Online gambling and betting advertising is non-compliant with Gambling Act — minister
South Africans have noticed that gambling and betting advertising is getting very intrusive, but there are plans for better regulation.
Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, has confirmed in parliament that the advertising for online gambling and betting does not comply with the National Gambling Act, but emphasised that a crack-down is coming.
He was responding to a question from Makashule Gana, an MP for Rise Mzansi, whether the recent advertising and marketing campaigns of gambling and betting companies comply with the National Gambling Act and related regulations and policies.
Tau said in his reply that the National Gambling Board reviewed recent gambling and betting advertising campaigns to see if they comply with the National Gambling Act and National Gambling Regulations.
'The findings indicate that a number of gambling operators' current advertising and marketing practices do not fully comply with the legislative and regulatory framework, particularly regarding responsible gambling messaging and protection of minors.
ALSO READ: Did you know online gambling is illegal in SA? Here are plans to stop it
Online gambling and betting skipping statutory warnings
Tau said online gambling operators are contravening regulation 3(2) of the National Gambling Regulations about the inadequate display of responsible gambling warnings, which requires that any advertisement must include a clear and prominent statement warning against the dangers of addictive and compulsive gambling.
In a video or television advertisement, this message must incorporate at a minimum the name, toll-free number and slogan of the National Responsible Gambling Programme, and it must be published in visual format so that each slogan appears in a legible and noticeable format for at least three seconds.
'The responsible gambling message was barely visible and appeared only briefly, which undermines the intent of the regulation.'
ALSO READ: R1.1 trillion worth of online bets in a year: Does SA need to rein in digital gambling?
Children exposed to online gambling and betting advertising
He said online gambling operators also contravened regulation 3(1)(i)(i) of the National Gambling Regulations in these ways:
Exposure to minors: prohibits placing gambling advertisements in media primarily directed at children under the age of eighteen, but the Board noticed that advertisements are frequently aired during family viewing times, including during popular shows, such as MasterChef and Junior MasterChef, as well as during sports matches where the audience is likely to include minors. Tau says this is contrary to the Act, which prohibits gambling for individuals under 18. Advertising during these time slots also increases the risk of normalising gambling behaviour among young viewers.
Targeted online and streaming advertising: Tau said gambling advertisements were observed on radio streaming websites and platforms such as YouTube, often without responsible gambling disclaimers. These platforms do not adequately verify the age of users, allowing easy access to gambling content by minors. 'This raises serious concerns regarding the enticement of underage children to participate in gambling activities,' he said.
Sponsorship and product placement: the sponsorship of family-friendly programmes by major bookmakers results in increased visibility and frequency of gambling advertisements during television content widely consumed by minors and families. Tau said this form of marketing bypasses regulatory intentions to protect vulnerable groups from gambling influence.
Tau said the board engaged the provincial gambling boards about the contraventions and intends to advise the National Gambling Policy Council Meeting of the matter for resolution. 'Therefore, the department and the board will focus on implementing corrective measures in the next cycle.'
ALSO READ: 'Let's make gambling safer': New bill targets unfair online gambling practices
National Gambling Policy Council stepping up soon
Gana also wanted to know whether Tau found that the lack of National Gambling Policy Council meetings since March 2018 contributed to the gambling crisis and lack of accountability in the gambling and betting sector.
Tau said he will convene the National Gambling Policy Council soon. 'Gambling is a functional area of concurrent competence between national and provincial government in terms of the constitution, and therefore requires intergovernmental cooperation.
'The statutory mandate of the Council in terms of section 62 of the National Gambling Act includes consulting on the determination and establishment of the national gambling policy and laws, including the promotion of uniform national and provincial laws about gambling norms and standards, as well as any matter concerning gambling.'
The Council enables provinces and national government to debate and deliberate on policy and ensure alignment of policy and enforcement interventions across the country.
Tau said that with the gambling environment evolving, there has been a growth in the industry, which also paved the way for illegal activities, such as online gambling, to thrive. 'In addition, the inability to meet affects uniformity and harmonisation of gambling policy and legislation, which leads to fragmentation in the gambling regulation in the country.'
