Call for Russians to withdraw before any peace talks
After fending off attacks during a three-day weekend ceasefire declared by Russia, some Ukrainian soldiers fighting near the front line had advice for their president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy: don't talk to Moscow until Russian troops withdraw.
Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed direct talks with Ukraine just over an hour after his ceasefire ended, something Zelenskiy said was possible, but only after Moscow agreed to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire from Monday.
The commander of a drone unit in Ukraine's national guard told Reuters any talks could only start with a full Russian withdrawal to Ukraine's borders when the country won independence in 1991.
"As a soldier and a citizen of Ukraine, I believe that before we sit down at the negotiation table, we should go back to the borders of 1991," the commander known as Chepa said in a bunker near the front line.
"That's it. Full withdrawal of all troops from the territory of Ukraine. Then when we can talk. Whatever he (Putin) is thinking of, take certain regions or divide territories, nobody has given him the right to do it."
Chepa's views were echoed by others in the unit.
Russia occupies nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory and has repeatedly said Kyiv must recognise the "reality on the ground".
Zelenskiy has acknowledged that at least some of Ukraine's occupied territory will have to be retaken through diplomacy.
But Kyiv cannot legally recognise Russian control over any Ukrainian territory because of the constitution.
Zelenskiy has said any discussion about territory can only take place after a ceasefire is in place.
Putin used a late-night press conference to make his proposal for talks, which he said should be based on a draft deal negotiated in 2022, under which Ukraine would agree to permanent neutrality.
That would contradict Ukraine's constitution, amended in 2019 to include the goal of fully-fledged membership of NATO.
Zelenskiy received a show of support from European powers on Saturday, when the leaders of Britain, France, Germany and Poland backed an unconditional ceasefire beginning on Monday.
Chepa said he also wanted negotiations but feared they would never come about.
"Yes, we do need negotiations. But he (Putin) is scared of talks," Chepa said, adding his brigade had seen no evidence of a ceasefire over the weekend.
"We have not seen any ceasefire, there were continuous attacks by howitzers, rocket launchers, they used it all. We have not experienced any ceasefire."
The Russian movements continued into Sunday, after the Russian-declared ceasefire ran out when the reconnaissance drones flew over a nearby village.
"There is a lot of movement there of military as well as civilian vehicles," Chepa said.
After fending off attacks during a three-day weekend ceasefire declared by Russia, some Ukrainian soldiers fighting near the front line had advice for their president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy: don't talk to Moscow until Russian troops withdraw.
Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed direct talks with Ukraine just over an hour after his ceasefire ended, something Zelenskiy said was possible, but only after Moscow agreed to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire from Monday.
The commander of a drone unit in Ukraine's national guard told Reuters any talks could only start with a full Russian withdrawal to Ukraine's borders when the country won independence in 1991.
"As a soldier and a citizen of Ukraine, I believe that before we sit down at the negotiation table, we should go back to the borders of 1991," the commander known as Chepa said in a bunker near the front line.
"That's it. Full withdrawal of all troops from the territory of Ukraine. Then when we can talk. Whatever he (Putin) is thinking of, take certain regions or divide territories, nobody has given him the right to do it."
Chepa's views were echoed by others in the unit.
Russia occupies nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory and has repeatedly said Kyiv must recognise the "reality on the ground".
Zelenskiy has acknowledged that at least some of Ukraine's occupied territory will have to be retaken through diplomacy.
But Kyiv cannot legally recognise Russian control over any Ukrainian territory because of the constitution.
Zelenskiy has said any discussion about territory can only take place after a ceasefire is in place.
Putin used a late-night press conference to make his proposal for talks, which he said should be based on a draft deal negotiated in 2022, under which Ukraine would agree to permanent neutrality.
That would contradict Ukraine's constitution, amended in 2019 to include the goal of fully-fledged membership of NATO.
Zelenskiy received a show of support from European powers on Saturday, when the leaders of Britain, France, Germany and Poland backed an unconditional ceasefire beginning on Monday.
Chepa said he also wanted negotiations but feared they would never come about.
"Yes, we do need negotiations. But he (Putin) is scared of talks," Chepa said, adding his brigade had seen no evidence of a ceasefire over the weekend.
"We have not seen any ceasefire, there were continuous attacks by howitzers, rocket launchers, they used it all. We have not experienced any ceasefire."
The Russian movements continued into Sunday, after the Russian-declared ceasefire ran out when the reconnaissance drones flew over a nearby village.
