Air India plane crash: Reactions from across the world, Asia News
More than 200 people were killed when an Air India plane bound for London with 242 people on board crashed minutes after taking off from India's western city of Ahmedabad on Thursday, authorities said.
Here's what world leaders have said so far:
INDIAN PRIME MINISTER NARENDRA MODI, ON X:
"The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words."
"In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected by it. Have been in touch with Ministers and authorities who are working to assist those affected."
BRITISH PRIME MINISTER KEIR STARMER, ON X:
"The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating."
"I am being kept updated as the situation develops, and my thoughts are with the passengers and their families at this deeply distressing time."
BRITAIN'S KING CHARLES, IN A STATEMENT ON X:
"My wife and I have been desperately shocked by the terrible events in Ahmedabad this morning. Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected by this appallingly tragic incident across so many nations, as they await news of their loved ones."
US SECRETARY OF STATE MARCO RUBIO, ON X:
"Heartbroken to hear the news of a tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. My prayers are with all who lost their loved ones in this horrible incident."
THE VATICAN'S SECRETARY OF STATE, ON X:
"Deeply saddened by the tragedy involving an Air India aircraft near Ahmedabad, His Holiness Pope Leo XIV sends his heartfelt condolences to the families and friends of those who have lost their lives, together with the assurance of prayers for all involved in the recovery efforts.""Commending the souls of the deceased to the mercy of the Almighty, His Holiness invokes upon all affected the divine blessings of healing and peace."
BANGLADESH CHIEF ADVISER MUHAMMAD YUNUS IN A MESSAGE TO MODI:
"We extend our deepest condolences to all the families who lost their dear ones at this tragic incident."
"We stand in solidarity with the people and Government of India, and offer our full support in any form."
PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA, MARK CARNEY, ON X:
"Canada is deeply saddened by the crash of a London-bound Air India plane in Ahmedabad with 242 people on board, including one Canadian."
"Canadian officials remain in close contact with counterparts in the wake of this tragedy. Our thoughts are with all those affected."
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESIDENT URSULA VON DER LEYEN, ON X:
"My deepest condolences to the families and loved ones grieving this terrible loss."
"Dear @narendramodi, Europe stands in solidarity with you and the people of India in this moment of sorrow."
RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN TO MODI, IN AN OFFICIAL TELEGRAM PUBLISHED ON KREMLIN WEBSITE:
"Please accept my deep condolences on the tragic consequences of the airliner crash at Ahmedabad airport."
"Please convey words of sincere sympathy and support to the families and friends of the victims, as well as wishes of a swift recovery to all those injured in this catastrophe."
FRENCH PRESIDENT EMMANUEL MACRON, ON X:
"We have learned with deep emotion of the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. In this time of sorrow, I extend our heartfelt thoughts to the victims' loved ones and to Prime Minister @NarendraModi."
AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER ANTHONY ALBANESE, ON X:
"The news of a passenger plane crash in Ahmedabad is absolutely devastating. In this time of tragedy, Australia's thoughts are with everyone affected."
"Our government is receiving regular updates and we will continue to monitor the situation closely."
IRISH PRIME MINISTER MICHEAL MARTIN, ON X:
"My thoughts and prayers are with the people of India after the terrible plane crash in Ahmedabad earlier today. Thinking of the families of all those on board, along with the emergency services attending the scene."
GENERAL SECRETARY OF BRITISH AIRLINE PILOTS' ASSOCIATION AMY LEVERSIDGE:
"Pilots around the globe are deeply saddened by this news. Members of the British Airline Pilots' Association send condolences to all those affected.
