin marriage. The alternative is betrayal of the most heinous kind. For here's a thought to focus minds: girls today, even as you read these words, are being abused by ethnic clans operating in this country. Fail to act now, and this is on you.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Minnesota shooting suspect was a 'prepper' who made a 'bailout plan'

The wife of the suspect charged with killing a Minnesota politician and attempting to assassinate another confessed the couple are 'doomsday preppers' and her husband had given her a 'bailout plan.' Vance Boelter, 57, is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home in the early morning hours of June 14 in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. He also allegedly shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. While Boelter was on the run, his wife was pulled over with a trove of suspicious items in her car. Jenny Boelter, 51, was stopped by authorities at a convenience store while driving a car with the couple's children inside and found with a weapon, ammunition, cash and passports. According to an FBI affidavit obtained by WCCO, Boelter's wife told the investigator they were 'preppers,' meaning they 'prepare for major or catastrophic incidents.' She said her husband gave her a 'bailout plan,' with instructions to go to her mother's home in southwestern Wisconsin, which she initiated after receiving a text from her husband that 'they needed to get out of the house and people with guns may be showing up to the house.' The affidavit also stated that Boelter was driven to a bank in Robbinsdale, Minnesota, by an unnamed person and withdrew all $2,200 he had in a bank account in his name. The driver, listed in court documents as 'Witness 1,' is the same person investigators said sold Boelter an electric bike and a Buick sedan, which were found during the 43-hour manhunt last weekend. Boelter surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history. He has been charged with six federal crimes, including murder, stalking and firearms offense, as two murder and two attempted murder charges at the state level. Boelter has not entered any pleas and could face the death penalty if convicted on the federal charges. Meanwhile, Boelter's wife has remained in hiding - as the accused assassin's defiant family were tight-lipped concerning her whereabouts, telling a reporter to 'piss off.' Shaken mom-of-five, Jenny rang pals only to say she was in a 'safe' location but wouldn't reveal where she was. She fled the family's bucolic farmhouse home in Green Isle, Minnesota, the morning of June 14 after Boelter hinted that he had done something monstrous in a 6.18am text. 'Dad went to war last night,' wrote of her 57-year-old husband. 'There's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger happy and I don't want you guys around.' As news broke that Boelter had allegedly gunned down two lawmakers and their spouses in Minneapolis, Jenny was pulled over driving through Onamia, 90 miles north. She had their youngest children in the car along with their passports, $10,000 in cash and two handguns, according to federal court filings. Jenny, the president of the couple's private security firm, consented to a voluntary search of her electronic devices but wasn't arrested during the 10am traffic stop. There's nothing in her husband's charging documents to suggest she had advance knowledge of his alleged plot to slaughter dozens of Democrat lawmakers and pro-abortion activists. Jenny has not commented publicly since Boelter was captured Sunday evening and charged with multiple counts of murder and stalking. Her brother Jason Doskocil, 54, had a blunt message for when we asked about her whereabouts.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Mahmoud Khalil gets incredible news three months after ICE threw Columbia activist in jail

A pro-Palestine activist and Columbia University graduate student was ordered freed by a judge three months after ICE took him into custody over claims he is a Hamas supporter. Mahmoud Khalil, 30, must be freed on bail, a New Jersey federal judge ruled on Friday in a major victory for the protestor. A lawful resident in the US, Khalil was taken into custody on March 8, 2025, as the Trump administration cracked down on pro-Palestine demonstrations on college campuses. Khalil was one of the primary organizers of protests that took over Columbia as the Israel - Hamas conflict was ignited. In the ruling Friday, Judge Michael E. Farbiaz that none of the Trump administration's allegations against Khalil justified his continued detention, and sided with Khalil's argument that he was locked up as an unlawful retaliation for his activism. In his ruling on Friday, Farbiarz said: 'There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish Mr. Khalil - And of course that would be unconstitutional.' Khalil has not been charged with a crime, but the judge's order to free him comes as the Trump White House continues efforts to deport him back to Algeria, where he is a citizen. When he was detained earlier this year, Khalil's case gained national attention as he was the first pro-Palestinian protester to be arrested by the Trump administration in its crackdown on college campuses. Several protests he organized and led at Columbia turned violent, with one seeing 112 students arrested when they stormed a campus building and occupied it as NYPD officers tried to shut their demonstration down. His arrest sparked protests across the country as critics accused the Trump administration of unlawfully arresting a legal resident without charging him with a crime in violation of his free speech. He was detained under the Cold War–era Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which states that non-US citizens can be deported if they are antagonistic against US foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Khalil of spreading anti-Semitism, and White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said he was 'siding with terrorists.' But in the three months that Khalil has been detained, the Justice Department hasn't disclosed any substantive connection between Khalil and Hamas, which attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, and killed around 1,200 civilians. In their successful filing to free Khalil this week, the graduate student's attorneys argued that he was not spreading anti-Semitism when he campaigned for Palestine in its war with Israel. They cited past quotes from him such as comments he made to CNN during a campus protest, where he said that 'he liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand by hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other.' Judge Farbiarz had previously ruled that the foreign policy law was not enough to justify Khalil's detention, and his ruling on Friday shot down further allegations from the Trump administration that Khalil made paperwork errors when applying for citizenship last year. A number of other pro-Palestine protestors have been arrested and freed in the time that Khalil was detained. Following Friday's ruling, Khalil's attorneys say he will be able to return to New York to be with his wife and baby son, both of whom are US citizens. 'Today's ruling underscores a vital First Amendment principle: The government cannot abuse immigration law to punish speech it disavows,' Noor Zafar, one of Khalil's attorneys, said.