Operation Sindoor's Lesson: Assertiveness Is Just Step One For A ‘Viksit Bharat'

Last Updated:
The road to 'Viksit Bharat' requires not just a robust security posture, but a concerted effort to bolster our military, economy, and national character from within
War scenarios, as elucidated in the previous part, have remained viable. However, there is a paradigm shift towards terrorist attacks and 'dousing the fire' tactics being employed by Pakistan—limiting the window of opportunity for Bharat, while allowing it to raise the stakes for Pakistan.
Terror Attacks Since 2014 And Bharat's Response
In recent times, the scale of skirmishes with Pakistan has reduced, and we now mostly witness an active Line of Control (LoC). Pakistan's attempts—though diminished—persist in conducting terrorist attacks and furthering its nefarious plans of Islamist jihad in the heartland of Bharat, albeit through misinformation and propaganda fuelling such dastardly endeavours. The smart fence along the LoC has greatly hampered Pakistan's terror designs. Its increasing reliance on Over-Ground Workers (OGWs) and sleeper cells has, in a way, worked to our advantage, as Bharat continues to eliminate these hidden terrorists and hunt them down.
The typical pattern—from letting attacks happen, to striking back tactically, to eventually engaging in dialogue under pressure from global opinion—has now shifted. We have developed adequate punitive responses for Pakistan, as seen after the Uri attack through surgical strikes, post-Pulwama air operations, and now during Operation Sindoor. In all three instances, Bharat targeted terror camps and infrastructure in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK); but Operation Sindoor went further, striking terrorist headquarters in mainland Pakistan.
The propensity and immunity with which these strikes were conducted demonstrate a range of mechanisms available to inflict damage with precision and restraint—minimising collateral damage while earning global appreciation. With each such strike, the lethality, precision, and psychological toll on Pakistan have increased, raising serious questions around red lines, nuclear intent and capability, and the escalation ladder—all tools of tantrum Pakistan had previously used to deter Bharat from taking such actions.
Had Operation Sindoor continued for another two or three days beyond 10 May 2025, it is likely Pakistan would have been severely crippled—facing deeper restraint from global powers. One can never be sure when 'enough is enough', but this time, in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist attack, Pakistan was saved due to a leak, which embarrassed its funders and suppliers alike.
What Does Bharat Need To Do?
Given the narration thus far, it is evident that we have evolved as a nation in our resolve to punish Pakistan for its terrorism and misadventures. We are now better prepared to take punitive action, and much of global opinion stands with us. However, we still face a handicap in perception warfare.
Bharat's growth invites envy, and some global actors continue to sustain the Pakistani proxy they once created—arming and supporting terror networks that mushroomed from its soil. Only now is the snake they nurtured beginning to bite the world at large.
Are we truly superior to Pakistan? Have we fully neutralised terrorism emanating from its territory? Do we possess conventional military superiority? Will those who use Pakistan as a proxy arm it further against Bharat? Can we count on the USA and China as friends? Can the European Union be trusted blindly? Who are our all-weather allies with whom we can co-develop better military hardware and software?
Will Pakistan resort to nuclear weapons—and what can we do in such a case? How much can our economy sustain in the event of a war? Are we truly invincible against Pakistan?
There are many lingering questions, and much cannot be answered in black and white, as probabilities and scenarios are multiple—and in some cases, mutually exclusive. However, the last question above does have a definite answer, and that is a firm no. And since that emphatic 'no' exists, we need to introspect and carve a pathway to strengthen our national power for the future.
What are our deficiencies, lacunae, and gaps? One can write about them separately. But given the highlights we have already examined in this paper—across the three scenarios and feasible actions during terrorist strikes—particularly in the context of declarations made by Bharat during Operation Sindoor, such as: that 'no first use' is not mandatory, and that any terrorist attack or proxy war will be construed as an 'Act Of War', Bharat has significant latitude to respond—and at its discretion.
Let me briefly outline what Bharat can and ought to do across various domains of national power:
A. Military Capacity Enhancement
Bharat is two decades behind China in military preparedness and is not adequately poised for a two- or three-front war, despite such scenarios being increasingly plausible. Given the wide range of terrain conditions in which we must operate—especially for ground forces—we need to develop the following capabilities:
Enhanced and modern operational infrastructure, including administrative systems, along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on the Tibetan Plateau, the Line of Control (LoC), and the international borders (IB) with Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Modernisation of ground forces with upgraded equipment, weapons, personal gear, surveillance tools, electronic warfare (EW) capabilities, cyber-awareness, air defence (AD) systems, and the ability to operate in a nuclear environment or 'fight dirty'.
Co-development of sixth-generation aircraft, alongside increased production of indigenised systems. Bharat should also continue imports with adequate service, parts, tools, and accessories (SPTA) support from countries like Russia and France to maintain and enhance the current fleet. This includes modernising the Indian Air Force (IAF) with advanced AD and EW capabilities.
Co-develop or domestically manufacture at least five additional aircraft carrier fleets equipped with indigenous hardware, weapon systems, missiles, and aircraft—targeted for completion within the next 5 to 10 years.
Leverage home-grown technologies to strengthen the missile arsenal, including multi-range delivery systems across all three services, while achieving sufficient tactical nuclear capability.
