Mexican judges say judicial reform violated human rights

May 6 - Fourteen current and former federal judges in Mexico filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights calling for "reparation for human rights violations" that they say were caused by the country's recent overhaul of the judicial system, a group representing the judges said in a statement on Tuesday.
CONTEXT
The sweeping judicial reform, voted into the country's constitution in September, marked a historic shakeup for Mexico's courts at every level. It requires voters to head to the polls to elect all judges, first in elections next month and then again in 2027.
Critics say the reform threatens the judiciary's political independence, blurring the separation of powers and exposing it to the influence of outside forces like organized crime.
WHY IT MATTERS
The commission, an autonomous arm of the Organization of American States, would not be able to repeal the reform, but its decisions are symbolically important.
Criticism of the reform, which is supported by President Claudia Sheinbaum, comes at a delicate time for her administration as it navigates trade tensions with Washington.
Sheinbaum's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the petition, but her government has repeatedly argued the reform is necessary to root out corruption within the judiciary and to make it more democratic.
KEY QUOTES
"This petition offers an opportunity for the Inter-American System to address alleged violations of judicial independence in Mexico and broader questions regarding judicial reform processes in the region," said Jaime Chavez Alor, associate executive director of the Cyrus R. Vance Center for International Justice, which filed the petition in representation of the judges.
"Although it appears neutral, the reform constitutes a mechanism for politicizing and capturing the judiciary," the petition states.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

5 hours ago

• Telegraph

I was ordered to post 30 apologies on X for calling trans politician a biological man

When Gabriel Quadri criticised two transgender politicians for winning women's seats in Mexico's House of Representatives, he did not think it would spark a three-year legal battle that would upend his political career. In an extraordinary sentence, the conservative opposition politician was convicted of being a 'political violator against women' and ordered to apologise for his actions on X twice a day for 15 days as part of his punishment. He has since been chased through the courts and threatened with having his right to stand for office taken away. Now, Mr Quadri, 70, has warned that 'wokeism' in Mexico is veering towards authoritarianism and has appealed to Donald Trump for support. 'This ideology is being used to repress free expression and I think it is part of a broader process in which Mexico is rapidly becoming an autocracy,' he told The Telegraph. 'I hope the Trump government will make a statement about suppression of freedom of speech in Mexico out of concern as a neighbour and our closest trading partner.' In 2021, two transgender politicians for the country's ruling Morena party, Salma Luevano and Maria Clemente Garcia, were elected to Congressional seats assigned to women. Since 2019, Mexican political parties have been required to put forward equal numbers of male and female candidates in order to tackle a historic gender imbalance. Mr Quadri, of the conservative National Action party, posted about the election result on X, warning that biologically male politicians were taking advantage of the law to gain access to political positions designated for women. In response, one of the Morena politicians, Ms Luevano filed a complaint to the National Election Institute (NEI) accusing Mr Quadri of 'gender based political violence' on the basis of 11 posts. The social media posts claimed that assigning biological males to women's seats in the House was sexist. They also criticised the participation of transgender athletes in women's sports and likened the suppression of voices speaking out against transgender ideology to fascism. Although Mr Quadri's tweets did not mention the Morena politician by name, Mexico's electoral court in April 2022 found him guilty of 'gender-based political violence'. The judgement read: 'The expressions analysed were intended to deny the identity of trans women, thus they violate the right to identity, which in turn is a form of denial of equal dignity, thus the tweets are discriminatory'. As a result of reform to candidate selection, female representation climbed from 15 per cent in 1994 to 50 per cent in 2023. For Mr Quadri, who describes himself as liberal and supported legislation on gay marriage and quotas to boost female representation in politics, the ruling was a slap in the face for women. 'Women are now being displaced by men who identify as women, and in my opinion, that's a terrible injustice and a setback of the feminist agenda in Mexico,' he said. Mr Quadri also warned Mexico has become 'one of the wokest countries in the world'. The former presidential candidate has become the first Mexican politician the justice system has ordered to apologise on social media as part of his sentence. Besides deleting his original posts, he was also ordered to complete two courses on gender-based violence and transgender violence, and be registered as a gender-based political violator. This final charge would prove to haunt Mr Quadri and almost cost him his job. Ahead of Mexico's congressional elections in June 2024, the Morena party made a filing to the electoral court demanding his removal from the ballot because of his conviction. However, the court upheld his right to run and he went on to win the race thanks in part, he says, to the media furore surrounding the decision. In May, Mr Quadri filed an appeal to the Intra-American Court of Human Rights, the equivalent of the European Court of Human Rights, where a decision is expected later this year that could pave the way for him to be absolved of any wrongdoing. For Mr Quadri, his case is symptomatic of a wider issue of freedom of expression in Mexico coming under threat. A recent report from the Atlantic Council warned about an 'authoritarian shift' taking place in the country, whereby its ruling party has undermined the NEI, weakened checks and balances and centralised power in the executive branch. Mr Quadri confesses to be no supporter of the Trump administration, but said the president is 'on the right path' with his 'crusade to end wokeism in the US'. At a time when the US has made upholding freedom of speech a condition of signing trade deals with its allies, the congressman urged the Trump administration to take action against the Mexican government.