"It is vital a full and thorough investigation is now carried out without interference or unhelpful speculation about the contributory factors so that future tragedies can be avoided."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Commentary: India and Pakistan are on a global charm offensive to tell their version of the conflict
LONDON: In the past fortnight, multi-party parliamentary delegations from India and Pakistan have stopped in London as part of a world tour. Having had the opportunity to interact with both delegations, one thing becomes abundantly clear: Dialogue is a dead end (for now). They were essentially two sides of the same coin, each seeking to make the case for their nation's narrative following the brief, 87-hour conflict in May. Both sought to claim the moral high ground while painting the other side as the aggressor. Each resented any parallels or equivalency drawn between their positions. According to India, its actions were a response to the terror attack in Pahalgam that claimed the lives of 26 civilians. According to Pakistan, its military action was triggered by India's military operation, while arguing that New Delhi has failed to offer the smoking gun of Pakistani complicity in the terror attack. Both trumpeted their battlefield successes while downplaying their losses. The Pakistani side touted the loss of Indian aircraft in the initial military exchange, while the Indian side downplayed this, noting that such losses should be expected as part of any military campaign (and refusing to admit to any specific losses). India also played up the strength of its air defences in repelling Pakistan's counterattacks and the concomitant weakness of Pakistan's air defences. Both emphasised red lines. For India, another terror attack would trigger a war. For Pakistan, any violation of the Indus Water Treaty would do the same. The Indian delegation noted that India had dropped its previous 'hesitation' of deploying hard power, while the Pakistani delegation accused India of 'dragging water onto the battlefield'. Each side offered differing conditionalities on returning to the negotiating table: New Delhi will only discuss the issue of terrorism and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, while Islamabad wants to focus on the water treaty and Indian-administered Kashmir. Both countries are seeking to internationalise the conflict, but in different ways. For India, the emphasis is on framing Pakistan as the epicentre of global terrorism (with reminders of Osama bin Laden being killed in Pakistan in 2011 and Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl being beheaded in Pakistan in 2002). For Pakistan, the emphasis is on getting third party 'facilitators' rather than 'mediators' (given New Delhi's rejection of third-party mediation). AMERICA'S DEFAULT RESPONSE Ultimately, both countries face similar dilemmas in getting their message across to the international community. For India, the global war on terrorism has lost the resonance it once had, making it difficult for New Delhi to make the case to the world of the severity of Pakistan's threat to global stability. For Pakistan, the effort to get United States or Western involvement in India-Pakistan hostilities and the issue of Kashmir is an uphill battle given the plethora of international (and domestic) crises presently confronting Western capitals. This will not stop Islamabad from trying to do so as demonstrated by Army Chief Asim Munir's visit to Washington this week, which demonstrates Pakistan's ability to leverage global issues – from the Sino-US rapprochement in the late 1960s and early 1970s to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and into the 1980s and the US-led 'War on Terror' in the 2000s – to advance its primary foreign policy objective of strengthening its position vis-a-vis India. Now Islamabad is seeking to do so again by leveraging the Trump administration's efforts to obtain Islamabad's support in the conflict between Iran and Israel (given that Pakistan shares a border with the former). Trump's 'sphere of influence' worldview makes it unlikely that the United States will play any substantive or lasting role in South Asia. While Trump claims to have applied pressure on both countries to initiate a ceasefire on May 10 – which has been denied by India – his initial nonchalant response (noting that both countries would sort it out 'one way or the other', which was supplemented by Vice President JD Vance's comment that the conflict was 'fundamentally none of our business') reveals what is likely to be the default response to future hostilities, as long as they stay below the threshold of a nuclear conflict. South Asia has lost the strategic significance it once had following the US-NATO withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. TALKING PAST EACH OTHER In this context, the world tours by parliamentarians from India and Pakistan appear more focused on appeasing domestic political constituencies than any genuine effort aimed at shifting global public opinion. There was more emphasis on dictating each country's position rather than engaging in a genuine dialogue. All this limits the prospects for any peace process. The Pakistani delegation pushed for the resumption of a 'comprehensive dialogue', but what would both sides discuss when they are essentially talking past each other? They cannot even agree on the facts of what happened, accusing the other of misinformation, hyper-nationalistic rhetoric and religious extremism. The Indian side accused Pakistan of employing 'terrorism as an instrument of state policy' while the Pakistani side claimed that the Modi government wants to 'eradicate' India's Muslims. This makes it impossible for both countries to sit down together. NUCLEAR DETERRENCE IS WORKING If there is any silver lining it is that among the world's flashpoints, India-Pakistan hostilities still seem relatively contained despite the bad blood in the bilateral relationship. The short four-day conflict and emphasis on precision-strike operations contrasts with conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East where there has been significant collateral damage and prolonged and expansive military operations across multiple theatres. This shows that nuclear deterrence is working in limiting the threshold of violence, although this threshold is being tested and eroded as both countries find new ways of targeting each other, from sponsoring irregular separatist/terrorist outfits to developing drone and cyber warfare capabilities. As a result, South Asia is in an interesting position, a region that is the most vulnerable to a nuclear exchange, and hence, ironically the most restrained of the world's major flashpoints.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Tens of thousands join pro-Palestinian marches in London and Berlin