Mechanise at least two-thirds of the current infantry, excluding glaciated and high-altitude areas where manoeuvre warfare is infeasible. This mechanisation initiative was originally envisioned during General K. Sundarji's tenure as Chief of Army Staff, but it came to a grinding halt due to economic constraints, bureaucratic indecision, and military leadership's inability to press forward. This failure has severely limited our offensive options and constrained us within the ambit of a nuclear deterrence posture.
Pakistan possesses nuclear capabilities and is willing to employ tactical nuclear weapons. To match and deter this threat effectively, Bharat needs mechanised forces capable of transporting troops safely into battle under nuclear-threat conditions. Failure to achieve this may eventually lead to disaster in a future conventional conflict—an outcome we have so far managed to avoid, and deter our enemies from initiating.
However, by the next decade or so, that strategic advantage may erode, especially as Pakistan's armed forces receive a fresh infusion of modern weapon systems—whether through proxies or directly from countries such as the USA and China, among others.
B. Perception Warfare
For a long time, we have been shy of creating assets that are useful not only for perception management but also have the capability to network and interact globally to gain better and faster intelligence. Bharat must work on a holistic Perception Warfare Department under HQ Integrated Defence Staff with elements of military, cyber experts, internal security agencies, PMF, intelligence agencies, MEA with its embassies across the world, industry, polity, media, diaspora, ISRO, NTRO, veterans from diverse fields as needed, friendly foreign countries on laid-down terms, etc. Reviving the Technical Support Division (TSD), or a similar organisation, and not being politically correct about it, should be a stance. This will be beneficial to create assets, conduct covert operations, curb and pre-empt terrorist activities, including targeting terrorists and their handlers deep inside enemy territories, and more unconventional tasks, as necessary.
Striking the enemy and eliminating leadership must be an ongoing process and that calls for specialisation without interference; albeit with due checks and reporting to the highest offices, as needed. In Pakistan, we have a failed state that thrives on extreme Islamist ideology, and to defeat such a country, it needs more and constant degradation of its intent and breaking it into pieces, such that constant turmoil grips it within and along other borders too. We also need to cleanse within the 'anti-national algae' that grows and mushrooms with support from foreign inimicals. We must create avenues to support teams and groups operating in Bharat and abroad financially, such that we are able to reach out to think tanks, world bodies and agencies, and people who matter, to influence events—and post-events too. Funding a group of diaspora in the UK, USA, Canada, etc. will be useful in the long run.
C. Developing National Fibre And Fortitude
Bharat, as we know it today, is fragmented with shades of citizens, ranging from nationalists to wokes to anti-nationals. While the first and the last are discernible and can be acted upon with firmness, the woke need special attention, as most are from the current generation of teenagers up to those in their 30s—who have been fed with a version of history that doesn't build enough pride, and where Western influences have been subtly infused through many aspects. Our education system, as such, needs major refinement and changes, and unless that is done, we are on a time-curve of doomsday, so far as moral and nationalistic fibre is concerned.
Our nation also needs to develop fortitude in difficult times and be able to appreciate the intentions of enemies, their tactics, media negativity, and the influence of agencies and institutions—including educational ones—and even comments made by other governments. One can appreciate the grooming of a young Israeli and their fortitude to return from safer places like the USA, etc., to fight and contribute in an armed conflict in Gaza, post the 7/10 attacks on their soil by Hamas. A nation has to be made strong internally, and that takes generations—but weakening it takes just a few decades. The 'Gurukul' system was effective as it trained scholar-warriors and nationalists, and our modern syllabus needs to be ingrained with teachings that foster national pride and commitment.
D. Pathway Of 'Atmanirbhar Bharat'
It is an absolutely critical necessity that we promote and produce weapons and fighting support systems in Bharat. At best, we should have co-development cases with friendly countries only—Russia and Israel, to reiterate, are the ones we must trust. All imports through COTS (Commercial Off The Shelf) procurement should be minimal and strictly stipulated for manufacturing in Bharat within a specific timeframe, such that we force ourselves to develop a competitive technological edge in that domain at the earliest.
iDEX and similar platforms need to be adequately funded to enable proper scale-ups, without these companies getting funded by foreign entities. Allied industries that support military hardware, software, and related products must also be indigenous.
E. Curating Geographical Advantage
In many places—especially along the LoC—we are at a position of disadvantage. Given the fact that we have a right to our territories in PoK, and also that Pakistan has recently suspended the Shimla Agreement, we need to have a 'roll-on plan' to nibble territories, with a view to improving our defensive posture along the LoC. These sporadic to limited offensive actions during the year will serve as a caution to Pakistan and reduce infiltration attempts, as some calculated aggression is carried out across the LoC by Bharat.
F. Encourage Diversified Population Growth In Kashmir
Kashmir has been the focal point of Pakistan's funding, terrorism, and more—under the garb of Islamic caliphate and its own misplaced claims of sovereignty. Kashmir is an integral part of Bharat, and the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits remains a blot on the then government and military leadership, which let mayhem prevail. It is time to undo that error and ensure that people and businesses move into Kashmir so that the population becomes more heterogeneous.
With a bounty of minerals and rare earths, it is incumbent upon Bharat to ensure that normalcy in Kashmir is such that the cost of meddling there for Pakistan is equivalent to striking New Delhi. Therefore, state a plan and stick to it—irrespective of which political party governs Delhi or Srinagar. Do not let Pakistan see Kashmir as a demography that suits its ideological battles.
