Central banks in Asia scale back currency intervention as dollar weakens

By Marcus Wong and Malavika Kaur Makol
Some of emerging Asia's biggest central banks look to be dialing back their interventions in the currency market.
The central banks of India and Malaysia have reduced the size of some derivatives positions they use to weaken their currencies. Taiwan has allowed its currency to surge against the dollar in recent weeks and dropped hints it would be comfortable with more if the moves were 'orderly.' South Korea's giant national pension fund has ended its five-month support of the won.
A major reason for these moves is a simple change in the market landscape: The dollar has tumbled more than 7 per cent this year, easing pressure on emerging market currencies. But strategists and investors also point to the risk of a backlash from US President Donald Trump, amid rising speculation that currency policies will be on the table during a series of ongoing — and high stakes — trade negotiations.
'The threat of being labeled a currency manipulator by the US, especially during this period of tariff negotiations, will act as a deterrent to further heavy FX intervention in local markets,' said Rajeev De Mello, a Geneva-based portfolio manager at GAMA Asset Management SA.
The shifting approach of Asia's central banks to defending their currencies underscores the sweeping changes in global markets since the election of Trump, whose on again-off again tariff threats have roiled asset prices and raised once unthinkable questions about the dollar's place in the global trading system.
Korea confirmed last month that it had held currency talks with the US, sending the won higher amid talk that Trump wants a weaker dollar. But White House chief economist Stephen Miran has denied the idea Washington is working on secret deals to depreciate the greenback, saying the US continues to have a strong dollar policy.
The greenback has plummeted against major currencies this year, suffering drops of around 10 per cent against the euro and the Swiss franc.
Best bets
Traders are now trying to game out which currencies have the most to gain from a period of reduced intervention. The Korean won and the Malaysian ringgit are two obvious candidates, since both countries have large trade surpluses, said Gautam Kalani, portfolio manager for BlueBay fixed income, emerging markets, at RBC Global Asset Management. Reduced intervention will speed up the appreciation of these currencies, he said.
The Taiwan dollar is also being hotly tipped by strategists. Although Taiwan's central bank is still likely to use intervention to keep volatility in check, most market participants think it will allow the local currency to appreciate further even after hitting multi-year highs.
That suggests room to build on what has already been a widespread rally against the dollar: Taiwan's currency has surged 11 per cent against the greenback this year, making it the region's best performer. The Korean won is up almost 8 per cent, while the Malaysian ringgit is around 5 per cent higher.
The retreat from intervention isn't unanimous across Asia. Bank Indonesia pushed back against volatility on Thursday as Middle East tensions hit emerging market currencies. The Philippines' central bank has sent mixed messages, calling intervention futile but also saying it might have to do so 'more seriously' if a current slide in the peso continues. The People's Bank of China continues to keep its currency under a tight leash.
But for some of emerging Asia's most interventionist central banks, the calculus appears to have shifted in favor of a less hands-on approach.
The US Treasury refrained from labeling any country a currency manipulator in its latest foreign-exchange report, released in June. However, it said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam all met two out of three of its criteria.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

an hour ago

• Economic Times

An uncertain world gets more perilous

Agencies The US on Saturday entered the Israel-Iran war, bombing Iran's three main nuclear sites-Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow. Donald Trump declared it a 'spectacular military success', but it remains to be seen whether the military operation has indeed destroyed Iran's nuclear capability or just caused severe damage to these sites. Iran has said it reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests and people. Retaliatory action is certain-where, how and how big remains the question. What is certain is that the world is in for even more US entry into the war was unprovoked. Trump has been unhappy with the pace and direction of the Washington-Tehran talks, and Israel has been egging on the US to take out Iran's nuclear capabilities. Reports on IAEA offsite radiation suggest that the sites have been severely damaged, and Iran had, in anticipation, likely moved its stockpile of enriched and highly enriched uranium to an undisclosed location. The US has acknowledged that the Isfahan site was more secure than anticipated. That would mean the Iranian N-programme will be delayed, maybe even temporarily derailed, but not destroyed. The US attack could be the factor that gives the Iranians that extra push to get the programme over the country that has been attacked, unprovoked, reserves the right to respond. For the region, indeed the world, the big question is the nature of the Iranian response. It could be attacks on US bases and military personnel, or disruptions of ship traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, affecting global trade. The US action will likely strengthen the Russia-Iran-China-North Korea axis, creating further geopolitical fractures and fragmentation. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Looking for quick buck in unlisted shares? Better think twice! Small finance banks struggle with perception. Will numbers turn the tide? Aadit Palicha on Zepto dark store raid, dark patterns, and IPO China rare earths blockade: Will electric vehicles assembly lines fall silent? Flames below deck: The silent threat lurking in cargo holds Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? For medium- to long-term investors with moderate risk appetite: 6 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 40% Sin goods, but not sin stocks from a long-term perspective: 6 stocks from liquor industry with an upside potential of up to 34%