"There is a lot of movement there of military as well as civilian vehicles," Chepa said.
After fending off attacks during a three-day weekend ceasefire declared by Russia, some Ukrainian soldiers fighting near the front line had advice for their president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy: don't talk to Moscow until Russian troops withdraw.
Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed direct talks with Ukraine just over an hour after his ceasefire ended, something Zelenskiy said was possible, but only after Moscow agreed to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire from Monday.
The commander of a drone unit in Ukraine's national guard told Reuters any talks could only start with a full Russian withdrawal to Ukraine's borders when the country won independence in 1991.
"As a soldier and a citizen of Ukraine, I believe that before we sit down at the negotiation table, we should go back to the borders of 1991," the commander known as Chepa said in a bunker near the front line.
"That's it. Full withdrawal of all troops from the territory of Ukraine. Then when we can talk. Whatever he (Putin) is thinking of, take certain regions or divide territories, nobody has given him the right to do it."
Chepa's views were echoed by others in the unit.
Russia occupies nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory and has repeatedly said Kyiv must recognise the "reality on the ground".
Zelenskiy has acknowledged that at least some of Ukraine's occupied territory will have to be retaken through diplomacy.
But Kyiv cannot legally recognise Russian control over any Ukrainian territory because of the constitution.
Zelenskiy has said any discussion about territory can only take place after a ceasefire is in place.
Putin used a late-night press conference to make his proposal for talks, which he said should be based on a draft deal negotiated in 2022, under which Ukraine would agree to permanent neutrality.
That would contradict Ukraine's constitution, amended in 2019 to include the goal of fully-fledged membership of NATO.
Zelenskiy received a show of support from European powers on Saturday, when the leaders of Britain, France, Germany and Poland backed an unconditional ceasefire beginning on Monday.
Chepa said he also wanted negotiations but feared they would never come about.
"Yes, we do need negotiations. But he (Putin) is scared of talks," Chepa said, adding his brigade had seen no evidence of a ceasefire over the weekend.
"We have not seen any ceasefire, there were continuous attacks by howitzers, rocket launchers, they used it all. We have not experienced any ceasefire."
The Russian movements continued into Sunday, after the Russian-declared ceasefire ran out when the reconnaissance drones flew over a nearby village.
"There is a lot of movement there of military as well as civilian vehicles," Chepa said.
After fending off attacks during a three-day weekend ceasefire declared by Russia, some Ukrainian soldiers fighting near the front line had advice for their president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy: don't talk to Moscow until Russian troops withdraw.
Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed direct talks with Ukraine just over an hour after his ceasefire ended, something Zelenskiy said was possible, but only after Moscow agreed to an unconditional 30-day ceasefire from Monday.
The commander of a drone unit in Ukraine's national guard told Reuters any talks could only start with a full Russian withdrawal to Ukraine's borders when the country won independence in 1991.
"As a soldier and a citizen of Ukraine, I believe that before we sit down at the negotiation table, we should go back to the borders of 1991," the commander known as Chepa said in a bunker near the front line.
"That's it. Full withdrawal of all troops from the territory of Ukraine. Then when we can talk. Whatever he (Putin) is thinking of, take certain regions or divide territories, nobody has given him the right to do it."
Chepa's views were echoed by others in the unit.
Russia occupies nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory and has repeatedly said Kyiv must recognise the "reality on the ground".
Zelenskiy has acknowledged that at least some of Ukraine's occupied territory will have to be retaken through diplomacy.
But Kyiv cannot legally recognise Russian control over any Ukrainian territory because of the constitution.
Zelenskiy has said any discussion about territory can only take place after a ceasefire is in place.
Putin used a late-night press conference to make his proposal for talks, which he said should be based on a draft deal negotiated in 2022, under which Ukraine would agree to permanent neutrality.
That would contradict Ukraine's constitution, amended in 2019 to include the goal of fully-fledged membership of NATO.
Zelenskiy received a show of support from European powers on Saturday, when the leaders of Britain, France, Germany and Poland backed an unconditional ceasefire beginning on Monday.
Chepa said he also wanted negotiations but feared they would never come about.
"Yes, we do need negotiations. But he (Putin) is scared of talks," Chepa said, adding his brigade had seen no evidence of a ceasefire over the weekend.
"We have not seen any ceasefire, there were continuous attacks by howitzers, rocket launchers, they used it all. We have not experienced any ceasefire."