Daily Mail​

20 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Mahmoud Khalil arrives in NJ after being granted release... and vows to continue fight 'even if they kill me'

Columbia University graduate student and Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil has landed in New Jersey, telling reporters that he will continue to fight for his country 'even if they kill me.' Khalil, 30, arrived at Newark Liberty International Airport on Saturday to an eruption of cheers after he was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement for over 100 days. New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez greeted him at the airport and stood by his side as he spoke to the press. Khalil defiantly spoke, telling reporters: 'If they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine.' 'I just want to go back and continue the work I was already doing, advocating for Palestinian rights, a speech that should actually be celebrated rather than punished.' Khalil, a lawful resident of the US, was granted release and freed on bail by a New Jersey federal judge on Friday. The green card holder was taken into custody on March 8, 2025, as the Trump administration cracked down on pro-Palestine demonstrations on college campuses. Khalil was one of the primary organizers of protests that took over Columbia as the Israel - Hamas conflict was ignited. In the ruling Friday, Judge Michael E. Farbiaz said that none of the Trump administration's allegations against Khalil justified his continued detention, and sided with Khalil's argument that he was locked up as an unlawful retaliation for his activism. In his ruling on Friday, Farbiarz said: 'There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish Mr. Khalil - And of course that would be unconstitutional.' Khalil has not been charged with a crime, but the judge's order to free him comes as the Trump White House continues efforts to deport him back to Algeria, where he is a citizen. When he was detained earlier this year, Khalil's case gained national attention as he was the first pro-Palestinian protester to be arrested by the Trump administration in its crackdown on college campuses. Several protests he organized and led at Columbia turned violent, with one seeing 112 students arrested when they stormed a campus building and occupied it as NYPD officers tried to shut their demonstration down. His arrest sparked protests across the country as critics accused the Trump administration of unlawfully arresting a legal resident without charging him with a crime in violation of his free speech. He was detained under the Cold War–era Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which states that non-US citizens can be deported if they are antagonistic against US foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Khalil of spreading anti-Semitism, and White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said he was 'siding with terrorists.' But in the three months that Khalil has been detained, the Justice Department hasn't disclosed any substantive connection between Khalil and Hamas, which attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, and killed around 1,200 civilians. In their successful filing to free Khalil this week, the graduate student's attorneys argued that he was not spreading anti-Semitism when he campaigned for Palestine in its war with Israel. They cited past quotes from him such as comments he made to CNN during a campus protest, where he said that 'the liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand by hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other.' Judge Farbiarz had previously ruled that the foreign policy law was not enough to justify Khalil's detention, and his ruling on Friday shot down further allegations from the Trump administration that Khalil made paperwork errors when applying for citizenship last year. A number of other pro-Palestine protestors have been arrested and freed in the time that Khalil was detained.

The Independent

21 hours ago

• The Independent

EU review ‘paints grim picture' of Israel's actions in Gaza, Irish premier says

An EU review 'paints a grim picture' of Israel's failure to adhere to international obligations, Ireland's premier Micheal Martin has said. The Taoiseach said the report highlights the restriction of food and medicines into Gaza, which he said 'amounts to the use of starvation as a method of war'. The EU- Israel Association Agreement is being reviewed after a dozen EU member states backed it last month. The unpublished report has found that there are 'indications' Israel could be in breach of its human rights obligations under the agreement, according to several media outlets. Reacting on Saturday, Mr Martin welcomed the 'substantive and important' report on Israel's compliance with its human rights obligations under the EU-Israel deal. He said Ireland had 'long argued' that clauses on human rights in the EU's international agreement 'have to be respected' and should prompt 'serious consequences' when they are not. Back in February 2024, Ireland and Spain jointly called for an urgent review of whether Israel had breached its human rights obligations in the trade agreement. A majority of EU countries did not back the review until last month, prompted by a proposal from The Netherlands. The shift came amid Israel's months-long blockade of Gaza, which has accelerated fears of a famine. A new Israeli and US-backed aid system has been marred by violence. Israel's 20-month military campaign in the the Palestinian enclave has killed an estimated 55,000 people and injured thousands more, according to Gaza's health ministry. Mr Martin said: 'I very much welcome the substantive and important report of the EU's High Representative for Human Rights on Israel's compliance with its human rights obligations under the EU-Israel Association Agreement. 'Bringing together the reports and analysis of serious, credible and reliable sources – including the International Court of Justice, the UN's Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Secretary General's Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict and others – it paints a clear and grim picture of a sustained and deliberate failure by Israel to adhere to its international obligations, especially in Gaza but also in the West Bank. 'It highlights a continued restriction of food, medicines, medical equipment, and other vital supplies into Gaza that amount to collective punishment of the civilian population, that amounts to the use of starvation as a method of war. 'It describes an unprecedented level of killing and injury of civilians in Gaza resulting from indiscriminate attacks without proportion or precaution, as well as attacks on hospitals, forced mass displacements and the killing of journalists. All of this with a persistent lack of accountability. 'In the West Bank, it reports sustained oppression of the Palestinian population, including through state and settler violence, the appropriation of land, and the use of detention as a form of collective punishment.' He added: 'We will now work with partners to follow up on this important report with concrete steps, and I will be discussing it with my colleagues in the European Council when we meet next week.'