Objective was to eliminate security threat to Israel: Defence experts on US bombing Iran
Amid growing tensions in the Middle East following US military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Indian defence experts said that the aim of the action -- to eliminate the security threat to Israel -- has been achieved.
A couple of defence experts spoke to IANS on the pounding of Iran by US bomber planes and also spoke about the likely impact of escalating tension in the Middle East on global oil and energy supplies.
Defence expert Lieutenant General Sanjay Kulkarni (Retd.), speaking to IANS said that the US strike was highly destructive and focused on eliminating Iran's nuclear capabilities.
"The way the United States destroyed Iran's three nuclear installations, especially the Fordow facility, using B-52 bombers and bunker-busting bombs weighing 30,000 pounds, marks a significant military strike. Reports suggest 6 to 12 such bombs were dropped, which effectively devastated the entire Fordow nuclear installation," he said.
"The goal was to destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure, and hence, the fear that Israel was facing has now been eliminated," he added.
Speaking to IANS, Major General Dhruv C. Katoch (Retd.) said India is not taking sides but is deeply concerned about the potential consequences of continued conflict.
"India seeks peace and has always stood for it. While not opposing the United States, India hopes to prevent further escalation, as increased volatility could disrupt the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, impacting energy supplies and causing crude oil and gas prices to soar. This is critical for India's goal of becoming a $30 trillion economy by 2047," he said.
He pointed out that the United States had warned Iran of consequences before launching the attack.
"The United States had clearly warned that if Iran did not stop, it would target its nuclear reactors. Last night, they struck three nuclear sites using B-52 bombers and submarine-launched missiles, causing significant damage to Iran's nuclear facilities -- a serious escalation in tensions," Katoch added.
According to him, Iran is unlikely to remain passive in response to the strikes.
"Now the Americans have made it very clear that they are not going to pursue this any further unless Iran reacts. I think Iranian options are limited. I think they will have to react, and after, at least one or two reactions, if nothing else, and those reactions are gonna take place, one against Israel, which I believe has already started. They have hit the Haifa Port," he said.
"Iran might actually strike at American targets, possibly by the end of the day or in the next few days, either directly or through proxies. We don't know what is going to happen, but that will be that will, again, be another level of escalation. But in my view, most likely, what is going to happen is that at some point in time, we are going to come to peace," he continued.
Reiterating India's position, he said the country stands firmly for dialogue and peaceful resolution.
"As far as India's position is concerned, India has always stood firmly for peace. I am quite confident that the official statement from India will reflect this stance -- that India supports peace, not war. We are neither on Iran's side nor on Israel's; we are on the side of diplomacy and peaceful resolution," Katoch said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
When America joins Israel's war with Iran
The US bombing of key Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday will have significant geopolitical implications for regional stability, global geopolitics, and India's immediate and medium-term interests. However, for now, it doesn't appear that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is likely to go all the way, making it improbable that Iran will be completely denuclearised or that the Islamic regime in Tehran will fall. A severely weakened Iranian regime is likely to respond with military and grey-zone tactics, increasing political and economic instability in the region. Moreover, neither Israel nor the US appear to have an endgame in mind in this war. The US-Israel attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines (REUTERS) There are at least six key implications of this ongoing war. First, West Asia is likely to revert to a period of chaos, conflict, and uncertainty, at least for some time. Despite Iran's strained relations with many of its neighbours, the US decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's military campaign will make it difficult for other regional powers to resume efforts to normalise relations with Tel Aviv. Iran and its regime may not be popular in the Sunni strongholds of West Asia, but neither is Israel, especially given its actions in Gaza and the ongoing humanitarian tragedy there. Russia and China are likely to increase their geopolitical influence in the region, and neither will miss opportunities to challenge Israel and the US, making the regional balance even more complex and unpredictable. Second, the attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines. While the US and Israel may achieve immediate military gains, many others will be dissatisfied: With their geopolitical standing threatened, they might seek to undermine the dominance established by the US-Israel alliance in the region. Many in the Global South are likely to condemn the unilateral actions and violations of international law by the US and Israel. Meanwhile, China will look to exploit the emerging regional fractures, while Moscow will seek to recover the influence it lost in West Asia — due to the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and now, through the attack on Iran — and spot an opportunity in the post-war scene. Interestingly, Europe has maintained a curious silence. However, it will inevitably ask why