The Russian movements continued into Sunday, after the Russian-declared ceasefire ran out when the reconnaissance drones flew over a nearby village.
"There is a lot of movement there of military as well as civilian vehicles," Chepa said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Israel starts ‘rescue' flights as airlines reroute across Middle East
Jerusalem | Israel briefly reopened its airspace on Sunday and is expanding flight operations on Monday, aiming to help tens of thousands of travellers stranded by widespread cancellations across the Middle East after the U.S. attacked Iran. An organisation that monitors flight risks warned on Sunday (Monday AEST) that US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region. Reuters
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Inside Trump's final decision to attack Iran – and how he kept it top secret
For days, President Donald Trump played coy about his plans to strike Iran, declaring that he hadn't yet made up his mind even as he approved attack plans and directed military officials to ready their forces. Within a small circle of White House and administration officials, it was clear that even when Trump announced Thursday that he might take as long as 'two weeks' to decide, an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities was imminent, and the ruse was already underway. Just over 36 hours after the announcement, a host of military aircraft – including seven B-2 bombers – were on their way to Iran. Loading The number of administration officials read in on the plan to quickly strike Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities remained small. Across the White House, a number of staff remained in the dark about if and when the strikes would occur until shortly before - in some cases after - Trump announced the mission to the world Saturday evening. Air Force General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the 'highly classified mission' as one with 'very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature.' Trump's statement about potentially waiting two weeks 'was our attempt to throw the Iranians off guard,' a senior administration official with direct knowledge of the operation said about the two weeks' notice. 'But there was also some truth to it,' said the official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. Trump, who had posed question after question to his advisers throughout the week about how the military could keep the operation surgical in an effort to avoid broader involvement in a war, made clear he reserved the right to abort the plan at any moment, up until planes reached Iranian airspace at roughly 6pm in Washington on Saturday night. The 'ultimate ultimatum', and the Pentagon's war gaming Trump repeatedly said he was still open to a diplomatic solution, but the president and top US officials had little expectation that Iran would make the sort of drastic concessions that would convince them to call off the strike. Trump had given Iran an ultimatum – the 'ultimate ultimatum,' he termed it on Wednesday (local time) – demanding that the country completely give up its ability to enrich nuclear fuel, a technology into which the nation's leaders had poured enormous resources over two decades. The Iranians had repeatedly refused to agree to that over the course of negotiations this spring. He knew there probably wouldn't be a breakthrough, which is why the Pentagon was putting together a plan.' Senior official Trump himself never had direct contact with Iranian officials. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, continued diplomatic talks with Iran throughout the week. European officials held a negotiating session with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Friday, but the White House did not expect meaningful progress to come from those talks, according to the senior official. 'He knew there probably wouldn't be a breakthrough, which is why the Pentagon was putting together a plan' throughout the week, the senior official said. After Israel began strikes on Iran on June 13, some top US officials privately cautioned Trump against military involvement, including Vice President JD Vance, an Iraq War veteran and vocal sceptic of US military intervention abroad, according to people with knowledge of the internal deliberations. But as it became clear that Trump was closing in on a plan to strike Iran, Vance and the rest of his advisers fell in line, according to the senior official. As the operation commenced, Trump was on a golf course A sense of 'camaraderie' quickly developed within the close-knit team, according to the official, even as news reports swirled about internal discord. The official insisted that accounts of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard being sidelined were 'false reporting'. As the B-2 stealth bombers left the United States in the early hours of Saturday morning, Trump and his vice president were each far from the Situation Room, the president at his golf club in New Jersey, Vance in the air returning from California. Continuing with their scheduled trips to appear at fundraisers on opposite coasts further contributed to the reduced sense of urgency among observers. After returning from New Jersey in the early evening, Trump walked into the White House just as the B-2s and support planes entered Iranian airspace. The president made his way from the residence toward the West Wing, and within 40 minutes, the bombers were over their targets. At 7:50 pm – 20 minutes after the bombers had exited Iranian airspace – Trump and aides posted an announcement on his Truth Social site alerting the world that the attack had occurred. Hegseth described the operation as one that 'involved misdirection and the highest of operational security,' saying that 'months and weeks' of preparation had enabled the US to strike when it did. Among those in the Situation Room with Trump and Vance on Saturday - the team that had been apprised of the secret operation in the days beforehand - were Hegseth, Gabbard, Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Caine, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, White House counsel Dave Warrington, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and James Blair, Trump's deputy chief of staff for legislative affairs. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Dan Scavino, Trump's longtime aide who handles many of his social media posts, were also in the room and read in early on the strategy. Attorney General Pam Bondi had not been part of the core team involved in strategising, but was added to the group on Saturday. Defence and State officials worked to ensure US assets and Americans in the region were protected as best as possible, while US forces there were 'minimised,' according to the senior administration official. Throughout the week, White House officials also kept in close contact with influential leaders in Trump's base, including Stephen K Bannon, Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec, to make sure they were being – and felt – heard, according to two White House officials with knowledge of the communications. Loading Bannon and Kirk each paid a visit to the White House, with Bannon's lunch meeting - originally scheduled for 12:30 pm on Thursday - running slightly late. The lunch didn't begin until after Leavitt's press briefing started, during which she read the statement from Trump saying he would allow up to two weeks for continued negotiations. Officials said the president was happy to hear from Bannon and other voices critical of US involvement, even though they did not sway him from taking military action. He also continued to hear from more hawkish conservative voices such as Mark Levin – even as Levin was critical of Trump's claim that he wanted more time to make a decision. 'He was listening to people across the ideological perspective' of his political base, the senior administration official said. 'Ultimately, the president felt this is a decision the base should support and get behind, because ultimately, he's preventing a conflict that very well could have happened if the supreme leader instructed Iran to create the nuclear weapon.' Those in the Situation Room with Trump in recent days - including top Cabinet officials who had been apprised of recent intelligence as Trump weighed the strike - were hesitant Sunday to put a time on when, exactly, the president made the decision. The senior administration official said there was 'not really a moment' that Trump made his final decision. It was based on 'a feeling' the president had as he realized diplomacy would not lead to an acceptable outcome. Vance conceded on television Sunday morning that it wasn't entirely clear at what point Trump was fully on board. 'I don't know that any of us knew exactly when the president made the decision except for the president himself,' Vance said on 'Meet the Press.' He said that Trump made the decision 'right before - and I'm talking about minutes - before the bombs were dropped' on Saturday evening. 'He himself over time decided this was necessary,' Vance said. 'But of course he had the ability to call off this attack until the very last minute.' Hegseth, meanwhile, claimed there was a moment of clarity, but declined to elaborate on when it was. 'I won't say the particular moment,' Hegseth said. 'There was certainly a moment in time where he realised that it had to be a certain action taken in order to minimise the threat to us and our troops.'
The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
Inside Trump's final decision to attack Iran – and how he kept it top secret
For days, President Donald Trump played coy about his plans to strike Iran, declaring that he hadn't yet made up his mind even as he approved attack plans and directed military officials to ready their forces. Within a small circle of White House and administration officials, it was clear that even when Trump announced Thursday that he might take as long as 'two weeks' to decide, an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities was imminent, and the ruse was already underway. Just over 36 hours after the announcement, a host of military aircraft – including seven B-2 bombers – were on their way to Iran. Loading The number of administration officials read in on the plan to quickly strike Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities remained small. Across the White House, a number of staff remained in the dark about if and when the strikes would occur until shortly before - in some cases after - Trump announced the mission to the world Saturday evening. Air Force General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the 'highly classified mission' as one with 'very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature.' Trump's statement about potentially waiting two weeks 'was our attempt to throw the Iranians off guard,' a senior administration official with direct knowledge of the operation said about the two weeks' notice. 'But there was also some truth to it,' said the official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. Trump, who had posed question after question to his advisers throughout the week about how the military could keep the operation surgical in an effort to avoid broader involvement in a war, made clear he reserved the right to abort the plan at any moment, up until planes reached Iranian airspace at roughly 6pm in Washington on Saturday night. The 'ultimate ultimatum', and the Pentagon's war gaming Trump repeatedly said he was still open to a diplomatic solution, but the president and top US officials had little expectation that Iran would make the sort of drastic concessions that would convince them to call off the strike. Trump had given Iran an ultimatum – the 'ultimate ultimatum,' he termed it on Wednesday (local time) – demanding that the country completely give up its ability to enrich nuclear fuel, a technology into which the nation's leaders had poured enormous resources over two decades. The Iranians had repeatedly refused to agree to that over the course of negotiations this spring. He knew there probably wouldn't be a breakthrough, which is why the Pentagon was putting together a plan.' Senior official Trump himself never had direct contact with Iranian officials. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, continued diplomatic talks with Iran throughout the week. European officials held a negotiating session with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Friday, but the White House did not expect meaningful progress to come from those talks, according to the senior official. 'He knew there probably wouldn't be a breakthrough, which is why the Pentagon was putting together a plan' throughout the week, the senior official said. After Israel began strikes on Iran on June 13, some top US officials privately cautioned Trump against military involvement, including Vice President JD Vance, an Iraq War veteran and vocal sceptic of US military intervention abroad, according to people with knowledge of the internal deliberations. But as it became clear that Trump was closing in on a plan to strike Iran, Vance and the rest of his advisers fell in line, according to the senior official. As the operation commenced, Trump was on a golf course A sense of 'camaraderie' quickly developed within the close-knit team, according to the official, even as news reports swirled about internal discord. The official insisted that accounts of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard being sidelined were 'false reporting'. As the B-2 stealth bombers left the United States in the early hours of Saturday morning, Trump and his vice president were each far from the Situation Room, the president at his golf club in New Jersey, Vance in the air returning from California. Continuing with their scheduled trips to appear at fundraisers on opposite coasts further contributed to the reduced sense of urgency among observers. After returning from New Jersey in the early evening, Trump walked into the White House just as the B-2s and support planes entered Iranian airspace. The president made his way from the residence toward the West Wing, and within 40 minutes, the bombers were over their targets. At 7:50 pm – 20 minutes after the bombers had exited Iranian airspace – Trump and aides posted an announcement on his Truth Social site alerting the world that the attack had occurred. Hegseth described the operation as one that 'involved misdirection and the highest of operational security,' saying that 'months and weeks' of preparation had enabled the US to strike when it did. Among those in the Situation Room with Trump and Vance on Saturday - the team that had been apprised of the secret operation in the days beforehand - were Hegseth, Gabbard, Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Caine, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, White House counsel Dave Warrington, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and James Blair, Trump's deputy chief of staff for legislative affairs. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Dan Scavino, Trump's longtime aide who handles many of his social media posts, were also in the room and read in early on the strategy. Attorney General Pam Bondi had not been part of the core team involved in strategising, but was added to the group on Saturday. Defence and State officials worked to ensure US assets and Americans in the region were protected as best as possible, while US forces there were 'minimised,' according to the senior administration official. Throughout the week, White House officials also kept in close contact with influential leaders in Trump's base, including Stephen K Bannon, Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec, to make sure they were being – and felt – heard, according to two White House officials with knowledge of the communications. Loading Bannon and Kirk each paid a visit to the White House, with Bannon's lunch meeting - originally scheduled for 12:30 pm on Thursday - running slightly late. The lunch didn't begin until after Leavitt's press briefing started, during which she read the statement from Trump saying he would allow up to two weeks for continued negotiations. Officials said the president was happy to hear from Bannon and other voices critical of US involvement, even though they did not sway him from taking military action. He also continued to hear from more hawkish conservative voices such as Mark Levin – even as Levin was critical of Trump's claim that he wanted more time to make a decision. 'He was listening to people across the ideological perspective' of his political base, the senior administration official said. 'Ultimately, the president felt this is a decision the base should support and get behind, because ultimately, he's preventing a conflict that very well could have happened if the supreme leader instructed Iran to create the nuclear weapon.' Those in the Situation Room with Trump in recent days - including top Cabinet officials who had been apprised of recent intelligence as Trump weighed the strike - were hesitant Sunday to put a time on when, exactly, the president made the decision. The senior administration official said there was 'not really a moment' that Trump made his final decision. It was based on 'a feeling' the president had as he realized diplomacy would not lead to an acceptable outcome. Vance conceded on television Sunday morning that it wasn't entirely clear at what point Trump was fully on board. 'I don't know that any of us knew exactly when the president made the decision except for the president himself,' Vance said on 'Meet the Press.' He said that Trump made the decision 'right before - and I'm talking about minutes - before the bombs were dropped' on Saturday evening. 'He himself over time decided this was necessary,' Vance said. 'But of course he had the ability to call off this attack until the very last minute.' Hegseth, meanwhile, claimed there was a moment of clarity, but declined to elaborate on when it was. 'I won't say the particular moment,' Hegseth said. 'There was certainly a moment in time where he realised that it had to be a certain action taken in order to minimise the threat to us and our troops.'