Business Standard

2 hours ago

• Business Standard

Climate technology startups stumble in a cold investment climate in India

Investment by private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) funds in the country's climate technology (tech) startups has seen a sharp fall, despite the big focus of the government on reducing carbon emissions and pushing for cleaner fuels. The reason: There is a big gap between startup climate tech needs for long-term funding and what VCs find bankable. According to data by research agency Tracxn, PE and VCs in 2023 put in substantial $1.66 billion in over 157 climate tech companies, with an average deal size of $10.57 million. But that number nosedived to $910 million in 2024, with the average deal size falling by half to an average of $5.5 million. And in 2025 to date, PE/VCs have put in a mere $270 million in the first six months of the year, but in only 37 companies — a third of what they did in the last year. The value of the largest deal this year to date has been in Euler Motors, which raised $75 million from the UK government climate fund British International Investment, a development finance institution of the UK government, and Hero MotoCorp in May of this year. The top five deals (which collectively received $188 million) until now accounted for over 68 per cent of the total PE/VC investment. Explaining the trend, Vasudha Madhavan, founder and chief executive officer of Ostara Advisors — which has facilitated deals worth over $125 million in the climate tech space, where they have focused exclusively for the past four years — says that they get a lot of demand for organising investments from startups in this space — ranging from agritech firms working on smart regenerative practices, Internet of Things-based models to make places and buildings more energy efficient, electric mobility, and companies in the recycling space, etc. But, says Madhavan: 'Only a few make the cut. One of our key criteria is that the company should be in a position to raise $2-4 million. Only then do we take them to the larger fund audience and support them at a strategic level. We come in at the Series A level — when the company is generating $2-4 million in annualised revenue and has some visibility towards profitability, even if it is at the earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation level.' She also points out that government policy support helps in making investors comfortable — for instance, Ostara is talking to companies in the solar space, where the government has a big role and a supportive policy. However, despite the problems, some of the key funds that have invested in the tech space include British International Investment (it has done two deals this year already), Zerodha founder Nithin Kamath's Rainmatter Foundation (two deals this year), UK-based EM Impact Capital, an independent investment firm focused on emerging markets (one deal this year), and Zurich-based responsAbility (one deal until now this year), which invests in climate finance and impact-driven startups, among others.

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

ASEAN co-chair rebukes Piyush Goyal over 'B-team of China' remark

New Delhi: The Asean co-chair for the review of India FTA has expressed displeasure over commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal's recent remarks, describing several countries in the region as a "B team of China". At a scheduled India-Asean meeting held in Kuala Lumpur on Friday, the Malaysian co-chair put out a strongly worded message in response to the Indian minister's comments, ET has learnt. The occasion was Asean-India trade in goods agreement review. The Asean-India Free Trade Agreement, signed in 2009, is currently undergoing a review to address trade imbalances and other concerns. India seeks a more balanced and sustainable trade relationship with Asean. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ¡Kit alarma con cámara Wi-Fi: ¡Precio increíble por tiempo limitado! Verisure Alarmas Leer más Undo Several officials from SE Asian states, including those who enjoy close partnership with India, speaking on the condition of anonymity told ET that the public comments were surprising as India's direct trade with China is high and the Asean states cannot be blamed for that. The officials expressed surprise as India as well as the Asean have been making concerted efforts over the last few years to expand ties across sectors. SE Asia's biggest state Indonesia has been proactive in blunting Pakistan's narrative in the OIC. On Friday, a senior MEA official held an informal meeting with the Asean Secretariat at Jakarta to discuss steps to further ties. Live Events The meeting exchanged views on the progress of Asean-India Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. Last Thursday Goyal had slammed Asean countries as the "B-team of China" and dubbed trade deals with them as "silly". This took the entire SE Asia by surprise on the 30th anniversary of India becoming a full dialogue partner of Asean in 2025.