G. Economic Surge With Security: Nothing Else Matters in the 21st Century
Bharat is on a pathway of transition—from a developing to a developed nation—and the call for 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047 by the Prime Minister mandates a relentless economic growth curve, with all dimensions of security aligned to support that enviable progress. Development in infrastructure, healthcare, education, energy, defence, enabling technologies and more is critical to sustain the needs and aspirations of 1.4 billion plus, who will likely grow to 1.85 billion by 2070—a timeline by which Bharat intends to become a net-zero country.
All of this requires high investments, best practices, collaborations, and strategic choices. Bharat must make the right partnerships with friendly countries and lead the conversation on investments. At the same time, rivals like Pakistan, an envious China, and others will count—and attempt to slow Bharat down. Bharat must optimise its internal economy and generate funds domestically to support growth and better standards of living for its citizens.
Ignoring minor skirmishes unless absolutely necessary for escalation should be the norm. Punitive actions must be brief, effective, and well communicated—to limit enemy countermeasures.
H. Societal Stability And National Ideology
Frequent infighting and political bickering have devastated Bharat since the Mughal invasions and British rule, where divide-and-rule policies prevailed. Even today, petty politics continues to divide Bharat on caste, language, income, and more—ushering in asymptotic clichés, weakening the societal fabric, and even deriding Bharat abroad, as we have seen with politicians who hold responsible positions and are privy to sensitive information.
We must observe the declining fabric of societies like the UK and USA, where wokeism has stripped them of their values, and the edifice of their governance has been weakened. Bharat has rich civilisational roots, but their deterioration in recent decades has been alarming. The current generations have not contributed enough towards its revival.
We need to push a 'restart button' for our education system and its ingrained philosophy—such that we preserve the best from our past, suitably enabled by the virtues of the present, especially in technology and future sciences. We must build a national ideology that is overwhelming and empowering for future citizens and the diaspora.
Institutions like RSS can do more in the service of Bharat and help bring together like-minded individuals who can shape and steer the course for a better, bolder, and beautiful Bharat.
I. Leadership Through Acumen
Bharat must create systems within systems that support a long-term vision of prosperity and peace—defined by clear targets and enforced where necessary. While the basic polity is based on elections and bureaucracy is run by cadre, there is a strong case—just like RSS benefits from the advice of luminaries—that the government must build attached structures to bring in experts, and fill the Rajya Sabha with citizens who will work more and enjoy privileges less.
The experiment of appointing Joint Secretaries from the private sector under Team Modi proved successful, with significant contributions made in the ministries where they served. We must extend this idea and introduce more lateral leadership, even up to the level of secretaries.
The cushy, assured promotion and growth enjoyed by the bureaucracy must come to an end. We must promote excellence from the vast pool of citizens—including veterans from diverse fields. No public sector organisation guarantees promotions and growth like the IAS cadre. While politicians must fight elections and other institutions advance through merit, IAS operates by its own benchmark—one that must be dismantled and replaced with a new one soon.
J. Make Military Elite And Wanted
A nation is only as strong and resilient as its military. In Bharat, the status of the military has been constantly downgraded, and the parity with other services like the IAS and IPS is rather humiliating—the warrant of precedence only adds to the agony.
Gone are the days when the military was schooled to ignore 'small things' in the belief that it had a larger role to play. The attraction of youth towards military service has declined, and the shortage of officers tells its own story. It is quite disheartening to see a Lieutenant General salute and call 'Sir' someone who is 25 per cent junior in service and stature—while even an MLA believes himself to be larger than a Corps Commander.
This anomaly, which is well-known and well-established, must be corrected soon—and no compromise should be acceptable to the polity. Operation Sindoor is also an example of how sluggishness sets in during decision-making, and how military commanders often appear to be mere pawns within the larger national structure.
Since the time of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, and without exception, the respect and remuneration afforded to the soldier has been craftily degraded by the bureaucracy—with the polity consenting to this erosion. It seems that, over the decades since independence, the bureaucracy (including IAS and IPS) has usurped power by staying close to the polity, while the soldier who defends the nation has slowly become a 'stranger in town'.
Bharat now stands at the cusp of becoming a developed nation—powerful across all dimensions of national power—and Operation Sindoor signals where we ought to be militarily. But truth be told, we are still far from where we need to be in terms of military capacities. As a nation with the aspirations and dreams of 1.4+ billion citizens, we cannot afford to be second-best militarily—not as the largest democracy on Earth.
We must collectively envision a stronger and surer Bharat—and do more for our nation, our Bharat.
top videos
View all
Jai Hind!
Colonel Rohit Dev, a 2nd Generation Army Officer, is an Adjunct Professor at the Rashtriya Raksha University, a geopolitical analyst and a primetime TV personality. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
Indian military Operation Sindoor pahalgam terror attack
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 19, 2025, 12:41 IST
News opinion Opinion | Operation Sindoor's Lesson: Assertiveness Is Just Step One For A 'Viksit Bharat'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