NOW READ: WATCH: Women and pensioners among 'vulnerable' groups, says Gauteng Gambling Board
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
SA engineers detained in Equatorial Guinea back home
The families of Frik Potgieter and Peter Huxham have confirmed that the two South African engineers, who had been unlawfully detained in Equatorial Guinea since 9 February 2023, have been released and are safely home on South African soil. A family statement mentioned that their release follows a pardon from the President of Equatorial Guinea – for which the families are extremely grateful. This brings an end to a harrowing ordeal of anguish, uncertainty, and unwavering efforts by many to secure their freedom. When South Africans connect, we don't just network; we build a community. The Lekker Network is a professional network where every conversation starts with, 'How can I help you?' Come join us & be a part of a community of extraordinary Saffas. In July 2024, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that their imprisonment was arbitrary, unlawful, and in breach of multiple international human rights obligations. The UN also, at the time, called for their immediate release. 'We are overwhelmed with relief and joy. The last two years and four months have been unimaginably painful for both of our families. Today, we are finally able to say: Frik and Peter are safely back home,' said family spokespersons Shaun Murphy and Francois Nigrini. The families expressed their deepest appreciation to everyone who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, including Potgieter and Huxham's employer (SBM Offshore), the South African and UK governments, international diplomatic partners, parliamentarians, legal teams, Hostage International and other civil society organisations, and the media. They are also grateful to former Minister of International Relations, Naledi Pandor, and the current Minister, Ronald Lamola, who visited Equatorial Guinea as envoys for the President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa. They also thanked the tens of thousands of individuals worldwide who signed petitions, supported media advocacy, offered emotional support and prayed for their safe return. 'Their return home is the result of collective efforts over many, many months, and we are deeply grateful to everyone who played a role in securing their freedom. 'This has been a long and difficult journey. We want to thank every person who stood with us; your support carried us through our darkest moments. We now respectfully ask for privacy and space as Frik, Peter and their families begin the journey of healing,' the families said. Post your 'welcome home' messages below, by … Leaving a comment below, or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
2 days ago
- The South African
Surviving to thriving: SPCA shares heartwarming update on Bobby
The SPCA has shared a heartwarming update on Bobby, a dog rescued after it was spotted in a viral TikTok video earlier this month. Images of the emaciated dog – who had been forced to eat plastic to survive – left many South Africans enraged and calling for action. Johannesburg content creator Sasha Tshiamo and the dog's owners are now facing charges of animal cruelty. Earlier this month, a TikTok video featuring Sasha Tshiamo dancing was posted on the X platform. The video quickly went viral because of an emaciated dog in the background. The animal's ribcage was clearly visible, and it appeared lethargic. Following a nationwide call, the SPCA stepped in, removing the dog – affectionately nicknamed 'Bobby' – from her shocking living conditions. The animal activists revealed that both the dog's owner – who willingly surrendered the animal – and the influencer were now facing animal cruelty charges. In a social media post, the SPCA shared an update about Bobby, who appeared to be thriving under their care. In a video clip, brave Bobby is seen wearing a winter jersey as she frolics in a garden and happily poses for pictures. The heartwarming caption read: 'One sad video, one brave dog, one second chance. 'Bobby's story didn't end in the background – it's only just begun! From a shadow of herself to a brave and beautiful girl. It turns out that all Bobby needed was a little love and some treats.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by NSPCA (@ According to the SPCA, Bobby will soon be up for adoption. The SPCA has repeatedly warned the public that animal abusers can be criminally charged under the Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962. The act – which was established to prevent the cruelty of animals – stipulates that those found guilty can face a fine or imprisonment. The SPCA rescued a starving dog that captured the hearts of South Africans. Content creator Sasha Tshiamo is now facing animal cruelty charges over the viral video. Images via X: @nspca_sa Offenders could also face a denial of ownership – preventing them from owning animals – as well as a criminal conviction. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
CRL chair's claims against its executive director are 'defamatory', Forsa says
Freedom of Religion South Africa (Forsa) has strongly denied what it termed false and defamatory allegations made by chairperson of the CRL Rights Commission Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva on Thursday. During a media briefing convened by the commission, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva alleged Forsa and its executive director Michael Swain had accused her, Cheryl Zondi and/or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation of receiving R1.5m from the National Lotteries Commission. Zondi was a witness in the rape trial of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso. Forsa said this donation was reported widely in the media. It said a press release from the National Lotteries Commission of December 13 2018 stated the Cheryl Zondi Foundation had partnered with the Izimvo 447 NPC and received R1.5m to aid their work for those exploited in sacred spaces. 'Neither Michael Swain, nor Forsa, has ever alleged financial misconduct of any kind. Such claims are false and wholly without any factual basis at all,' the organisation said in a statement. Forsa said it was disappointed that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva did not first seek clarity or engage with it before making public accusations and threatening legal action. 'Her subsequent laying of criminal charges against Michael Swain and Forsa is seen as vexatious and unfounded. It appears to be a personally motivated attack designed to intimidate and deter Forsa (or others) from opposing the chair's agenda to push again for state regulation of religion.' Forsa said it reserved all legal rights in its response to this matter and was considering appropriate legal remedies in response to these false and harmful allegations. 'These include a formal demand for retraction as well as amending its extant damages claim for defamation.' Forsa said it was not against any person or institution, including Mkhwanazi-Xaluva or the commission. 'On the contrary, Forsa supports all of its legitimate and constitutional objectives. However, our singular focus is the protection and advancement of religious freedom and related constitutional rights in South Africa.' Forsa said a letter from more than 20 senior religious leaders representing about 12-million South Africans was sent to President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2019, raising several concerns, including that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva simultaneously served as CRL chairperson and deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation. The commission was a Chapter 9 institution, created to be independent and impartial, accountable only to parliament, Forsa said. 'Thus, its chair must avoid bias, preferential treatment and dual loyalties. Arguably, this includes keeping clear boundaries when interacting with organisations, especially advocacy organisations, linked to matters before the commission.' Forsa said under Mkhwanazi-Xaluva's leadership at the time, the CRL strongly pushed for state regulation of religion. 'A wide diversity of faith communities strongly opposed the CRL's proposal. The 'conflict of interest' concern arose because the CRL chair cited the Omotoso case as a high-profile example to justify the CRL's proposed regulation model (via peer review councils, licensing of religious leaders, etc).' Her appointment as the deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation, therefore, created a strong impression of an overlap of interest and influence. 'On the one hand, the chair of the CRL is tasked with impartial interaction with faith communities, constitutional compliance, and safeguarding diverse religious rights. Acting as deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation is an advocacy-aligned — not neutral — position.' This raised legitimate concerns about a conflict of interest on the part of the chairperson, Forsa said. 'It must be stressed that this in no way raises any concern or casts any suspicion on Cheryl Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation.' Since being reappointed, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva has continued promoting proposals for state regulation of religion, including the introduction of peer review mechanisms, Forsa said. It said it had consistently opposed this course of action, repeatedly warning that state regulation of religion was unnecessary, unconstitutional, unworkable and unaffordable. 'In Forsa's public education efforts to point out the dangers to religious freedom of state regulation of religion, we gave the historical background to the current context. One part of this extensive presentation referenced the 2019 letter to the president in good faith and with full transparency.' Forsa said the 2019 letter did not accuse Mkhwanazi-Xaluva of theft or corruption of any kind and did not contain any accusations against Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation at all.