the US, which wanted its Nato partners to pay for their defence and abandoned Ukraine thus increasing Europe's insecurity, would resort to force in a distant country. Clearly, Trump has prioritised Israel over Nato allies; that rude reality won't be lost on Europe. Third, the American and Israeli attacks on Iran lack legitimacy under international law, and as a result, these will further undermine the credibility of the United Nations and weaken the influence of international law worldwide. For America's western partners, this presents several dilemmas. It will test their commitment to international legal frameworks as condemning the attack risks alienating Trump further, and not condemning it risks being seen as tacit support for an illegal action. Moreover, if they do not condemn the US action, the moral ground to criticise Russia will be considerably weakened. It also undermines the geopolitical standing of key western States, which were actively engaged in negotiations with the Iranian foreign minister in Geneva to end the conflict. They face the risk of losing credibility considering how Trump went ahead and bombed Iran ignoring the talks. Fourth, American engagement in the West Asian conflict could divert attention from Ukraine's ongoing war with Russia. The Iran war would be disastrous for Ukraine, especially as the US has been unable to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, Russia's gains on the battlefield are growing and Moscow shows no enthusiasm to negotiate a ceasefire with Kyiv. Fifth, the attempted denuclearisation of Iran will likely have the opposite effect internationally, prompting several other countries to consider developing their own nuclear weapons for after all those who possess nuclear weapons have little to fear. Rather than strengthening the global nuclear order, the US and Israel's military action to denuclearise Iran will end up weakening it, encouraging more States to pursue nuclear arms as insurance against potential threats. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, while Iran failed to reach the finish line; both faced significant consequences. Israel developed its nuclear programme secretly, North Korea built its nuclear weapons at great domestic cost, and India and Pakistan developed theirs despite sanctions and US pressure. The lessons are many, and will not be lost on nuclear aspirants around the world. Finally, for India, the war in West Asia will likely unsettle the country's grand plans for broader engagement with the region. Energy prices are likely to spike, while heightened geopolitical divides will challenge India's ability to manage regional fault lines. If the war spreads or persists, it could also impact Indian nationals in the region and the remittances they send home. Moreover, the Iran conflict will, at least for the moment, stall India's regional plans for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Chabahar port in Iran, projected as India's gateway to central Asia. Happymon Jacob teaches India's foreign policy at Jawaharlal Nehru University and is the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
J&K leaders lash out at US over strike in Iran
By Ashiq Hussain , Srinagar Jun 22, 2025 08:20 PM IST J&K political leaders Farooq Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti on Sunday lashed out at the US for its strikes on Iran calling it a dangerous escalation which can trigger Third World War. Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Farooq Abdullah (File) National Conference (NC) president Farooq Abdullah said that the US and Israel have always been against the nuclear ambitions of Iran. 'This is not the first time. America and Israel always have this view to not allow Iran to make nuclear weapons. Today it proved that it is their only motive,' Abdullah said. US bombers made strikes on Iran's three nuclear facilities during the previous night amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Abdullah also castigated US president Trump for not sticking to his word. 'He had talked about waiting two weeks to see if negotiations would work. They want a regime change. Will there be anything good after regime change,' he said. 'The person or country whom we had expected to intervene, themselves, joined the war. This is their second war -one they are already fighting-- Russia in Ukraine. This means this is moving towards Third World War,' he cautioned. Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti castigated Indian government's response to the strikes on Iran by US and Israel, while also lashing out at the neighbouring country for its advocacy of Nobel Peace Prize for Trump. 'The OIC, as expected, has once again limited its response to mere lip service in the wake of the attack on Iran. Meanwhile the country that rushed to recommend Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize now finds itself with egg on its face after he attacked Iran. By launching this attack on Iran, Trump has dangerously escalated tensions plunging the region into a new wave of violence and edging the world closer to the brink of a global conflict,' Mufti said on X. 'Regrettably India long seen as a nation with a historic and principled role in international affairs is not only remaining silent but appears to be aligning itself with the aggressor,' she said.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pentagon Chief LAUDS 'Op Midnight Hammer' Success; 'Used Decoys To Misdirect,' Says Hegseth
/ Jun 22, 2025, 08:06PM IST The Pentagon has provided new details on the U.S. operation targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth praised the mission's execution, highlighting the use of decoys and coordinated air power. B-2 bombers launched from the U.S. and struck targets across Iran during an 18-hour mission. Officials described it as one of the most complex long-range strike operations in recent history. Watch.