Suicide bomber kills 22, injures dozens at Greek Orthodox church in Syria

The attack took place in Dweil'a on the outskirts of Damascus inside the Mar Elias Church, according to state media SANA, citing the Health Ministry for the toll of dead and wounded AP Dweil'a (Syria) A suicide bomber in Syria opened fire then detonated an explosive vest inside a Greek Orthodox church filled with people praying on Sunday, killing at least 22 and wounding 63 others, state media reported. The attack took place in Dweil'a on the outskirts of Damascus inside the Mar Elias Church, according to state media SANA, citing the Health Ministry for the toll of dead and wounded. Britain-based war monitor the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said there were at least 19 peopled killed and dozens wounded, but did not give exact numbers. Some local media reported that children were among the casualties. The attack on the church was the first of its kind in Syria in years, and comes as Damascus under its de facto Islamist rule is trying to win the support of minorities. As President Ahmad al-Sharaa struggles to exert authority across the country, there have been concerns about the presence of sleeper cells of extremist groups in the war-torn country. No group immediately claimed responsibility Sunday. Syrian Interior Ministry spokesman Noureddine Al-Baba said in a news conference that their preliminary investigation points to the extremist Islamic State group. The ministry said one gunmen entered the church, fired at the people there before detonating himself with an explosives vest, echoing some witness testimonies. The security of places of worship is a red line, he said, adding that IS and remaining members of the ousted Assad government are trying to destabilise Syria. Syrian Information Minister Hamza Mostafa condemned the attack, calling it a terrorist attack. This cowardly act goes against the civic values that brings us together, he said on X. We will not back down from our commitment to equal citizenship... and we also affirm the state's pledge to exert all its efforts to combat criminal organisations and to protect society from all attacks threatening its safety. Witnesses said the gunman with his face covered entered and fired at the people. When a crowd charged at him to remove him from the church, he detonated his explosives at the entrance. Syria's Social Affairs and Labour Minister Hind Kabawat, the country's Christian and female minister, met with the clergy at the church in the evening to express her condolences. People were praying safely under the eyes of God, said Father Fadi Ghattas, who said he saw at least 20 people killed with his own eyes. There were 350 people praying at the church. However, Meletius Shahati, a church priest, said there was a second gunman who shot at the church door before the other person detonated himself. Issam Nasr who was praying at the church said he saw people blown to bits". We have never held a knife in our lives. All we ever carried were our prayers, he said. Security forces and first-responders rushed to the church. Panicked survivors wailed, as one lady fell to her knees and burst into tears. A photo circulated by Syrian state media SANA showed the church's pews covered in debris and blood. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Hans India