Tens of thousands join pro-Palestinian marches in London and Berlin LONDON - Tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters marched in London and Berlin on June 21, calling for an end to the war in Gaza, amid concerns that the Iran-Israel conflict could spark wider regional devastation. Protesters in the British capital waved Palestinian flags, donned keffiyeh scarves and carried signs including 'Stop arming Israel' and 'No war on Iran' as they marched in the sweltering heat. 'It's important to remember that people are suffering in Gaza. I fear all the focus will be on Iran now,' said 34-year-old Harry Baker, attending his third pro-Palestinian protest. 'I don't have great love for the Iranian regime, but we are now in a dangerous situation,' he added. There have been monthly protests in the British capital since the start of the 20-month-long war between Israel and Hamas, which has ravaged Gaza. The June 21 march comes amid heightened global tensions as the United States mulls joining Israel's strikes against Iran. Cries of 'Palestine will be free' rang out as protesters carried signs saying 'Hands off Gaza' or 'Stop starving Gaza'. Gaza is suffering from famine-like conditions according to UN agencies in the region following an Israeli aid blockade. Gaza's civil defence agency has reported that hundreds have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to reach the US- and Israeli-backed aid distribution sites. 'People need to keep their eyes on Gaza. That's where the genocide is happening,' said 60-year-old protester Nicky Marcus. 'I feel frustrated, angry because of what's happening in Gaza,' said 31-year-old data analyst Jose Diaz. 'It's in everyone's eyes. It's still on after so many months,' Diaz added. 'Scared' The overall death toll in Gaza since the war broke out has reached at least 55,637 people, according to the health ministry. Israel has denied it is carrying out a genocide and says it aims to wipe out Hamas after 1,219 people were killed in Israel by the Islamist group's Oct 7, 2023, attack. Protesters holding Palestinian flags take part in a 'United 4 Gaza!' rally in Berlin on June 21. PHOTO: AFP A 31-year-old Iranian student who did not want to share her name, told AFP she had family in Iran and was 'scared'. 'I'm worried about my country. I know the regime is not good but it's still my country. I'm scared,' she said. Tehran said over 400 people have been killed in Iran since Israel launched strikes last week claiming its arch-foe was close to acquiring a nuclear weapon, which Iran denies. Some 25 people have been killed in Israel, according to official figures. In Berlin, more than 10,000 people gathered in the centre of the city in support of Gaza, according to police figures. 'You can't sit on the sofa and be silent. Now is the time when we all need to speak up,' said protestor Gundula, who did not want to give her second name. 'Germany finances, Israel bombs' was among the chants from the crowd, which gathered mid-afternoon close to the German parliament. For Mr Marwan Radwan, the point of the protest was to bring attention to the 'genocide currently taking place' and the 'dirty work' being done by the German government. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
International Business Times
7 hours ago
- International Business Times
Pakistan Proposes Nobel Peace Prize for Donald Trump Amid India-Pakistan Tensions and U.S. Diplomatic Moves
Pakistan announced on Saturday that it would recommend former U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, a recognition he has openly desired, citing his role in de-escalating a recent military standoff between India and Pakistan. Some political observers in Pakistan believe this gesture may influence Trump's stance on potential U.S.-Israel collaboration against Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has strongly criticized Israel's actions, calling them violations of international law and a threat to regional peace. In May, Trump unexpectedly declared a ceasefire that brought an end to four days of cross-border conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbors. Trump has repeatedly claimed he prevented a nuclear war and saved millions of lives, lamenting the lack of global recognition. While Pakistan credits Trump's diplomatic efforts for stopping the clashes, India insists the ceasefire was a mutual agreement between its military and Pakistan's forces. "President Trump displayed strategic wisdom and exemplary statesmanship by engaging diplomatically with both New Delhi and Islamabad to ease rising tensions," Pakistan stated. "This mediation highlights his commitment to global peace." Governments are eligible to nominate individuals for the Nobel Peace Prize. Washington has yet to respond to the proposal, and the Indian government has not commented either. Trump has long expressed willingness to mediate on the Kashmir conflict, which is at the heart of India-Pakistan hostilities. Islamabad, a consistent advocate for international intervention on Kashmir, welcomed Trump's attention. However, Trump's approach has disrupted traditional U.S. foreign policy in South Asia, which traditionally leans toward India to counterbalance China. This shift also strained his previously warm ties with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. On Friday, Trump posted a list of international conflicts he claims to have helped resolve during his presidency, including India-Pakistan tensions and the Abraham Accords involving Israel and Muslim nations. He added, "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do." Pakistan's nomination coincided with the visit of its Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, to the U.S., where he had lunch with Trump. It marked the first official visit by a Pakistani military leader to the White House under a civilian government. Although Trump and Modi were expected to meet at the G7 summit in Canada, the meeting didn't occur due to Trump's early departure. A subsequent phone call had Modi reaffirming India's stance: "India does not and will never accept mediation" with Pakistan. Mushahid Hussain, former chair of Pakistan's Senate Defence Committee, supported the nomination. "Trump is good for Pakistan," he remarked. "If it feeds Trump's ego, so be it. European leaders are already doing the same." But not all in Pakistan approve, especially due to Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza. "Israel's backer in Gaza doesn't deserve any peace award," said journalist Talat Hussain. "And what if he starts praising Modi again in a few months?"