an hour ago

• Hans India

Modi focuses on serving people

Hyderabad: Union Minister and State BJP chief G Kishan Reddy has emphasized that Prime Minister Narendra Modi believes public representatives should be accessible to people and work to address their issues. He was speaking at the 'Viksit Bharat Sankalpa Sabha,' which celebrated 11 years of the Modi government and the first year of Malkajgiri MP Etala Rajender's term. He highlighted the significant developments achieved under Modi's leadership. Reddy pointed out that the BJP had been in power for 11 years, delivering transparent governance. He contrasted this with the corruption scandals that plagued the previous Congress-led UPA regime, noting the absence of such scandals during Modi's tenure, which showcases the administration's integrity. The Union Minister recounted how Modi's leadership had strengthened India's response to terrorism, citing the surgical strikes as a significant shift in policy. "For Telangana, substantial funds have been allocated for infrastructure projects, including the construction of national highways and the modernization of railway stations," he said, highlighting the progress made under Modi compared to that in the previous Congress government. Kishan Reddy pointed out that Telangana had struggled with debt and corruption, particularly under the Bharat Rashtra Samithi party, which had failed to serve its citizens effectively. He expressed his confidence that BJP would win the next Legislative Assembly elections in the state. BJP MP and OBC Morcha National president Dr K. Laxman outlined how the Congress had consistently let down Backward Classes (BCs) from the time of the first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to Rajiv Gandhi, pointing out the flaws in the caste survey conducted by the Telangana government, which he argued deprived BCs of their due rights. Eatala Rajender said that the exhibition organized to mark the occasion showcased the achievements from Shyama Prasad Mukherjee to Modi. Recalling his interaction with the Prime Minister earlier in his role as the State Finance Minister regarding the rollout of the GST, he stated, "Modi focuses on serving the people rather than simply seeking power." He highlighted Modi's demonstration of the country's strength through 'Operation Sindoor'. In contrast, he pointed out that the Congress party was mired in scandals, with some of their own ministers facing jail time due to mismanagement. He noted that the state of Telangana was born out of sacrifices, but Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy had disrespected its people. Modi's leadership exemplified how a country could thrive, with India excelling in digital transactions. "While some create sensationalism with words, it is actions that matter, which reflects Modi's approach. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee sacrificed his life for our unity, and Modi has fulfilled his vision."

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Trade deal hits hurdle over US demand of low duties on agricultural , genetically modified food

NEW DELHI: The proposed trade deal with the US is has run into rough weather with Indian authorities resisting the insistence of their counterparts to allow lower-duty import of American agricultural products such as maize and soybean, fearing adverse impact on farmers and health concerns related to genetically modified food. Sources acknowledged that the talks have hit a hurdle. In the absence of a limited deal ahead of the July 9 deadline, domestic industry will have to brace for a 26% levy, especially with a view within the govt that what the Trump administration is offering in the form of a 10% baseline tariff, applicable to all countries, is not good enough. At the start of the negotiations, the govt was hoping to get zero duty access for several products of India's interests, including textiles, leather goods, pharmaceuticals as well as some engineering goods and auto parts. American negotiators, who are keen that the deal be finalised, have indicated to their Indian counterparts that the Trump administration cannot go down to zero tariffs immediately. In any case, India has sought immunity from future tariff actions once a deal is in place. Unhappiness in India over US President Donald Trump's claim - since rejected by PM Narendra Modi - of having brokered the pause in Operation Sindoor, has also not helped in creating a conducive atmosphere for resolution of trade-related issues.